
Private R&D investment by Australian businesses falling, report finds ahead of roundtable
The report — collated by the Business Council of Australia ahead of Treasurer Jim Chalmer's productivity roundtable next month — identified a raft of targeted policies to boost business potential.
It proposes offering extra incentives for collaboration and commercialisation, cutting red tape, and consolidating grants into major national programs.
The report estimates that for every $1 spent on R&D, it generates $5 in economic value and $7 billion in gross domestic product (GDP) annually.
If the suite of measures are implemented, it's expected to grow productivity in Australia 0.1 per cent each year.
It also recommends a simpler R&D Tax Incentive by standardising tax offsets of 18.5 per cent above the company rate and removing its current $150 million cap.
It's hoped having a single, consistent rule rather than the current different benefit rates depending on company size or how much they spend, would encourage firms to invest in R&D, especially smaller players.
As for scrapping the cap, the policy is designed to allow businesses to claim tax offsets for all of their eligible R&D spend rather than just the first $150 million under the current framework.
BCA chief executive Bran Black said the targeted policies were designed to fix Australia's productivity problems by unlocking investment, boosting jobs and wages.
He said reversing the current trend, which has seen R&D investment drop 24 per cent in the last decade, would help drive innovation and productivity nationally.
He said it was important businesses were given the 'right environment' to invest: 'If we don't act now then we will keep losing innovators, capital and ideas to other nations'.
'Better tax, collaboration and commercialisation policies will give businesses the confidence to take the next step and create new Australian technologies that benefit everyone's lives,' he said.
The report will form part of a joint industry submission with well-known Australian software firm Atlassian and medical device company Cochlear.
Cochlear chief executive and president Dig Howitt said policy reform and 'well-funded strategies' would be critical to unlocking more R&D in Australia.
Atlassian chief of staff Amy Glancey said by supporting major companies to invest in R&D it would have a trickle down effect to create a better environment for entrepreneurship and innovation.
Dr Chalmer's roundtable will be held at Parliament House August 19–21 and is expected to shape a shared agenda on improving productivity, strengthening budget sustainability, and building economic resilience.
It has prompted a number of state-level consultations and spin-off roundtables, including one held on Friday by Independent MP Allegra Spender involving economists and industry figures in Canberra.
The BCA, along with other industry bodies, companies, and government representatives, are finalising submissions ahead of the August roundtable, outlining ideas across tax, regulation, innovation, skills, and digital transformation to help lift Australia's productivity.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Age
40 minutes ago
- The Age
Cricket Australia
Should the game's bosses follow through on the advice to sell off stakes in BBL teams, it will be the most revolutionary moment in Australian cricket since Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket breakaway in 1977.


7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Hope for tariff carve-out wanes as US President Donald Trump strikes deals
Australia's hopes for a total tariff exemption are dwindling as Donald Trump's deals with other nations lay bare the limits of trade negotiations. Since pushing his tariff deadline to August 1, the US president has struck trade agreements with Japan, and on Monday, the European Union. While the deals landed on tariffs lower than Mr Trump's initial threats, both were higher than the 10 per cent baseline levy imposed on Australian goods. No US trading partner has managed to completely dodge tariffs on their items. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Trade Minister Don Farrell have maintained that Australian products should not be hit with any tariffs, but the latest deals show an exemption could be off the table. Overnight, Mr Trump implied the 10 per cent base rate, which applies to the goods of many countries including Australia, could rise to 15-20 per cent. Mr Trump said in Scotland that his administration will notify about 200 countries soon of their new 'world tariff' rate. 'I would say it'll be somewhere in the 15 to 20 per cent range,' he said. 'Probably one of those two numbers.' University of Sydney US politics expert David Smith told AAP it's proving hard for countries to talk their way out of tariffs on their exports to the US. 'Trump really does see tariffs as something that is good in themselves,' University of Sydney US politics expert David Smith told AAP. 'Even though there were a lot of hopes at the beginning of this process that countries could negotiate their way out of tariffs altogether - that's not really happening.' Australia, like other nations, might instead have to pivot approaches and try to strategically position its industries within these deals. For example, the US pharmaceutical sector has long taken issue with Australia's drug subsidy scheme and urged the president to act. In early July, Mr Trump threatened a 200 per cent tariff on pharmaceuticals, which could be seen as a way for the US to chip away at the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in exchange for a trade deal. Both of Australia's major parties have maintained the program is not up for negotiation. Instead, the federal government revealed it would lift restrictions on certain US beef imports. 'Australia is thinking about other areas where we would be prepared to make concessions, because we were not going to be making concessions on (the PBS),' Associate Professor Smith said. Mr Albanese says the government is engaging in Australia's national interest. While the government said its decision to lift restrictions followed a decade-long scientific review and noted the measure would not compromise biosecurity, the opposition and figures within the cattle industry have called for an independent examination of the issue. 'If we have created a brand new threat, we should be very clear about that,' Liberal senator Jane Hume told parliament.


7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Banks forced to take action on high-fee accounts
Australian banks will refund more than $93 million to low-income customers who were charged high fees on their accounts. More than a million people have already been moved to low-fee accounts, saving an expected $50 million in annual fees, according the the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC) Better and Beyond report released on Tuesday. The review follows the Better Banking for Indigenous Consumers report, released in July 2024, which revealed at least two million low-income Australians, who relied on Centrelink payments, had bank accounts charging high fees. There were 21 banks included in the latest report, which found even larger numbers of low-income Australians paying too much. 'What started as an initiative focused on addressing avoidable bank fees for low-income customers in regional and remote locations, particularly First Nations consumers, revealed a much wider problem affecting customers nationwide,' commissioner Alan Kirkland said. Since July 2024, the four banks involved in the initial report- ANZ, Bendigo Bank, Westpac and the Commonwealth Bank (including Bankwest) have paid more than $33 million in refunds to the customers identified. Three-of-those-four banks have committed to refunds to a broader group of low-income customers who have been in high-fee accounts. The Commonwealth Bank and Bankwest have indicated they don't intend making payments to customers outside the initial cohort, ASIC's report said. Several other banks have also reviewed the impact of high-fee accounts on low-income customers and have committed to remediation. A further $60 million will be refunded to more than 770,000 customers as a result. ASIC chairman Joe Longo said while banks had made improvements during the commission's surveillance, there was still work to be done. 'It should not take an ASIC review to force $93 million in refunds or make banks assess their processes to ensure the trust and expectations placed in them are justified,' he said. 'Banks need to truly hear the messages in this report - read it, review it, and ask themselves some difficult questions about what led to this situation.' Nine banks had made it easier to access low-fee accounts, while another seven had improved processes for moving customers to those types of accounts. Six more banks were now collecting data to identify First Nations customers, following a recommendations from the commission's initial review. 'Our intervention has forced many banks to take action, but more needs to be done to ensure financially vulnerable consumers are not put in this position again,' Mr Kirkland said. 'We encourage consumers to challenge their banks to ensure that they are in the best account for their needs. 'More importantly, we encourage banks to do more to proactively identify low- income customers and move them to low-fee accounts.'