logo
BBSI Appoints Joseph S. Clabby as Chairman of the Board

BBSI Appoints Joseph S. Clabby as Chairman of the Board

Yahoo04-06-2025
Anthony Meeker to Continue as Director
VANCOUVER, Wash., June 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Barrett Business Services, Inc. (BBSI) (NASDAQ: BBSI), a leading provider of business management solutions and one of the largest professional employer organizations (PEO) in the U.S., today announced that Joseph S. Clabby has been appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors. He succeeds Tony Meeker, who will continue to serve as a member of the board.
"On behalf of the board and leadership team, I want to thank Tony for his longstanding service and steady leadership as Chairman," said Clabby. "Tony has served on BBSI's Board since the company went public in 1993, and his contributions have been instrumental to our growth and success. It is an honor to step into this role and help guide BBSI forward as we build on the company's strong foundation and momentum."
Meeker added: "Joe has consistently brought strategic insight and sound judgment to the board since joining. His deep industry knowledge and thoughtful leadership make him an excellent choice to serve as Chairman. I look forward to continuing to work with him and the board in support of BBSI's long-term success."
Clabby was appointed Vice Chairman of the Board in December 2024, following his initial appointment as a director in September 2022. He spent over two decades with ACE Limited and then Chubb (NYSE: CB) following its merger with ACE, holding a variety of senior executive positions, including board roles at several affiliated companies.
The Vice Chairman role will not be filled at this time.
About BBSI
BBSI (NASDAQ: BBSI) is a leading provider of business management solutions, combining human resource outsourcing and professional management consulting to create a unique operational platform that differentiates it from competitors. The company's integrated platform is built upon expertise in payroll processing, employee benefits, workers' compensation coverage, risk management and workplace safety programs, and human resource administration. BBSI's partnerships help businesses of all sizes improve the efficiency of their operations. The company works with more than 8,100 PEO clients in all 50 states. For more information, please visit www.bbsi.com.
Investor Relations:Gateway Group, Inc.Cody Slach Tel 1-949-574-3860 BBSI@gatewayir.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Flowers Foods Inc (FLO) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Market Shifts with ...
Flowers Foods Inc (FLO) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Market Shifts with ...

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Flowers Foods Inc (FLO) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Market Shifts with ...

Release Date: August 15, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Flowers Foods Inc (NYSE:FLO) is aggressively transitioning its portfolio to align with current consumer demand, which is expected to drive long-term growth. The company has seen success with its differentiated products, such as Dave's Killer Bread and Canyon Bakehouse, which are performing well in the market. Flowers Foods Inc (NYSE:FLO) is actively innovating, with new products like small loaves and keto offerings showing promising growth. The company is experiencing substantial space gains in mass channels for its organic products, particularly Dave's Killer Bread, indicating strong market acceptance. Despite challenges, Flowers Foods Inc (NYSE:FLO) maintains a strong market share performance, particularly in premium and differentiated product segments. Negative Points The company is facing increased competitive pressure, particularly from new lower-priced bread products affecting traditional loaf sales. There is ongoing weakness in the away-from-home food service business, impacting overall performance. Flowers Foods Inc (NYSE:FLO) has reduced its EPS guidance, narrowing the gap between dividend commitments and current EPS run rate. The transition to align with shifting consumer trends is expected to take time, requiring patience from stakeholders. The company is experiencing negative fixed cost leverage due to lower volumes, impacting gross margins. Q & A Highlights Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with FLO. Q: Ryals, can you provide more details on the competitive environment and the impact of new lower-priced bread products? A: The promotional environment is elevated but stable. We've increased promotions, especially for differentiated products like Dave's Killer Bread (DKB), which performed well. Lower-priced entrants are affecting traditional loaf areas, but we're addressing this with our own small loaves. The market remains bifurcated, with good performance in premium and value segments, particularly in mass and club channels. We're also seeing continued weakness in the away-from-home food service business. Q: Steve, regarding the updated tariff outlook, have previous tariff costs been delayed or structurally updated? Also, how does the reduction in EPS guidance affect capital allocation, especially concerning dividends? A: The tariff update is structural, with expectations for tariffs to decrease based on current observations. Regarding capital allocation, we maintain a balanced approach, and the board evaluates performance, cash flow, and liquidity quarterly. We don't have a stated target payout ratio, but on a cash basis, it's different due to depreciation and amortization being above CapEx. Q: Are we returning to a highly competitive environment similar to years ago, with aggressive pricing strategies? A: The category is transitioning due to shifting consumer trends, such as health and wellness and ultra-processed food concerns. We're committed to innovation to navigate this transition. Traditional loaf products are most affected, but we're seeing success with differentiated products like DKB and Canyon Bakehouse. We have plans to address traditional loaf weaknesses, but I won't disclose details for competitive reasons. Q: Can you comment on the performance of Wonder and its impact on Tastykake? A: Wonder's launch has exceeded expectations without cannibalizing Tastykake, likely due to geographic strengths. Wonder is a national brand, while Tastykake is strong in the mid-Atlantic. We're pleased with Wonder's performance and have more innovation planned. Q: How long will the transition take, and are there near-term solutions to speed it up? A: The transition will take time, but I won't specify a duration. The category will stabilize eventually, driven by consumer behavior shifts and the pandemic's final effects. Our focus is on innovation to replace declines in traditional loaf sales. We have the number one brand and SKU, and we'll continue investing in brands like Nature Zone to mitigate losses. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Why Texas Pacific Land Corporation Zoomed 4% Higher Today
Why Texas Pacific Land Corporation Zoomed 4% Higher Today

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Why Texas Pacific Land Corporation Zoomed 4% Higher Today

Key Points The company will list its shares on a new stock exchange. This is NYSE Texas, smack dab on its home turf. 10 stocks we like better than Texas Pacific Land › On the second-to-last trading day of the week, investors cheered the latest move made by Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL). The storied company's stock is going to anchor a new regional equities exchange, and market players cheered the expansion. They bid up Texas Pacific's shares by 4%, a figure well higher than the barely over 0% posted by the S&P 500 index that day. It's bigger in... In what feels like a suitable and symbolic development, Texas Pacific will list some of its equity on the newly formed NYSE Texas exchange. As the name implies, this is a branch of the New York Stock Exchange located in the large state. It offers solely electronic trading, as opposed to the traditional variety. In doing so, Texas Pacific is a founding member of the new bourse. The company said its "primary" stock listing would remain on the main NYSE exchange, and the NYSE Texas-listed shares would bear the same ticker symbol (TPL). In its press release trumpeting the news, the company quoted CEO Tyler Glover as saying that "With the entirety of our employees and virtually all our assets located in Texas, we maintain strong business and community ties here." Glover pointed out that Texas Pacific is the longest-listed and Texas-headquartered company on the NYSE. Positive expansion It's important to note that Texas Pacific's listing on the new exchange, no matter how appropriate, probably won't change the fundamentals of its business much, if at all. It will, however, raise its profile in its home state, and perhaps rope in new investors who might not be familiar with its operations (despite its longevity). This feels like a small but clear win for the company. Should you buy stock in Texas Pacific Land right now? Before you buy stock in Texas Pacific Land, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Texas Pacific Land wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $649,544!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,113,059!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Texas Pacific Land Corporation Zoomed 4% Higher Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income
High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income

Key Points Statistical evidence supports the idea that these two ETFs can simultaneously grow capital and generate income. Maximum monthly drawdowns are less than the benchmark's performance, and so is the risk as defined by standard deviation. These ETFs do relatively best when benchmark indexes are highly volatile but still make money in bull markets. 10 stocks we like better than JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF › The JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (NYSEMKT: JEPI) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (NASDAQ: JEPQ) have garnered significant investor attention, in part due to their trailing-12-month dividend yields of 8.2% and 11.2%, respectively. Moreover, they offer monthly income, making them a favorite among passive income investors. As such, it would be interesting to share some modeling of their performance to see if they do offer investors a way to a relatively low-volatility strategy that practically guarantees a monthly income. (Keep in mind dividends can always be cut.) Introducing two JPMorgan ETFs The first thing to understand about these two exchange-traded funds is that they are not tailored to invest in dividend stocks. Instead, they both follow the same strategy of investing up to 80% of net assets in equities (stocks), with the only difference being that the Equity Premium ETF focuses on S&P 500 stocks while the Nasdaq Equity Premium ETF focuses on stocks in the Nasdaq-100. As noted above, the stocks are not explicitly selected for their dividend yield, an essential point because high-yield equity-focused ETFs often involve concentrating holdings in sectors with high yields. The remaining net assets, up to 20%, are invested in equity-linked notes (ELNs) that follow a strategy of selling call options on the indexes that the two ETFs benchmark -- S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100, respectively. A call option is the right to buy shares of the index at a specified price (the strike price) and is bought by bullish investors. The seller of the call options (in this case the ETF) receives a premium from the buyer. However, if the index increases significantly, the option is exercised, and the ELN typically incurs a loss. Conversely, when the index experiences a small gain, stays flat, or loses value, the option isn't exercised. The idea is that an anticipated net profit in premiums collected from the ELNs, combined with some dividend income from stock holdings, will generate sufficient income for distributions to be paid to shareholders under any condition, particularly in the event of a substantial increase in the index. And note that the upside is limited (gains less than the market), but the downside is also restricted. This table lays out how the portions of the ETFs will perform based on how the underlying index performs in a month. Monthly Index Performance Strong Gain Moderate Gain Moderate Loss Strong Loss Equities (At least 80% of the ETF assets) Strong Gain Gain Loss Strong Loss ELNs (Up to 20% of the ETF's assets) Loss Profit Profit Profit Overall Gain, but less than the market Gain, but less than the market Slight profit/slight loss Loss, but less than the market Author's analysis. What the ETFs need to do to demonstrate they work Before I throw charts at you, it's worth noting that the proof of the strategy working includes: The ETF should have a lower volatility than the index (measured here by the standard deviation of monthly returns). The ETFs should have relatively low maximum monthly drawdowns because passive investors usually do not want to lose a significant amount in any one month. The strategy should demonstrate a high coefficient of determination, or R^2, indicating that the independent variable (in this case, the benchmark index) is primarily responsible for determining the outcome. Performance consistent with the outcomes outlined in the table above. That said, here are the charts comparing the monthly index performance to the ETF's performance. Both sets of data include reinvestment of dividends. First, here's the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF. And now the JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF. A few conclusions can be drawn from the data, along with some additional calculations. The monthly standard deviation of the S&P 500 over the period is 4.7%, compared to 3.1% for JEPI, indicating lower volatility returns. The monthly standard deviation of the Nasdaq-100 over the period is 5.7%, compared to 4.2% for JEPQ, indicating lower volatility returns. Both ETFs exhibit high R^2 values, indicating a consistency of outcome from the strategy. The three most significant monthly drawdowns for JEPI are -6.4%, -4.2%, and -4.1%. The three most significant monthly drawdowns for JEPQ are -8.7%, -6.8%, and -6.6%. In general, the strategy is effective, generating a collection of positive returns when the indices report moderate gains and losses. The downside is limited compared to the index when the market declines significantly, and the upside is limited when the indexes perform well. What it means to passive investors Both indices have performed very well over the periods, with an average monthly gain of 1.5% on the S&P 500 and 1.8% on the Nasdaq; therefore, the ETFs have understandably underperformed. However, there's no guarantee that these conditions will continue, and these ETFs have demonstrated lower volatility returns while maintaining substantial dividends for those seeking monthly income. As such, they are excellent options for those seeking to generate passive income across a range of market conditions. Should you invest $1,000 in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF right now? Before you buy stock in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income was originally published by The Motley Fool

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store