U.S. citizenship could soon look very different
Nearly four months into his second term, it's becoming clear that President Donald Trump's xenophobic views on immigration are reshaping what it means to become a U.S. citizen.
His vision tilts heavily toward the wealthy and well-to-do, with special shortcuts for them and barriers to entry for the rest — particularly the world's refugees and asylum seekers.
There's Trump's proposal for $5 million "gold visa' cards, the prototype of which is literally Trump's visage and Lady Liberty emblazoned on a golden rectangle. The cards would allow, in Trump's words, "very high-level people' a "route to citizenship.' One goal of the gold card is to cut years off the typical vetting process, producing residency in as little as two weeks.
Then there are the hefty deterrents for everyone else. New and escalating fees, proposed in the Republican Party's House budget bill, would quickly diminish the chances of entry for lower-income immigrants or refugees. A $3,500 fee would be slapped on unaccompanied minors. Anyone seeking a work permit would have to pay $550. And asylum applications, previously free, would cost $1,000 each. Most refugees and asylum seekers arrive in the U.S. with few possessions and even less cash. Until now, those with valid claims have depended heavily on modest federal resettlement stipends to ease their transition.
And while it remains a long shot, Trump's challenge to the Constitution's promise of birthright citizenship is an important declaration by this administration that it wants to determine who can become a citizen. Trump would deny citizenship to children born to parents who are undocumented or who are here lawfully but on a temporary student or work visa. Some 2 million foreign nationals are here on such visas. Trump's case was before the Supreme Court at the time of this writing, and depending on the outcome, a new subclass of Americans could be created — born here, but never fully belonging.
Finally, there was this little-noticed move amid a flurry of other executive orders: Trump in January rebooted efforts dedicated to stripping immigrants of their U.S. citizenship. Such cases, the department has said, would have no statute of limitations. There are more than 24 million naturalized citizens in the U.S., all of whom have traveled a long path through the immigration bureaucracy to get where they are.
This project follows up on some of Trump's first-term efforts, when his Justice Department ordered investigations of 700,000 naturalized citizens for possible infractions (few of which were ever completed). Later in his term, Trump created an Office of Denaturalization. In 2023, Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff to the president, said that under a second term, denaturalization efforts would be "turbocharged.'
Fernando de Brito, originally from Cape Verde, takes the Oath of Citizenship during a naturalization ceremony to make him a U.S. citizen in Boston on March 11. |
REUTERS
Taken together, these new polices would create a more mutable type of citizenship, no longer rooted in birthplace or in the arduous and lengthy task of proving one's worth.
It is a dramatic turn for a nation that, nearly since its inception, has welcomed immigrants and is now home to one-fifth of the world's international migrants.
Such a shift would hurt this country. Running immigrants through a wealth filter would cost us the drive, persistence and ingenuity that newcomers have brought to this country throughout its history. There is no filter for such intangibles.
Offering the super-rich a fast-track to citizenship would also shorten the vetting process which is, after all, an important security measure. When Trump was asked about whether Russian oligarchs or other unsavory types might take advantage of his gold card, Trump replied, "Possibly,' adding, "Hey, I know some Russian oligarchs that are nice people.'
And it would diminish the U.S. itself. For nearly 250 years this country has stood as a beacon of freedom and hope — and has reaped the rewards. The stories of impoverished refugees and immigrants who go on to contribute to the nation's well-being are legion.
Trump's vision of U.S. citizenship seem to grow out of his views on immigration more broadly. But it should alarm all Americans, even the many who support his more popular efforts, such as securing a border that had become too porous under President Joe Biden; arresting and deporting criminals; and focusing on the human and drug trafficking that makes insecure borders so dangerous.
Anti-immigrant sentiment has run like a bright thread through Trump's public life since he started his first campaign for president. In his first term, he cracked down on legal immigration far more than illegal, sending the number of green cards and temporary visas (known formally as nonimmigrant visas) plummeting.
In a meeting midway through his first term, Trump famously inquired why the country should admit immigrants from "all these (expletive) countries,' such as Haiti, El Salvador and African nations. He suggested more immigrants from countries such as Norway or Asian countries that he believed helped the U.S. economically.
There have long been signs that Trump's goal is to rid this country of those he considers undesirable. For now, that would seem to turn on one's wealth — or lack of it. Soon it could be whatever else Trump finds objectionable. Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish student at Tufts University, has been imprisoned for over five weeks since masked ICE agents arrested her in Somerville, Massachusetts. Her only infraction was co-writing a student op-ed for the school newspaper that was at odds with the Trump administration's support of Israel's war in Gaza.
Mohsen Mahdawi, a permanent resident, attended what he thought was a naturalization interview in April and was promptly arrested for his political views on the Israel-Hamas war. A judge freed him from federal custody just recently, but he still faces possible deportation. In an op-ed for the New York Times, Mahdawi said that "When they look at my case, all Americans should ask themselves: what is left of our democracy and who will be targeted next?'
Remarkably, Mahdawi said he still wants to become a citizen. "I believe in a system of democracy and I have faith in the justice system here.'
Faith like that has fueled this country for 250 years. In comparison, Trump's obsession with wealth and loyalty is far too puny a way to measure what makes a good American.
Patricia Lopez is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering politics and policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
an hour ago
- The Mainichi
Top US universities raced to become global campuses. Under Trump, it's becoming a liability
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Three decades ago, foreign students at Harvard University accounted for just 11% of the total student body. Today, they account for 26%. Like other prestigious U.S. universities, Harvard for years has been cashing in on its global cache to recruit the world's best students. Now, the booming international enrollment has left colleges vulnerable to a new line of attack from President Donald Trump. The president has begun to use his control over the nation's borders as leverage in his fight to reshape American higher education. Trump's latest salvo against Harvard uses a broad federal law to bar foreign students from entering the country to attend the campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. His proclamation applies only to Harvard, and a federal judge late Thursday temporarily blocked it. But Trump's order poses a threat to other universities his administration has targeted as hotbeds of liberalism in need of reform. It's rattling campuses under federal scrutiny, including Columbia University, where foreign students make up 40% of the campus. As the Trump administration stepped up reviews of new student visas last week, a group of Columbia faculty and alumni raised concerns over Trump's gatekeeping powers. "Columbia's exposure to this 'stroke of pen' risk is uniquely high," the Stand Columbia Society wrote in a newsletter. Ivy League schools draw heavily on international students People from other countries made up about 6% of all college students in the U.S. in 2023, but they accounted for 27% of the eight schools in the Ivy League, according to an Associated Press analysis of Education Department data. Columbia's 40% was the largest concentration, followed by Harvard and Cornell at about 25%. Brown University had the smallest share at 20%. Other highly selective private universities have seen similar trends, including at Northeastern University and New York University, which each saw foreign enrollment double between 2013 and 2023. Growth at public universities has been more muted. Even at the 50 most selective public schools, foreign students account for about 11% of the student body. As the middle class has grown in other countries, more families have been able to afford test prep and admissions guidance to compete for spots in the Ivy League, said Rajika Bhandari, who leads a firm of higher education consultants. "The Ivy League brand is very strong overseas, especially in countries like India and China, where families are extremely brand-aware of top institutions in the U.S. and other competing countries," Bhandari said in an email. Over the last two decades, she said, U.S. universities have increasingly recognized the benefits of international exchange, seeing it as a crucial revenue source that subsidizes U.S. students and keeps enrollments up in the STEM fields of science, technology, engineering and math. America's universities have been widening their doors to foreign students for decades, but the numbers shot upward starting around 2008, as Chinese students came to U.S. universities in rising numbers. It was part of a "gold rush" in higher education, said William Brustein, who orchestrated the international expansion of several universities. "Whether you were private or you were public, you had to be out in front in terms of being able to claim you were the most global university," said Brustein, who led efforts at Ohio State University and West Virginia University. The race was driven in part by economics, he said. Foreign students typically aren't eligible for financial aid and, at some schools, they pay much higher tuition than their American counterparts. Colleges also were eyeing global rankings that gave schools a boost if they recruited larger numbers of foreign students and scholars, he said. Some wealthier universities -- including Harvard -- offer financial aid to foreign students. But students who get into those top-tier U.S. universities often have the means to pay higher tuition rates, Brustein said. That provides further incentive to enroll more foreign students, he said, saving more scholarship money for American students. Still, international enrollment didn't expand equally across all types of colleges. Public universities often face pressure from state lawmakers to limit foreign enrollment and keep more seats open for state residents. Private universities don't face that pressure, and many aggressively recruited foreign students as their enrollment of U.S. students stayed flat. The college-going rate among American students has changed little for decades, and some have been turned off on college by rising costs and student debt loads. Supporters say foreign students benefit colleges -- and the wider US economy Proponents of international exchange say foreign students pour billions of dollars into the U.S. economy, and many go on to support the nation's tech industry and other fields in need of skilled workers. Most international students study STEM fields. In the Ivy League, most international growth has been at the graduate level, while undergraduate numbers have seen more modest increases. Foreign graduate students make up more than half the students at Harvard's government and design schools, along with five of Columbia's schools. Harvard's undergraduate foreign population increased by about 100 students from 2013 to 2023, while graduate numbers increased by nearly 2,000. Part of that growth can be explained by increasing global competition at the graduate level, said William Kirby, a historian at Harvard who has written about the evolution of higher education. "If you don't recruit the very best students internationally in your most important graduate programs, particularly in science and engineering, then you will not be competitive," Kirby said. The Ivy League has been able to outpace other schools in large part because of its reputation, Brustein said. He recalls trips to China and India, where he spoke with families that could recite where each Ivy League school sat in world rankings. "That was the golden calf for these families. They really thought, 'If we could just get into these schools, the rest of our lives would be on easy street,'" he said. Last week, Trump said he thought Harvard should cap its foreign students to about 15%. "We have people who want to go to Harvard and other schools, they can't get in because we have foreign students there," Trump said at a news conference. The university called Trump's latest action banning entry into the country to attend Harvard "yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the Administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights." In a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's previous attempt to block international students at Harvard, the university said its foreign student population was the result of "a painstaking, decades-long project" to attract the most qualified international students. Losing access to student visas would immediately harm the school's mission and reputation, it said. "In our interconnected global economy," the school said, "a university that cannot welcome students from all corners of the world is at a competitive disadvantage."
Asahi Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Tohoku University seeks 500 researchers mainly from U.S.
Tohoku University President Teiji Tominaga announced on June 6 that the university will invest 30 billion yen ($209 million) over the next five years to recruit about 500 top researchers in Japan and from abroad. The university aims to attract U.S. researchers affected by President Donald Trump's administration making significant cuts in research spending. Professors at acclaimed universities in the United States earn several times more than professors at Japanese universities, making a large amount of money necessary for recruiting them. Tohoku University in Sendai is the first institution to receive government funding through the Universities for International Research Excellence project. It intends to take advantage of the substantial financial resources. The Universities for International Research Excellence project is a system where the government designates universities to support by providing them with money with the aim of enhancing the country's research capabilities. Designated universities can receive money from the investment profits of a 10 trillion yen government fund for a maximum of 25 years. Currently, Tohoku University is the only designated university for the project. It will receive a total of 15.4 billion yen in fiscal 2025. According to Tohoku University's plan, it will not set a salary cap for researchers. It also aims to strengthen ties with U.S. universities, including plans to establish research labs for quantum technology and semiconductors, conduct joint research and use these labs as a base for recruiting researchers. The university intends to recruit 100 researchers in fiscal 2025, including early-career researchers, by investing 2.2 billion yen. In May, senior officials of the university visited the United States and held information sessions there. This resulted in offering positions to 36 researchers based overseas that included professionals in the United States as well as 25 researchers based in Japan. 'Researchers' social status is higher and they earn better pay overseas than in Japan,' Tominaga said at a news conference on June 6. 'Japanese national universities have historically paid little attention to working conditions for researchers. However, to gain sufficient capabilities to compete globally, we intend to shift our focus to investing in researchers.' Other Japanese universities, such as the University of Osaka and Ritsumeikan University, have also announced plans to accept researchers from U.S. universities affected by the Trump administration's actions. (The article was written by Takahiro Takenouchi and Fumio Masutani.)
Asahi Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
U.S. declines to label China a currency manipulator, but blasts its transparency policies
WASHINGTON--The U.S. declined to label China a currency manipulator in a new Treasury report released Thursday but accuses Beijing of standing out among America's major trading partners for lacking transparency in its exchange rate policies. Treasury's semi-annual report to Congress — called Macroeconomic and Foreign Exchange Policies of Major Trading Partners of the United States— comes as the Trump administration seeks to strike a trade deal with China, averting a trade war that has been brewing between the two nations. A Treasury official told reporters previewing the report that the U.S. could in the future find evidence that China is manipulating its currency and will make a determination in the fall whether China has been manipulating the renminbi, also known as RMB. During President Donald Trump 's first term, the Treasury, which was then led by Secretary Steve Mnuchin, labeled China a currency manipulator in 2019 — before then the U.S. had not put China on the currency blacklist since 1994. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the administration 'has put our trading partners on notice that macroeconomic policies that incentivize an unbalanced trading relationship with the United States will no longer be accepted.' 'Moving forward, Treasury will use all available tools at its disposal to implement strong countermeasures against unfair currency practices,' he said. The decision not to sanction China for currency manipulation comes after Trump said Thursday that his first call with China's Xi Jinping since returning to office was 'very positive,' announcing that the two countries will hold trade talks in hopes of breaking an impasse over tariffs and global supplies of rare earth minerals. 'Our respective teams will be meeting shortly at a location to be determined,' Trump wrote on his social media platform after the call, which he said lasted an hour and a half. Trump has lowered his 145% tariffs on Chinese goods to 30% for 90 days to allow for talks. China also reduced its taxes on U.S. goods from 125% to 10%. The back and forth has caused sharp swings in global markets and threatens to hamper trade between the two countries.
