
How does Europe's defence spending shape up as Trump pressures allies?
As the NATO summit ended with a commitment to spend 5% of GDP on defence, a Bruegel and Kiel Institute report warns Europe is far from ready to defend itself, at least not by 2030, primarily due to its dependence on foreign production and technology.
"Europe needs to shift its political debate from fiscal numbers to actual military capabilities purchased and delivered in the coming years," the report said.
Currently, Europe imports a substantial amount of weapons. Imports have increased from approximately $3.4 billion (€2.9 billion) for the period between 2019 and 2021 to $8.5 billion (€7.2 billion) between 2022 and 2024 in EU countries.
The US is the main trading partner for military equipment for both the EU and the main European countries, except for France.
For instance, around 70% of the non-European purchases from Poland are contracted with US companies, and the remaining deals are mainly struck with South Korean firms.
However, the average delivery time of defence equipment manufactured in European countries like Germany, the UK and Poland can reach four years.
Europe also lacks some top military technologies, with development timelines often stretching into decades rather than just a few years.
"A reduced or even completely missing technological lead in warfare is becoming an increasing concern across Western militaries and is particularly an issue for Europe," the report stated.
Developing new technologies
New battlefield technologies, such as drones and AI, can be complementary capabilities of a warfighting force.
In Russia's ongoing invasion of Ukraine, drones are responsible for between 60% and 70% of damage currently caused to Russian equipment, according to the UK's defence and security think tank, the Royal United Services Institute.
For instance, the target for the production of first-person-view (FPV) drones in Ukraine for 2025 is around 4.5 million, while that for Russia is between 3 and 4 million.
Speaking from the Hague on the eve of a summit of NATO leaders, the Ukrainian president said the country's defence sector is able to produce much more than it currently does, but is limited by a lack of financing.
"Our defence production potential has surpassed $35 billion (€29 billion)," Volodymyr Zelenskyy told the NATO Defence Industry Forum, with a range of over 1,000 types of weapons produced in the country, including artillery, armoured vehicles, drones, and missiles.
"But around 40% of this potential lacks proper funding. That's a problem. For example, we can produce over 8 million drones of different types each year, but the financing allows for far fewer."
Apart from Ukraine, European armies appear to be further behind on such developments compared to the US.
Although there are emerging European start-ups focused on drone manufacturing, the technology is evolving rapidly, so drones older than six months may already see a significant decline in their effectiveness.
Meanwhile, both Russia and China have substantially advanced their production capacities as well as technological capabilities.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
30 minutes ago
- Euronews
EU leaders kick Israel partnership down the road despite pressure
A majority of EU countries ordered the review of the bloc's deal with Israel over its war with Gaza, but they cannot agree on what to do with it. Over lunch on Thursday conducted in strict discretion, with mobile phones kept out of the room, the 27 EU leaders chewed over the eight-page review listing Israel's human rights violations including blockade of humanitarian assistance, military strikes against hospitals and forced displacement of the Palestinian population. But despite a majority of 17 countries calling for the review in May, leaders concluded only "to continue discussions on a follow-up... taking into account the evolution of the situation on the ground." It was a 'good sign" according to one diplomat that the EU "is responsive to Palestinian plight', since it will give Kaja Kallas, the EU's top diplomat, space to engage with Israel and work with the European Commission, to scope out further options for action if the situation on the ground doesn't improve. With Israel's recent ceasefire with Iran, some argue that severing political and trade ties with Tel Aviv would not make sense. For others, it's another sign of Europe's weak response to the ongoing crisis in the Middle-East. Divisions among member states over how to address Israel's war on Gaza and the humanitarian catastrophe are so deep that most countries prefer to let Kallas decide on what to do next. Some also warn that any trade measure with Israel will require a qualified majority that will be difficult to find in the European Commission's college of commissioners. 'I defended that the EU must suspend the association agreement between Europe and Israel, as a measure that is proportional to the humanitarian catastrophe (…) in Palestine,' Spain's prime minister Pedro Sanchez told reporters at a press conference following the Council summit. 'From a political and moral point of view, we have the obligation, the moral duty to saves lives in Gaza," he said. Thursday's conclusions on Israel came despite pressure from Spain but also Ireland and Slovenia whose leaders had called on the EU prior to the Council summit to take concrete steps to condemn Tel Aviv's violations in Gaza. Ireland's Taoiseach Micheál Martin said that the "degree of carnage and destruction" as well as "death and injury to children" in Gaza requires "strong" humanitarian and political responses from the EU. Martin said he found it "incomprehensible" that Europe cannot find a way "to pressure Israel to stop this war in Gaza". Following the Council, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that the Council had shared concerns about the humanitarian situation in Gaza, and had considered how – with the US – the EU could exert pressure on Israel to bring about a ceasefire. French President Emmanuel Macron also called for an immediate ceasefire. Israel has so far maintained its humanitarian blockade in Gaza to pressure Hamas to release its remaining hostages. On Wednesday, the Israeli military killed at least 45 Palestinians, including some who had sought aid, the Hamas-run health ministry said. At the same time, the Israeli military announced that seven soldiers had been killed in a bomb attack claimed by Hamas. The war has so far resulted in more than 56,000 Palestinians killed and more than 131,00 wounded, according to the Associated Press citing the Hamas-run health ministry. On Thursday, Israel's national security minister Itamar Bengvir called on X for a 'complete halt' of humanitarian aid in Gaza, as the current one is a 'true shame".
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Spain PM accuses Israel of genocide in Gaza as 65 more killed
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez on Thursday, June 26 became the most prominent European leader to describe the situation in Gaza as a genocide, as rescuers in the war-ravaged Palestinian territory said Israeli forces killed 65 people. After more than 20 months of devastating conflict, rights groups say Gaza's population of more than two million face famine-like conditions. Israel began allowing supplies to trickle in at the end of May following a blockade of more than two months but distribution has been marred by chaotic scenes and near-daily reports of Israeli forces firing on those waiting to collect rations. Israel meanwhile is pressing its bombardment of the territory, in a military offensive it says is aimed at defeating militant group Hamas, whose October 2023 attack on Israel triggered the war. Sanchez said Gaza was in a "catastrophic situation of genocide" and urged the European Union to immediately suspend its cooperation deal with Israel. The comments represent the strongest condemnation to date by the Spanish premier, an outspoken critic of Israel's offensive who is one of the first European leaders, and the most senior, to use the term "genocide" to describe the situation in Gaza. Speaking ahead of an EU summit in Brussels, Sanchez mentioned an EU report which found "indications" Israel was breaching its human rights obligations under the cooperation deal, which forms the basis for trade ties. Israel reacted furiously to Sanchez's comments. Its embassy in Madrid accused him of "demonizing" Israel, saying Spain was "on the wrong side of history". The Spanish government called the statement "unacceptable" and summoned the embassy's chargé d'affaires. Rescuers say Gazans killed The director of medical supplies in Gaza's civil defense agency, Mohammad Al-Mughair, told Agence France-Presse 65 people had been killed by Israeli forces in the territory on Thursday. The Israeli military said its troops "fired warning shots" in order to prevent "suspects from approaching them" near the Netzarim corridor in central Gaza, where Palestinians gather each night for rations. Israel says its Gaza offensive is aimed at destroying Hamas and rescuing hostages seized during the October 2023 attack, which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's military campaign has killed at least 56,259 people, also mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza. The United Nations considers its figures reliable. 'We are dying' "My children have nothing to eat. I haven't had any flour for nearly two months," said Imad al-Attar, a Gaza resident who obtained a bag of flour in the southern city of Khan Yunis. "We just want to eat," said another man, Khaled Rashwan. "We are dying, and no one is paying attention to us. Who can we turn to?" Gaza's health ministry says nearly 550 people have been killed near aid centers while seeking scarce supplies since late May. The United Nations has condemned the "weaponization of food" in Gaza, and slammed a US- and Israeli-backed foundation that has largely replaced established humanitarian organisations in the territory. Help us improve Le Monde in English Dear reader, We'd love to hear your thoughts on Le Monde in English! Take this quick survey to help us improve it for you. The privately run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) was brought into the territory in late May, but its operations have been marred by chaotic scenes, deaths and neutrality concerns. The GHF denies deadly incidents have occurred in the immediate vicinity of its aid points. The US State Department said Thursday it had approved its first direct funding – $30 million – for the GHF and urged other countries to follow suit. Israeli restrictions on media in Gaza and difficulties in accessing some areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by rescuers and authorities in the territory. The World Health Organization said it had delivered its first medical shipment into Gaza since March 2, adding that the nine truckloads were "a drop in the ocean". Ceasefire push After claiming victory in a 12-day war against Iran that ended with a ceasefire on June 24, Israel said it would refocus on its offensive in Gaza, where Palestinian militants still hold Israeli hostages. US President Donald Trump told reporters Wednesday: "I think great progress is being made on Gaza" to end the war, and forecast "very good news". Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces growing calls from opposition politicians, relatives of hostages held in Gaza and even members of his ruling coalition to end the fighting. Key mediator Qatar said this week it would launch a new push for a ceasefire. Israel said efforts to return Israeli hostages in Gaza were ongoing "on the battlefield and via negotiations".


Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Iran's uranium stocks said to be intact, UK media says
Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium is believed to be largely intact following US strikes on the country's main nuclear sites, the Financial Times reported on Thursday, citing European officials. The newspaper, citing two people briefed on preliminary intelligence assessments, said European capitals believe Iran's stockpile of 408 kilograms of uranium enriched close to weapons-grade levels was not being held in Fordow and may have been moved prior to US strikes on Sunday. Claims that uranium was moved from any of Iran's nuclear sites were dismissed by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday. "We were watching closely and there was no indication to the United States that any of that enriched uranium was moved," she said. The initial European intelligence assessment is unlikely to go down well with US President Donald Trump who is currently engaged with a fight with his own spy agencies about the impact of the US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites. On Thursday, CIA Director John Ratcliffe said the strikes had caused "severe damage" to Iran's nuclear facilities after a leaked report downplayed the extent of the operation. According to Ratcliffe, key sites had been destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the "course of years." But he stopped short of supporting Trump's claims that the operation on Iran's nuclear programme had been a "spectacular military success" that had "obliterated" the facilities. Trump's claims were supported by Israel's Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) which said on Wednesday that US and Israeli strikes had rendered the Fordow underground enrichment site "inoperable." In a handout, the IAEC claimed the "devastating" strikes "destroyed the site's critical infrastructure." The new US intelligence assessment comes a day after a leaked early report from the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) played down the extent of the destruction and concluded that key components of Iran's nuclear programme could be restarted in months. Speaking at the NATO Summit in The Hague on Wednesday, Trump rejected that assessment, insisting that his country's spies did not have the full picture and defended his own conclusion that American bombs and missiles delivered a crushing blow. "This was a devastating attack and it knocked them for a loop," Trump said as his administration scrambled to support claims he made only hours after the attack. The impact of the US strikes was also downplayed by Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. In his first public remarks since Iran and Israel agreed to a ceasefire which brought an end to the 12-day conflict, Khamenei said Trump's assessment had been "exaggerated." "They could not achieve anything significant," Khamenei said in a video message broadcast on state television. US military operation The US launched strikes on Sunday on three of Iran's nuclear facilities; Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. At Fordow, which is buried deep under a mountain north of the city of Qom, US stealth bombers dropped several 14,000-kilogram bunker-buster bombs, collapsing the entrance and damaging infrastructure. But the facility itself was not destroyed, US intelligence found. Iran's ongoing nuclear programme was at the heart of the recent conflict with Israel, which Israeli officials see as an existential threat to their country. Iran was previously subject to an international nuclear deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which saw the country receive sanctions relief in exchange for strict limits on its nuclear activities. During his first term in office, President Donald Trump withdrew the US from the pact in 2018, slamming it as "the worst deal ever negotiated" and slapping new sanctions on Iran. Since then, the other signatories to the deal have scrambled to keep Iran in compliance, but Tehran considers the deal void and has continued with uranium enrichment, which at current levels sits at 60%. That's still technically below the weapons-grade levels of 90%, but still far above the 3.67% permitted under the JCPOA. Iran maintains that its nuclear programme is peaceful and purely for civilian purposes.