Chili's is America's hottest restaurant
Chili's is on fire.
Chili's sales at restaurants open for at least a year increased a whopping 31% last quarter. It was Chili's third-straight quarter of double-digit sales growth, and the results drove parent company Brinker International's (EAT) stock up 16% on Wednesday.
The restaurant chain's growth was fueled by more customers visiting restaurants — not Chili's raising prices. Foot traffic to Chili's increased 20% last quarter, the company said.
Analysts gushed over Chili's results on an earnings call, offering congratulations to the company 11 times. One analyst said the company's turnaround was 'the best one of all time' in the restaurant industry, and another said CEO Kevin Hochman was 'going to write a great book on this some day.'
Once falling behind flashier restaurants, Chili's is pulling off its comeback thanks to upgraded French fry and chicken tender recipes, fast food-like deals and viral TikTok videos of customers pulling apart its gooey mozzarella sticks.
Chili's has blown up on TikTok with its 'Triple Dipper' platter, which lets customers choose from three appetizers — mozzarella sticks, southwestern egg rolls and chicken wings — for under $20. The platter had been around for decades, but Chili's started advertising it prominently on social media last spring.
The deal went viral on social media. One video of a customer dipping mozzarella sticks in sauce and eating the stringy cheese has more than 16 million views. 'Never in my whole life would I have thought Chili's has the best, dare I say, mozzarella stick,' another customer said in a video with 1.4 million views.
The viral success is helping the chain draw younger customers who had never visited a Chili's before and previously associated the brand with their parents.
Chili's is also winning customers hunting for deals with $6 margaritas and a new $10.99 meal that includes the 'Big Smasher' burger, which it advertises as 'twice the beef of a Big Mac.'
This combination has helped Chili's buck the recent restaurant slowdown. Institutions like Red Lobster and TGI Fridays filed for bankruptcy last year; Denny's and Applebee's announced major store closings; and customers reached their breaking point with McDonald's, Burger King and KFC's prices.
Competition has increased, however.
Applebee's recently launched a $9.99 'Really Big Meal Deal' and implied that its deal was better than Chili's 'Big Smasher' value meal because it's $1 cheaper. Applebee's version also includes either a fried chicken sandwich or bacon cheeseburger, endless fries and a soda.
Additionally, Chili's has been advertising its prices against McDonald's and other fast-food chains, but McDonald's is adapting.
McDonald's recently unveiled the 'McValue' menu, a new budget-friendly category that is rolling out at US restaurants this month. The popular $5 meal deal, unveiled earlier last year, is the centerpiece. Burger King and Wendy's have stepped up their own value meals as well.
But Chili's expects to be able to sustain its hot streak.
'Our sales have increased and they're staying at those levels and that momentum has continued,' Hochman said Wednesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Jim Cramer rebuffs recent downgrades of McDonalds, Tesla and Apple
CNBC's Jim Cramer on Monday pushed backed against recent downgrades of stocks he believes can persevere, including McDonald's, Tesla and Apple. "Some stocks should not be downgraded," he said. "It's just not worth it, because it's only a matter of time before they snap right back." Some analysts have been negative on McDonald's, including Morgan Stanley, who worried about pressure on the fast sector in general. One firm, Loop Capital, fretted over negative feedback for the new chicken strips offering. But Cramer expressed confidence in McDonald's ability to quickly discard unpopular products and adapt to changing conditions. For example, he said, the company rolled out a successful discount meal after customers complained prices had become too high. The strength of McDonalds, Cramer added, is that "they don't fight battles they can't win — when something doesn't work, they just dump it, and they move on." While Cramer conceded he's not thrilled about Tesla CEO Elon Musk's feud with President Donald Trump — or that sales of the company's electric vehicles are declining — he said he feels there is "another act coming from Musk." He pointed out that Tesla is set to launch robotaxis later this month. Although Tesla was hit with two downgrades on Monday, he noted that the stock still managed to close up 4.55%. Much of Wall Street has soured on Apple, Cramer surmised, noting a dip in enthusiasm at the Worldwide Developers Conference. While the iPhone maker is "in dry spell," he claimed it has the capacity to acquire something new, like AI search outfit Perplexity. Apple "is not a company that stands still," Cramer continued. He also emphasized that there's a reason this may not have been Apple's biggest year — it has faced serious pressure from the White House and its harsh tariff policies. Apple is scrambling to reduce its reliance on China by moving some production to India, and the company committed $500 billion to manufacture in the U.S. in an effort to satisfy Trump's demands. But the president has insisted all phones be made in the U.S., not India, threatening 25% or more tariffs on products made abroad. "As long as nobody switches to Android, call me sanguine about Apple," he said. "Not more than that…certainly not less than that." McDonald's, Tesla and Apple did not immediately respond to request for comment. Click here to download Jim Cramer's Guide to Investing at no cost to help you build long-term wealth and invest The CNBC Investing Club Charitable Trust owns shares of Apple.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Klarna CEO predicts AI-driven job displacement will cause a recession
Klarna's CEO has predicted that a recession could be around the corner as companies around the globe—including his own—reduce the headcount of well-paid, white-collar jobs and replace them with AI. Sebastian Siemiatkowski, the boss of the Swedish Buy Now, Pay Later group is once again sounding a pessimistic tone on AI's impact on the workforce. But as he embraces the potential positive effects of AI on his own bottom line, he may have to contest with the negative fallout of a company that has flirted with growing credit losses in the last year. While he admitted that 'making future statements about macroeconomics is like horoscopes,' Siemiatkowski's well-documented feelings about AI's impact on the labor market leave him making a pessimistic prediction about the economy. 'My suspicion…is that there will be an implication for white-collar jobs. And when that happens, that usually leads to at least a recession in the short term. And I think, unfortunately, I don't see how we could avoid that with what's happening from a technology perspective,' Siemiatkowski said on the Times Tech Podcast. Siematkowski has long warned of the disruptive nature of AI on the labor market, using his experience of shifting recruiting practices at Klarna to support his argument that it will replace roles. He told the podcast that the company's headcount had fallen from 5,500 people to 3,000 in the space of two years. Speaking in August last year, Siematkowski said his ambition was to eventually reduce that figure to 2,000 through workplace norms like attrition rather than by engaging in layoffs. In February last year, Klarna announced that its AI chatbot was doing the work of 700 customer service staff, previously a role filled by customer service agents working for the French agency Teleperformance. While Siemiatkowski has faced criticism for his willingness to talk about AI's disruptive potential, he indicated he felt it was more of a duty to be frank about the technology. 'Many people in the tech industry, especially CEOs, tend to downplay the consequences of AI on jobs, white-collar jobs in particular. I don't want to be one of them.' Indeed, Siemiatkowski implied that if he added up the number of employees of CEOs who had called him to ask about making 'efficiencies,' that figure in itself would make for a seismic economic event. An AI-induced recession would combine a number of brewing themes for the Swedish tech group. Siemiatkowski's comments come as the group reported widening credit losses, which rose by 17% to $136 million last year. Siemiatkowski explained the losses as a result of the group taking on more customers, naturally leading to a rise in defaults. On a relative basis, the percentage increase in defaults was small, Siemiatkowski said. The Swede added that because Klarna customers' average indebtedness was £100, they were more likely to pay back their loans compared with typical credit card debt of what he said was £5,000. The typical U.K. credit card holder has an outstanding credit balance closer to around £1,800, while in the U.S., the average is about $6,300. Regardless of the variance, Siemiatkowski says the difference means customers are more likely to pay off their Klarna debts. 'We are very unsensitive to macroeconomic shifts. We can still see them, but they're much less profound than if you're a big bank, you have tons of mortgages. And for people to really increase losses, credit losses, what has to happen is people have to lose jobs.' Despite that, predictions of mass layoffs among white-collar workers could inform higher risk for the company's credit business. While there wasn't any sign of a recession currently, Siemiatkowski did observe falling consumer sentiment, which would impact spending. Siemiatkowski's views on AI in the labor force have evolved over time. Speaking to Bloomberg in May, Siemiatowski was reported to have said the company was embarking on a recruitment drive, contrary to his previous statements about a workforce reduction. Speaking with the Times, Siemiatkowski clarified that the company needed different types of workers to handle more complex customer service requests. 'When we started applying AI in our customer service, we realized that there will be a higher value to human connection,' he said. This story was originally featured on
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Online shopper slammed with a $1K tariff bill after ordering from popular retailer: ‘I had no idea'
One woman's online shopping spree turned into a fashion fiasco — with a hefty price tag. Amanda Ivanelli, a Florida-based family vlogger, was floored when she opened her mail and found a $1,243 FedEx bill associated with a recent ASOS order. She originally ordered 'a bunch of dresses' from the British fast fashion side but only kept one or two of them, totaling about $150. Advertisement 'I got my mail today, and I got this,' she said in a now-viral TikTok, waving the invoice. 'And I open it, and I'm like, 'It's an invoice for $1,243.'' Ivanelli suspects the surprise fee was due to import tariffs — government-imposed taxes on foreign goods that President Donald Trump imposed under a rarely used 1977 emergency law. Advertisement 'I would have never ordered from ASOS or anywhere that I know I would be charged for — I'm assuming — the tariffs,' she fumed in the clip. 'Isn't that something that should have been shown at checkout?' 'I had no idea when I checked out, I had no idea,' she went on. The Post reached out to Ivanelli for comment and more details on her experience. Advertisement Fashionistas are feeling the tariff squeeze more than ever these days. The measures targeted China, Mexico, Canada and nearly every U.S. trading partner. While a federal court blocked the tariffs in May, the Trump team is expected to appeal — and shoppers are left hanging in legal limbo. It's become like a curse word, one style-savvy New Yorker dished to The Post. Advertisement Tiffany Radulescu, a 34-year-old Brooklyn glam girl, told The Post she skips the shipping stress by jet-setting to Europe for her wardrobe hauls. One Florida mom and TikTokker was recently left gasping after finding a $1.2K FedEx bill for an ASOS haul — despite only keeping a couple of dresses and returning the rest. SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images 'I'd rather catch a flight than catch a tariff,' Radulescu quipped, revealing she regularly flies to Paris to scoop Prada, Hermès and Louboutin without worrying about getting dinged by Uncle Sam. And she's not the only one scheming to skirt the fees. Social media has become a runway of rage, with users bashing jaw-dropping duties that sometimes exceed the cost of the clothes themselves. Big brands like Walmart, Nike and Macy's have hiked domestic prices to cover the added costs, while luxury houses like Louis Vuitton and Hermès have padded US prices to keep profits intact. Even activewear giant Lululemon has been feeling it. Advertisement 'We are not immune to macroeconomic factors such as tariffs,' chief financial officer Meghan Frank said during a recent earnings call. CEO Calvin McDonald added that while Lululemon had seen some tariff relief, the brand remains 'vigilant.' Turns out Ivanelli isn't the only fashionista shopping for clothes and getting hemmed in by hidden fees.
