logo
Why MAP (Minimum AI-Ready Product) Is The New MVP

Why MAP (Minimum AI-Ready Product) Is The New MVP

Forbesa day ago

Ashay Satav is a Product leader at eBay, specializing in products in AI, APIs, and platform space across Fintech, SaaS, and e-commerce.
What makes AI-driven products so distinct that we need a new term like MAP? The difference lies in how AI-first products are conceived compared to traditional products. In a conventional minimum viable product (MVP), AI may be seen as a "nice-to-have" feature added later to automate certain functions. In contrast, a minimum AI-ready product (MAP) strategically integrates AI from the beginning, resulting in intelligent, adaptive and anticipatory products right from day one.
What Is A Minimum AI-Ready Product?
A minimum AI-ready product can be viewed as the next-generation minimum viable product designed for an AI-focused world. It represents the smallest functional product with essential components to harness artificial intelligence effectively.
A MAP is designed to be viable and ready for AI enhancement. While it may not yet have a complex AI model in place—sometimes the "AI" in a MAP may involve a manual process or a basic algorithm—the key idea is that the product's architecture and team are equipped to integrate or upgrade to genuine AI as more data is collected. If PMs overlook data and AI factors during the MVP stage, making adjustments later can be challenging.
Decomposition Of A Minimum AI-Ready Product
Data is at the core of any AI-ready product. AI systems learn from data, so a MAP must be designed to collect and utilize it continuously from day one. A robust data pipeline is essential and should not be an afterthought. Identify critical data early, such as user behaviors and transactions, and ensure your product captures it effectively. Design your MAP to collect both explicit feedback (like forms) and implicit feedback (such as usage logs and click streams).
An AI-ready product should integrate machine learning (ML) models seamlessly into the user experience and system architecture. For instance, if your app plans to personalize content with an ML model, the MAP could start with a basic heuristic while calling a service for recommendations. This early planning helps avoid future refactoring. Consider a MAP as having "hooks" for intelligence, allowing the architecture to support ongoing updates and easy rollbacks if needed.
Building an AI-ready product involves focusing on both technology and collaboration among people. Unlike a traditional MVP team of just a few developers and a product manager, a MAP needs a cross-functional team. This includes PMs, engineers, data scientists, machine learning experts and UX designers. A team should have product managers who align efforts with business goals, designers who ensure usability, engineers who build scalable systems and AI specialists who develop models.
Any discussion of AI in products must include ethical and security considerations. AI can introduce various risks, including biased decision-making, privacy leaks and opaque systems that users may not trust. If your product collects user data for AI, ensure that you obtain consent and provide a clear privacy policy. Use encryption and secure data storage, even if your user count is small—breaches at an early stage can be just as damaging to trust, if not more so, than breaches that occur later.
Guidance To The Product Manager On Building AI-Ready Products
Integrate AI into the heart of your product strategy rather than treating it as an experiment on the side. When crafting your PRDs or setting your OKRs, it's crucial to incorporate AI-driven goals immediately. For example, a goal could be, "Use machine learning to improve personalization and increase user retention by X%." This emphasizes the importance of AI to your team and helps ensure that resources are allocated effectively.
The development of AI features involves a degree of experimentation. Product development should necessitate more hypothesis testing, prototyping and iteration than a typical software project. Before making meaningful investments, run a pilot to determine if an AI model delivers value. Embrace a prototype-and-test mentality, where you validate the impact of potential AI features with a simplified version before scaling them up.
Realistically, not all features in your backlog should be AI-powered. Part of an effective strategy is to select the correct problems for AI to address. Identify use cases where AI can significantly improve user experiences or automate labor-intensive processes and concentrate your efforts there. A prudent approach is to start with one or two high-impact AI use cases. "Start small but smart," as one framework suggests.
Product managers must allocate resources effectively and measure success. They should also focus on metrics like AI recommendation accuracy and prediction latency on top of traditional product metrics, such as monthly active users (MAUs) or conversion rates. Tracking these metrics ensures that the AI component receives adequate attention. Strategically plan for slightly longer development cycles or dual-track development (one track for model development and another for feature development).
To summarize, a product manager should fundamentally consider AI readiness at the strategic level, which, as needed, would be integrated into the product's vision, road map and team culture. This involves anticipating the data, talent, and integration needs and addressing them in product development. By doing so, project managers position their products for successful launches and continue to innovate, ultimately increasing their value.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla Stock Sinks as Musk-Trump Feud Escalates Again
Tesla Stock Sinks as Musk-Trump Feud Escalates Again

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla Stock Sinks as Musk-Trump Feud Escalates Again

Shares of Tesla are dropping in premarket trading Tuesday as the feud between CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump heats up again. Trump early Tuesday accused Musk of gaining excessively from electric vehicle subsidies. Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill," currently being debated by the Senate, includes a provision to eliminate the $7,500 new EV tax credit, a key piece of former President Joe Biden's efforts to accelerate U.S. EV of electric vehicle maker Tesla (TSLA) are dropping more than 4% in premarket trading Tuesday as the feud between CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump heats up again. In a post on his Truth Social platform early Tuesday, Trump accused Musk of gaining from subsidies on electric cars. "Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa," Trump wrote. Trump's signature "One Big Beautiful Bill," currently being debated by the Senate, includes a provision to eliminate the $7,500 new EV tax credit, a key piece of former President Joe Biden's efforts to accelerate U.S. EV adoption. "No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!,' Trump added as he lashed out at his former ally. Musk, who also is the CEO of rocket company SpaceX, recently stepped down from running the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in order to focus on his businesses. Trump's comments came hours after Musk posted his latest complaints about the tax-and-spending bill on his social media platform X. "Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!" Musk wrote. "And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth." Tesla shares entered Tuesday having lost more than a fifth of their value this year. During the initial escalation of the public spat between Musk and Trump on June 5, shares tumbled 14%, erasing more than $150 billion from Tesla's market capitalization. Read the original article on Investopedia Sign in to access your portfolio

US Senate holds marathon overnight vote on Trump's 'big beautiful bill'
US Senate holds marathon overnight vote on Trump's 'big beautiful bill'

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US Senate holds marathon overnight vote on Trump's 'big beautiful bill'

The US Senate is holding a marathon voting session on a sprawling budget bill that is critical to President Donald Trump's agenda. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, though, hangs in the balance as Trump's Republicans - who control both chambers of Congress - remain split over how much to cut welfare programmes by as they seek to extend tax breaks. If approved in the Senate, the bill will return to the lower House of Representatives, which passed its own version by a single vote last month. Elon Musk has stepped up his criticism of Republicans who "campaigned on reducing government spending" and then "immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history". The tech billionaire was in charge of Doge, the Department of Government Efficiency, which has been tasked to find ways of cutting government spending, until the pair fell out. The US national debt currently sits at $36tn (£26tn), according to the treasury department. According to new estimates, if passed, the bill will add $3.3tn to that debt. The proposed legislation - running to nearly 1,000-pages - includes increased spending for border security, defence and energy production - offset to a degree by cuts to healthcare and food-support programmes. Proposed cuts could strip nearly 12 million Americans of their health insurance coverage, according to the Congressional Budget Office, a non-partisan federal agency. Senators are currently arguing for or against adding amendments - each voted on separately in a process called "vote-a-rama", which has been going on for more than 20 hours. The Republican debate has focused on how much to cut welfare programmes in order to extend $3.8tn (£2.8tn) in Trump tax breaks. One of their amendments, by Senator John Cornyn, proposed reducing federal Medicaid payments - the programme that helps low-income groups cover healthcare costs - to states that provide coverage to undocumented immigrants charged with specific crimes. It was not approved. Democrats have criticised the proposed cuts. Senator Ed Markey, for instance, proposed an amendment to delete provisions which he argued would force rural hospitals to limit their services or shut down altogether. Other amendments proposed by Democrats concerned the bill's cuts to food assistance. They were all voted down along party lines. "We have been debating amendments for 21 hours and we are still going because through 12 hours of debate and 21 hours of amendment votes, Republicans still don't have 50 votes for their bill. Because it's a moral monstrosity," Democratic Senator Chris Murphy said early on Tuesday. On Sunday, Democrats used a political manoeuvre to stall the bill's progress, calling on Senate clerks to read all 940 pages of the bill aloud, a process that took 16 hours. It followed weeks of public discussion and the Senate narrowly moving on the budget bill in a 51-49 vote over the weekend. Two Republicans sided with Democrats in voting against opening debate, arguing for further changes to the legislation. One of those Republicans, North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis, announced his retirement following that vote and said the legislation broke promises that Trump and Republicans made to voters. "Too many elected officials are motivated by pure raw politics who really don't give a damn about the people they promised to represent on the campaign trail," Tillis wrote in his announcement. Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul objected to the debt increase, and cuts to Medicaid. A look at the key items in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' The woman who could bust Trump's 'big beautiful bill Republicans in the Senate can only afford three defections in order for the bill to pass. If they lose three votes, Vice-President JD Vance will have to cast a tie-breaking vote. The bill would then return to the House of Representatives, where a full vote on the Senate's version could come as early as Wednesday morning. Fiscal hawks of the Republican-led House Freedom Caucus have threatened to torpedo the Senate package which they say adds over $650bn to the national deficit. Despite the uncertainty, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said Trump is "confident" the bill will be on his desk for a final signature by 4 July. For his part, Elon Musk has, once again, threatened to set up a new political party if the bill clears Congress. In a sign of further alienation between the pair, Trump has suggested that Doge should take a look at cutting the subsidies that Tesla CEO's companies have received. "Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. (With additional reporting from Bernd Debusmann Jr at the White House) Senate Republicans advance Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' but final vote hangs in balance The woman who could bust Trump's 'big beautiful bill' Republican Senator Thom Tillis to leave Congress after clash with Trump

3 times Trump's tariffs worked
3 times Trump's tariffs worked

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 times Trump's tariffs worked

President Donald Trump's tariffs are designed to boost US manufacturing, restore the balance of trade and fill America's coffers with tax dollars. The White House's record on those three goals has been a decidedly mixed bag. But Trump has a fourth way that he likes to use tariffs. Trump has repeatedly threatened tariffs as a kind of anvil dangling over the heads of countries, companies or industries. The subjects of Trump's tariff threats have, at times, immediately come to the negotiating table. Sometimes, threats just work. The most recent example was over the weekend, when Canada backed off its digital services tax that was set to go into effect Monday. Trump had railed against the tax on online companies, including US corporations that do business in Canada. On Friday, he threatened to end trade talks with America's northern neighbor. Trump also said he would set a new tariff for Canada by the end of this week. On Sunday, Canada backed down, saying it would drop the tax to help bring the countries back to the table. 'To support those negotiations, the Minister of Finance and National Revenue, the Honourable François-Philippe Champagne, announced today that Canada would rescind the Digital Services Tax (DST) in anticipation of a mutually beneficial comprehensive trade arrangement with the United States,' the Canadian government said in a statement. On Monday, United States and Canada restarted trade discussions. 'It's part of a bigger negotiation,' said Prime Minister Mark Carney in a press conference Monday. 'It's something that we expected, in the broader sense, that would be part of a final deal. We're making progress toward a final deal.' Trump's first tariff action of his second term came against Colombia after President Gustavo Petro in late January blocked US military flights carrying undocumented migrants from landing as part of Trump's mass deportation effort. In turn, Trump threatened 25% tariffs on Colombian exports that would grow to 50% if the country didn't accept deportees from the United States. Colombia quickly walked back its refusal and reached an agreement to accept deported migrants. 'You can't go out there and publicly defy us in that way,' a Trump administration official told CNN in January. 'We're going to make sure the world knows they can't get away with being nonserious and deceptive.' Trump ultimately dropped the tariff threat. Citing a lack of progress in trade negotiations, Trump in late May said he was calling off talks with the European Union and would instead just impose a 50% tariff on all goods from there. 'Our discussions with them are going nowhere!' Trump wrote on Truth Social on May 23. Later that day in the Oval Office, Trump said he was no longer looking for a deal with the EU. But three days later, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen spoke with Trump and said the EU would fast-track a deal with the United States. Trump then delayed the 50% tariff deadline until July 9. Although a deal hasn't yet come through, Trump's threat got Europe to get serious, in the White House's view, on trade, when it had been slow-walking negotiations, trying to get a consensus from its dozens of members. The Trump administration attributes a large number of corporate investments in the United State to its tariffs and tariff threats, although it's often hard to draw a clear line from Trump's trade policy to a particular company announcing it will build an American factory. Those decisions often take years of planning and are costly processes. For example, shortly after Trump doubled down on steel and aluminum tariffs and included finished products like dishwashers and washing machines in the 50% tariff, GE Appliances said it would move production from China to Kentucky. The company said it had planned the move before Trump announced the derivative product tariffs – but Trump's trade war accelerated its plans. In some other cases, Trump's threats have largely gone nowhere. Furious with Apple CEO Tim Cook for announcing the company would export iPhones to the United States from India – rather than building an iPhone factory in the United States – Trump announced a 25% tariff on all Apple products imported to the United States. He threatened the same against Samsung. But Trump never followed through with his threat, and Apple and Samsung haven't budged on their insistence that complex smartphone manufacturing just isn't practical or possible in the United States. Skilled manufacturing labor for that kind of complex work isn't readily available in the United States – and those who do have those capabilities charge much more to work here than their peers charge in other countries. Complying with Trump's demands could add thousands of dollars to the cost of a single smartphone – more than Trump's threatened tariff. Trump similarly threatened Hollywood in May with a 100% tariff on movies made outside the United States. That left many media executives scratching their heads, trying to figure out what the threat entailed – a threat that ultimately never materialized. The administration later acknowledged Trump's statement about the tariff was merely a proposal, and it was eager to hear from the industry about how to bring lost production back to Hollywood. Nevertheless, Trump's threats against the movie industry raised awareness about the bipartisan issue, and California's Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom subsequently posted support for a partnership with the Trump administration to incentivize movie and television makers to film in the state again. Trump's threats don't always work, and sometimes his tariffs have kicked off a trade war, raising prices in a tit-for-tat tariff escalation. But a handful of times, including this weekend, his tariff threats have gotten America's trading partners to agree to major concessions. CNN's Luciana Lopez and Michael Rios contributed to this report. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store