DA rejects Simelane, Nkabane departmental budgets
This after the party this week voted against budgets of the departments of human settlements and higher education led by Thembi Simelane-Nkadimeng and Nobuhle Nkabane respectively.
This decision was taken as a direct response to President Cyril Ramaphosa axing trade and industry deputy minister Andrew Whitfield, of the DA, last week for defying his order that none of the members of his executive were allowed to go to the US at the height of the diplomatic tensions between the two countries.
The DA in response argued that Ramaphosa had been harsh on Whitfield and that it was not acceptable that he fired him for such a minor transgression while he still kept Simelane and Nkabane in his cabinet.
Unlike Whitfield, the DA argued, Simelane was accused of corruption and Nkabane stood accused of lying to parliament. Instead of dealing with the two ministers who were facing serious allegations, Ramaphosa decided to axe Whitfield for going on a trip without getting permission, the DA argued.
DA MP Luyolo Mphithi on Wednesday said his party was voting against Simelane's budget vote because of the corruption allegations she was facing.
Mphithi said the DA was concerned that instead of firing Simelane, Ramaphosa had moved her from the department of justice to human settlements.
'You'd think that the response to this that the president would have shown minister Simelane the door, he did not. He asked for the report that he stayed with for three months,' said Mphithi. 'And even though the DA sustained pressure asking the president to act, he lacked courage to act and instead decided to dump minister Simelane at human settlements, one of the most important departments for South Africans.'
'It seems that this president does not take an issue with the fact that a person accused of corruption sits in his cabinet and will have to look after a budget of R30bn that is set aside for South Africans,' he said.
Ideally, Mphithi said, the DA would not have a problem with voting for the department of human settlements' budget as it relates to people's housing and security but they could not do it because of the allegations faced by Simelane.
'The DA will always support the granting of funds to house the vulnerable at the same time fast-tracking jobs and growth to give many more South Africans the dignity of being able to buy and own their own houses,' he said. 'And though this budget and the department have many challenges under normal circumstances it would be supported. However, we sit with a minister who faces corruption allegations who has not been accountable to the South African public. And it is because of this we struggle support this particular budget.'
Mphithi and the MK Party's Thulani Gumede raised several issues with the human settlements budget presented by Simelane, saying it was not dealing with some of the key issues faced by South Africans in the sector.
'A critical examination reveals a fundamental flaw, an overall real decline in the department's budget. None of its five main programmes demonstrates above-inflation increases,' said Gumede.
'This systemic underfunding of human settlements initiatives will inevitably worsen existing backlogs and impair the progressive realisation of adequate housing.'
He said his party could not vote for as it would mean they accepted the decrease in allocation.
'I asserted during the committee meeting last week and I reiterate now that this draft budget must be rejected. It's real term decline across key programmes particularly in integrated human settlements and informal settlements upgrading directly contradicts the constitutional obligation to provide adequate housing and the strategic goals of the national development plans,' he said.
'Accepting this budget will constitute a retreat from addressing deeply entrenched structural inequalities and the pressing needs of the vulnerable communities for basic services and dignified living conditions.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
29 minutes ago
- IOL News
Trump tariffs a stone in the shoe of 'made in USA' cowboy boots
Ryan Vaughan, the CEO of Rio of Mercedes cowboy boot factory tests ostrich leather in Mercedes, Texas. In an unusual consequence of Donald Trump's tariffs, cowboy boots "made in the USA" will suffer from the 30% tariff due to come into force on South Africa, which produces the overwhelming majority of the ostrich leather so prized for these boots. The manufacture of iconic "made in the USA" cowboy boots is set to suffer from President Donald Trump's 30-percent tariffs on South African exports that came into force in August. Texas's most renowned makers of the southern US fashion staple source the ostrich leather they require exclusively from Oudtshoorn. Known as the world's "ostrich capital", Oudtshoorn is home to a few hundred thousand people and about as many of the giant flightless birds. "We just don't know how bad the impact will be, but positive it wouldn't be," said ostrich farmer Laubscher Coetzee of the tariffs that kicked in after South Africa appeared unable to negotiate a new trade deal with Trump. More than half of the global supply of ostrich-derived products - from feathers to leather and meat - comes from nearly 200 farmers around Oudtshoorn who are joined in the Cape Karoo International (CKI) group, said its managing director Francois de Wet. South Africa supplies about 70 percent of the world's production, he said. Luxury handbag manufacturers in France and Italy are among the CKI's main clients. It also ships 20 percent of its ostrich leather to top Texas bootmakers such as Lucchese, Justin and Rios of Mercedes, whose boots are sold at several hundreds of dollars a pair. Ostrich is "an extremely important leather in our industry", Ryan Vaughan, CEO of the Rios of Mercedes manufacturer, said. "It's very resilient, it forms to the foot," he said, wearing a typical cowboy hat. Coming from "a long line of cattle ranchers", his family brand was born in Texas in 1853 and employs 250 people. The tariffs "would make a dramatic impact in our business and in the western industry," he said, "because it's not just us that build a lot of cowboy boots out of ostrich leather". It is also the case of Tony Lama, an El Paso bootmaker supplied by CKI that has given a pair to every recent Republican president. Donald Trump received cowboy boots emblazoned with "MAGA" made out of "American alligator" skin. De Wet from the CKI said he believed the South African supply of ostrich leather to the US manufacturers did not run counter to a push by the Trump administration for production to be brought home. The United States did not have enough ostriches to provide the required leather, he said. "We export the raw material, the ostrich leather. They can't produce it from local ostriches in the US. They don't have them," he said. "They do all the value-adding in the United States," he said. "So therefore, in terms of the pure definition of what the Trump administration would like to see, in this case, we do it already." The soft skins, recognisable by spots left by the large ostrich feathers, are currently sold to American manufacturers for around $20 a square foot. "We exported more than the usual volume of ostrich leather to the US in the past two-three months, so we have a little bit of a buffer," said de Wet. "For the moment we don't expect any layoffs in the short term," he said. But "in the long term, if we have to pick up the full tariff, it will definitely... cause a shrinkage of our business." The consumer could also not be expected to pay an extra 30 percent for the already pricey boots, he said. "So the tariff will have to be split between the exporter... and the importer, and preferably also a part paid by the end consumer." It is the unique climate of the Little Karoo, which gets less than 400 millimetres of rain a year, that makes it ideal for ostrich rearing, said Coetzee, a fourth-generation Oudtshoorn farmer. "That is the reason the ostrich industry is still here 200 years after (it started)," he said. His great-grandfather built the family home in 1896, when the price of ostrich feathers rivalled that of gold because of their value to the women's fashion industry. The extravagant "ostrich palaces" of the time are a reminder of the industry's previous major crisis, when the market collapsed in the early 1900s as the arrival of the low-roofed motor car ended the fashion for high-feathered hats. | AFP
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Leveraging G20 presidency: South Africa's path to bridging the digital divide
How can South Africa navigate the complexities of the digital economy during its G20 presidency? Experts weigh in on the lessons to be learned from global counterparts amid pressing challenges. Image: IOL / Ron AI The experts have weighed in on the digital economy and digital divide in the G20, giving voice to where exactly South Africa finds itself in the global geo-digital landscape and what it can learn from other countries. South Africa's G20 presidency takes place when the world is facing a series of overlapping and mutually reinforcing crises, including climate change, underdevelopment, inequality, poverty, hunger, unemployment, technological changes, and geopolitical instability. The country has embraced the theme 'Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability' for its G20 presidency, but has also incorporated the spirit of Ubuntu. On the G20 website, it states: 'Countries that attempt to prosper alone amid widespread poverty and underdevelopment contradict the essence of Ubuntu and our collective humanity.' Tackling the conversation of the digital divide and digital economy, Associate Professor Jonathan Shock of the University of Cape Town's Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics has explained that while we can look to other countries and their strategies, the South African landscape has its own demands. 'Countries like Estonia have surged forward with building a strong digital economy, and there are certainly lessons to be learned from them. Estonia prioritised data protection laws before they built the technological infrastructure on top; they also built national platforms, like the X-Road secure data exchange layer, which foster interoperability, mitigating potentially siloed solutions which don't speak to each other. 'Singapore has created national digital training programmes (the SkillsFuture credit programme), industry-academia partnerships, and constant monitoring to understand the effects of their interventions,' Shock said. Associate Professor Jonathan Shock of the University of Cape Town's Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics. Image: Shock Lab / Website 'India is the country that has most quickly built up a digital ID system, which was rolled out to around 600 million citizens over four years. This has allowed for more financial inclusion in national benefits and unlocked high economic value. However, such a system, if built, has to be done with the appropriate level of cybersecurity awareness,' he said. 'This is a non-trivial task, and there are reasonable questions about privacy, gaps in the legal frameworks, and potential security vulnerabilities.' Shock explained that it is vital to study how digital economies have been implemented around the world, then adapt these solutions to build our own. He added that AI is a potentially powerful technology when used carefully, and, with training, can empower people to create their own businesses. 'It is easier than ever for someone to use AI to build their own app, create their own digital services, connect with customers or develop effective marketing strategies, but without access to training, those potential entrepreneurs will not necessarily know that such possibilities exist.' Shock said SA needs to celebrate its diversity and richness, as well as see the need to grow our own digital solutions, which takes investment in personnel, in infrastructure, and in data. 'We need to learn from the mistakes that other countries have made, in how resources are exploited - be they data, energy, or people - and see that there are other ways forward. We also need to understand the importance of data sovereignty and the colonial patterns of data extractivism.' CEO of LeanTechnovations, Rowen Pillai, said that across the G20, the digital divide isn't just who's connected, but rather who can afford to participate at quality. Pillai explained that even in advanced economies, rural users still trail cities on speed and reliability; in emerging markets, the bigger wall is the affordability of devices and data. 'We should shift from counting towers and instead start measuring meaningful connectivity for metrics like latency, speed, reliability, affordability, and safety at a district level, and tie budgets to closing those gaps,' Pillai said. CEO of LeanTechnovations, Rowen Pillai, said that across the G20, the digital divide isn't just who's connected, but rather who can afford to participate at quality. Image: Supplied 'A major part of the challenge is to move from pilots to scale, set outcome-based Scale Gates tied to meaningful connectivity. When a pilot hits district targets on speed/latency/reliability, affordability, and safe use, it should trigger a multi-year rollout via public procurement or blended finance. 'We balance private investment with universal service by modernising Universal Service Funds (USFs) into transparent, outcome-based tenders, pairing spectrum with pay-or-play rural obligations and co-funding neutral-host/backhaul, and by publishing quarterly district scorecards so operators are paid on verified improvements, not just availability,' Pillai said. 'In parallel, align the Digital Economy Working Group agenda: connectivity + digital public infrastructure + Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises ecosystems + equitable AI and require green siting and disclosure as standard, because AI-era data centres compete for the same power and water communities rely on.' Pillai said that the country should run a two-track strategy to adopt global best-practice governance now, and scale green, affordable compute at home. 'On governance, align local guidance to the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST's) AI Risk Management Framework (which is practical, risk-based, sector-agnostic) and map cross-border work to the EU AI Act timelines that will matter to our exporters. That gives South African firms clarity without slowing innovation. 'On capability, we should leverage the AI Institute of South Africa hubs, the AI Collective South Africa (or similar) to rapidly build skills in safety, evaluation, and domain-specific AI (health, mining, agriculture), and establish an open evaluation centre that small firms can use to test models and datasets. Then we co-site compute with renewables, publish power and water intensity transparently, and make green PPAs(Power Purchase Agreements) a default for any hyperscale installations,' Pillai said. 'This is how we grow AI adoption while protecting constrained grids and water systems.' [email protected]
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Parliamentary committees to engage Lamola, Motshekga on SANDF chief's remarks in Iran
Mayibongwe Maqhina | Published 2 days ago The parliamentary Committees on Defence and International Relations and Cooperation plans to engage with Minister Angie Motshekga and Ronald Lamola over comments made by SANDF Chief, General Rudzani Maphwanya during his recent visit to Iran. This will be after President Cyril Ramaphosa has scheduled a meeting with Maphwanya. Maphwanya caused a storm last week when it emerged that during a visit to Tehran he pledged 'common goals' with Iran and claimed his trip carried 'a political message'. His trip, sanctioned by Motshekga, took place amid tensions between South and the US with President Donald Trump imposing a 30% tariff on South African goods. The Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Defence and Military Veterans, Dakota Legoete, and the Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on International Relations, Supra Mahumapelo, noted with concern Maphwanya's remarks during his visit to Iran. Legoete and Mahumapelo also noted with alarm that the Department of International Relations and Cooperation has publicly distanced itself from the General's comments while the Presidency described the visit as 'ill advised'. They said the committees will have a joint meeting to engage with Lamola and Motshekga on the issue. Legoete said it was evident that there was a worrying lack of coordination between defence diplomacy and South Africa's official foreign policy. 'This disjuncture exposes potential misalignment and cohesion in the country's approach to international relations,' he said. Legoete added that the Department of Defence should draw long-term lessons from these events and ensure thorough alignment, going forward. He further stressed that the committee awaits the outcome of engagements between Ramaphosa in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the SANDF, Motshekga and SANDF leadership. 'These engagements must demonstrate unity, strength and synergy in how South Africa conducts itself on the international stage.' Legoete reiterated the committee's stance that 'the SANDF must remain a professional and apolitical institution, focusing squarely on its constitutional mandate to safeguard the Republic, while steering away from statements in the political domain'. Last Thursday, the Presidency said Ramaphosa was unaware about the 'ill advised' visit by Maphwanywa to Iran. Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Magwenya stated that Ramaphosa did not sanction Maphwanya's visit as Motshekga approved the travel. 'As much as the president is the appointing authority and the commander in chief, he does not get involved in supervising the general's travel. That process sits with the minister. So the President did not know.' Both the Department of International Relations and Cooperation and Defence have distanced themselves from Maphwanya's remarks, citing that Ramaphosa and Dirco were custodians of foreign policy. Magwenya said Ramaphosa will meet Maphwanya within the next week regarding his 'ill-advised' trip. 'I can't say when that meeting will happen, but there will be an engagement between the President and the general. So it's still early to say what the outcome of that engagement will be.' He would not comment on the possible consequence for the defence chief amid calls by the DA for him to be hauled before a court martial. [email protected]
