UK's largest bioethanol plant to shut in September ‘unless Government acts'
The UK's largest bioethanol plant says it will stop production by mid-September unless the Government acts, following the recent trade deal with the United States.
Hull-based Vivergo Fuels said that, given 'the strategic importance of a domestic ethanol supply', the Government has committed to formal negotiations to reach a 'sustainable solution'.
But the firm, which is owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), said on Thursday that it is simultaneously beginning consultation with staff to wind down the plant, which employs more than 160 people, due to the uncertain situation.
The Government described the company's announcement as 'disappointing', coming as it had entered into negotiations with Vivergo about financial support on Wednesday.
The firm said in a statement: 'Unless the Government is able to provide both short-term funding of Vivergo's losses and a longer-term solution, we intend to close the plant once the consultation process has completed and the business has fulfilled its contractual obligations.
'We would cease all manufacturing before the end of our financial year on September 13 2025.'
The statement said: 'In our interim results announcement on April 29 2025, we stated that the commercial viability of Vivergo, our bioethanol business, was being undermined by the way in which the UK Government was applying regulations to imported ethanol.
'Since then, the situation has been made significantly worse by the UK's trade deal with the US, which will allow tariff-free US ethanol into the UK.
'ABF has engaged in extensive discussions with the Government to find a financial and regulatory solution that would enable Vivergo to operate on a profitable and sustainable basis.
'Yesterday, our extended deadline for the Government to deliver that solution passed.'
Last month, Vivergo wrote to the wheat farmers who supply it, telling them it will have to close unless there is quick Government intervention.
It said the removal of a 19% tariff on US ethanol imports, which formed part of the recent UK-US trade deal, was the 'final blow'.
The bioethanol industry says the deal has made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised American products.
Vivergo said the Hull plant can produce up to 420 million litres of bioethanol from wheat sourced from thousands of UK farms.
It described bioethanol production as 'a key national strategic asset' which helps reduce emissions from petrol and is expected to be a key component in sustainable aircraft fuel in the future.
The plant is also the UK's largest single production site for animal feed and the company says it indirectly supports about 4,000 jobs in the Humber and Lincolnshire region.
A Government spokesperson said: 'We recognise this is a concerning time for workers and their families and it is disappointing to see this announcement after we entered into negotiations with the company on financial support yesterday.
'We will continue to take proactive steps to address the long-standing challenges the company faces and remain committed to working closely with them throughout this period to present a plan for a way forward that protects supply chains, jobs and livelihoods.'
The Government said the bioethanol industry has been facing significant challenges for some time and officials and ministers have met with Ensus and Vivergo consistently over the last few months to address the challenges.
It said both the business and transport secretaries met with representatives from the industry on June 10 and engagement with the companies 'will continue at pace' to assess potential solutions, with the help of external consultants.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
21 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Calls for private jet tax as Prestwick Airport sees surge in flights
A new investigation published on Thursday by Oxfam Scotland revealed that there were 12,143 private flights in and out of Scottish airports in 2024, with the busiest being Edinburgh, Glasgow, Prestwick and Inverness. In Prestwick alone, the number of private flights rose from 1845 in 2023 to 2437 in 2024 – an increase of 32%. The investigation also found an "alarming" spike in private flights at Prestwick which coincided with a key golfing event. In July 2024, when The Open was held at the nearly Royal Troon Golf Club, private flights at Prestwick surged by 123%. A total of 453 private jets took off or landed that month (compared to the 203 average monthly flights in 2024), equivalent to 15 flights a day. Oxfam Scotland used data on departures and landings from the Civil Aviation Authority, looking specifically at aircraft over 2.73 tonnes and excluding those from aero-clubs. While there were 768 fewer flights in 2024 than the previous year, it is slightly more than the 10-year average. The charity said that if an Air Departure Tax (ADT) had been in place – and applied at the highest possible rate – it would have generated an extra £28.8 million in tax revenue for the Scottish Government. Oxfam Scotland has been campaigning for a private jet tax like the ADT to be introduced, set to at least 10 times the existing higher rate within the UK Air Passenger Duty. The Scottish Government has previously said it is committed to introducing an ADT and that it is open to introducing a higher tax on private jets. However, progress on introducing ADT in Scotland has been delayed by an ongoing stalemate between the Scottish and UK governments. The Scottish Government owns Prestwick Airport as well as Highlands and Islands Airports Limited (HIAL), which operates airports in Barra, Benbecula, Campbeltown, Dundee, Inverness, Islay, Kirkwall, Stornoway, Sumburgh, Tiree and Wick. 'All talk, no take off' Commenting on the report, Jamie Livingstone, head of Oxfam Scotland, said the Scottish Government should be "embarrass[ed] that Prestwick is being used "as a playground for the world's wealthiest polluters". He said: "For a government that's already scrapped a key climate target and diluted vital green policies, continuing to give ultra-wealth polluters an easy ride adds insult to injury. 'The First Minister says he backs landing a fair tax on pollution-spewing private jets, but so far, it's all talk, no take-off. It's time he stopped circling the issue and finally land this fair tax on those polluting Scotland's skies.' Becky Kenton-Lake, Stop Climate Chaos Scotland coalition manager, said: 'People in Scotland want our political leaders to invest in fast and fair climate action. "A Private Jet Tax would help hold the biggest polluters accountable and raise vital funds to protect us all from the damage they're causing. "Ministers have the chance to lead boldly, and Scotland is counting on them to deliver.' Meanwhile, the Scottish Greens, which have long campaigned for a private jet tax, called on the Scottish Government to "show clear leadership" and to introduce the tax at airports it owns. Ross Greer MSPScottish Greens MSP Ross Greer said: 'An obscene amount of wealth is being hoarded by a tiny number of elites who fly across the globe in their climate-wrecking private jets. 'These jets have a huge impact on our environment, and while their super-rich occupants fly between their golf courses and superyachts, it's Scottish taxpayers left paying to clean up their mess." Greer pointed towards data quoted by Oxfam Scotland which shows that private jet use is 20 times more polluting than regular commercial flights, as he said a private jet tax would "keep the super-rich and their destructive toys on the ground". He continued: 'We've waited for years for the Scottish and UK Governments to deliver the devolution of ADT in Scotland, as they agreed to do over a decade ago. 'Delays to the devolution of ADT aren't a get out of jail free card for the Scottish Government. They can introduce a charge on private jets at the dozen airports they own right now, raising cash for public services and taking action to tackle the climate emergency.' Greer reiterated calls for the Scottish Government to introduce the charge at the airports it owns during First Minister's Questions on Thursday. John Swinney told him: "I've already stated that I'm interested in the suggestion of higher tax rates on private jet flights." He added that the Scottish Government is continuing to "explore all options for implementing air departure tax", in a way which does not disproportionately affect communities in the Highlands and Islands. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: "As has previously been set out, ministers are open to the suggestion of higher rates of Air Departure Tax on private jet flights. "This will form part of the review of rates and bands undertaken prior to implementation."
The National
24 minutes ago
- The National
Commons committee sets out 'concerns' over arms exports to Israel
The International Development Committee sent an eight-page letter to Jonathan Reynolds and Foreign Secretary David Lammy over the decision to exempt components for F-35 fighter jets from suspended arms exports to Israel. The committee raised fears that those weapons components could be used in attacks by Israel on aid workers and humanitarian infrastructure on Gaza. Chair Sarah Champion, Labour MP for Rotherham, wrote: 'As the Committee identified in its report, there are a number of avenues for accountability in response to violations of IHL (international humanitarian law), including the suspension of arms export licences. READ MORE: Patrick Harvie and Angus Robertson face-off over Israel divestment 'I remain concerned that there is a real risk that weapon components, manufactured in the UK, could be used in attacks, including those on aid workers or humanitarian infrastructure.' The MP noted that Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty previously claimed that stopping F-35 exports to Israel would require the 'entire programme' to be suspended as it is 'highly integrated'. However, Champion insisted it was 'fundamental' that the UK Government adheres to international law. 'I am concerned by the decision to exempt F-35 components from the suspension of arms export licences, given your assessment that there are 'clear risks' of serious violations of IHL by Israel in Gaza,' she wrote. The MP then noted the UK's obligations under the Genocide Convention, asking if ministers accepted that the duty to prevent genocide has been triggered. She asked: 'If so, at what point was this duty triggered? If not, why not?' Champion also noted the UK Government's obligations under the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) which states that it is 'strictly prohibited' for a state transferring arms where the transfer would 'violate its relevant international obligations under international agreements to which it is a Party'. Exports are also banned if the arms 'would be used in the commission of genocide, crimes against humanity, grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, attacks directed against civilian objects or civilians protected as such, or other war crimes,' Champion added. The MP put several questions to ministers, including if it accepts exporting F-35 components is incompatible with its international legal obligations, and if it accepts Israel is using the components to commit war crimes. Another question asks: 'What legal authority does the Government rely upon to support its position that a positive contribution to peace and security is to be balanced against a clear risk of the arms being used to commit serious violations of IHL/IHRL?' READ MORE: YouGov poll predicts result in every Scottish seat – see the full map Champion asked the ministers to reply by July 11. The UK Government has been contacted for comment. It comes as a legal challenge over the UK's arms exports to Israel is currently underway. We told in January how the Labour Government refused to review Israel's access to F-35 parts exported from the UK despite evidence that the planes have been used to bomb 'safe zones' in Gaza. In September 2024, Labour blocked around 30 of 350 UK arms export licences to Israel after accepting that there existed a 'clear risk that they might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian law'. However, parts for F-35 fighter jets were specifically excluded – despite media confirmation that the jets had been used by Israel to bomb the Al-Mawasi humanitarian zone in Gaza in July 2024.
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nato was a victory for Starmer on the global stage, but now he's at war with his own MPs
Sir Keir Starmer seemed chipper as he boarded the plane home from the Nato summit on Wednesday evening. He cheerily thanked hacks in the travelling press delegation for what he said had been a great two-day trip to The Hague. And looking at Nato alone, it had been a success. Across the board, allies signed up to a historic increase in defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP. After briefly wavering on his commitment to Article 5, even Donald Trump fell in line. And following a public love-in with Nato secretary general Mark Rutte – who unnervingly, dubbed him the 'daddy' between the two warring nations of Iran and Israel – the US president conceded that the alliance was no longer a 'rip off', saying he is with is his European friends 'all the way'. Meanwhile, Starmer was able to pitch Britain as a leader on the world stage by cosying up to Mr Trump and purchasing 12 new F-35A fighter jets, massively ramping up Britain's nuclear capabilities. But what was left unsaid when the PM briefly greeted the media sharing the plane with him was that he was flying back into the most significant rebellion of his premiership – a revolt which threatens to shake the foundations of the historic majority he won just 11 months ago. Speaking at a press conference about Britain's contribution to defence spending at the Nato summit just hours earlier, the prime minister was forced to deny suggestions that he might be forced out of office before the next election. 'Many people predicted before the election that we 'couldn't read the room' we 'hadn't got the politics right' we 'wouldn't win an election after 2019' because we lost so badly. "We got a landslide victory. So I'm comfortable with reading the room and delivering the change the country needs', Sir Keir insisted. But at home, his MPs are much less convinced. More than 120 Labour MPs have signed an amendment which would kill off the government's flagship £5bn welfare reforms entirely. And there is a growing feeling that the prime minister has failed to listen to them, after he used part of his Nato presser to dismiss the rebellion as 'noises off'. 'No 10 sees MPs as irritants and fodder', one Labour MP with her name on the amendment said. 'We're all working hard and this is how they treat us. It goes back to the point about how arrogant and out of touch they are.' The prime minister's comments at the Nato press conference displayed a real lack of empathy for his own MPs, and ironically, a distinct failure to read the room. It would be hard to argue the prime minister is a wholly unempathetic person. An in-depth profile of the prime minister in the New Statesman published earlier this month showed how deeply he feels the weight of sacrifices made by individuals putting their lives on the line to serve their country. But in his first year in office, it has become increasingly clear that the prime minister is much more comfortable navigating foreign diplomacy than he is with dealing with angry backbenchers. It is in this area that Sir Keir seems entirely unable to empathise. He is known for being pragmatic rather than ideological, and appears to be bored by political manoeuvring. At times, this can provide a refreshing break from the Westminster bubble. But, taken too far, it can be the opposite. Starmer seems to have lost sight of the fact that in some scenarios, political manoeuvring is more than just self-serving posturing. Sometimes, it's a fight for hundreds of thousands of disabled people who are scared of losing vital financial support. The prime minister is now frantically meeting with leading MPs involved in the amendment to try to secure their backing by offering concessions. But the fact that it was allowed to get this far in the first place has angered those who would naturally be inclined to back the prime minister. Many are now threatening to dig their heels in until the bill is dead in the water. As Starmer returns from what was a strong showing at Nato, he must now display some of the empathy and political nous that he so effectively shows on the global stage. If he is unable to do so, he may well lose the domestic battle – and it could be catastrophic for his authority.
