
Burberry stops the rot in Q1, Americas comps rise, but China is still negative
So how did it do in the 13 weeks to late June? It's not back in top form, although there were very clear signs of progress. The company said that its retail revenue fell 6% on a reported basis to £433 million and it was down 2% at constant exchange rates (CER), stripping out the negative impact of currency effects that have been denting a lot of fashion businesses this year. It was trading from a little less space this time too (-1%), so that also weighed on the figures.
Its comparable store sales were down 1% and one of the aforementioned signs of progress could be seen from the fact that a year ago that figure was negative to the tune of 21%. OK, it's not yet been able to claw back any of that 21% deficit of this time last year but in the circumstances of an ongoing luxury slump and the company's own turnaround drive, that 1% fall isn't bad. And analysts had been expecting a fall of around 3% so that was more good news.
Most importantly though, comparable store sales in two of its key regions tipped into positive territory. In EMEIA, they were up 1% and in the all-important Americas market they rose 4%. Admittedly Asia in general remains an issue for the brand and Greater China comp sales were down 5% while Asia-Pacific fell 4%.
EMEIA had been boosted by local spend offsetting declines from tourists; the Americas was supported by new customer growth; the Greater China figure included a drop of 4% from Mainland China; and the Asia Pacific drop came as it saw a challenging performance in Japan, partially offset by growth in South Korea.
What it did right
In Q1, the company had taken various actions to boost its performance, 'resulting in comparable retail sales improvement across all regions relative to the previous quarter. This was supported by stronger brand desirability, outperformance in outerwear and scarves and improved conversion'.
The company has issued a a series of distinctive monthly campaigns such as High Summer, Highgrove, and Festival, 'each celebrating British summertime traditions while appealing to different customer archetypes'.
It rebalanced the autumn 25 collection (its first under the Burberry Forward era), 'attracting a broad range of luxury customers, focused on fewer, bigger ideas, hero-ing recognisable brand codes'.
Visual merchandising was also enhanced in stores with fixtures to improve product densities. And its scarf bar pilot is outperforming the fleet with 200 targeted by year end.
It saw online momentum continuing for the third consecutive quarter, driven by a 'stronger product mix, universal styling and storytelling'.
And its organisational changes are 'fostering greater collaboration and agility'. Its cost efficiency programme is on track to deliver £80 million in annualised savings by FY26.
CEO Joshua Schulman understandably chose to focus on the positives and said: 'Over the past year, we have moved from stabilising the business to driving Burberry Forward with confidence. The improvement in our first-quarter comparable sales, strength in our core categories, and uptick in brand desirability gives us conviction in the path ahead.'
Of course, it's the future that counts and he added that the autumn 2025 collection 'is being well received by a broad range of luxury customers as it arrives in stores. Although the external environment remains challenging and we are still in the early stages of our transformation, we are encouraged by the initial progress we are starting to see'.
As for the FY26 outlook, Schulman emphasised that as well as it still being early in its turnaround drive, the macroeconomic environment 'remains uncertain'. Without giving any concrete figures, he said: 'Our focus this year is to build on the early progress we have made in reigniting brand desire, as a key requisite to growing the top-line. In the first half we are continuing to prioritise investment and expect to see the impact of our initiatives build as the year progresses. We will deliver margin improvement with a continued focus on simplification, productivity and cash flow. We remain confident that we are positioning the business for a return to sustainable, profitable growth.'
Analyst view
The general view of all this from analysts is that the business is going in the right direction but they're aware that there's still much to do and the market remains tough.
Nick Sherrard, MD of innovation expert network Label Sessions, said: 'The leadership team at Burberry has done so much right. In fact, in the year since Josh Schulman took over as CEO it has repositioned the brand in a way that shows real vision, and is hugely admired inside and outside the industry. There are tentative signs of why in today's update.
'The work Burberry has done over leaves it well placed to eat into its competitors' market share. Recent brand activations in Ibiza, Glastonbury, and Highgrove show a brand… clear on its strategy. Execute on that and this could be a classic case study of transformation.
'All of that said, 2025 is not a great time to run a luxury brand. The ad campaign reads 'it's always Burberry weather' but in financial terms, at least, there are limits to how fast you can drive revenue recovery in economic conditions like these – particularly in China and the wider Asia Pacific region.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
a day ago
- LeMonde
'If a dictator issued a call for tenders to reopen gulags, some consulting firms would be ready to bid'
The British daily Financial Times revealed in early July that Boston Consulting Group (BCG), a major consulting firm, had carried out an assignment for an American security company, commissioned by an Israeli think tank, on the "reconstruction of Gaza." The study discussed the displacement of 500,000 Palestinians and assessed proposals – if one dares call them that – to make to Gazans, weighing which would be most effective: $9,000 in cash or $5,000 and four years of rent. A plan conceived without the residents, for a reconstruction without the survivors, billed at several million dollars. BCG apologized, fired those responsible, and gave up its fee. That might have been enough, if not for the countless deaths, horrors and suffering. We could pretend to forget the McKinsey controversy in the United States, in which the consulting firm recommended increasing opioid dosages to drive up prices. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), this resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of people from overdoses. Once again, the firm expressed its "deep" regrets and, in 2024, reached a settlement of nearly a billion dollars to avoid litigation. Those fond of calculations will appreciate the irony. We could settle for these acts of contrition. A moment of nausea, before moving on. But it would be more useful to ask what makes these scandals possible. Like all businesses, consulting firms have "processes." No one is staffed on a project without approval. No new client is accepted without a risk analysis. No work is done outside the rules of deontology. Poorly known codes These rules do exist: Some firms refuse to work for the sex, gambling, or tobacco industries, others avoid certain countries. All of them establish "Chinese walls," supposedly protecting against conflicts of interest. But unlike regulated professions (lawyers or certified public accountants) or those with formal codes (like journalists), these rules are rarely published and often little known even to the consultants themselves. Everything depends on self-regulation.

LeMonde
2 days ago
- LeMonde
Cognac drags down LVMH's spirits division
The engine driving cognac sales has yet to regain full speed. LVMH acknowledged it in its half-year results, published Thursday, July 24. Moët Hennessy, its wine and spirits division – of which British company Diageo owns 34% – reported an 8% drop in revenue to €2.58 billion. This marks a further slide after an 11% decline over 2024, to €5.9 billion. The blow was even harsher for recurring operating profit, which fell by one-third to €524 million in the first six months of 2025. The group, led by Bernard Arnault, explained the disappointing performance due to "weak demand for cognac" and "the impact on customers of trade tensions weighing on key markets in the US and China." The US and China accounted for 80% of sales of the prized Charente region spirit, whose leading brand is Hennessy. Across the Atlantic, LVMH – and major competitors such as Pernod Ricard, owner of Martell, or Rémy Cointreau, known for its Rémy Martin brand – were caught off guard. After the post-Covid-19 boom, the wave of inflation disrupted consumer behavior. They suddenly became more cautious about spending just as spirits groups continued to raise their prices. The drop-off was abrupt. Chinese customers also adopted a wait-and-see attitude, troubled by their country's economic slowdown. After trade battles On top of this new consumer mindset, fierce trade battles compounded the problem. Since early 2024, cognac has been ensnared in a conflict between Europe and China. The sector breathed a sigh of relief in early July. Although Beijing decided to impose 32% tariffs on European wine-based spirits, most companies that agreed to set a minimum price – in effect, a price increase ranging from 12% to 16% – were granted exemptions. LVMH benefited from this agreement. Likewise, Rémy Cointreau revised down the impact of Chinese tariffs on Friday, July 25, from €40 million to €10 million. Conversely, the impact in the US would rise from €25 million to €35 million.


Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
Immigration is "killing Europe", says Trump
Upon his arrival in Scotland for a five-day trip, US President Donald Trump declared that immigration is "killing Europe". Responding to a question from a reporter on migration, he said that "on immigration, you'd better to get your act together. You're not going to have Europe anymore." He continued to say that "You've got to stop this horrible invasion that's happening to Europe. Some people, some leaders have not let it happen. They're not getting the proper credit." He did not name the leaders he had in mind, however, in order not to "embarrass" the others. The US President is set to meet with EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen during his visit, as well as British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Von der Leyen had said they would "discuss translatlantic relations", in a week when negotiations have intensified ahead of 1 August, a deadline set by Trump from when he said will impose 30% tariffs on EU imports. EU member states meanwhile approved a llist of countermeasures of their own if no deal is reached. For his part, Trump said on Friday that reaching a deal with the EU on trade would be "the biggest deal of them all if we make it." 'Stop the windmills' The US president also took the opportunity to take aim at wind energy, saying Europe should "stop the windmills, you're ruining your countries... ruining your beautiful fields and valleys, and killing your birds." Trump has on multiple occasions expressed an intense dislike for wind turbines, recently saying "'I don't want windmills destroying our place.' The Trump Organisation, whose assets are currently in a trust run by is children, was ordered to cover the Scottish government's legal costs after the golf course it owns in Aberdeenshire unsuccessfully sued over the construction of a nearby wind farm, arguing in part that it hurt golfers' views. While in Scotland, Trump will visit a golf course in Aberdeenshire ahead of its opening on 13 August, and another near Turnberry. His family owns both golf courses.