This popular smartphone can overheat and explode — so it's banned from planes: ‘Nobody should have that phone anymore'
That's one hot device.
A June 6 clip on the platform has reignited buzz about the infamous Galaxy Note 7, the smartphone so dangerous, it's banned from the skies due to the possibility of its battery overheating and potentially exploding or catching on fire.
In a video that racked up 2.5 million views, TikTokker K-Shawn Brower (@malckbro) filmed an airport warning that read: 'FAA BANNED ITEM / Samsung Galaxy Note 7 / Individuals may NOT transport this device on their person, in carry-on baggage, or in checked baggage on flights to, from, or within the US.'
The phone is on the TSA's official no-fly list, where feds make it clear: This gadget's grounded for good.
On the agency's website, it notes, 'The U.S. Department of Transportation, with the Federal Aviation Administration and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, have issued an emergency order to ban all Samsung Galaxy Note 7 smartphone devices from air transportation in the United States.'
The statement further explained, 'Individuals who own or possess a Samsung Galaxy Note7 device may not transport the device on their person, in carry-on baggage, or in checked baggage on flights to, from, or within the United States.'
Some blindsided viewers ran to the comment section of the social media video, desperate to know what the heck was going on. Others knew the answer.
'Why is it banned?' one asked as another quipped, 'Not me watching this on my Samsung Galaxy Note 7.'
Someone else replied, 'That phone is from 2016. It's almost 10 years old. Nobody should have that phone anymore because it's too outdated. After a while, Google stops doing updates for older phones.'
An additional user commented, 'probably because it's been known to have issues with its battery that can spontaneously catch fire. there's videos of it all over the internet, some of them are older but there's lots of videos of it.'
As reported by Indy100, in 2016, Samsung conducted a 'thorough investigation and found a battery cell issue.'
The company further added, 'To date (as of September 1) there have been 35 cases that have been reported globally and we are currently conducting a thorough inspection with our suppliers to identify possible affected batteries in the market. However, because our customers' safety is an absolute priority at Samsung, we have stopped sales of the Galaxy Note 7.'
In other related news,The Post reported last month that the TSA has officially grounded a travel essential — banning portable chargers and power banks from checked luggage after a new FAA advisory.
Under the updated rules, any device using lithium-ion or lithium-metal batteries — including power banks and phone charging cases — must now fly in carry-ons only. Checked bags? Off limits.
'When a carry-on bag is checked at the gate or at planeside, all spare lithium batteries and power banks must be removed from the bag and kept with the passenger in the aircraft cabin. The battery terminals must be protected from short circuit,' the FAA said.
Nearly all portable chargers run on lithium batteries, so most travelers hauling the handy holiday must-have are getting zapped by the new ban.
Looks like when it comes to explosive devices — and trends that are blowing up — TikTok and the TSA are both keeping receipts.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Android Authority
27 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Verizon told to clarify ambiguous advertising claims after T-Mobile complaint
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority TL;DR The National Advertising Division (NAD) has recommended that Verizon change its marketing language about satellite texting based on a complaint from T-Mobile. T-Mobile has also challenged Verizon's claim of being 'America's largest network,' with the watchdog calling Verizon's advertising 'ambiguous.' Verizon has said that it'll comply with NAD's recommendations. Verizon is once again under the lens for its inconspicuous advertising claims. This time, the Big Red has been pulled up over claims about its satellite texting service and network size following a challenge from rival T-Mobile. The National Advertising Division (NAD), an industry watchdog under BBB National Programs, found some of Verizon's claims to be supported but recommended that the carrier make its advertising clearer for the benefit of consumers. NAD said Verizon's slogan 'conquering dead zones with satellite' is not misleading on its own, but warned that Verizon must improve its disclosures. Specifically, the NAD says Verizon failed to clarify that the satellite texting service only works on select new phone models and under certain conditions. Moreover, T-Mobile also took issue with Verizon's 'America's largest network' claim. While Verizon has based that claim on the number of postpaid subscribers, T-Mobile said the phrase could mislead consumers into thinking it refers to coverage area or geographic reach. NAD recommended Verizon clarify what Verizon means by 'largest.' 'NAD found the phrase 'largest network' to be ambiguous, potentially conveying different messages to consumers. NAD also determined that the term 'postpaid phone connections' may not clearly communicate that it refers to Verizon subscribers,' the organization wrote in a press release shared with Android Authority. NAD made similar recommendations to those of Verizon last year and asked the carrier to discontinue or modify its satellite texting claims based on a previous complaint by T-Mobile. Verizon stated it would comply with the NAD's recommendations. While the NAD does not have the power to enforce changes, companies often follow its guidance to avoid legal or regulatory issues. For customers, the ruling means Verizon ads may soon become more transparent, especially regarding satellite texting and what its 'largest network' claims really mean.


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Can You Choose an A.I. Model That Harms the Planet Less?
From uninvited results at the top of your search engine queries to offering to write your emails and helping students do homework, generative A.I. is quickly becoming part of daily life as tech giants race to develop the most advanced models and attract users. All those prompts come with an environmental cost: A report last year from the Energy Department found A.I. could help increase the portion of the nation's electricity supply consumed by data centers from 4.4 percent to 12 percent by 2028. To meet this demand, some power plants are expected to burn more coal and natural gas. And some chatbots are linked to more greenhouse gas emissions than others. A study published Thursday in the journal Frontiers in Communication analyzed different generative A.I. chatbots' capabilities and the planet-warming emissions generated from running them. Researchers found that chatbots with bigger 'brains' used exponentially more energy and also answered questions more accurately — up until a point. 'We don't always need the biggest, most heavily trained model, to answer simple questions. Smaller models are also capable of doing specific things well,' said Maximilian Dauner, a Ph.D. student at the Munich University of Applied Sciences and lead author of the paper. 'The goal should be to pick the right model for the right task.' The study evaluated 14 large language models, a common form of generative A.I. often referred to by the acronym LLMs, by asking each a set of 500 multiple choice and 500 free response questions across five different subjects. Mr. Dauner then measured the energy used to run each model and converted the results into carbon dioxide equivalents based on global most of the models tested, questions in logic-based subjects, like abstract algebra, produced the longest answers — which likely means they used more energy to generate compared with fact-based subjects, like history, Mr. Dauner said. A.I. chatbots that show their step-by-step reasoning while responding tend to use far more energy per question than chatbots that don't. The five reasoning models tested in the study did not answer questions much more accurately than the nine other studied models. The model that emitted the most, DeepSeek-R1, offered answers of comparable accuracy to those that generated a fourth of the amount of emissions. Source: Dauner and Socher, 2025 Note: A.I. models answered 500 free-response questions By Harry Stevens/The New York Times Grams of CO2 emitted per answer Source: Dauner and Socher, 2025 Note: A.I. models answered 100 free-response questions in each category By Harry Stevens/The New York Times Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tech accounts for half of US M&A spending so far in 2025
There has been less dealmaking in 2025 than there was the year prior, but the 2025 deals total more than the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in the first six months of 2024. Yahoo Finance Senior Banking Reporter David Hollerith outlines what this signals about the dealmaking landscape and what's to come in the second half of the year. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend here. With the first half of the year coming to a close, we're taking a look at the M&A landscape. New data from PWC highlight that about 30% of companies are pausing or revisiting pending deals due to tariffs. We're bringing in Yahoo Finance banking reporter, David Hollerith. David. Hey Josh. So, um, you know, it's kind of a mixed picture with the deals market right now. We're seeing that the number of deals year to date compared to last year is actually, um, down, but total volume or in dollar amount, the amount of dollars going into deals so far this year is actually up. So it's fairly confusing, and we have two big trends that are sort of shaping this market. The first is tariffs or sort of companies' reaction to tariffs, and that goes back to the PWC stat that you just put out, um, which is just that, um, you know, they're having to rethink their models and uh, you know, whether or not they can actually, um, do a deal without, uh, you know, taking some sort of impact from tariffs that they didn't think. And that's just if they're in an industry that might be sort of resistant to tariffs or exposed to tariffs, excuse me. Um, and then we have AI, and AI is a huge one, obviously, because, um, tech at this point makes up 50% of, uh, uh, US M&A so far year to date, and that's up from about 41% from, uh, the same period last year. And within tech, um, AI is kind of taking over in these few big deals that we're seeing. Um, OpenAI, uh, the investment from, uh, SoftBank, as well as, uh, Salesforce, um, purchasing Informatica, uh, Meta's, uh, purchase of Scale AI. I could sort of go on with that. But so it's a market where a lot of the smaller players aren't really making decisions yet, but it looks not too bad in dollar amount just because we've seen all these big players do these AI plays effectively. All right, David. Thank you for that setup. Appreciate it. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data