How VCs are navigating Europe's defence spending push
By Elizabeth Howcroft, Supantha Mukherjee and Michael Kahn
PARIS/STOCKHOLM/PRAGUE (Reuters) -As venture capital investors look to profit from Europe's defence spending boom, speculators hunting for the next unicorn need to navigate hurdles such as EU sustainability guidelines and difficulties for start-ups in a market dominated by large prime contractors.
The European Union has earmarked up to 800 billion euros ($920 billion) for defence through 2030 with a bulk of that amount expected to go to prime contractors such as France's Airbus or Germany's Rheinmetall.
But with large defence contractors focused on meeting record demand due to the war in Ukraine, investors and start-up founders are betting that defence technology startups can fill an innovation gap in Europe, developing technology and driving growth and possibly attracting the attention of those big players later on.
"We think it's an important trend and we're investing behind it," said Sequoia investor Julien Bek. His firm invested $15.5 million in German autonomous drone company STARK in October 2024, according to PitchBook.
Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine and U.S. President Donald Trump's prodding of NATO countries to raise defence spending to 5% of gross domestic product from a current 2% have spurred the EU to ramp up its military spending plans.
It has also drawn venture capital funding into European defence tech, which hit $1 billion in 2024, up from a modest $373 million in 2022. That is up fivefold since 2020, yet Europe's defence tech sector has produced just three unicorns - startups with a valuation of $1 billion - and last year attracted just 1.7% of the venture capital money in Europe, according to startup data provider Dealroom. HURDLES Among the biggest barriers to entry for venture capital targeting defence tech in Europe are strict EU ESG rules, which forbid investment in lethal, single-use technology, according to more than a dozen investors, companies and government officials interviewed by Reuters. Many funds receive individual state government or EU backing, which in most cases precludes them from investing in defence. Despite the EU's support for Ukraine, only Estonia and Finland have established government-backed funds allowing for investments into lethal, single-use technology. Borys Musielak, managing partner at Smok Ventures, a U.S. VC firm based in Warsaw, said rules there had prompted funds like his to invest in cybersecurity. "In Poland nearly every fund has some part of it government or European funding, which makes it difficult to invest in defence," he said. Jan-Hendrik Boelens, CEO of Munich-based Alpine Eagle, which develops counter-drone systems, the topic of ESG represents a hurdle that remains for investors and startups.
"There are changes on the way, but I can't say that they've happened yet, at least not to the extent that they should," he said, referring to governments or investors changing policies to facilitate more defence investment. "If you are not a pure weapon of war, as it is called, then I think that is very fundable. If you cross this line into actually becoming a lethal weapon, that might still be very difficult to fund." DUAL-USE TECHNOLOGIES Some VCs seek to avoid ESG restrictions by targeting so-called "dual-use" technologies that have civilian as well as military applications. Such technologies include computer vision where AI mimics human vision to interpret visual information, robots, cybersecurity software and autonomous drones. All three of Europe's defence tech unicorns – German battlefield software firm Helsing, German drone maker Quantum Systems and Portuguese drone company Tekever – market themselves as dual-use. Sten Tamkivi is a partner in Tallinn- and London-based investment platform Plural, which has invested in Helsing. "We and our limited partner base are aligned with the idea that defending the future of our democracies is a moral good, but some investor bases at other firms say lethal is not okay," Tamkivi told Reuters. London-based VC firm Balderton in 2025 led a 160 million euro funding round by Munich-based Quantum Systems. "Why this one? I think it's serendipity, right team, right company, right timing," said Rana Yared, a general partner at Balderton. "We passed on almost everything that we had looked at up until that point," she said. Founded in 2015, Quantum Systems' AI-operated reconnaissance drones provide real-time battlefield intelligence and are being used in Ukraine. "We have shown we can deliver due to three years at the battlefront, with more than 800 systems in Ukraine," Quantum Systems co-CEO Sven Kruck told Reuters. "The defence market is getting hotter," he said. "Every investor is now creating a defence fund." Last month the company raised 160 million euros to take its total funding to 310 million euros. It also reached unicorn status, as did Tekever. RULE CHANGES? With its increased defence spending plans, the European Commission is also looking to rewrite the rules to allow more investors to participate and individual governments are doing the same. The Commission has said next week it will propose giving governments more flexibility on defence procurement, which is another challenge startups face.
They also need to contend with figuring out how to connect to and sell to the big players and governments who represent the majority of the customer base, investors say. In Finland, the country's pension agency, the Finnish Industry Investment Ltd, has removed a clause that had prevented it from investing in defence. Prague-based Presto Ventures in partnership with Czech arms maker CSG launched a 150 million euro fund last year, which is able to invest in single-use technology. "With dual-use you don't have one market you are focusing on, but you have two, so you have to solve problems and needs of two markets," said Vojta Rocek, a partner at Presto Ventures.
($1 = 0.8687 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
44 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why Capital Flows To The U.S. Could Slow
A stack of 250$ and 1000$ dollar bills, US, 1987. (Photo by) U.S. financial markets are calm now, with stocks rallying in the past two months and bond yields stabilizing following a 90-day reprieve in tariffs that expires on July 8. However, the U.S. dollar is more precarious, as it sank to its lowest level in three years on Thursday, according to the Financial Times. The dollar's weakening occurred after President Donald Trump told reporters he would send letters to trading partners outlining new tariff rates in the next few weeks. This occurred as investors were digesting a trade truce between the U.S. and China announced on Wednesday and rising tensions between Israel and Iran. The dollar has now depreciated by nearly 10 percent on a trade-weighted basis against key currencies this year. Moreover, it remains under pressure against the euro, even though the European Central Bank has lowered official interest rates by two percentage points over the past year while the Federal Reserve has kept interest rates unchanged. This development indicates that global investors are now requiring a greater interest-rate premium to hold dollars than before. Looking ahead, the ECB is nearing the end of its easing cycle while the Fed could lower rates if the U.S. economy succumbs to the higher tariffs and supply chain disruptions that are now in effect. If so, it could weaken the dollar further, although the impact on financial markets would likely be benign. Two other possibilities, however, could be more troubling for U.S. financial markets. One risk is that global investors are now questioning whether America is a reliable partner on trade and security issues, and they are assessing whether the U.S. is as attractive an investment haven as in the past. The change in perception is occurring when the net international investment position of the U.S. is at an all-time low (see chart below). This metric captures the difference between U.S. residents' foreign financial assets and liabilities (including stocks, bonds and tangible assets). For example, The Economist reports that at the end of 2024, foreigners owned $62 trillion worth of American assets (including derivatives) compared with $36 trillion owned abroad by Americans. This represents a net deficit position for the U.S. of $26 trillion, equivalent to 90 percent of GDP. U.S. Net International Investment Position (trillions of dollars) US International Investment Position ($ Trillions) This does not necessarily mean the U.S. will encounter difficulty attracting international capital to finance its trade and budget imbalances. As the FRED Blog of Oct. 7 explains, the deficit in the U.S. net international investment position widened steadily since the 2008 Financial Crisis, yet the dollar was strong throughout most of the period. The primary reason is that U.S. equity valuations increased substantially than for international equities. Consequently, the dollar strengthened as foreign investors were attracted by the favorable performance of U.S. stocks. Recent developments, however, suggest global markets may be at a turning point: Foreign equities have outperformed U.S. stocks while the dollar has weakened so far this year. This became a concern in early April, when U.S. stocks and bonds plummeted along with the dollar after Trump announced reciprocal tariffs on America's trading partners. As I noted in a previous commentary, it forced President Trump to grant a 90- day waiver in implementing the tariffs and it incented him to strike a trade deal with China. While these actions were well received by investors, a new issue has surfaced recently. Namely, a provision in the budget bill House Republicans passed last month could lower returns foreign investors earn on their U.S. assets. Section 899 of the House bill would authorize the U.S. Treasury to impose penalties on 'applicable persons' from 'discriminatory countries' by increasing U.S. federal income tax and withholding rates incrementally from 5% up to 20% on their U.S. investments. The tax would apply to dividends paid to foreign shareholders, profits from foreign firms based in the U.S., and proceeds earned by foreigners on property sales in the U.S. The provision targets countries with 'unfair foreign taxes' such as digital services taxes imposed by some EU members and the U.K. that mainly impact U.S. tech giants. It could also apply to countries that tax U.S. multinationals that have operations in tax havens. This represents an attempt by the Trump administration to undo the OECD Global Tax Deal that established a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15% for large multinational corporations. Because the Section 899 provision penalizes investment and business income earned by foreigners, critics view it as a 'revenge tax' that President Trump could use to bully countries in trade negotiations. In his congressional testimony last week, Scott Bessent supported the proposal on grounds that it was necessary to defend U.S. fiscal sovereignty. He said, 'This bill will allow us to prevent our corporate revenues from being drained into foreign treasuries, and that is in the hundreds of billions of dollars.' According to the scoring for the tax bill, the provision could raise $116 billion in federal revenues over 10 years. U.S. Treasuries probably will be exempted from Section 899. However, foreign buyers, who collectively hold $9 trillion of Treasury bonds, could be wary of the rules being changed in the future. If so, the cost of financing the massive federal budget deficit could be higher. Financial markets have not reacted to the provision thus far partly because it is obscure, and the Senate could modify it. However, other proposals reportedly are under consideration that include taxing sovereign wealth funds and possibly invoking Section 891 of the tax code. The latter would grant the President authority to double tax rates on citizens and corporations of foreign countries that are deemed to be subject to discriminatory or extraterritorial practices. Amid this, investors are left wondering whether, after launching a global trade war, the U.S. government is opening a new front on taxes that could impact the flow of international capital. While it is too soon to tell, it has added to the uncertainty about U.S. international policies.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Innovative Molecules Completes Enrollment of Phase 1b Clinical Trial of IM-250
Innovative Molecules GmbH Announces Completion of Phase 1b Enrollment for IM-250 in Genital Herpes Clinical Trial MUNICH, June 16, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Innovative Molecules GmbH today announced the completion of enrollment in the Phase 1b portion of its ongoing Phase 1b/2a clinical trial evaluating IM-250, a next-generation helicase-primase inhibitor targeting herpes simplex virus (HSV). This placebo-controlled study is designed to assess the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of once-weekly oral dosing of IM-250 in patients with recurrent genital herpes. The successful completion of Phase 1b enrollment marks a key inflection point in the program, supporting the continued clinical development of IM-250 and its potential to reshape a market that has seen little therapeutic innovation in over four decades. "Completing Phase 1b enrollment represents a significant milestone not only for our clinical program but also for patients who continue to face the burden of recurrent genital herpes with limited treatment options," said Dr. Anja Glaessing, Head of Medical Affairs at Innovative Molecules. Topline results from the Phase 1b portion of the study are expected in H2, 2025. About IM-250 IM-250 is a novel, orally available, selective HSV-helicase primase inhibitor. Helicase primase inhibitors block DNA unwinding in the replication fork during viral DNA-replication by a potentially uncompetitive mechanism of action. IM-250, due to its optimized molecular structure, is likely to improve target tissue penetration (neural and brain tissue), achieving adequate therapeutic exposure at the site of HSV reservoir. About Innovative Molecules Innovative Molecules GmbH is a drug development company based in Munich, Germany. With the aim to set a new treatment standard for herpes simplex induced diseases, the company is focused on the development of IM-250, a potent, second-generation helicase-primase inhibitor of HSV-1 and HSV-2. For more information visit Logo - View original content: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
EIB provides $1bn for Bay of Biscay electricity interconnection project
The European Investment Bank (EIB) has committed €1.6bn ($1bn) for the construction of the Bay of Biscay electricity interconnection, which will increase power exchange capacity between Spain and France. The project is part of efforts to strengthen cross-border connections and improve energy security within Europe. The Bay of Biscay interconnection, designated by the European Union (EU) as a Project of Common Interest, is being executed by Inelfe, a joint venture between Red Eléctrica and Réseau Transport d'Électricité. The project aims to connect two alternating current systems through a submarine direct current line. Conversion stations located in Cubnezais, France, and Gatika, Spain, will transform the direct current back into alternating current for integration with the respective national transmission grids. The first loan tranches totalling €1.2bn ($1bn) have been signed at the EIB headquarters in Luxembourg. The financial support complements a substantial EU grant of €578m ($666m) allocated under the Connecting Europe Facility. Together with initiatives such as Baixas-Santa Llogaia underground project and improvements to the Argia-Hernani infrastructure, the project aims to strengthen the Iberian Peninsula's integration into the EU energy market. Construction work on the project is underway and it is expected to become operational in 2028. Once active, the project will almost double the France-Spain electricity exchange capacity to 5GW while reducing carbon emissions by 600kt annually. The Bay of Biscay project aligns with broader objectives such as meeting EU interconnection targets, stipulating that member states must have at least 15% installed production capacity interconnected by 2030. "EIB provides $1bn for Bay of Biscay electricity interconnection project" was originally created and published by Power Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
