Europe is shifting from supplying weapons to Ukraine to funding its defense industries
It's a strategy to make Ukraine more self-reliant and ease pressure on Europe's own stockpiles.
Ukraine is a far cheaper place to manufacture weapons at scale, one expert told BI.
European countries are shifting their strategy when it comes to Ukraine, aiming to boost the country's capacity to produce enough weapons for its own defense rather than handing over ready-made weapons from their own depleting stockpiles.
In March, the European Union said that half of a €2 billion ($2.3 billion) aid package, taken from frozen Russian assets, was being earmarked specifically to help Ukraine boost its own artillery production, the largest package of its kind to date.
It's a trend that could have wider repercussions.
Military analysts told Business Insider that directing funds to grow Ukraine's defense industry can help reduce Ukrainian dependence on foreign military aid and strengthen Europe's own growing defense sector.
Europe struggles to produce enough shells
After decades of peace, Europe is rapidly bolstering its defenses amid waning US support and renewed threats from Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Even so, its armaments industry is struggling to rebuild military stockpiles while simultaneously providing Ukraine with the shells and other weapons it needs to fend off Russia.
Ukraine's own burgeoning defense sector offers a solution, Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, a senior fellow at the Bruegel think tank and a non-resident senior fellow with the Peterson Institute for International Economics, told BI.
"It makes imminent financial and economic sense for especially richer Western European nations to directly finance the full utilization of expanding Ukrainian production capacity," he said.
Ukraine, Kirkegaard added, is a far cheaper place to manufacture weapons at scale than Western Europe, and it already has a growing and innovative defense manufacturing sector.
Refocusing European arms production in Ukraine itself is a "win-win," he suggested, enabling Europe to cut costs, boost a crucial ally, and also see weaponry tested and refined on the battlefield.
Ukraine boosts weapons production
In the early years of Russia's full-scale invasion, Ukraine was heavily dependent on its Western allies for weapons and ammunition, and was manufacturing only a small fraction of the weapons it needed.
But it's fired up old Soviet weapons manufacturing plants and now produces around 40% of the weapons it uses at the front, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said this month.
Ukraine is also now a world leader in the development and production of cheap UAV drones, which have become ubiquitous weapons on the battlefield.
"We've become the biggest drone manufacturer in the world, drones of tactical and strategic level," Rustem Umerov, Ukraine's defense minister, said in February.
And as BI's Jake Epstein reported, Ukraine's drone makers aren't just building weapons — they are rewriting the rules of modern warfare at a pace and scale that few could have imagined only a few years ago.
"With the rising importance of drones, the share of Ukrainian domestic production will also rise," said Kirkegaard.
Europe's defense sector, meanwhile, has struggled to boost production to keep pace with demand, with military analysts at the UK's Royal United Services Institute in April identifying regulation and a lack of coordination as factors holding it back.
"Increasing the output of domestic industry takes time," Jacob Parakilas, research leader for Defence Strategy, Policy and Capabilities at RAND Europe, told BI. "Ukrainian industry, which is already much more mobilized, can be effectively supported in the short term with direct investment and targeted knowledge transfer."
Parakilas said that European countries would also get a major boost from working more closely with Ukraine to jointly raise production.
"These approaches can happen simultaneously, and ideally produces synergies," he added, with "Ukrainian experience informing European understanding of the state of the art, while European money supports Ukrainian industry."
European defense firms set up shop in Ukraine
Several European defense firms, including Rheinmetall in Germany, BAE Systems in the UK, and the Franco-German firm KDNS, have already set up manufacturing operations in Ukraine to make military supplies, including armored vehicles.
Others, such as France's Thales, have entered into joint ventures with Ukrainian companies.
And cooperation between Ukraine and NATO countries on arms production is steadily increasing.
According to Ukrainian media, state arms manufacturer Ukroboronprom State Concern has been working with an unspecified NATO country to manufacture ammo since 2022. The ammunition is reportedly made to the alliance's standards, further integrating NATO and the Ukrainian military.
Ukraine has also been working with Poland to manufacture shells and other equipment domestically since 2023.
The latest aid packages will further boost these efforts. "This trend is expected to gain pace during 2025 as the US pivot away from Europe fuels increased defense spending across the continent," Serhii Kuzan, chairman of the Ukrainian Security and Cooperation Center, wrote for The Atlantic Council in March.
Parakilas projected that with more European support, Ukraine could manufacture significantly more than 40% of its equipment domestically, and move into manufacturing more complex weapons and technology, which it still relies heavily on its allies for.
But this, he said, meant the sector would become more exposed to Russian attacks and would "probably require greater and more careful investment to produce resilient returns."
Even so, it seems likely that Western European and Ukrainian defense sectors are moving toward closer integration.
"It will over time not be sensible to distinguish between the EU/European and Ukrainian defense sectors," Kirkegaard said. "They will become one."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
41 minutes ago
- New York Post
Miranda Devine: Russiagate lies are being exposed — and everybody is watching, even the Dems
Despite the best efforts of Russiagate-complicit media to dismiss as 'Russian disinformation' the latest revelations in this escalating scandal implicating Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in the treasonous 'years-long coup' against President Trump, the public is paying attention and wants heads to roll. According to a Rasmussen poll released Monday, two-thirds of voters (65%) are following declassified releases over the past month by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and Sen. Chuck Grassley 'very closely' (32%) or 'somewhat closely' (33%), repudiating the calculated media silence about the Obama administration's fake narratives and manipulation of intelligence to frame Donald Trump as a Kremlin stooge to cover up Hillary Clinton's wrongdoing. The poll of 1,172 likely voters, conducted July 29-31, shows 54% believe Obama administration officials committed serious crimes in 'manipulating intelligence,' with 37% saying it's 'very likely' and 17% saying it's 'somewhat likely.' A staggering 69% agree it is critical that the perpetrators be held accountable 'for the survival of our country.' Dems interested too Even more disturbing for Democrats is that it's not just Republicans who are concerned. The poll shows 56% of Democrats are following the investigation, 32% believe serious crimes were committed and 59% agree the perpetrators must be 'held accountable.' The respective Republican comparison is 75%, 83% and 86%. Hispanics are more cynical about the scandal than either black or white voters, with 66% saying serious crimes were committed and 74% wanting accountability, compared to 51% and 65% respectively for blacks, and 53% and 69% respectively for whites. Men are more concerned than women, with 74% vs. 59% following the revelations closely; 60% vs. 49% believing there is serious criminality; and 72% vs. 66% favoring accountability. It's a demonstration of the impotence of Democrat-allied media, like The New York Times, Washington Post, ABC, NBC and CBS, who showered themselves with praise and Pulitzer Prizes for their since-debunked stories about Russiagate and are hoping their audience is willing to be duped again. But like the boy who cried wolf, no one is listening anymore. According to Gabbard's office, ABC, CBS and NBC spent a total of 2,284 minutes covering Russiagate, yet they have devoted only 2 minutes and 17 seconds on the disclosures of the last couple of weeks. Even when they mention the story, it's to try to debunk it. Obama administration CIA Director John Brennan and DNI James Clapper and Hillary Clinton lawyer Marc Elias have fanned out across their favorite media outlets desperately trying to extinguish public interest. 'I am imploring, like honestly, I'm just imploring the media, do not report this as a legitimate investigation,' Elias told MSNBC. 'Do not report this as 'They are opening an investigation into John Brennan' . . . Report this as the misuse, the abuse, the authoritarian takeover of the Department of Justice. That should be the headline.' Hah! Too bad for Elias, it's no longer 2016. The public — and Donald Trump — are wiser and more determined to put heads on pikes. The renewed scrutiny of the 'Obama administration's conspiracy to subvert Trump's 2016 victory and presidency,' as Gabbard puts it, began early last month, when CIA Director John Ratcliffe released a bombshell review of the Intelligence Community Assessment, ordered by Obama on Dec. 9, 2016, that falsely claimed Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to help Trump. The review found Brennan, Clapper and then-FBI Director James Comey were 'excessively involved' in the ICA drafting, rushed its completion before Trump took office and forced the inclusion of the discredited Steele dossier, over the objections of the CIA's Russia experts, suggesting a 'potential political motive.' 'Treasonous conspiracy' That ICA was the genesis of Russiagate, casting doubt over the legitimacy of Trump's 2016 election and sabotaging his first term, with Obama the 'ringleader,' says Trump, and Democrat-allied media was crucial to its success. Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe here! What followed Ratcliffe's bombshell was a systematic release by Gabbard and Grassley of evidence that exposed the Obama and Biden administrations' weaponization of law enforcement and intelligence agencies against Trump. July 18: Gabbard releases a declassified report that finds that at a meeting in the Oval Office on Dec 9, 2016, Obama directed top national security officials, including Clapper, Brennan, Comey, Andrew McCabe, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Loretta Lynch and Avril Haines, to create a new intelligence assessment saying Russians meddled in the election on behalf of Trump, contradicting multiple intelligence assessments to the contrary released previously. Gabbard describes the plot as a 'treasonous conspiracy by officials at the highest levels of the Obama White House to subvert the will of the American people and try to usurp the President from fulfilling his mandate.' July 23: Gabbard holds a press conference at the White House to announce that she has sent criminal referrals to the DOJ and FBI implicating Obama and his national security team in 'seditious conspiracy.' She alleges Brennan suppressed intelligence showing Russia was not favoring Trump. She also releases a declassified House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence report that had been withheld even from the committee. It shows that in September 2016, Russia's foreign intelligence service had obtained DNC emails showing Clinton was suffering from 'intensified psycho-emotional' and physical problems. Russian spies also had a Clinton campaign email discussing a plan to tie Trump to Putin to distract Americans from Hillary's email-server scandal. July 30: Brennan and Clapper write an op-ed in The New York Times branding as 'patently false' allegations from Gabbard and Ratcliffe 'that senior officials of the Obama administration manufactured politicized intelligence, silenced intelligence professionals and engaged in a broad 'treasonous conspiracy' to undermine the presidency of Donald Trump.' Gabbard responds by releasing a whistleblower's account detailing the pressure applied to him to agree to a bogus assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump. 'I was pressured to alter my views,' the intelligence analyst-turned whistleblower claimed. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters His boss told him in January 2017: 'There is reporting you are not allowed to see, if you saw it, you would agree . . . Isn't it possible Putin has something on Trump, to blackmail and coerce him? . . . You need to TRUST ME on this.' The whistleblower tried repeatedly to report his concerns about the fraudulent ICA to multiple government officials, including the inspector general for the intelligence community and former special counsel John Durham, but was rebuffed and ignored. 'Consequences' 'There must be consequences,' White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told Fox News host Maria Bartiromo on Sunday. 'Because, if we have a country where we can continue to have FBI careerists and CIA careerists, deep staters, who will fabricate and doctor evidence . . . to try to go after their political enemies, up to and including the president, if we continue to create the impression and the reality that there is not a criminal, a severe criminal penalty for such conduct, it will never stop,' he said. Yes, this is not about looking in the rearview mirror or pursuing petty vendettas, as Trump critics say. It's about holding the coup-plotters accountable as a deterrent, restoring the integrity of our intelligence and law enforcement institutions and righting a historic wrong committed against the American people.

Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
China Is Choking Supply of Critical Minerals to Western Defense Companies
China is limiting the flow of critical minerals to Western defense manufacturers, delaying production and forcing companies to scour the world for stockpiles of the minerals needed to make everything from bullets to jet fighters. Earlier this year, as U.S.-China trade tensions soared, Beijing tightened the controls it places on the export of rare earths. While Beijing allowed them to start flowing after the Trump administration agreed in June to a series of trade concessions, China has maintained a lock on critical minerals for defense purposes. China supplies around 90% of the world's rare earths and dominates the production of many other critical minerals.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Ukrainian drone attack sets Russian oil depot on fire as Zelenskyy announces prisoner exchange
An overnight Ukrainian drone attack on an oil depot near Russia's Black Sea resort of Sochi sparked a major fire, Russian officials said Sunday, as the two countries traded strikes and the Ukrainian president announced a prisoner exchange. More than 120 firefighters attempted to extinguish the blaze, which was caused by debris from a downed drone striking a fuel tank, Krasnodar regional Gov. Veniamin Kondratyev said on Telegram. Videos on social media appeared to show huge pillars of smoke billowing above the oil depot. Russia's civil aviation authority, Rosaviatsia, temporarily stopped flights at Sochi's airport. Farther north, authorities in the Voronezh region reported that four people were wounded in another Ukrainian drone strike. Russia's Defense Ministry said its air defenses shot down 93 Ukrainian drones over Russia and the Black Sea overnight into Sunday. Meanwhile, in southern Ukraine, a Russian missile strike hit a residential area in the city of Mykolaiv, according to the State Emergency Services, wounding seven people. The Ukrainian air force said Sunday Russia launched 76 drones and seven missiles against Ukraine. It said 60 drones and one missile were intercepted, but 16 others and six missiles hit targets across eight locations. The reciprocal attacks came at the end of one of the deadliest weeks in Ukraine in recent months, after a Russian drone and missile attack on Thursday killed 31 people, including five children, and wounded over 150. The continued attacks come after U.S. President Donald Trump last week gave Russian President Vladimir Putin a shorter deadline — Aug. 8 — for peace efforts to make progress. Trump has threatened to impose new economic sanctions on Russia if progress is not made, while expressing doubt about how effective they would be. 'You know, they're wily characters, and they're pretty good at avoiding sanctions, so we'll see what happens,' Trump said Sunday evening of the Russians. He said his special envoy Steve Witkoff may travel to Russia on Wednesday or Thursday, the final days before his new deadline. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Sunday that Ukraine and Russia have agreed to exchange 1,200 prisoners following their latest round of negotiations in Istanbul in July. 'There is an agreement to exchange 1,200 people,' he wrote on X, saying that the lists of individuals to be swapped were being worked on and that they were working to 'unblock the return of our civilians.' There was no immediate comment from Russia. Zelenskyy also said he discussed with top Ukrainian officials 'the negotiation track – specifically, the implementation of the agreements reached during the meetings with the Russian side in Istanbul, as well as preparations for a new meeting.' Each of the three rounds of talks between the countries this year has resulted in prisoner exchanges but yielded no breakthrough in reaching a ceasefire.