Not everyone agrees with Tan Kin Lian's suggestion that Singaporeans face higher living costs than Malaysians
In a social media post earlier this week, Mr Tan, who had served as chief executive officer of National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) Income between 1977 and 2007, wrote that 'many Singaporeans think that they are better off than Malaysians' due to the big disparity in monthly salaries.
Singaporeans earn 'say S$3,000 while the Malaysians earn RM3,000, and the SGD is more than three times higher than RM,' he added.
This view, Mr Tan wrote, overlooks the important factor of the cost of living, including housing and car ownership, which is substantially higher in Singapore, one of the most expensive cities in the world. He added that Singaporeans' disposable income for food could only be 20% of their salaries, or S$600.
In Malaysia, meanwhile, housing and car ownership are considerably less expensive, leaving them with a higher disposable income to pay for food, which Mr Tan believes is 40%.
The former NTUC Income chief also pointed out that food is less expensive in Malaysia than in Singapore, saying that a meal that costs RM12 in Malaysia will cost more than its equivalent in Singapore dollars. Instead of costing Singaporeans S$3.50, it could cost as much as S$8.
'After allowing for the lower disposable income, the Singaporean is likely to struggle with the cost of food, in the same way that the Malaysians have to struggle with higher costs,' wrote Mr Tan. He added a caveat, however, that this was his observation and he could be wrong.
His post has since been widely shared and commented on, although not everyone agreed with his observations.
'Dollar to dollar comparison, the cost of living is higher in Malaysia, isn't it?' asked one Facebook user.
'If we compare KL median housing prices, it is higher than the median HDB, in term of median income, the median income in KL is MYR4.2k , SG is S$5.5k. The only thing they can compete is car prices, but that's the best part of SG, you don't even need a car in SG for many in Singapore. Our public transport is world-class,' pointed out another.
A Malaysian working and living in Singapore wrote, 'SG is a lot cheaper, even with housing. I bought a BTO (build to order), which is cheap, but I do not own a car here. Chicken rice costs S$5 here, RM12 in Malaysia, not S$8. My disposable income is a lot higher, but my quality of life is definitely lower, with a small house without condo facilities and no car… waste a lot of time travelling.'
Another Malaysian wrote that, on average, Singaporeans and Malaysians spend the same on housing, and transportation can cost more in Malaysia, depending on location. In places such as Kuala Lumpur, it can be even more expensive than in Singapore.
In addition, while Malaysian food may be cheaper, at around 60% to 80% of the cost in Singapore, the cost of groceries may be the same.
Morever, they pointed out that Malaysians also face the risk of their vehicles getting destroyed in floods, which have become more common, 'and insurance will not cover it.'
The commenter added that the purchasing power of the Singapore dollar 'allows more Singaporeans to be less impacted by price hikes compared to neighbouring citizens'. /TISG
Read also: Post-PE2023: There is public space for Ng Kok Song, George Goh and, of course, Tan Kin Lian
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
6 minutes ago
- CNA
What happens when she earns more than him? High-earning women get real about dating, money and relationships
There is no point skirting around the issue: Money plays a significant role in the foundation of a healthy relationship. It is not about how much money you have. Money, or rather the process of earning it, brings other pertinent relationship topics into the spotlight – topics such as trust, communication, shared values and maturity. 'I have never been in a relationship where the man was more financially successful than I,' said Jo-anne Peng, a 46-year-old business development manager who earns a monthly salary of S$18,000. 'In each new relationship, I convinced myself that as long as I am financially comfortable and that the guy isn't expecting me to give him money, it's all good.' Peng has never asked her partners how much they were earning, but she guesses it was 30 to 50 per cent less than her. She told CNA Women that although this mentality meant she was never dependent on her partners, it also created a situation where she found it difficult to 'be a woman'. 'Over time, I forgot how to bring my feminine self into the relationship. The practical matters took over, and I neglected my emotional needs. And always, the love would die,' said Peng. Is Peng being dramatic? According to Aloysius Tay, principal psychologist at The Psychology Clinic, she is not. 'Jo-anne's feelings are completely legitimate. She is expressing how others in similar circumstances would feel but stay silent about. When one partner carries most of the financial load, it can lead to emotional burnout because they are expected to take care of the home and meet the other person's emotional needs.' While men also feel this strain, Tay said women often feel additional pressure because of expectations that they have, to be both strong providers and nurturing partners. 'They are stuck in a 'be everything' mode and this makes it hard for them to relax, feel supported, or even connected to their emotional selves,' he said. FINDING THE RIGHT BALANCE IS KEY But financial equality can present itself in another form. For Jessica Lim, a 41-year-old communications manager who has been with her partner for almost 23 years, financial success is not the same thing as financial values. She said: 'The more important thing is we need to have the same financial values. For example, we should have the same attitude towards spending and saving.' Lim believes both her husband and her are financially compatible despite the difference in the sizes of their pay cheques. The balance, she said, comes from the level of job security they face in their respective fields. She said: 'In my situation, layoffs are not uncommon in my industry. I've been made redundant twice but my husband's job is pretty secure and pays a decent bonus. So even though I earn more, I know I can lean on him for financial support when times are uncertain.' Amy Ang, a 35-year-old working in finance, holds the same belief that a man can make up for his lack of earning power in other ways. 'Emotional safety is what I look for at this stage in my life,' she said. Ang, who is single and earns about S$13,000 a month, feels that men who are financially successful may not be ready to commit so easily to one woman. 'I'm fine with dating a man who earns less but not to the extent that I have to change my lifestyle. What I look for is a man who has a plan for his finances and lives within his means.' Tay, the psychologist, added: 'The success of a relationship depends on more than income dynamics. It is about mutual respect, emotional intelligence, and shared values. What matters most is the willingness to share responsibility and power, and show each other appreciation for what they bring to the table.' "I DON'T NEED A MAN'S MONEY BUT I NEED A MAN WITH MONEY" In recent times, social media has presented content talking about 'feminine energy' and how women need to be in their 'feminine selves' to thrive in a relationship. 'Indeed, this observation has psychological support but it's more about people feeling emotionally fulfilled when they aren't weighed down by outside pressures, like financial strain,' Tay said. Peng, who is recently divorced, is adamant that for her next relationship, she wants a partner who is equally or more financially successful. 'I don't need a man's money but I need a man with money.' She explained that money is the result of a person working hard to build their career and ultimately, their legacy. 'I want someone who knows what it is like to worry about security, to acknowledge my worries about the future. When I'm tired, I also hope that my partner would be there to support me.' For Peng, money is not just a symbol of security, power, identity, and the ego – it is also about a person's mindset and how her partner can show up effectively in their relationship. It may look like she is fixated on 'who is earning more' but in reality, she is looking for a person who can support her goals and wellbeing. ARE HIGH-EARNING WOMEN PERCEIVED AS "TOO MUCH"? In Singapore, hypergamy (marrying up) is still very much a social expectation. However, rather than seeing high-earning women as 'picky', we should understand that they are likely being 'self-protective'. 'Some women may internalise the notion that their success restricts their 'romantic eligibility' and when they are with a man who is less successful, the man's insecurity will negatively impact the relationship,' said Tay. The reality may not be as harsh as these women think. Hayley Quinn, a dating coach whose TedX talk Searching for Love to Escape Ourselves attracted over 3 million viewers, writes on her website that it's not that men don't like successful women, but they just don't have it high on their priority list. And, believing that men are intimidated by a woman's success disempowers women in the dating field. She writes that while many men may not have much money in the bank, they also don't discriminate against successful women. 'The right relationship gives you the support and stability you need to reach your goals,' she said. It doesn't matter if you perceive money to be the dealmaker/breaker. What matters at the end of the day is going into every relationship with authenticity and that your partner shares, not breaks, your vision of life. 'Success is not the punishment. How men, women and society react to it, that's the punishment,' said Tay.
Straits Times
6 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump bid for cut of Nvidia, AMD chip revenue risks ‘dangerous world'
The Nvidia and AMD revenue-sharing deals could prompt the Trump administration to target other industries and goods. Hong Kong - The revenue-for-exports deal between the US government and two of the world's biggest chipmakers opens a new front in a trading regime turned upside down by Presdient Donald Trump. Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) agreed to pay the US government 15 per cent of revenue from some chip sales to China. The chips – Nvidia's H20 AI accelerator and AMD's MI308 chips – were earlier banned by the Trump administration and require export licences to sell. 'To call this unusual or unprecedented would be a staggering understatement,' said Stephen Olson, a former US trade negotiator now with the Singapore-based ISEA – Yusof Ishak Institute. 'What we are seeing is in effect the monetisation of US trade policy in which US companies must pay the US government for permission to export. If that's the case, we've entered into a new and dangerous world.' The chip-payment arrangement may face legal challenges because it could be construed as an export tax, something that's not allowed under the constitution, trade experts said. The proposal is the latest direct government intervention into business and finance since Mr Trump returned to the Oval Office in January. As well as a chaotic tariff campaign and persistent criticism of a sitting Federal Reserve chairman, Mr Trump has used his Truth Social platform for everything from calling on CEOs to resign to offering commentary on corporate advertising campaigns. Mr Trump's transactional policy approach saw him approve the sale of United States Steel Corp. to Japan's Nippon Steel in a US$14.1 billion (S$18 billion) deal that included caveats such as agreeing to US national security rules and a 'golden share' for the US government. Japan, South Korea and the European Union all pledged to invest billions in the United States, helping secure tariff rates of 15 per cent, while companies such as Apple have also skirted levies by promising to invest hundreds of billions of dollars. The Nvidia and AMD revenue-sharing deals may now prompt the White House to target other industries and goods, according to Deborah Elms, head of trade policy at the Hinrich Foundation in Singapore. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump signs order extending China tariff truce by 90 days, White House says World Trump seizes control of Washington police, deploys National Guard Opinion For Singapore, the AI revolution is coming just in time Asia Death of student in Sabah raises hurdle for Malaysian PM Anwar as he faces tough state polls soon Opinion Sumiko at 61: Hearing loss is linked to dementia risk. Here's what you risk by ignoring it Business S'pore start-up among 5 global picks for Japan construction group Kajima's mentorship and funding Business Lower-wage retail workers to receive up to 6% pay bump from Sept 1 Singapore ST Explains: Who owns Simba, the company that is buying M1? 'The sky is the limit,' she said. 'You could come up with all sorts of company-specific, country-specific combinations that would say, 'No one else can trade, but if you pay us directly, then you get the ability to trade.'' The Trump administration is already in the midst of a lawsuit related to his use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to levy what he called 'reciprocal' tariffs on the world. On Aug 8, Trump warned of a 'GREAT DEPRESSION' if US courts ruled that his tariffs were illegal. Chips are at the heart of the US-China battle to dominate industries of the future such as AI and automation. The Biden administration restricted the sale of advanced chips to China, prompting Nvidia to develop the H20, which skirted such restrictions. Trump administration officials tightened export controls in April by barring Nvidia from selling the chips without a permit. In July, however, the White House decided to allow Nvidia and AMD to resume sales of chips designed specifically for the Chinese market, which are several rungs below the most advanced artificial intelligence accelerators. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the administration wanted Chinese developers 'addicted' to American technology. China has grown increasingly hostile to the idea of Chinese firms deploying the H20, particularly after the US called for the chips to be installed with tracking technology to better enforce export controls. Yuyuantantian, a social media account affiliated with state-run China Central Television that regularly signals Beijing's thinking about trade, on Sunday slammed the chip's supposed security vulnerabilities and inefficiency. Still, Chinese companies could use the H20s because domestic firms can't produce enough AI chips to meet demand. That potentially provides an opportunity for Nvidia and AMD to sell more – and now for the US government to earn additional revenue as well. Mr Trump on Aug 11 signed an order extending a 90-day tariff truce between the US and China, which was set to expire on Aug 12, by another 90 days. This staves off triple-digit duties on Chinese goods as US retailers prepared for the critical end-of-year holiday season. 'There's clearly a shift by the administration to take a lighter national security stance as these negotiations are ongoing,' said Drew DeLong, lead in geopolitical dynamics practice at Kearney, a global strategy and management consulting firm. While the US has intervened before, including by taking stakes in private companies after the 2008 financial crisis, a similar deal like the one struck with Nvidia and AMD is hard to remember and – without proper oversight – could lead to a 'crony capitalism state,' according to Scott Kennedy, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. 'It represents a huge shift in the way the American economy is supposed to operate,' Mr Kennedy said. 'It won't make anyone happy except maybe the Chinese, who will get their chips and watch the US political system go through gyration and domestic tensions.' REUTERS
Business Times
6 minutes ago
- Business Times
Do Kwon may plead guilty in US case over US$40 billion Terraform collapse
[NEW YORK] Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon may plead guilty in a US fraud case tied to the US$40 billion collapse of the TerraUSD stablecoin in 2022. US District judge Paul Engelmayer in New York scheduled a change of plea hearing for Tuesday (Aug 12). The judge said in an order on Monday that Kwon should be ready to explain how he violated the law if he pleads guilty. Kwon, 33, pleaded not guilty in January following a two-year extradition battle over whether he would first face prosecution in the US or his native South Korea. A call to Kwon's lawyer was not immediately returned. Kwon was charged in both countries in connection with the implosion of Singapore-based Terraform's TerraUSD, which shook the crypto world in the spring of 2022. The downturn that followed played a role in the collapse of cryptocurrency exchange FTX. Kwon had been a fugitive from South Korean charges for months when he and Terraform's former chief financial officer were caught trying to board a Dubai-bound private jet at the airport in Montenegro's capital, Podgorica, with fake passports in March 2023. Kwon, who owned 92 per cent of Terraform, was held in Montenegro for months as officials in the Balkan nation spent most of two years battling over whether he should be extradited to the US or South Korea. Meanwhile, Terraform and Kwon were found liable for civil fraud in a 2024 suit by the US Securities and Exchange Commission. A jury in New York, at the end of a two-week trial, determined that Kwon and Terraform misled investors. Jurors found that Terraform and Kwon falsely claimed that Chai, a popular Korean payment application, was using Terraform's blockchain technology to make transactions. The jurors also found investors were misled about the stability of the UST stablecoin, which Kwon and Terraform claimed was algorithmically pegged to the US dollar. Terraform and Kwon later agreed to pay the US US$4.47 billion to resolve the case. The deal required Kwon to wind down the business and use any remaining assets to pay off the company's creditors. BLOOMBERG
