Dollar's Dramatic Drop Signals Investor Caution As Fed Speculation Grow
The U.S. dollar is facing its sharpest first-half drop in over five decades, as markets absorb mounting uncertainty around future Federal Reserve actions and growing political interference.
According to a report from Reuters, the dollar index has declined more than 10% since January—its worst performance for a first half of the year since 1973. This decline follows a confluence of pressures, including subdued inflation, weaker economic growth signals and political rhetoric surrounding Federal Reserve leadership.
One significant contributor to investor unease: former President Donald Trump's recent suggestion that he may replace Fed Chair Jerome Powell if elected again. Trump described Powell's leadership as "a disaster" in a televised interview, fueling speculation of political disruption at the central bank. As a result, rate futures are now reflecting a higher probability of rate cuts by the end of the year, even as inflation remains just above the Fed's 2% target.
A separate analysis by Bloomberg highlights that the weakening greenback has boosted investor appetite for risk assets, driving the Nasdaq 100 and other equity indices to new highs. At the same time, currencies such as the euro and Swiss franc have rallied significantly against the dollar, reflecting broader global shifts in sentiment.
While the Fed has thus far held rates steady and emphasized a data-driven approach, market participants are now navigating both economic signals and political undercurrents. With GDP data, inflation readings, and campaign rhetoric expected to intensify over the coming months, analysts warn that the dollar may remain volatile well into the second half of 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Rwanda, DRC To Ink Peace Deal In US But Questions Remain
Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo will sign an agreement in Washington on Friday to put an end to a conflict in the eastern DRC that has killed thousands, although broad questions loom on what it will mean. President Donald Trump has trumpeted the diplomacy that led to the deal and publicly complained that he has not received a Nobel Peace Prize. But the agreement has also come under scrutiny for its vagueness including on the economic component, with the Trump administration eager to compete with China and profit from abundant mineral wealth in the long-turbulent east of the vast DRC. The M23 rebel group in late 2021 launched a new offensive that it escalated sharply early this year, seizing broad swathes of territory including the key eastern DRC city of Goma. The Kinshasa government has long alleged that M23, consisting mostly of ethnic Tutsis, receives military support from Rwanda. These claims are backed by Washington. Rwanda has denied directly supporting the rebels but has demanded an end to another armed group, the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), which was established by ethnic Hutus linked to the massacres of Tutsis in the 1994 Rwanda genocide. The Rwandan and DRC foreign ministers will sign the agreement in Washington in the presence of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott said. In a joint statement ahead of the signing, the three countries said the agreement would include "respect for territorial integrity and a prohibition of hostilities" as well as the disarmament of all "non-state armed groups." The agreement was mediated through Qatar, a frequent US partner, and Massad Boulos, a Lebanese-American businessman and father-in-law of Trump's daughter Tiffany tapped by the president as a senior advisor on Africa. The statement also spoke of a "regional economic integration framework" and of a future summit in Washington bringing together Trump, Rwandan President Paul Kagame and DRC President Felix Tshisekedi. Denis Mukwege, a gynecologist who shared the 2018 Nobel Peace Prize for his work to end the DRC's epidemic of sexual violence in war, voiced alarm that the agreement was too opaque. He said that the talk of economic cooperation was an unjust reward for Rwanda. The deal "would amount to granting a reward for aggression, legitimizing the plundering of Congolese natural resources, and forcing the victim to alienate their national heritage by sacrificing justice in order to ensure a precarious and fragile peace," he said in a statement. On the eve of the signing, news outlet Africa Intelligence reported that the deal asks Rwanda to withdraw its "defensive measures" and for the DRC to end all association with the FDLR. Rwandan Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe on X denied the account. "As a matter of facts, the words 'Rwanda Defense Force', 'Rwandan troops' or 'withdrawal' are nowhere to be seen in the document," he said. Congolese Foreign Minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner, on a visit to Washington in April to jumpstart negotiations on the deal, said that Rwanda should be obliged to withdraw from her country, which has been ravaged by decades of war. Both countries have sought favor with the United States. The DRC -- whose enormous mineral reserves include lithium and cobalt, vital in electric vehicles -- has pitched an agreement to seek US investment, loosely inspired by the Trump administration's minerals deal with Ukraine. Rwanda has been discussing taking in migrants deported from the United States, a major priority for Trump. Rwanda, one of the most stable countries in Africa, had reached a migration deal with Britain's former Conservatives government but the arrangement was killed by the Labour government that took office last year.
Int'l Business Times
8 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
How Trump Finally Learned To Love NATO -- For Now
It will go down as the summit where US President Donald Trump learned to stop worrying and love NATO. Trump reveled in gushing praise from leaders in The Hague -- including being called "daddy" by alliance chief Mark Rutte -- and a pledge to boost defense spending as he had demanded. But it went further than just lapping up flattery. Trump also spoke of what sounded like an almost religious conversion to NATO, after years of bashing other members as freeloaders and threatening to leave. "I came here because it was something I'm supposed to be doing, but I left here a little bit differently," Trump said at his closing press conference on Wednesday. "I watched the heads of these countries get up, and the love and the passion that they showed for their country was unbelievable. I've never seen quite anything like it. "It was really moving to see it." A day after returning to the White House, Trump still sounded uncharacteristically touchy-feely about his time with his 31 NATO counterparts. "A wonderful day with incredible and caring Leaders," he posted on his Truth Social platform on Thursday. It was a remarkable turnaround from the US president's first term. Trump repeatedly berated allies as not paying up and threatened to pull the United States out of NATO as part of his wider disdain for international institutions and alliances. At his first summit in 2017 in Brussels, Trump memorably shoved aside Montenegro's prime minister Dusko Markovic as he made his way to the front of the stage. A year later Trump publicly lambasted Germany and privately talked about wanting to quit. But this time NATO leaders had carefully choreographed the trip. They massaged the numbers to give Trump the defense spending deal he craved. And while Trump headed to the summit dropping F-bombs in frustration at a shaky Iran-Israel ceasefire, NATO leaders love-bombed him from the moment he arrived. The Netherlands put him up overnight in the Dutch king's royal palace and gave him a royal dinner and breakfast -- "beautiful," according to Trump -- while NATO organizers kept the summit deliberately short. Frederick Kempe, the chief executive officer of the Atlantic Council, said Trump had "waxed poetic" about NATO in a way he had never done before. "Trump -- the vilifier of European deadbeats on defense and crusader against allies for what he sees as unfair trade practices -- sounded like an altered man," he said in a commentary. The question now is what it means for NATO when the alliance's priorities end up guided by one man. The final summit statement's language on Russia's invasion of Ukraine was watered down from previous years. It also made no mention of Ukraine's push to join NATO. Reporters were not allowed into Trump's meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The move was partly because of their Oval Office bust-up in February, but it also deprived Zelensky of the set-piece he had craved. "The biggest loser was Ukraine," said Ed Arnold of the Royal United Services Insitute in London. Trump also hinted at what lies in store for any backsliders on the defense spending pledge, threatening to make Spain "pay" on trade over its resistance to commit to the new target. As with any relationship, the pressure will now be on NATO to keep up the first flush of love over the three summits that are due to take place over the rest of Trump's second term. "The real worry is that NATO will be unable to keep up the hype," said Arnold. For now, though, Trump and his administration seem to be content. As he arrived back in Washington, the White House posted a video of summit highlights, with the caption: "Daddy's Home."
Int'l Business Times
9 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Housing Market Softens, With Rising Inventory And Stabilizing Demand
U.S. housing market dynamics are shifting this June, with growing inventory levels and stabilizing buyer interest beginning to alter long-standing conditions in the market. New home sales dropped 13.7% in May to a seasonally adjusted pace of 623,000 units—marking the lowest level since October 2024. This sharp decline was most pronounced in the South and Midwest, according to Business Insider, reflecting increasing affordability challenges faced by buyers. Meanwhile, homebuilders are reporting approximately 507,000 newly constructed homes ready for sale—consistent with a supply buffer of nearly 10 months, as noted by the same source. Despite cooling in the new-construction segment, signs of recovery are emerging in the existing-home market. The Pending Home Sales Index—measuring signed contracts on existing homes—increased 1.8% in May to 72.6, surpassing analyst expectations, as reported by Reuters. All four U.S. regions showed gains, driven primarily by strong job and wage growth, though high mortgage rates continue to impede broader affordability. One key relief factor is a recent dip in borrowing costs. The 30‑year fixed-rate mortgage rate eased to roughly 6.77%, its lowest in seven weeks, supported by renewed hopes for a Federal Reserve rate cut this summer, according to Reuters in the same report. The combination of these trends—ample new and resale inventory, alongside slightly lower mortgage costs—suggests a gradual shift toward a more balanced housing market after years of overheating. First-time buyers, in particular, may find renewed opportunities if downward pressure on rates continues. Still, median home prices remain stubbornly high, keeping the market challenging for many. Analysts warn that true affordability hinges not just on rate declines but also on continued wage growth and manageable inflation.
