Oleg Gordievsky, famed Cold War spy and KGB defector, dead at 86
Gordievsky died on March 4 in England, where he had lived since defecting from the Soviet Union in 1985. Police said on Saturday that they are not treating his death as suspicious. The BBC reported on Friday that Gordievsky "died peacefully" at his home in Surrey.
The world learned his name four decades ago, when the British Foreign Office announced on Sept. 12, 1985, that Gordievsky — initially described as being a senior official of the KGB — had sought and been granted asylum in the United Kingdom.
After his defection, then-prime minister Margaret Thatcher sought to cut a deal with Moscow: If Gordievsky's wife and daughters were allowed to join him in London, Britain would not expel all of the KGB agents he had exposed.
Moscow rejected the offer, and Thatcher, pointing to information Gordievsky provided, ordered the expulsion of more than two dozen people — diplomats, journalists and trade officials among them — over allegations they were involved in spying.
Gordievsky, a once high-ranking KGB officer who defected to the West, is shown during an interview with CBC's The Journal in August 1991. (The Journal/CBC Archives)
The move was announced despite objections from Foreign Secretary Geoffrey Howe, who feared it could scuttle relations just as reforming Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev was easing the stalemate between Russia and the West.
Soviet officials rejected the spying allegations, with a spokesperson telling reporters that "all accusations, or insinuations, as to the alleged illegal activities of the Soviet representatives have nothing to do with reality."
Moscow responded by expelling 25 Britons. But despite Howe's fears, diplomatic relations were never severed.
Reassuring a jittery Moscow
Two years before his defection, in 1983, Gordievsky had warned Britain and the United States that the Soviet leadership was so worried about a nuclear attack by the West that it was considering a first strike. As tensions spiked during a NATO military exercise in Germany, Gordievsky helped reassure Moscow that it was not a precursor to a nuclear attack.
Soon after, Ronald Reagan, U.S. president at the time, began moves to ease nuclear tensions with the Soviet Union.
With time, the public would learn more about the dramatic circumstances that brought Gordievsky to a new life in the West.
He'd been posted to the KGB's London office in 1982, but his tenure there abruptly ended a few years later, when Gordievsky was recalled to the Soviet Union on suspicion of being a Western mole — which he was, as he'd been sharing secrets with British intelligence for years.
Daring escape, first heading to Finland
In May 1985, Gordievsky returned to Moscow, as directed, and he endured interrogation but was not charged.
In July of that year, he made a dramatic escape from the Soviet Union, via a British exfiltration effort that saw him spirited across the border to Finland while he hid in the trunk of a car.
Agents involved in his rescue are said to have played a cassette recording of Jean Sibelius's Finlandia as a signal to Gordievsky that they had made it across the border. He was then flown to Britain through Norway.
Gordievsky's family remained under KGB surveillance for six years before being allowed to join him in England in 1991, the year the Soviet Union dissolved.
"Many times, I was saying to myself: 'It's like a movie, it's like a movie,'" Gordievsky told the BBC's Witness Historypodcast in 2015, recounting the story of his escape. "It was incredible."
British authorities credit Gordievsky with having made "an outstanding contribution" to the country's national security and to helping tamp down tensions between Russia and the West during "a critical time of the Cold War."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
DOJ doubles reward for arrest of Venezuela's Maduro to $50M
The Department of Justice (DOJ) on Thursday upped the reward it's offering for information that leads to the arrest of Venezuela's President Nicolás Maduro to $50 million. 'He is one of the largest narco traffickers in the world and a threat to our national security. Therefore, we've doubled his reward to $50 million,' Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a video posted to X. The Biden administration previously set the award amount at $25 million, which was an increase from the first Trump administration when officials offered $15 million for information that led to Maduro. Maduro was indicted in 2020 on U.S. charges of narco-terrorism for allegedly attempting to weaponize cocaine by 'flooding' U.S. communities with the drug. Western leaders have refused to recognize Maduro as the legitimate president of Venezuela, pointing to what they say is a disputed reelection leading to his return to office in 2024. Still, he's garnered support from local allies who claim Bondi's reward for his arrest is politically motivated. 'We're not surprised, coming from whom it comes from. The same one who promised a nonexistent 'secret list' of Epstein and who wallows in scandals for political favors,'Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yvan Gil said in a statement, referencing her failure to produce a client list for convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, according to the Associated Press. 'Her show is a joke, a desperate distraction from her own misery.' 'Under President Trump's leadership, Maduro will not escape justice and he will be held accountable for his despicable crimes,' she added. Officials said they've already seized over $700 million worth of assets linked to Maduro to include two private jets and nine vehicles. The Drug Enforcement Administration has recovered 7 tons of cocaine linked to the Venezuelan leader often trafficked by members of TDA, Sinaloa, and Cartel of the Sons street gangs, according to the DOJ.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Douglas Murray: Mamdani smears Cuomo for allegedly talking to Trump —and yet associates himself with Mahmoud Khalil
'Democratic socialist' Zohran Mamdani is trying to smear one of his rivals by association. Yesterday the Democratic mayoral nominee claimed Wednesday that Andrew Cuomo recently spoke to President Trump by phone. Mamdani claimed that the two men had been 'conspiring about the fate of this city.' Advertisement For his part, former Gov. Cuomo has denied that he has even had a phone call with the president. But so what if he had? Is the president of the United States — a man who won the popular vote last November — so fringe that no candidate for mayor of New York should even speak with him? Advertisement That seems to be Mamdani's view. Keep away from fringe, wacko figures like, er, the president of this country. But if Mamdani is so keen on guilt by non-association, why not apply the same standard to him? To that end it would be good to know why Mamdani has been so happy to advocate for, associate with and even campaign alongside Mahmoud Khalil, formerly of Columbia University. 'A moral victory' Advertisement Readers will remember that Khalil was the former student who was weirdly living with his wife on student accommodation but whose main occupation seemed to be leading student protests at Columbia since October 2023. It is Khalil's group — Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD) — that declared the Oct. 7 massacre to be 'a moral, military and political victory' and declared that as an organization CUAD was 'fighting for the total eradication of Western civilization.' After discovering that Khalil — a foreign national — had lied on his visa application, praised terrorists and organized unrest in New York, ICE detained Khalil. He promptly became one of the great poster boys of the anti-American left. Advertisement They decided that nobody in America will be free until Mahmoud Khalil is free. Former Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil, accompanied by his wife Noor Abdalla, raises his hands as he arrives for a press conference outside the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York on June 22, 2025. AFP via Getty Images They decided that Khalil had done nothing wrong and was indeed a free-speech martyr. It's funny the people some folks are willing to make into folk heroes. Since his release from ICE detention, Khalil has been playing the same sob story as his wife did while he was in custody — claiming that America had been exceptionally mean to him. Apparently all he wanted to do was to study in the US. Something he appears to have spent almost zero time actually doing — preferring the path of agitation. 'Had to reach' Now, in an interview out this week, Khalil has once again exposed his real views and intent. In an interview with Ezra Klein of The New York Times, he talked about why he came to America in the first place. Advertisement He said that he was attracted to 'the quality of education' in this country, knew about Columbia because of its reputation in 'Palestinian circles' and was pleased to get a scholarship in 2018. Democratic New York City mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani during a news conference outside the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building on Thursday, August 7, 2025, in New York, N.Y. James Keivom He didn't exactly reward this country for the honor and opportunities it gave him. In fact, he seems to have found one of the most radical campuses in America to be not radical enough for him. Advertisement 'The anti-Palestinian sentiment at Columbia was very obvious,' he now claims — a statement so deranged that you wonder whether Khalil knows the difference between up and down, earth and sky. But it is his statements about Hamas and the October 7th massacre that are most disgusting. Asked about his reaction to the events of that day, he said: 'It felt frightening that we had to reach this moment in the Palestinian struggle.' Apart from asking who the 'we' is in that sentence, I'd love to know why Khalil thinks that raping women and massacring young people at a dance party is some kind of inevitability. According to Khalil, 'We [again] couldn't avoid such a moment.' Advertisement 'Palestinians are here' Pushed lightly on why it was necessary to murder babies and kidnap pensioners, Khalil went on to explain that the problem was that the Israelis were trying to make a peace and normalization deal with the Saudis. Something that would have added to the extraordinary success of the Abraham Accords that had been signed with other Arab countries. Khalil thinks that the idea of 'normalization' is appalling. Advertisement In his view, the Palestinians 'are not being heard' and so the atrocities and barbarism of October 7th were an 'attempt to tell the world that Palestinians are here.' That's certainly one hell of a way to tell people. 'It was not inevitable' In case it isn't obvious, this is pure apologism for Hamas. Moderate, peace-loving Palestinian voices comprehensively refute Khalil's evil view. For instance, the proud American, Gazan-born Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib, said yesterday, 'Khalil invoked the repetitive and tired idea that the October 7 attack by Hamas was an inevitability, when the truth is far more straightforward and needs to be told by Gazan voices and those who are impacted by the war.' 'October 7th was a choice, not an inevitability! A choice that two psychopaths made from within Hamas' military wing, Sinwar and Al-Deif. It was not inevitable that Gaza had to be the source of the worst single-day attack on the Jewish people since the Holocaust.' He went on: 'Hamas squandered billions of dollars and tens of thousands of lives for a fraudulent resistance narrative.' Unfortunately, Khalil is one of many arrivals in this country who have pushed that fraudulent narrative. The same people who claim, as Khalil went on to claim in his interview with Klein, that the bloody and murderous Second Intifada [2000-2005] was a mostly 'peaceful uprising.' So, Mr. Mamdani, if Gov. Cuomo is to be smeared for having the audacity to even be reported to have spoken to the US president, what are we to make of you knowingly and repeatedly associating with a terrorist mouthpiece? What are the voters of New York to think about a candidate for mayor who is so happy to advocate for terrorists for years and associate himself even now with someone who makes such excuses for terrorism? Any candidate for mayor who thinks President Trump is a more reprehensible figure than a Hamas apologist should be nowhere near the running of this city.
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Gridlock on the Western grid
With help from Noah Baustin, Alex Nieves and Saqib Rahim POWER PLAYS: California wants to lead the West into a unified electricity market. The problem? California. Lawmakers have just over a month to salvage legislation that could reshape the Western power grid. Forming an independent West-wide grid operator to manage electricity trading a day ahead of time, as Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democratic lawmakers are proposing, would expand on the real-time trading market already run by California's grid operator. The promised benefits include more easily exporting the state's surplus solar during the daytime and tapping the Pacific Northwest's steady hydropower during the evening, when solar goes down and power demand spikes. The catch: California wants to drive the transition, and the rest of the West won't get in the car unless it lets go of the wheel. Former Public Utilities Commission President Loretta Lynch, one of the foremost opponents, warned lawmakers this spring that the new regional grid would 'give up control of the pilot seat' and expose Californians to higher costs and out-of-state fossil fuels. Ratepayer advocates and some environmental groups have echoed the concerns — pushing for tighter legal safeguards in case legal challengers or the Trump administration try to use a new regional grid to undercut California's leading renewable energy laws. (Meanwhile, East Coast Democrats have been bashing their own regional grid operator for rising power costs.) Backers, both inside and outside California, say the fears are overblown. They're also running out of time. A rival regional market based in Arkansas is gaining traction, winning commitments from Arizona and Washington utilities that once considered teaming with California. They cited a more palatable governance structure even if costs might be lower in California. (Still up for grabs: energy providers in states like Colorado, New Mexico and Idaho.) 'If we don't do this, then we could lose all of our neighbors to the market out of Arkansas,' said Sen. Josh Becker, author of the bill, SB 540, that would pave the way for California to set up the regional grid. 'It can't look like, and it can't actually be, a California-dominated market.' But amendments Becker took in May to get through the Senate Appropriations Committee — which added a California oversight council made up of lawmakers with power to pull out of the new market — have spooked backers. Environmental groups that once co-sponsored the bill have pulled their support, warning that the new structure is too California-centric to attract other states. Utilities central to California's plan, including Pacific Gas & Electric and PacifiCorp, told lawmakers that the new bill could drive trading partners to sign on to the rival market instead, which would drive up the cost of getting energy in moments of grid stress. Becker said he's gotten an earful across state lines. At last month's National Caucus of Environmental Legislators meeting, Oregon lawmakers pulled him aside during dinner to press for an update. 'They really want this to happen,' he said. He's also heard from curious (but largely agnostic) Utah and Washington legislators, he said. The effort still has momentum. The bill passed the Senate unanimously in June, with strong backing from Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire. This month, both Newsom and Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas publicly pledged to stand up the regional grid, with Newsom calling it 'our best shot at lowering energy costs' in a year dominated by affordability concerns. They stopped short of endorsing the current version of SB 540, however. Becker said the bill is 'untenable' as written but that he expects to amend the bill once lawmakers return from summer recess on Aug. 18. Even if it passes, the deal isn't done. Kathleen Staks, executive director of Western Freedom, an organization representing large industrial and commercial power customers who want a regional grid, and a key leader of the West-Wide Governance Pathways Initiative, said her main focus right now was keeping the coalition together — a broad group that includes utilities who've already committed to California's regional grid like PacifiCorp, companies like Amazon and Rivian, and former skeptics like labor unions, who were worried about ceding control over California's energy but were mollified by backers promising that wouldn't happen. 'When you're talking about that kind of an investment, you need some certainty — and creating that certainty from California is really critical,' Staks said. 'Being able to build trust that has been lost, and maybe in some places was never even there, is going to be what we have to work on next.' — CvK Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! CUTTING THE LINE: California is on its way to establishing 30 experimental gas-free communities. On Thursday, scores of people eagerly urged the California Public Utilities Commission not to choose their town. 'I really like my gas appliances. I don't want to get rid of them,' said one Costa Mesa caller during the agency's public forum on designating 'neighborhood decarbonization zones.' A similar sentiment was shared by many commenters, perhaps a sign that a Southern California Gas Co. email blast encouraging customers to weigh in at the forum hit home. But the opposition was far from unanimous. A City of Santa Barbara staffer called in expressing the municipality's interest in participating in the program. The controversy stems from the 2024 passage of SB 1221, which instructed the CPUC to set up pilot project zones in which utilities would be relieved of their obligation to provide natural gas in the area to help customers instead transition to zero-emission alternatives. In July, California's utilities submitted maps showing where they planned to replace pipelines in coming years. But Denise Grab, energy law and policy project director for the UCLA Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, worries that the maps highlight such a wide swath of locations that it could overwhelm the CPUC, slowing the program's progress. 'When everything is a priority (neighborhood decarbonization zone), nothing is a priority,' Grab wrote in a post on Legal Planet. Pacific Gas & Electric, SoCalGas and San Diego Gas & Electric didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. The agency has until Jan. 1, 2026, to choose its priority neighborhoods, and another six months to set up the pilot programs. Energy customers in the chosen zones will get a chance to vote on whether they want to participate, and a community will need at least 67 percent of customers' ayes to set up a pilot. — NB RETURN OF THE SUN: The California Supreme Court gave rooftop solar advocates a small win Thursday. The state's highest court ruled that a lower court had deferred too much to state utility regulators when it upheld the California Public Utilities Commission' 2022 decision to slash incentives to new rooftop solar customers. The case now goes back to the court of appeals, where a judge will have to consider the arguments for and against with fresh eyes. The decision means the fight over the payments rooftop solar customers get from selling energy back to the grid through a process called 'net metering' will continue on. But it also has broader implications for the CPUC, which is now on the back foot in other legal disputes over its various decisions. 'This is the highest court in the state saying, 'Look, you have to follow the law closely,'' said Roger Lin, an attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity, one of the plaintiffs alongside the Environmental Working Group and the Protect Our Communities Foundation. Terrie Prosper, a CPUC spokesperson, said the agency appreciates 'the Court's careful attention to the appropriate standard of deference for reviewing CPUC decisions.' 'We are pleased that the CPUC's decision will remain in effect as an important part of controlling electricity bills,' she said. — CvK SMOG SETTLEMENT: U.S. EPA officials have agreed to issue a decision by next month on whether the Central Valley is out of compliance with federal standards for smog-forming ozone. The agency agreed in a proposed lawsuit settlement released Thursday to issue a final rule by Sept. 15 on whether the San Joaquin Valley meets the 1997 federal ozone standard of 80 parts per billion, Sean Reilly reports for POLITICO's E&E News. If a judge approves the deal between EPA and groups, including the Committee for a Better Arvin and the Sierra Club, federal officials would also face a January deadline to decide on a 'contingency measure' to cut vehicle tailpipe pollution in the region. The Central Valley and Southern California consistently rank among the smoggiest regions in the U.S, and are both in 'extreme' nonattainment for ozone, the lowest ranking on EPA's scale. Ozone is the main component of smog, which increases the risk of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. — AN, SR DISASTER DRAMA: The insurance industry is pushing back on Sen. Adam Schiff's attempt to create a federal backstop to stabilize state insurance markets. Congressional Democrats are proposing a federal reinsurance program that would cap the amount insurers pay in claims after large disasters. The program, funded by premiums, would pay out the remainder of the claim after the cap is reached. The American Property Casualty Insurance Association and National Association of Mutual Insurance Cos. warn that the proposal would create incentives for people to live in high-risk areas and artificially suppress rates, as Saqib Rahim reports for POLITICO's E&E News. Schiff's bill is an attempt to lower the cost of reinsurance, essentially insurance for insurance companies, which providers buy to pay a portion of claims after a catastrophic event — like the Los Angeles wildfires earlier this year. Schiff introduced a similar bill in 2024 while serving in the House. That effort died in committee. — AN, SR — New research finds that ropeless fishing gear can avoid whale entanglements while also preserving yield for commercial Dungeness crab fishermen. — A new giant solar-plus-storage power plant in the Mojave Desert will power seven percent of the city of Los Angeles. — Venture capital funding for solar companies fell significantly in the first half of this year — but project acquisitions and mergers picked up.
