
What is the controversy surrounding Japan's Yasukuni shrine?
Amid calls that Self-Defense Force members be honored at Tokyo's Yasukuni Jinja shrine if they die in war, some have questioned the legitimacy of such a move in light of the Japanese Constitution, which stipulates the separation of religion and state. The Mainichi Shimbun answers some common questions readers may have about the controversial shrine where Class-A war criminals are enshrined.
Question: What kind of place is Yasukuni shrine?
Answer: Located in Kudankita in Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward, Yasukuni shrine's origin goes back to the "Tokyo Shokonsha" (Tokyo soul-inviting shrine) founded in 1869 to honor the pro-imperial loyalists of the Meiji Restoration and government soldiers who died in the Boshin War in the late 19th century. It was renamed Yasukuni Jinja in 1879. Approximately 2,466,000 people who died in conflicts including the First Sino-Japanese War in the 1890s and the 1904-1905 Russo-Japanese War, as well as the Pacific War in the 1940s are collectively enshrined there as "eirei" (heroic spirits of the war dead).
Q: What does it mean to collectively enshrine eirei?
A: Eirei is an honorific term for the spirits of those who died in war. At Yasukuni shrine, the names of the war dead are written in a registry called a "reijibo" (spirit ledger), and through a formal ritual, the multiple spirits are enshrined collectively.
Q: Who are enshrined there?
A: The shrine primarily enshrines military personnel and civilian military employees, but it also includes mobilized nurses, student workers killed in air raids on military factories and conscripted Koreans, on the grounds that they "participated in combat under military orders." Because they are enshrined regardless of the wishes of the individuals or their families, some bereaved relatives object.
Q: What is the controversy about?
A: Before and during World War II, Yasukuni shrine was closely tied to militarism and was used to encourage the public to support the war. Many soldiers died, saying to each other, "I'll see you again at Yasukuni," as their final words before charging into the enemy lines. The major point of controversy is the enshrinement in 1978 of 14 Class-A war criminals, including former Prime Minister Hideki Tojo, who were held responsible for planning and directing the war.
Q: Visits by Japanese politicians often make the news too, right?
A: Yes. Since then Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone's official visit in 1985, prime ministers' visits to Yasukuni shrine have frequently triggered diplomatic issues. China and South Korea criticize the visits, calling Yasukuni a "symbol of militarism" and accusing Japan of taking a wrong stance on historical issues. In Japan, too, such visits have been brought to court as violations of the separation of religion and state.
Q: There was talk about establishing an alternative memorial facility. How's that going?
A: Yasukuni shrine became a religious corporation after WWII. It maintains that "once a spirit is enshrined, it cannot be removed," and does not allow the separation of Class-A war criminals. In response to the backlash -- both at home and abroad -- over then Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's 2001 visit, a private advisory panel for the chief Cabinet secretary suggested the need to create a "permanent, secular, national memorial facility." Due to opposing views, however, the debate over this matter faded and remains stalled to this day.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Mainichi
5 hours ago
- The Mainichi
What is the controversy surrounding Japan's Yasukuni shrine?
Amid calls that Self-Defense Force members be honored at Tokyo's Yasukuni Jinja shrine if they die in war, some have questioned the legitimacy of such a move in light of the Japanese Constitution, which stipulates the separation of religion and state. The Mainichi Shimbun answers some common questions readers may have about the controversial shrine where Class-A war criminals are enshrined. Question: What kind of place is Yasukuni shrine? Answer: Located in Kudankita in Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward, Yasukuni shrine's origin goes back to the "Tokyo Shokonsha" (Tokyo soul-inviting shrine) founded in 1869 to honor the pro-imperial loyalists of the Meiji Restoration and government soldiers who died in the Boshin War in the late 19th century. It was renamed Yasukuni Jinja in 1879. Approximately 2,466,000 people who died in conflicts including the First Sino-Japanese War in the 1890s and the 1904-1905 Russo-Japanese War, as well as the Pacific War in the 1940s are collectively enshrined there as "eirei" (heroic spirits of the war dead). Q: What does it mean to collectively enshrine eirei? A: Eirei is an honorific term for the spirits of those who died in war. At Yasukuni shrine, the names of the war dead are written in a registry called a "reijibo" (spirit ledger), and through a formal ritual, the multiple spirits are enshrined collectively. Q: Who are enshrined there? A: The shrine primarily enshrines military personnel and civilian military employees, but it also includes mobilized nurses, student workers killed in air raids on military factories and conscripted Koreans, on the grounds that they "participated in combat under military orders." Because they are enshrined regardless of the wishes of the individuals or their families, some bereaved relatives object. Q: What is the controversy about? A: Before and during World War II, Yasukuni shrine was closely tied to militarism and was used to encourage the public to support the war. Many soldiers died, saying to each other, "I'll see you again at Yasukuni," as their final words before charging into the enemy lines. The major point of controversy is the enshrinement in 1978 of 14 Class-A war criminals, including former Prime Minister Hideki Tojo, who were held responsible for planning and directing the war. Q: Visits by Japanese politicians often make the news too, right? A: Yes. Since then Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone's official visit in 1985, prime ministers' visits to Yasukuni shrine have frequently triggered diplomatic issues. China and South Korea criticize the visits, calling Yasukuni a "symbol of militarism" and accusing Japan of taking a wrong stance on historical issues. In Japan, too, such visits have been brought to court as violations of the separation of religion and state. Q: There was talk about establishing an alternative memorial facility. How's that going? A: Yasukuni shrine became a religious corporation after WWII. It maintains that "once a spirit is enshrined, it cannot be removed," and does not allow the separation of Class-A war criminals. In response to the backlash -- both at home and abroad -- over then Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's 2001 visit, a private advisory panel for the chief Cabinet secretary suggested the need to create a "permanent, secular, national memorial facility." Due to opposing views, however, the debate over this matter faded and remains stalled to this day.

13 hours ago
Japan GSDF Conducts Large-Scale Live-Fire Exercise
Newsfrom Japan Tokyo, June 8 (Jiji Press)--Japan's Ground Self-Defense Force conducted a large-scale annual live-fire exercise in the central prefecture of Shizuoka on Sunday, assuming the defense of a remote island. Some of the equipment under development with counterattack capabilities were displayed to the public for the first time at the Fuji firepower exercise, held at the Higashifuji maneuver area. Among them was an improved surface-to-ship missile with a range of more than 1,000 kilometers. The exercise was conducted on the scenario of recapturing a remote island from an enemy. Training on trench warfare was carried out at the annual exercise also for the first time, as the type of warfare has been conducted in the war in Ukraine. During a midday exercise, watched by Defense Minister Gen Nakatani, about 58.8 tons of ammunition worth about 640 million yen was used. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.]


The Mainichi
3 days ago
- The Mainichi
Yoroku: Japan needs a political party that can sidestep 'low birth rate trap'
The "low birth rate trap" is becoming an expression in Japan. This refers to the ageing of society due to low births over the long term, leading to a "seniors' democracy" in which policies are made that only exacerbate the problem. In a book on the topic, population researcher Kanako Amano made several points: The country's budget is spent on social security for the middle-aged and elderly, while policies to increase the well-being of young people, who are now in the minority, are secondary. Measures to support marriage and child rearing also tend to be based on the values of the middle-aged and older generation, such as "It is natural for men to earn (the) money." The Diet bill debate over the introduction of selective separate surnames for married couples for the first time in 28 years reveals the values of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. Responding to a suggestion that the system should be introduced to counter the declining birth rate, he stated, "It is not a matter that can be decided by majority vote." Last year, the number of births in Japan fell below 700,000 for the first time. Measures taken over the past quarter century to combat the declining birth rate have had no effect. The book cites "a lack of imagination about the values of young people" as a factor. Perhaps it is easier to get to the essence of the problem from an outside perspective. The declining birth rate is not the result of women not wanting to have children, but the result of creating a society in which women are unable to bring themselves to think they want to have children, a female pianist living in France pointed out in the Mainichi Shimbun readers' column "Minna no Hiroba" (Everyone's square). Will Japan rely on immigrants? Or will we seek to create a society based on the premise of a declining population? We seem to be at a crossroads, but hopes of creating a society in which women want to give birth are not lost. How can the opinions of young people be taken into account? A national election nears. Will a political party show up that will not lead Japan into the "low birth rate trap?"