Singapore shipping firm hit by US sanctions over Iran oil links
By Serene Cheong and Weilun Soon
(Bloomberg) – A Singapore-based company has been slapped with US sanctions for links to the Iranian oil trade, becoming the first in the city-state to be penalised for assisting with oil transfers at sea.
Shipload Maritime was sanctioned because it 'knowingly engaged in a significant transaction for the transport of petroleum or petroleum products from Iran,' according to a statement from the US Department of State on March 13. The punishment relates to an ship-to-ship transfer in December near Indonesia.
Calls to Shipload Maritime on Friday went unanswered.
The Trump administration has vowed 'maximum pressure' on Iran to disrupt the flow of its oil, which the White House says generates revenue that supports Tehran-backed militia groups such as Hamas. Rounds of US sanctions on the OPEC producer has caused logistical challenges and slowed exports to China, forcing traders to engage in risky efforts to circumvent the measures.
Shipload Maritime was sanctioned for using the tug boat Malili to facilitate the STS transfer between Sobar, an Iranian-flagged tanker, and Star Forest on Dec. 25 near Nipa in Indonesia, according to the statement. The Singapore-based company is the commercial manager and operator of Malili, it said.
The US also targeted PT Bintang Samudra Utama and PT Gianira Adhinusa Senatama for using tug boats related to the Sobar-Star Forest transfer.
Tug boats are small and powerful vessels that help safely guide bigger ships with tight manoeuvres near ports, or stabilise them during STS operations. The region off eastern Malaysia is home to the world's biggest and busiest hub for the movement of Iranian oil from one tanker to another.
Shipload Maritime provides STS transfer support to oil majors in and around Singapore, as well as in Japan, according to shipping executives familiar with its operations. The company is based in Golden Mile Tower, a mixed-used commercial and residential building that houses many small businesses.
It's not the first time a Singapore-based company has been hit with US sanctions related to the Iranian petroleum trade. Asia Fuel and Unicious Energy were penalised in 2023 for their roles in facilitating Tehran-related shipments and payments.
(Removes AI summary for incorrect timeline.)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
32 minutes ago
- CNN
CIA says it has evidence Iran's nuclear program was ‘severely damaged' as assessments of US strikes' impact continue
CIA Director John Ratcliffe on Wednesday said in a statement that the agency had obtained 'a body of credible evidence [that] indicates Iran's Nuclear Program has been severely damaged' by recent strikes, underscoring a broad intelligence community effort is ongoing to determine the impact of the US strikes on three of the country's nuclear sites on Saturday. Without providing details, Ratcliffe said the CIA's evidence included 'new intelligence from a historically reliable source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' It was not clear whether Ratcliffe was offering an official agency assessment or his view of the intelligence. The statement came a day after an initial analysis by the Defense Intelligence Agency that suggested that strikes by the US on Saturday did not destroy some key components of Iran's nuclear program and likely only set back Tehran's nuclear ambitions by a matter of months was reported by CNN and other outlets. The White House has pushed back on that assessment, which cast doubt on President Donald Trump's claims that the strikes 'obliterated' Iran's ability to produce a weapon, calling it 'wrong.' Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard also posted on X on Wednesday that 'new intelligence' supported the notion that Iran's nuclear facilities were 'destroyed' in the strikes. 'New intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed,' Gabbard posted without providing evidence. 'If the Iranians chose to rebuild, they would have to rebuild all three facilities (Natanz, Fordow, Esfahan) entirely, which would likely take years to do.' It's not unusual for intelligence agencies to disagree in subtle ways when making a judgment call about how to interpret raw reporting. Although it's not yet clear what additional collection and analysis is ongoing beyond the CIA and the DIA efforts, other agencies, including the Pentagon arm responsible for satellite imagery analysis, are almost certainly also closely scrutinizing the impact of the strikes on Iran's nuclear program. The final US military 'battle damage assessment,' by the DIA could take days or even weeks to complete, multiple sources familiar with the Pentagon's process told CNN. The initial DIA analysis was produced just 24 hours after the attack, according to one of the sources. Because it was only a preliminary analysis, its judgments were 'low-confidence,' the sources said. It was not coordinated with the wider intelligence community, according to a US official, and the document itself acknowledged that it could take weeks to produce a finalized assessment. When the military conducts a BDA, it typically follows three proscribed phases: Phase I assesses the physical damage done to the target sites. Phase II assesses the functional impact on the target. Phase III zooms out to encompass all the intelligence the military has to assess the overall impact on the system the US was trying to impact – in this case, Iran's nuclear program. The DIA assessment that CNN and other outlets reported on was a Phase III analysis. But it was only an initial report, based on roughly 24 hours' worth of intelligence gathering. As time passes and more intelligence becomes available, the military will repeat the this process before it finalizes its judgment. Trump on Wednesday conceded that initial US intelligence assessments found the damage caused by the US bombers 'could be limited,' before adding that follow-up work showed it was 'obliterated.' 'The document said it could be very severe damage,' Trump said, referring to the DIA assessment. 'They said it could be limited or it could be very severe. They really didn't know other than to say it could be limited or it could be very, very severe.' Trump said the US has since 'collected additional intelligence' and has spoken with people who have 'seen the site.' The initial findings cast doubt on Trump's insistence that Saturday's strikes 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear capabilities and suggest that he made the claim before the military and US intelligence agencies had enough information to adequately assess the impact. Allies and top officials – including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth – have sought to back up the president's view. The president has sought to characterize the strikes as a one-off designed to make it impossible for Iran to ever obtain a nuclear weapon, while experts have said that a single operation was not likely sufficient to achieve that goal. In particular, questions have swirled about the extent of the damage to one of the facilities, Isfahan, where Iran is believed to have stored highly enriched uranium deep underground. US officials believe Iran also maintains secret nuclear facilities that were not targeted in the strike and remain operational, according to two sources familiar with the matter. 'I've been briefed on this plan in the past, and it was never meant to completely destroy the nuclear facilities, but rather cause significant damage,' Republican Rep. Michael McCaul, the chairman emeritus of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, told CNN on Tuesday, referring to the US military plans to strike Iranian nuclear facilities. 'But it was always known to be a temporary setback.' Another key question, according to a senior US lawmaker, is whether Iran had already moved any of its highly enriched uranium stockpiles from the facilities in question by the time the US dropped bombs on them. Trump had made public he was weighing striking at least one of the sites, Fordow, and 'Iranians aren't idiots,' this person said. A final Phase III BDA traditionally includes a recommendation about whether any additional military strikes are necessary to achieve the commander's objective. The preliminary report did not contain any such recommendations, according to two sources familiar with the document. Initial assessments like the one produced by the DIA are often based at least in part on technical modeling of the effects of this kind of bomb on the US's best map of the facilities, experts say. And these assessments can change dramatically over time. 'We had this problem in 1999,' said Jeffrey Lewis, a weapons expert and professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies. 'The initial BDA on the bombing against Yugoslavia was very high levels of success' based on modeling, he recalled. But with time and more analysis – and on the ground investigation – officials realized many of the things they had assessed as targets that were successfully hit wound up being decoys. 'The BDA came way down.' In this instance, it's not clear US officials will ever be able to physically inspect the sites. That leaves intelligence analysts reliant on satellite imagery, intercepted communications, and intelligence shared by allies like Israel to piece together what happened.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
The US and Iran have had bitter relations for decades. After the bombs, a new chapter begins.
A B-2 bomber arrived at Whiteman Air Force Base Mo., on Sunday, the same aircraft used to carry out the US's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend. David Smith/Associated Press This change of tone, however fleeting, came after the intense U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear-development sites this week, Iran's retaliatory yet restrained attack on a U.S. military base in Qatar and the The U.S. attack on three targets inflicted serious damage but did not destroy them, Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Here are some questions and answers about the long history of bad blood between the two countries: Advertisement Why did Trump offer blessings all around? In the first blush of a ceasefire agreement, even before Israel and Iran appeared to be fully on board, Trump exulted in the achievement. 'God bless Israel,' he posted on social media. 'God bless Iran.' He wished blessings on the Middle East, America and the world, too. When it became clear that all hostilities had not immediately ceased after all, he took to swearing instead. 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f— they're doing,' he said on camera. Advertisement In that moment, Trump was especially critical of Israel, the steadfast U.S. ally, for seeming less attached to the pause in fighting than the country that has been shouting 'Death to America' for generations and is accused of trying to assassinate him. Why did U.S.-Iran relations sour in the first place? In two words, Operation Ajax. That was the 1953 coup orchestrated by the CIA, with British support, that overthrew Iran's democratically elected government and handed power to the shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. The Western powers had feared the rise of Soviet influence and the nationalization of Iran's oil industry. The shah was a strategic U.S. ally who repaired official relations with Washington. But grievances simmered among Iranians over his autocratic rule and his bowing to America's interests. Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, with a heavy escort, as he entered a car to leave the airport in Tehran in 1979 after arriving back in the country. FY/Associated Press All of that boiled over in 1979 when the shah fled the country and the theocratic revolutionaries took control, imposing their own hard line. How did the Iranian revolution deepen tensions? Profoundly. On Nov. 4, 1979, with anti-American sentiment at a fever pitch, Iranian students took 66 American diplomats and citizens hostage and held more than 50 of them in captivity for 444 days. It was a humiliating spectacle for the United States and President Jimmy Carter, who ordered a secret rescue mission months into the Iran hostage crisis. In Operation Eagle Claw, eight Navy helicopters and six Air Force transport planes were sent to rendezvous in the Iranian desert. A sand storm aborted the mission and eight service members died when a helicopter crashed into a C-120 refueling plane. FILE - Remains of a burned-out U.S. helicopter lis photographed in the eastern desert region of Iran, April 27,1980, one day after an abortive American commando raid to free the U.S. Embassy hostages. (AP Photo, File) Uncredited/Associated Press Diplomatic ties were severed in 1980 and remain broken. Iran released the hostages minutes after Ronald Reagan's presidential inauguration on Jan. 20, 1981. That was just long enough to ensure that Carter, bogged in the crisis for over a year, would not see them freed in his term. Advertisement Was this week's U.S. attack the first against Iran? No. But the last big one was at sea. On April 18, 1988, the U.S. Navy sank two Iranian ships, damaged another and destroyed two surveillance platforms in its largest surface engagement since World War II. Operation Praying Mantis was in retaliation against the mining of the USS Samuel B. Roberts in the Persian Gulf four days earlier. Ten sailors were injured and the explosion left a gaping hole in the hull. Did the U.S. take sides in the Iran-Iraq war? Not officially, but essentially. The U.S. provided economic aid, intelligence sharing and military-adjacent technology to Iraq, concerned that an Iranian victory would spread instability through the region and strain oil supplies. Iran and Iraq emerged from the 1980-1988 war with no clear victor and the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives, while U.S.-Iraq relations fractured spectacularly in the years after. What was the Iran-Contra affair? An example of U.S.-Iran cooperation of sorts — an illegal, and secret, one until it wasn't. Retired Air Force Major Gen. Richard Secord recieved some advice from his attorney Thomas Green while testifying on Capitol Hill before a congressional committee holding hearings on the Iran-Contra affair, in 1987, LANA HARRIS/Associated Press Not long after the U.S. designated Iran a state sponsor of terrorism in 1984 — a status that remains — it emerged that America was illicitly selling arms to Iran. One purpose was to win the release of hostages in Lebanon under the control of Iran-backed Hezbollah. The other was to raise secret money for the Contra rebels in Nicaragua in defiance of a U.S. ban on supporting them. President Ronald Reagan fumbled his way through the scandal but emerged unscathed — legally if not reputationally. How many nations does the U.S. designate as state sponsors of terrorism? Only four: Iran, North Korea, Cuba and Syria. The designation makes those countries the target of broad sanctions. Syria's designation is being reviewed in light of the fall of Bashar Assad's government. Advertisement Where did the term 'Axis of Evil' come from? From President George W. Bush in his 2002 State of the Union address. He spoke five months after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and the year before he launched the invasion of Iraq on the wrong premise that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. He singled out Iran, North Korea and Saddam's Iraq and said: 'States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world.' In this January 2002 photo, former President George W. Bush labels North Korea, Iran and Iraq an "axis of evil" during his State of the Union address on Capitol Hill. DOUG MILLS/Associated Press In response, Iran and some of its anti-American proxies and allies in the region took to calling their informal coalition an Axis of Resistance at times. What about those proxies and allies? Some, like Hezbollah and Hamas, are degraded due to Israel's fierce and sustained assault on them. In Syria, Assad fled to safety in Moscow after losing power to rebels once tied to Islamic State terrorism but now cautiously welcomed by Trump. In Yemen, Houthi rebels who have attacked commercial ships in the Red Sea and pledge common cause with Palestinians have been bombed by the U.S. and Britain. In Iraq, armed Shia factions controlled or supported by Iran still operate and attract periodic attacks from the United States. What about Iran's nuclear program? In 2015, President Barack Obama and other powers struck a deal with Iran to limit its nuclear development in return for the easing of sanctions. Iran agreed to get rid of an enriched uranium stockpile, dismantle most centrifuges and give international inspectors more access to see what it was doing. This image released by the official website of the office of the Iranian Presidency shows President Hassan Rouhani has he listened to explanations on new nuclear achievements at a ceremony to mark "National Nuclear Day," in Tehran in April 2018. Uncredited/Associated Press Trump assailed the deal in his 2016 campaign and scrapped it two years later as president, imposing a 'maximum pressure' campaign of sanctions. He argued the deal only delayed the development of nuclear weapons and did nothing to restrain Iran's aggression in the region. Iran's nuclear program resumed over time and, according to inspectors, accelerated in recent months. Advertisement Trump's exit from the nuclear deal brought a warning from Hassan Rouhani, then Iran's president, in 2018: 'America must understand well that peace with Iran is the mother of all peace. And war with Iran is the mother of all wars.' How did Trump respond to Iran's provocations? In January 2020, Trump ordered the drone strike that killed Qasem Soleimani, Iran's top commander, when he was in Iraq. Then Iran came after him, according to President Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland. Days after Trump won last year's election, the Justice Department filed charges against an Iranian man believed to still be in his country and two alleged associates in New York. Coffins of Gen. Qassem Soleimani and others who were killed in Iraq by a US drone strike were carried on a truck surrounded by mourners, in the city of Kerman, Iran, in January 2020. Uncredited/Associated Press 'The Justice Department has charged an asset of the Iranian regime who was tasked by the regime to direct a network of criminal associates to further Iran's assassination plots against its targets, including President-elect Donald Trump,' Garland said. Now, Trump is seeking peace at the table after ordering bombs dropped on Iran, and offering blessings. It is potentially the mother of all turnarounds.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Trump's spy chiefs say new intel shows Iran's nuclear facilities were destroyed
Two of President Donald Trump's top intelligence chiefs issued statements on Wednesday stating that new intelligence indicates Iran's nuclear facilities were 'destroyed' in U.S. airstrikes over the weekend. CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard issued their statements within hours of each other, reinforcing the administration's daylong blitz to counter media reports of a preliminary government assessment that the strikes had not significantly set back Iran's nuclear program. Gabbard weighed in with a statement on X around 2 p.m. Wednesday saying that 'New intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed.' Ratcliffe posted an image of his own statement on social media about two hours later. 'A body of credible intelligence indicates Iran's nuclear program has been severely damaged' in the recent strikes, Ratcliffe said in the statement. 'This includes new intelligence from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years,' he continued. Ratcliffe added that the agency was continuing to collect 'reliably sourced information' on the matter. Neither Gabbard nor Ratcliffe provided further details on the intelligence, or specifics on when it had been obtained. But DNI spokesperson Olivia Coleman later said that the intelligence Gabbard cited was U.S. in origin. A former CIA analyst called it 'highly unusual' for the agency's director to put out an analytic assessment in a press release. But the person, who was granted anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence processes, said that it was unlikely that any sources or methods would have been exposed by the statement. The earlier assessment by the Defense Intelligence Agency was reported Tuesday by CNN and other media outlets, which said it found the strikes didn't destroy the core components of the country's nuclear program and likely only set it back by months. DIA stressed Wednesday that its finding were not conclusive. 'This is a preliminary, low confidence assessment — not a final conclusion — and will continue to be refined as additional intelligence becomes available,' DIA said in a statement. 'We have still not been able to review the actual physical sites themselves, which will give us the best indication.' The leak of the DIA assessment has infuriated Trump. On Wednesday he posted an angry tirade against one of the CNN reporters who wrote the initial story and reiterated his claims that Iran's nuclear facilities had been 'obliterated.' Gabbard also hit out at the 'propaganda media' in her post. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who stood astride Trump during a nearly hourlong press conference at the NATO summit in The Netherlands on Wednesday, also took turns pushing back angrily on the findings of the DIA report — and the news media's reporting of it. 'Anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the president and the successful mission,' Hegseth charged at one point. The Defense secretary separately told reporters that the Pentagon and the FBI are probing how the classified report was leaked. Israeli officials also appear to have rushed to the defense of Trump. The office of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu released a statement Wednesday from Israel's Atomic Energy Commission stating that the combined effect of U.S. airstrikes and Israel's attacks was to 'set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years.' Daniel Shapiro, who served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East during the Biden administration, urged caution in relying too heavily on any initial assessment. 'There's a high likelihood that they did very significant damage to these facilities, but we should wait for the data and the actual information,' Shapiro said. He estimated that it would ordinarily take a matter of weeks for the intelligence community to reach a firm conclusion on the impact of such a strike. In a Truth Social post Wednesday evening, Trump hinted the administration might share more information on the damage from the strikes soon. He said Hegseth will deliver a 'Major News Conference' Thursday morning that 'will prove both interesting and irrefutable.'
