
Don't believe the myth: Britain's services industry has been hit hard by Brexit
Brexit
have been knocked away by the realities. Far from being shackled to a corpse, as some Brexiteers described the
European Union
economy, both the euro zone and the EU have grown faster than the UK since the 2016 referendum. Britain's goods exports have slumped compared with the rest of the G7.
'Look at services,' Brexiteers cry. Their export growth has been exceptional, according to Policy Exchange, the right-of-centre think-tank. The Office for Budget Responsibility also noted a year ago that UK services trade growth had been the strongest in the G7.
Should the UK be happy that its trade in services has performed well? Was this the result of Brexit?
The short answers are 'no' and 'no'. Instead it should be annoyed that services exports did not grow even more, and blame Brexit for this disappointment, according to new research from the London School of Economics.
READ MORE
Before explaining the findings, it is important to note that although the UK economy has many weaknesses, services are a strength. While television crews will always want to picture industries such as manufacturing or fishing to visually describe what makes a country wealthy, this is not relevant to 80 per cent of Britain's economic activity.
The UK's success lies in its lawyers, information providers, creative types, management consultants and educators. A handful of universities generate more export income than the entire fishing industry, for example.
[
Post-Brexit export drive hampered by UK trade finance regulations, ICC warns
Opens in new window
]
Unusually for any economy, UK services exports exceed those of goods and not by a trivial amount – almost 40 per cent higher in 2024, with the gap widening. The OBR noticed, however, that not all of the UK's services exports appeared equally strong.
Business services including management consultancy and research and advertising – where Brexit barriers were small or nonexistent – were growing strongly. Other services did not perform nearly as well, including finance and transport, where the barriers erected by leaving the single market were significant. But the fiscal watchdog left its analysis hanging.
The Juggle: the issues facing women with young children when balancing childcare and their careers
Listen |
44:30
Picking up the baton has been left to LSE team economists Shania Bhalotia, Swati Dhingra and Danyal Arnold. Using data that allowed comparison of the growth in services trade across different sectors and between a large number of pairs of countries, they examined how strong UK services exports were in each sector compared with all other countries.
They also meticulously examined the UK-EU Trade and Co-operation Agreement to document which services exports into the EU faced new barriers after the post-Brexit deal came into effect in 2021.
The results are stark. The OBR was right to note that UK services exports facing new Brexit barriers appeared to perform worse. UK exports to countries with greater barriers were hit much harder. Where the most extreme barriers were introduced, services exports fell 90 per cent.
[
Brexit was 'single stupidest thing a country's ever done'
Opens in new window
]
On average there was a 16 per cent drop in services exports to the EU in sectors where Brexit imposed new trade frictions compared with bilateral trade between other countries in the same sectors.
Did Brexit allow British companies to focus on trade with the US and other countries? Again, the answer was 'no'. Overall, the research found that UK services exports five years after Brexit were 4-5 per cent lower than they would have been without the effect of new trade frictions.
In a nation that struggles to accept its relative economic decline since Brexit, the UK has been far too quick to celebrate the better performance of services. Instead of showing that Brexit might have some benefits, it simply shows that the UK had specialised in the right industries at the right time, allowing many world-class companies to sell globally.
Rather than generate 'global Britain', leaving the EU has had one simple effect: economic harm. Without Brexit, they would have done even better. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Financial and healthcare stocks drag down European shares
European shares ended lower on Tuesday, dragged down by heavyweight financial and healthcare stocks as investors awaited news on a potential US-EU trade deal while assessing the latest US inflation data. DUBLIN The Iseq All-Share index ended the session narrowly in the black, up 0.06 per cent at 11,262.29, on Tuesday. Hotel group Dalata closed down 2.6 per cent to €6.37 after a Scandinavian consortium reached an agreement to buy the business for €1.4 billion. READ MORE Permanent TSB was 1.91 per cent weaker on €2.05 after news broke early in the day that NatWest Group had sold its remaining 11.65 per cent shareholding in the bank, raising €126 million. Ryanair also fell, giving up 0.88 per cent to €23.57 on the day, alongside healthcare services group Uniphar which dropped 1.08 per cent, continuing losses from yesterday. Irish Ferries brand owner Irish Continental Group was the strongest performer on the index, closing up 1.44 per cent to €5.64. Gains by bankers kept the market in the green, with AIB rising 1.19 per cent and Bank of Ireland adding 1.25 per cent. LONDON The FTSE 100 retreated from record highs as rising US inflation raised concerns about the impact of tariffs. Investors also focused on the Bank of England's monetary policy path. The blue-chip FTSE 100 dropped 0.7 per cent to 8,938.32, having crossed the 9,000 mark for the first time earlier in the day, while the domestically oriented FTSE 250 index fell 0.2 per cent. British stocks have largely shrugged off concerns about chaotic US trade policies, with the UK being the first country to secure a trade deal with the United States. Among individual stocks, GSK fell 1.5 per cent after the US Food and Drug Administration raised safety concerns that the drugmaker's blood cancer drug Blenrep, when used in combination with other treatments, may cause eye damage in patients. Experian rose 4.3 per cent after the credit data firm reported 8 per cent organic revenue growth in its first quarter and reaffirmed its annual forecasts. Britain's largest home builder Barratt Redrow slumped 8.9 per cent after it said home completions missed expectations for fiscal 2025. EUROPE The pan-European STOXX 600 index fell 0.36 per cent. Several big European defence stocks were weaker after US President Donald Trump threatened to impose stiff economic penalties on Russia if it doesn't end hostilities with Ukraine within 50 days. The threat came as he pledged fresh weapons supplies for Kyiv. Rheinmetall dropped 2.77 per cent and Dassault Aviation fell 2.47 per cent. In the euro zone, the banking index slipped 1.1 per cent. Germany's Commerzbank, Italy's Banco BPM and France's Société Générale each fell more than 2 per cent Healthcare also lagged, with Danish drugmaker Novo Nordisk sliding 2.3 per cent. Ericsson reported upbeat results but the Swedish telecom equipment maker's shares declined 7.7 per cent after it warned that tariffs could crimp its margin growth. Danish offshore wind developer Orsted gained 8.3 per cent after Morgan Stanley raised its rating to 'overweight' from 'equal weight'. Accelleron rose 8.7 per cent to a record high after the engine components maker increased its revenue forecast for 2025. NEW YORK The Nasdaq cruised to a fresh record high in midafternoon trading on Tuesday, powered by a jump in Nvidia, while the S&P 500 hovered below its peak as investors digested an inflation report and a flurry of big bank earnings. AI-chip leader Nvidia was higher after unveiling plans to resume sales of its H20 AI chip to China. Other chipmakers also advanced, including Advanced Micro Devices and Super Micro Computer. The gains led the technology sector to a record high. JPMorgan Chase slipped despite raising its 2025 net interest income outlook, while Wells Fargo fell even as its profit rose on reduced loan-loss reserves. BlackRock notched a new milestone, managing a record $12.53 trillion in assets amid optimism over trade deals and rate cuts, yet its shares were also weaker. The KBW Bank Index sank to a two-week low, but Citigroup bucked the trend by climbing after its traders delivered a windfall that boosted second-quarter profits. – Additional reporting, Reuters, PA.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Michael Flatley refused access to documents in row over legal fees and receiver costs
Lord of the Dance star Michael Flatley has suffered a setback in his legal row over a €1.4 million disputed costs bill associated with his recent battle to keep a receiver from the door of his Cork mansion, Castlehyde. The entertainer, in an affidavit opened last May before the Commercial Court where he is disputing legal and receiver fees, claimed he was shocked at what he called the 'blatant' level of alleged 'overcharging'. Referring to a receiver costs bill of €86,000 plus legal costs of €186,000, Mr Flatley alleged he may be seen 'as an easy mark for inflated costs'. Also in dispute are €793,000 in legal fees from the opposing side in the Castlehyde receiver battle. But Mr Justice Mark Sanfey on Tuesday refused the Flatley side's application for key documentation from Novellus Finance Ltd and the receivers who were appointed over Castlehyde. Mr Flatley's legal team want the documentation as part of their bid to have all of part of the €1.4 million disputed costs lodged in court returned. READ MORE In his judgment, Mr Justice Sanfey said the Flatley side have 'to use a colloquial expression put the cart before the horse'. The allegations of overcharging are very serious, the judge said, and required to be pleaded appropriately before any question of the adequacy of documents furnished or the need for discovery of further documentation could be considered. He said the Flatley application was 'premature and inappropriate'. To accede to it 'would be to permit a trawl through sensitive and confidential documentation in circumstances where the Flatley allegations have not been formally articulated in pleadings'. The other side, the judge said, must be given an opportunity to meet the allegations made against them and respond as they see fit before the question of whether they must provide supporting documentation for their claims, arises. Mr Justice Sanfey commented that an application to court as was contemplated by the Flatley side did not seem appropriate in relation to the question of legal or receivers costs 'in circumstances where there are statutory mechanisms for appropriate interrogation of such claims and production of documentation relevant to them'. Mr Flatley paid off a €6.9 million loan on his Castlehyde mansion last March to save it from the receiver. The original legal battle related to a loan made to Mr Flatley's Blackbird Film Productions Ltd by Novellus Finance Ltd, with registered offices at St Stephen's Green, Dublin, in 2023 with repayments of €67,000 per month over two years. Novellus claimed there had been default on repayment, which Mr Flatley denied. Mr Flatley had provided a guarantee for the loan on the strength of the value of his Castlehyde mansion. As a result of the alleged default, Novellus appointed a receiver over the property. An interim injunction was granted to the Flatley side to prevent the receiver from taking further measures in relation to Castlehyde and a judge conducted a two-day hearing on the matter. The Flatley side asked the court to hold off on giving judgment on whether to set aside the interim injunction stopping the receiver taking steps or grant an interlocutory injunction to the Flatley side and said Mr Flatley was flying into Dublin to pay off the loan. The €6.9 million loan was finally paid off but the issue of certain disputed costs remained. In his judgment, Mr Justice Sanfey said Mr Flatley had refinanced the loan from Novellus and redeemed the mortgage and had 'effectively withdrawn the proceedings' and consented to an order that he pay the costs of the proceedings to the defendants. As such, the judge said the issues between the parties as set out in the proceedings have been resolved and the various allegations by Mr Flatley against the defendants must be regarded as withdrawn. 'Notwithstanding this, Mr Flatley now seeks to make a new range of allegations against the defendants in relation to alleged overcharging in respect of legal and receivers costs and in relation to interest.' The judge said allegations of this nature are extremely serious, particularly for professional defendants such as the receivers. The allegations were not part of the original proceedings, he said, and do not find expression anywhere other than in Mr Flatley's affidavit. The defendants, he said, strenuously deny that there has been any overcharge. The judge said pleadings are absolutely necessary to bring definition and clarity to the allegations made by Mr Flatley.


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Planned 9.8% increase in non-domestic water charges undermining viability of hotels, says IHF
Non-domestic water charges are set to be increased by 9.8 per cent in October following a decision by the Commission for the Regulation of Utilities (CRU), but hoteliers have expressed 'serious concerns' over the increase. Michael Magner, the IHF president, described the increase as 'yet another example of the relentless increases in operating costs that are eroding Irish competitiveness and undermining the viability of businesses.' The new water and wastewater tariff rates will be effective from October 1st. The move is to 'ensure the recovery of costs of water services' and would aide 'the reliability, efficiency and sustainability of water services,' the CRU said. The decision to increase all charges by the same percentage value was made in the hopes of 'retaining the equity of cost allocation in the 2024 tariffs for all customer types' the CRU said in the decision published on Monday. READ MORE The IHF president said that, over the past two years, the average 70-bedroom hotel in Ireland will have seen an increase of over 40 per cent in its water tariffs. He said the increase is 'unsustainable given the exceptionally challenging environment' for Irish hotels. 'As a big consumer of water services, the hospitality sector is disproportionately impacted by increases in water tariffs, which businesses are unable to absorb.' Mr Magner said the 'cumulative impact of these and other cost increases now poses a serious threat to the viability of many businesses through our wider tourism and hospitality sector.' He said the sector is concerned about potential future annual increases over the next four years and the 'ongoing transfer of unjustifiable costs arising from inefficiencies in the delivery of water services in Ireland' while calling for a 'fairer funding model' to sustain water services and cost competitiveness for businesses.' Uisce Eireann had originally suggested a 13 per cent increase in charges to the CRU, which decides the rate, alongside two alternative increases of 1.7 per cent – in line with the harmonised index of consumer prices for 2025 – and 6.9 per cent – the average growth in Uisce Eireann's approved allowed revenues from 2020 to 2024. During a consultation period on the decision, the CRU received 22 submissions which opposed any increase but it noted that while 'affordability and competitiveness are significant issues for non-domestic customers and the Irish economy', Uisce Eireann is required to run in a 'commercially viable manner'. The regulator noted the increase was 'similar, or lower than' increases in similar percentage increases in UK water utilities. In light of the submissions received, the CRU said the 9.8 per cent increase was 'the most balanced approach'. 'The CRU is aware of the impact of bill increases for certain non-domestic customers and has engaged with Uisce Éireann to ensure that there are measures in place when engaging with customers with financial difficulties.'