Homeland security revokes legal status for those who entered US via Biden-era CBP One app
Migrants who were temporarily allowed to live in the United States after having entered the country via a Biden-era online appointment app have been told to leave 'immediately', officials said on Monday. It was unclear how many beneficiaries would be affected.
Since January 2023, more than 900,000 people were allowed in the US after using the CBP One app to schedule appointments with immigration officials and apply for asylum. They were generally allowed to remain for two years with authorization to work under a presidential authority called parole while awaiting their cases to be heard.
'Canceling these paroles is a promise kept to the American people to secure our borders and protect national security,' the Department of Homeland Security's media affairs unit said in response to questions.
Authorities confirmed termination notices were sent to CBP One beneficiaries but did not say how many.
Those receiving notices were urged to voluntary self-deport using the same app they entered on, which has been renamed CBP Home.
'It's time for you to abandon the United States,' the Department of Homeland Security wrote to a Honduran family that entered the US at the end of last year. The Associated Press reviewed the email received on Sunday.
Others shared the same email on social media platforms.
Al Otro Lado, a non-profit organization that provides legal aid to migrants, said some who received the revocation letters are from Honduras, El Salvador and Mexico.
CBP One was a cornerstone of the Biden administration's strategy to create and expand legal pathways to enter the United States in an attempt to discourage illegal border crossings.
By the end of December, 936,500 people had been allowed to enter with CBP One appointments at border crossings with Mexico. Donald Trump ended CBP One for new entrants on his first day in office, stranding thousands in Mexico who had appointments into early February.
Trump has ended and revoked temporary status for many who benefited under Joe Biden's policies. Homeland security said on Monday that Biden's use of parole authority – more than any president since it was created in 1952 – 'further fueled the worst border crisis in US history'.
Homeland security said last month that it was revoking another form of parole for 532,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela who flew to the country at their own expense with a financial sponsor. It ends on 24 April.
The Trump administration has also announced an end to temporary protected status (TPS) for 600,000 Venezuelans and about 500,00 Haitians, though a federal judge temporarily put that on hold, including for about 350,000 Venezuelans who had been scheduled to lose TPS on Monday. TPS is granted in 18-month increments to people already in the US whose countries are deemed unsafe for return due to natural disaster or civil strife.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Coast Guard sharpshooter Peter Stinson who made threats to kill Donald Trump is freed from prison
The former US Coastguard lieutenant charged with making online threats to kill Donald Trump has been bailed on condition that he declares his home gun-free and pays for his internet use to be monitored, can reveal. Trained sharpshooter Peter Stinson, 63, was arrested on Friday charged with making a slew of disturbing social media posts against the President, including saying he needed to be 'Luigied,' a reference to Luigi Mangione, the man accused of killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in cold blood on a New York City street. But in a hearing on Wednesday, federal magistrate judge Ivan Davis said he will order the self-declared Antifa activist released on home detention provided he reveals the whereabouts of his father's 22 rifle, among other conditions. The judge's release order came despite strong objections by prosecutors, who argued that Stinson was 'dangerous' to the president and the wider public. Prosecutor Natasha Smalky pointed to a chilling February 2025 online post in which Stinson allegedly asked 'How much collateral damage is appropriate? If, say, two of the top three targets can be completed, what sort of collateral damage is ok.' He is said to have followed up with a second post justifying it by saying: 'I'd say other fascists and [orange emoticon] sycophants are fair game for sure'. A raid of Stinson's home in Oakton, Virginia, by federal investigators last week found only two BB guns – and an empty safe in his truck – but the decorated veteran of three decades had also told agents he was looking after his father's rifle, which they could not locate. A copy of the order obtained by states Stinson – who has no valid passport – is banned from obtaining a new passport or travel document, must remain at his home except for court-sanctioned exceptions and 'refrain from having contact or affiliation with any extremist organizations'. Wednesday's hearing Federal Court in Alexandria, Virginia, was told Stinson expressed interest in traveling to Uruguay and used Signal and Proton email, the encrypted communication messaging apps and stated the benefits were the messages could self-destruct. The court also heard how Stinson's partner left their home when he was arrested and had refused to be a third-party custodian if he was granted home detention – a condition the prosecution had pushed for and the judge denied. Stinson was told that if he commits a federal felony while awaiting trial he would face additional penalties of up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine tacked on to whatever sentence he received. Prosecutors argued for Stinson's continued detention, highlighting the large number of online threats over several years and their 'increasing specificity and escalation' around the time of the Butler assassination attempt on Trump and the Inauguration. Stinson's lawyers argued his posts were 'political hyberbole' and there was no single online statement in which he used the word 'I' and threatened to harm or kill the president. In a court memo arguing for his pre-trial release on Tuesday, Stinson's public defender characterized the 57-year-old Virginia father's threatening comments about Trump as mere 'political advocacy' that should be protected by his First Amendment rights. Attorney Geremy Kamens argued that Stinson, a trained sharpshooter, has engaged in 'abstract' political commentary on social media over several years and had no 'specific' or 'imminent' plans to harm the president. He is listed on LinkedIn as a coordinator for the MayDay Movement, which has the goal of impeaching and removing Trump as 47th U.S. president Stinson, who served in the Coast Guard for 33 years, was arrested on Monday after a 19-page FBI affidavit alleged he made a series of threats against Trump between April 2020 and June 11, 2025. Describing Stinson as a 'devoted father of five children' with 'deep ties to his community', Kamens pointed out that his client has no 'significant' prior criminal history and does not pose a flight risk or danger to the community. In an extraordinary statement, Kamens also noted that Stinson 'repeatedly disclaimed his own ability to carry out violence', which he argues 'demonstrates' that his posts 'constitute political hyperbole' and 'disclaim any personal intention to engage in violent conduct'. The apparent disclaimers were in reference to the posts in which Stinson stated he lacks the 'skills' and is 'not a good enough shot' and would serve only in a 'support capacity.' Stinson also allegedly made graphic threats against Trump on multiple social media platforms involving guns, knives and poisoning. Stinson served in the United States Coast Guard for 33 years from 1988 until 2021. He was a sharpshooter and an instructor with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) during that time. He is listed on LinkedIn as a coordinator for the MayDay Movement, which has the goal of impeaching and removing Trump as president. Stinson also made several references online to '8647,' which government officials recognized as a reference to an Instagram post made by former FBI Director James Comey. To '86' means to cancel or get rid of something. Many interpreted Comey's post as a threat against Trump, who was the 45th and is now the 47th president. Stinson's arrest comes amid heightened scrutiny by federal prosecutors, who are taking an aggressive approach to threats against the president and other government officials, following previous assassination attempts on Trump. Thomas Matthew Crooks shot Trump in the ear in an assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024. Crooks was taken out by counter snipers – but not before the shooter killed a rally attendee and badly injured two others. Based on the timing of that attempt on Trump's life and Stinson's social media posts, investigators found that the former Coast Guard officer was referencing the attack when he wrote: 'A missed opportunity will not come around again.' Stinson referenced online on February 6, 2025 that he didn't have the 'necessary skills' to carry out an assassination and claimed that many people and groups were plotting action. He suggested, however, in other posts that he does have those skills. The court documents come as neighbors in the quiet rural enclave in Oakton, Virginia, where Stinson lives with his wife, two high-school aged sons and their dog Betty-Lou, told of the dramatic moment FBI agents and an armored vehicle swooped on the property on Friday evening at about 5pm. One neighbor, who did not want to be named, said about 10 FBI agents in multiple unmarked vehicles with blacked out windows took over the three-bedroom house for several hours. Some of the agents were wearing heavy military fatigues, he said, but he understood they were conducting a federal search warrant. Another said when she saw an 'aggressive' armored vehicle roll into the street – which appeared to have a machine gun mounted on the back – she took her family into their basement. 'We didn't know what was happening at this stage, and we were fearful of a shootout,' she said. The locals said they did not see Stinson detained by the authorities, but that his younger son was at home during the search as they saw him standing at the top of the street Many interpreted '86 47' as a threat against Trump, since '86' means to get rid of something and Trump is the 47th president Neighbors believe the FBI had been scoping out the house – which is set back from the road in a wooded glade – all day on Friday, as they'd seen several unfamiliar cars driving down the road. Documents show Stinson was arrested in Fairfax county, on Friday before news broke of the charges against him this week. Locals were in disbelief at the charges levied against Stinson, who they described as an 'unassuming, quiet guy' and a 'nice, down-to-earth man'. 'There was nothing that gave me cause to think he'd be accused of anything like that, but we didn't really know them too well,' one said. They said Stinson and his family had been renting their home for about a year-and-a-half and 'kept themselves to themselves'. Another neighbor, who did not want to be identified, said: 'I met him on Halloween, it was a two-second conversation, he seemed nice. 'So when Friday happened, I was like, "Ok holy cow, what's going on", but they [the authorities] didn't tell us anything. 'I went outside to take out the recycling and saw them up there, and was like oh "do I need to move my vehicles?" They were like "no" and I was like "Am I safe?" and they said "you're fine". 'My husband called me earlier because he heard news of it on the radio, I only just found out what it was about today. I didn't even know his name. 'It's kind of crazy. You never know who's living next door, but unfortunately this is a time when there's a lot of people upset with a lot of things on both ways.'
NBC News
35 minutes ago
- NBC News
The political tug-of-war at the center of Trump's Iran decision: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, Andrea Mitchell breaks down the critical decision facing President Donald Trump on the Israel-Iran conflict. Plus, Lawrence Hurley examines the questions that a major Supreme Court ruling on transgender rights left unanswered. Programming note: We're taking a break for Juneteenth tomorrow and will be back in your inbox on Friday, June 20. — Adam Wollner By Andrea Mitchell As President Donald Trump considers whether the U.S. will strike Iran — likely the most important decision of his second term, one that could remake the landscape of the Middle East — allies and adversaries are taking sides, both at home and abroad. 'I may do it. I may not do it,' Trump told reporters outside the White House earlier today. 'Nobody knows what I'm going to do.' The president openly admired the effectiveness of Israel's initial airstrikes against Iran, even though Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu clearly launched his strikes to interrupt Trump's nuclear diplomacy with Tehran. But after being rebuffed in April when he sought Trump's approval for a joint operation against Iran's nuclear program, Netanyahu could be on the verge of persuading an American president to provide the B-2s to deliver the 30,000-pound 'bunker buster' bombs capable of penetrating the concrete fortress believed to conceal Tehran's most dangerous stockpile of nearly-weapons-grade uranium, based on new Israeli intelligence. Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said on MSNBC today that conflicts with a briefing to Congress this week that the U.S. intelligence has not changed: Iran has not decided to build a nuclear weapon. Israel's argument is that it's now or never. It has decapitated two of Iran's proxies — Hezbollah and Hamas — and toppled the Assad regime in Syria, and its retaliatory strikes last year eliminated many of Iran's air defenses. Israel's air force could damage Iran's above-ground nuclear sites and missile bases if it struck now, before Iran repairs its defenses, but can't eliminate the nuclear threat without U.S. bombs and bombers to reach the most critical underground facility. That has created a political tug-of-war for the heart and mind of Trump, who has publicly yearned for the Nobel Prize, seeing himself as a peacemaker who could bring Iran back into the community of non-terrorist nations and avoid another 'forever war.' Fighting that vision is his competing impulse to join Israel in eliminating the nuclear threat once and for all. And Tehran's leaders clearly misjudged how patient Trump would be with their refusal to compromise in the negotiations. Russian President Vladimir Putin remains on the sidelines, preoccupied with his own war. Jordan's King Abdullah II and French President Emmanuel Macron strongly oppose U.S. involvement. Trump has been consulting Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the Gulf's most influential leader. At home, the MAGA base is divided, with Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., leading the hawks and a growing cohort of Republican isolationists — even in Trump's Cabinet — opposed. Most prominently, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard posted a highly produced anti-war video on her official X account, reportedly infuriating her boss. Critics worry about unintended consequences of military action, repeating former Secretary of State Colin Powell's rueful warning before the U.S. war in Iraq. It's like the Pottery Barn rule: If you break it, you own it. U.S.-backed regime change has a checkered past — Iran may be no different, by Alexander Smith Will Israel's airstrikes cause the collapse of the Iranian regime?, by Dan De Luce and Alexander Smith by Megan Lebowitz By Lawrence Hurley The Supreme Court ruling that upheld a Tennessee law banning certain care for transgender youth left various legal questions open, even as other laws aimed at people based on gender identity, including those involving sports and military-service bans, head toward the justices. That means that even though transgender rights activists face a setback, the ruling does not control how other cases will ultimately turn out. 'This decision casts little if any light on how a majority of justices will analyze or rule on other issues,' said Shannon Minter, a lawyer at the National Center for LGBTQ Rights. Most notably, the court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, did not address the key issue of whether such laws should automatically be reviewed by courts with a more skeptical eye, an approach known as 'heightened scrutiny.' Practically, that would mean laws about transgender people would have to clear a higher legal bar to be upheld. The justices skipped answering that question because the court found that Tennessee's law banning gender transition care for minors did not discriminate against transgender people at all. But other cases are likely to raise that issue more directly, meaning close attention will be paid to what the justices said in the various written opinions, as well as what they did not say.
Reuters
40 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump faces uproar from MAGA base over possible Iran strike
WASHINGTON, June 18 (Reuters) - The prospect of a U.S. strike against Iran has exposed divisions in the coalition of supporters that brought President Donald Trump to power, with some of his base urging him not to get the country involved in a new Middle East war. Some of Trump's most prominent Republican allies, including top lieutenant Steve Bannon, have found themselves in the unusual position of being at odds with a president who largely shares their isolationist tendencies. Bannon, one of many influential voices from Trump's "America First" coalition, on Wednesday urged caution about the U.S. military joining Israel in trying to destroy Iran's nuclear program in the absence of a diplomatic deal. "We can't do this again," Bannon told reporters at an event sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor in Washington. "We'll tear the country apart. We can't have another Iraq." The anti-interventionist part of the Republican Party is watching with alarm as Trump has moved swiftly from seeking a peaceful diplomatic settlement with Iran to possibly having the United States support Israel's military campaign, including the use of a 30,000-pound "bunker buster" bomb. The criticism shows the opposition Trump could face from his right-leaning "Make America Great Again" flank should he join the fight, a step that Iran has warned would have big consequences for Americans without specifying what that might be. A decision by Trump to enter the conflict would be a sharp departure from his usual caution about foreign entanglements. It could impact his campaign to foster good relations in the Gulf and could be a distraction from his efforts to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine and make tariff deals with countries around the world. The MAGA coalition propelled Trump into office in the 2016 and 2024 elections and remains critically important to him even though he is prevented by the U.S. Constitution from running for a third term. Upsetting that base could erode Trump's popularity and factor into whether Republicans hang on to control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections. Asked about the rift on Wednesday, Trump appeared unconcerned that some in his base could be turning its back on him, at least on this issue. "My supporters are more in love with me today, and I'm in love with them more than they were even at election time," Trump told reporters at the White House. "I only want one thing: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon." He said some of his supporters "are a little bit unhappy now" but that others agree with him that Iran cannot become a nuclear power. 'I'm not looking to fight. But if it's a choice between them fighting or having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do," Trump said. Marc Short, an ally of former Vice President Mike Pence who served as Trump's legislative director during his first term, called the division over Iran within Trump's party a "pretty large rift." He said he thought Trump's base would stay with him despite the differences, however. "The divisions are obviously coming out in the open in this moment, but ultimately I think that most of the president's followers are loyal to him more so than any worldview," he said. Short said standing with Israel could help Trump politically, too. Traditionally conservative voters favor standing by Israel. In a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in March, 48% of Republicans agreed with a statement that the U.S. should use its military power to defend Israel from threats no matter where the threats come from, compared to 28% who disagreed. Among Democrats, 25% agreed and 52% disagreed. International experts believe Iran has been intent on developing a nuclear weapon, despite Tehran's denials, and Israel believes it would be at risk as a result. U.S. officials believe if Iran possessed an atomic weapon it would trigger an nuclear arms race in the Middle East. Bannon, host of the popular "War Room" podcast, said "the Israelis need to finish what they started" and that Trump should slow down deliberations over U.S. involvement and explain his decision-making. "This is one of the most ancient civilizations in the world, okay, with 92 million people. This is not something you play around with. You have to think this through at this level, and the American people have to be on board. You can't just dump this on them," he said. Other influential MAGA voices with similar messages of worry include former Fox News Channel host Tucker Carlson and U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican and long-time Trump ally. "Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA," Greene said in a social media post on Sunday. "We are sick and tired of foreign wars. All of them." The rift was on full display when Carlson, on his streaming program, clashed with Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas late on Tuesday. A clip from Carlson's interview with Cruz went viral with Carlson strongly criticizing the senator for seeking regime change in Iran, and Cruz expressing support for the president. "You don't know anything about Iran!' Carlson told Cruz. 'I am not the Tucker Carlson expert on Iran,' Cruz fired back. 'You're a senator who's calling for the overthrow of the government,' Carlson retorted. Vice President JD Vance tried to tamp down talk of a rift on Monday with a social media post defending the president. "People are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy. But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue," he said. Now allies and opponents are waiting on Trump's decision-making process. The president said on Wednesday afternoon he had some ideas on how to proceed but had not made a final decision.
