EU preparing to hoard critical supplies over security fears
The document reportedly says a new mechanism is needed to improve EU member states' readiness for global risks.
'The EU faces an increasingly complex and deteriorating risk landscape marked by rising geopolitical tensions, including conflict, the mounting impacts of climate change, environmental degradation, and hybrid and cyber threats,' the draft states. It proposes coordinated backup stockpiles of critical goods including food, medicines, nuclear fuel, rare earths, permanent magnets and even cable repair modules 'to ensure prompt recovery from energy or optical cable disruptions.'
Brussels reportedly aims to create a 'stockpiling network' to improve coordination between EU nations, citing a 'limited common understanding of which essential goods are needed for crisis preparedness.'The plan would also involve compiling updated lists of essential supplies tailored to each region and crisis type. Member states are advised to invest in critical stockpiles and involve the private sector through incentives such as tax credits. The draft adds that the EU will cooperate with NATO and other allies on 'shared warehousing' and management of resources, as well as dual-use infrastructure.
Funding plans for the initiative will reportedly be addressed in proposals for the EU's new multiannual budget expected later this month. The European Commission did not immediately respond to media requests for comment on the reported initiative.
The strategy comes amid wider EU concern over security. Brussels has been urging increased military spending for months, citing the supposed threat of Russian aggression – a claim Moscow has repeatedly rejected as baseless. Earlier this year, EU leaders adopted the ReArm Europe initiative, unlocking up to €800 billion ($840 billion) to double defense spending from 2024 levels. Last month, the European NATO members also agreed to raise defense spending to 5% of GDP, calling it necessary to counter the 'long-term threat posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security.'
Russia has denied that it plans to attack the West, calling such claims 'nonsense' and accusing the EU of fueling fear to justify massive arms spending. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov previously labeled the bloc's buildup 'rabid,' while former President Dmitry Medvedev accused the EU of turning into 'a politicized, globalist, and fiercely Russophobic organization' that poses 'a threat' to Russia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
20 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Fyodor Lukyanov: Western Europe is at Trump's mercy
From a theatrical point of view, Monday's Washington summit between US President Donald Trump and Western Europe's leaders was a vivid spectacle. Each official played their role, some with greater skill than others. But behind the carefully staged performance, the real story emerged: the region's inability to act as a political entity in its own right. Contrary to media spin, the meeting was not about Ukraine. Attempts to resolve the crisis continue, but its outcome will ultimately be decided not in Brussels or Berlin, but by non-European powers. The real lesson from Washington lay in the display of Western Europe's dependence. Every move by these Western European leaders was aimed at one goal: not angering the American president. In the words of NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Trump has become 'Daddy' – a figure to be placated with smiles, tributes, and flattery. Leaders compared notes on how best to manage his moods, even down to reportedly advising Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky on what to wear, what to say, and how to thank him. This might sound absurd. But that is the political reality of the transatlantic relationship. The EU no longer acts with autonomy. Its politics revolve around managing the temper of a man in Washington. Of course, Trump's personality is unique, but it would be a mistake to reduce the issue to character. The essence is deeper: Western Europe has suddenly realized the scale of its strategic, political and economic dependence on the United States. Put bluntly, the half-continent can do very little without America – even in matters that directly touch its own interests. This dependency did not appear overnight. Ironically, it deepened under Joe Biden. With his rhetoric of 'unprecedented transatlantic solidarity,' the former president made Western Europe carry much of the political and economic burden of the conflict with Russia. The United States reaped the economic benefits, while the costs were shifted to the Old World. Trump has simply made this arrangement overt. He openly treats the Europeans not as partners, but as tools. In his eyes, the EU exists to finance American priorities and later to handle the technical details of a post-settlement Ukraine. Western Europe's 'position' counts for little if it differs from Washington's. The recent trade talks proved the point: negotiations went America's way, and his guests accepted it. Faced with this reality, Western Europe has chosen a strategy of unrestrained flattery. Leaders believe that by praising Trump, they can slip their own disagreements into the conversation. But the approach is self-defeating. Trump regards praise not as persuasion but as recognition of self-evident truth: if you admire me, I must be right. Join me, and keep applauding. Brussels reassures itself that this humiliation is temporary, the product of one unusual leader. When Trump leaves, normality will return. But the illusion will not last. For over two decades – since the presidency of George W. Bush – Washington has been steadily shifting its strategic focus away from Europe. This course has been consistent across parties and presidents. It will not change after Trump. And given the current willingness of EU leaders to grovel, future US presidents will expect no less. Some argue that Western Europe's position is no different from that of nation states dealing with America. That is misleading. Canada, for example, has taken a firm stance under its new prime minister, and Trump has eased his attacks. Outside the Atlantic bloc, the contrast is sharper still. China, India, Brazil and South Africa have all resisted US pressure. They may compromise, but they refuse to submit. None wants a direct confrontation with America, but none accepts blackmail. Only the EU consistently folds. It has become the undisputed champion of compliance, treating subservience as prudence. History shows Western Europe has not always been so timid. In the early 1980s, when Soviet-American dialogue collapsed, its leaders persuaded Ronald Reagan not to interfere with their energy projects with the USSR. Why? Because it suited the EU's own interests. That clarity of purpose is absent today. The problem is not that Brussels simply follows America, but that Western Europe no longer knows what its own interests are. Having lost the ability – or perhaps the courage – to define them, it automatically falls in line with Washington. For the United States, this is convenient. The EU is treated as a competitor in some spheres and a resource in others, but never as a genuine partner. What does this mean for Russia? For now, little. The relationship is at a low ebb, and rebuilding it is a question for the distant future. Still, the lesson of history is clear: the most productive periods in Russian-EU relations came when Western Europe acted in its own interests, not as America's appendage. Today, that capacity has vanished. Instead, the bloc risks descending into what can only be described as a collective political neurosis. Leaders reassure themselves with illusions, while the gap between Western Europe's ambitions and its actual autonomy grows wider. The consequences could be dangerous – for the EU itself, for its neighbors, and for the stability of the wider international article was first published by the magazine Profile and was translated and edited by the RT team.
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Don't worry about WW3
US President Donald Trump has declared that the world is no longer facing the prospect of the Ukraine conflict escalating into World War III. Trump has repeatedly said that global tensions peaked when relations between Moscow and Washington hit their lowest point during former President Joe Biden's tenure. He has also accused his predecessor of provoking the Ukraine conflict by backing Kiev's NATO ambitions despite Moscow's legitimate concerns. In a podcast with radio host Mark Levin published on Wednesday, Trump said that when he came into office earlier this year, the Ukraine conflict was 'raging' and 'heading to World War III.' However, he argued that now 'you're not going to have that anymore.' 'That's the nice part. You're not going to have to worry about that,' Trump said, admitting that it remains to be seen how exactly the conflict will be resolved. Since returning to office, Trump has taken a markedly different approach toward Russia compared to Biden. He has reopened high-level diplomatic channels with Moscow and communicated directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Last week, Trump hosted Putin in Alaska for the first face-to-face talks between the American and Russian leaders since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in February 2022. On Monday, Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky and several European leaders arrived in Washington for talks with Trump. Trump described his talks with Putin as 'very productive' and said the meetings have made a settlement more realistic. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that there is now 'light at the end of the tunnel and an opportunity for lasting peace.' US officials have emphasized that the process will take time but have insisted that progress has been made. Russia has consistently described the Ukraine conflict as a proxy war waged by the West. Moscow has accused NATO of seeking to escalate the confrontation and has warned that the deployment of Western troops in Ukraine could risk triggering a world war. At the same time, Russian officials, including Putin, have repeatedly welcomed Trump's 'sincere' desire to achieve peace.
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Retreating Ukraine boasts it ‘knows how to kill Russians'
The Ukrainian military's skill at killing Russians should be enough to have it admitted to NATO, Kiev's ambassador to Poland, Vasily Bodnar, has claimed. Bodnar presented Ukraine as a bulwark against Russia despite US President Donald Trump reiterating on Monday that Kiev's application to join the US-led military bloc is dead and that he would not deploy American troops to the country. 'If Russia attacks NATO countries tomorrow without Ukraine on NATO's side, it would be much more difficult than with Ukraine. That's why Ukraine should be seen as an added value to NATO: it is fighting and knows how to kill Russians, whereas you do not yet,' Bodnar told Polsat News in an interview published on Monday. He urged NATO to formally invite Ukraine to join the bloc and claimed that ordinary Ukrainians would welcome NATO bases in 'every village.' Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova condemned Bodnar's remarks and accused Kiev of rejecting a prisoner swap that could have involved around 1,000 POWs. Meanwhile, the Russian army has continued to gain ground throughout 2025, as Ukraine struggles to replenish its forces with new conscripts. Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly said Moscow has no intention of attacking NATO members unless attacked first. The Kremlin has also stressed that it would not tolerate Western troops on Ukrainian soil, even under the guise of peacekeepers, and has cited Ukraine's NATO aspirations as one of the root causes of the ongoing conflict.
