logo
Clearwater Ferry crash victim sues Jeffry Knight after deadly collision

Clearwater Ferry crash victim sues Jeffry Knight after deadly collision

Yahoo08-05-2025
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
The Brief
A Pinellas County school teacher who was on the Clearwater Ferry the night of a deadly crash is suing Jeffry Knight for more than $50,000.
In a lawsuit, Nicole Makelele claims she suffered bodily injuries, disability, disfigurement and other injuries.
The crash killed a father of two and injured 10 others. It remains under investigation by FWC. No arrests have been made.
CLEARWATER, Fla. - A Pinellas County school teacher who was onboard the Clearwater Ferry when it was involved in a deadly crash is suing Jeffry Knight, the boater who was operating the vessel that slammed into the back of the ferry.
What we know
According to the lawsuit, Nicole Makelelele is suing Knight for more than $50,000.
The lawsuit states that Makelelele "suffered bodily injury and resulting pain and suffering, disability, disfigurement, mental anguish, loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life, expense of medical care and treatment, loss of earnings, and aggravation of previously existing conditions. These losses are either permanent or continuing in nature, and [she] will suffer such losses in the future."
It accuses Knight of operating his boat in a careless manner, including excessive speed, failing to take evasive action, and fleeing the scene without rendering aid.
So far, no criminal charges have been filed against Knight.
The backstory
Knight was the operator of the recreational boat that crashed into the Clearwater Ferry near the Memorial Causeway Bridge on the night of April 27. It left Palm Harbor father of two, Jose Castro, dead and 10 others injured.
The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) said more than 40 people were on board the Clearwater Ferry at the time of the crash, and six people were on board the 37-foot recreational boat.
RELATED: Jannus Live owner steps down after Clearwater Ferry crash leaves 1 dead, 10 injured
FWC investigators said they spoke with Knight after the crash, and he and all the passengers on the recreational boat were cooperative with the investigation. Knight even did a voluntary breathalyzer test, which came back with a reading of zero.
However, FWC says no blood tests were done.
Conflicting statements
What they're saying
Attorney J. Kevin Hayslett, who represents Knight, sent two letters to investigators along with three witness statements from passengers onboard Knight's boat.
Hayslett said that one of Knight's passengers called 911 while Knight tried to render aid to the victims, then only left the scene once his boat took on too much water and first responders arrived.
Another passenger said Knight was yelling, "They had no lights. Where the f*** were their lights?"
Pictured: Scene after the Clearwater Ferry crash on April 27.
A third letter, written to the FWC on Knight's behalf, stated ""According to 33 CFR § 83.34(d) (Rule 34 of the Inland Navigation Rules), when a vessel is in sight of another and there is doubt as to the other vessel's intentions, the proper and immediate response is five short and rapid blasts on the vessel's whistle or horn," Hayslett said. "This signal is critical to prevent collisions and is considered the standard response to imminent danger."
In the letter, Knight's attorney said a passenger reportedly heard the captain or a crew member shout, 'Hey, hey, hey!' just before the crash.
"Multiple witness statements and press accounts indicate that no such horn signal was made prior to the crash," Hayslett said.
Knight's attorney also questioned the capacity on the ferry and whether it was in compliance with USCG requirements.
He requested the preservation of ticket sale logs for the ferry, Maddie's Crossing. Hayslett continued to question the ferry's navigation lighting, specifically the stern light and side lights on the vessel.
"On Maddie's Crossing, the only visible white light appears to be mounted foreship," Hayslett said. "Though this light was elevated above the deck, a vessel approaching from the stern would not have seen this light as it was obstructed by the canopy.
Knight's attorney requested the preservation of evidence including the ferry's navigation system, on-board camera data, 911 calls and maintenance log of the ferry.
The other side
However, attorneys for Mickey Keenan, P.A., a law firm representing victims, including the family of Marcos Pacheco and Brenda Alvarez, say Knight's version of events does not match what took place the night of the crash.
Lawyers pointed out three statements, in particular, writing:
"Knight's Claim 1: Allegations of "leaving the scene" are without Legal or Factual Basis.
Truth: Jeffry Knight, LEFT THE SCENE of the crash, this is the only fact that is undisputed. He drove away, period, end of story.
Knight's Claim 2: "In the moments before the collision, the captain and many PASSENGERS were distracted by dolphins in the area, diminishing navigational awareness."
Truth: Blaming the victims for this crash is offensive and improper. If it was light enough out that the victims could see dolphins, why couldn't Knight see a massive ferry directly in front of him? The answer: Because he wasn't paying attention.
Knight's Claim 3: "The Clearwater Ferry was not displaying the required navigational lights at the time of the accident" … "The uncontested facts show that Mr. Knight acted in full compliance with Florida law."
Truth: None of Mr. Knight's actions were responsible, lawful, or in sound judgment. The video of the ferry crash is not ambiguous, Knight's failure to follow the relevant nautical rules is the primary cause of the collision with the ferry.
No matter what Jeffry Knight says, it is clear that his actions caused this collision and the immeasurable pain and suffering of his victims."
Dig deeper
Scot Seplowe, who is representing Pacheco and Alvarez, says some of the statements made by Knight's attorney since the crash add insult to injury.
"They're dealing with the trauma," Seplowe said. "They're deal with their injuries, but ultimately now, they're dealing with someone blaming them."
The couple says they were coming back from Clearwater Beach with their young children the night of the crash.
"It has definitely not been easy, for sure, on any of us and just, it's draining," Alvarez said. "It's emotionally draining."
The couple responded to statements made by Knight's attorney that questioned the lighting and navigation on the ferry.
"We could see them," Pacheco said. "We could see them, and then they're claiming that they couldn't see our ferry, but they can see that we were being distracted like all kind of this. It's almost insulting."
RELATED: Jannus Live owner steps down after Clearwater Ferry crash leaves 1 dead, 10 injured
They also responded to a statement made about some passengers on the ferry being distracted by dolphins right before the crash.
"There was no dolphins," Alvarez said. "If anybody needs to hear that, there was no dolphins. We would have been the first to point them out because we have toddlers and you know, we always like to see things that are going on around us and we would've liked to point out the dolphins if we were to have seen dolphins."
Although Knight's attorney says he acted lawfully and responsibly at every point after the crash, the couples' attorney says otherwise.
The couple says they want to see this investigation come to a resolution, so their family can move forward.
"We're not here to point fingers," Pacheco said. "We were put in a position that we shouldn't have been, that our kids shouldn't have been. So, we just wanted to be able to heal and move on and be there for our kids."
What's next
The lawsuit states that Makelelele is demanding a trial.
What you can do
FWC is still investigating the crash and is asking for any video footage from the area between 8 p.m. and 8:45 p.m. on April 27.
The Source
This story was written with information provided in a lawsuit and previous FOX 13 News articles.
STAY CONNECTED WITH FOX 13 TAMPA:
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Luigi Mangione's attorneys seek hearing over claims DA's office improperly obtained medical records
Luigi Mangione's attorneys seek hearing over claims DA's office improperly obtained medical records

CBS News

time19 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Luigi Mangione's attorneys seek hearing over claims DA's office improperly obtained medical records

Luigi Mangione's defense attorneys are doubling down on accusations the Manhattan District Attorney's office improperly obtained and reviewed his medical records. The DA's office denied the claims, but Mangione's attorneys are once again asking the judge to hold an evidentiary hearing on the matter. "Based on the evidence developed through this discovery process and the requested hearing, the defense reserves the right to seek various remedies, including the recusal of the prosecution team, suppression of evidence or dismissal of the indictment," the defense wrote in their latest filing. Attorneys for the man accused of murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson first raised the allegations over his medical records in a filing last month. They claimed the DA's office wrongfully obtained the records by compelling Aetna to turn over confidential information, violating health privacy laws. Sources in the DA's office said they requested limited information but Aetna sent additional material in error, and that they deleted the material as soon as they became aware of it. "Even assuming Aetna's subpoena response exceeded what the District Attorney's Office requested, that still does not justify the prosecution reviewing Mr. Mangione's protected medical records that it was mistakenly given," the defense wrote in the new filing. This isn't the first time the defense raised concerns about evidence and tried to get the charges dismissed. They also accused the DA's office of listening to a recording of a phone call with their client, and they are seeking to have at least two of the counts against him thrown out. Mangione faces a slew of federal and state charges in the December 2024 shooting of Thompson outside a hotel in Midtown Manhattan. The federal charges are eligible for the death penalty, which federal prosecutors say they intend to pursue. In June, the DA's office released a filing with handwritten notes they say Mangione wrote and outlined his motive. Arguing in support of the state terrorism charge, prosecutors wrote, "If ever there were an open and shut case pointing to the defendant's guilt, this case is that case." Mangione has pleaded not guilty, and his next court date is set for mid September. Earlier this month, he was granted a request for a laptop while in federal custody so he can prepare for trial. It isn't connected to the internet and he can only access case-related information, like documents and Gainer contributed to this report.

DAVID MARCUS: DC just had a murder-free week, and yes, Dems, Trump did that
DAVID MARCUS: DC just had a murder-free week, and yes, Dems, Trump did that

Fox News

time19 minutes ago

  • Fox News

DAVID MARCUS: DC just had a murder-free week, and yes, Dems, Trump did that

As the wailing and gnashing of teeth over the Trump administration's takeover of the Washington DC police force begins to fade, the results are coming in, and they are nothing short of extraordinary. As of Wednesday afternoon, the nation's capital has had no murders for seven days, something that had not been achieved since March and something I can find no recent record of in summer months when the murder rate is typically at its highest. Last Monday, when a man was tragically gunned down in Logan Circle just hours after the Trump takeover, Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., took to social media to say that "Trump owns this. No word if the congressman agrees Trump also owns the lives saved this past week. And it's not just murder, according to the local police union. Robbery dropped 46% in the week after the takeover, carjackings were down a whopping 83%, and violent crime down 22%. Who could possibly argue against that? What DC needed was not a slow and steady approach to crime that fluctuates the rates here and there. It needed a shock to the system, and it got one. The patient is responding very well. The lesson here, as Shakespeare put it, is "If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well it were done quickly," which is to say that history shows us that cleaning up urban crime is not a slow, laborious process, but one to be attacked fast and aggressively. In his first term as mayor of New York City, Rudy Giuliani oversaw a 60% drop in Gotham's murder rate, and a violent crime drop of 56%, much of it in his first two years. One of Rudy's first acts as hizzoner was shut down the adult movie theaters in Times Square, which had turned a tourist mecca into a glass and steel valley of squalor, crime, and depravity. As the peep shows and live nude dancers were banished, so too was the high crime in drugs, prostitution and violence that went along with them. The only real question left to ask about Trump's efforts to fight crime in DC is, why didn't we do this sooner? It looks a lot like what the National Guard has succeeded in doing outside of Union Station in Washington, which has long been a hive of homelessness, drug use, and even tent cities. Similarly, flooding the District with law enforcement is having the same impact it did back in early 1990s New York. Criminals understand their chances of being caught committing a crime have just skyrocketed. A few more years of this and you might be able to buy toothpaste and deodorant that isn't under lock and key at a CVS. The only real question left to ask about Trump's efforts to fight crime in DC is, why didn't we do this sooner? The answer is the liberal backlash to the successful crime initiatives of the 1990s, not just in New York, but in other cities that also adopted tactics like broken window policing. That backlash, in the form of cashless bail, reduced police forces and George Soros-backed district attorneys, gave back many of the gains in fighting crime that had been won. In many instances, the Giuliani-era policies were defeated by wealthy elites in safe neighborhoods who thought they were doing something good, not condemning their poorer fellow citizens to a crime-ridden existence. By and large, this is the same demographic that protests Trump's anti-crime approach. If the results and numbers from President Trump's first week in charge of the DC police can be maintained, and there is no reason to think it can't, then there is no political or rhetorical force on Earth that can stop it. Swalwell is absolutely right: Trump owns this remarkable drop in crime in Washington that we are witnessing, just as his Democrats own the killing fields they allowed it and so many of our cities to become in the first place. For the first time in a long time in our capital, there is hope that children being murdered in gang shootouts can be a rare tragedy again, not a predictable occurrence. Many years from now, as the cherry blossoms bloom in Washington, there are going to be people alive who wouldn't be if not for Trump's actions to punish crime. What could be a more important job for our political leadership?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store