Opinion - China is teaching Trump some tough lessons on trade
Trump's efforts to bully China into submission via tariffs has already gone spectacularly wrong. Far from being intimidated, China has been invigorated with a new sense of national purpose. To anyone who had the slightest understanding of Chinese history, this was all perfectly predictable.
The First Opium War in 1839 — there were two — was, ironically enough, a dispute over the trade deficit. It involved Great Britain attacking China to force it to allow Western powers, including the U.S., to sell opium into China. If you imagine the Chinese occupying New York City to force the U.S. to legalize the trade in fentanyl, you get some idea of what this incident means to people in China.
The First Opium War began what the Chinese call the 'century of humiliation,' during which China was exploited and invaded by various foreign powers. It didn't end until the Japanese were driven out at the end of World War Two. This is still an open wound for China, so it is politically impossible for Xi Jinping to give in to Trump's intimidation even if he wanted to.
And he doesn't want to. Trump's efforts to punish China by imposing a 145 percent tariff on Chinese imports was actually the greatest gift he could have given Xi. First, China is far better positioned to survive a trade war than is the U.S., for one simple reason: China can solve its biggest problem by throwing money at it. Exporters may lose business, but China can use some of the more than $750 billion it has invested in U.S. Treasurys alone to keep them afloat.
The U.S. can't do that — we have a supply-chain problem, not a financial problem. Once China stops exporting to the U.S., there is no amount of money we can spend that will fill up our Walmarts. Remember trying to buy medical masks during the pandemic? Multiply that by tens of thousands of products. Many things will be completely unavailable, and what is available will be much more expensive. Not even Trump can repeal the law of supply and demand by executive order.
China also has a long-term interest in making its economy less dependent on exports and decreasing its dependence on Western technology. Trump's trade war gives Xi the perfect opportunity to pursue these goals, since any resultant pain will now be the fault of rapacious foreigners seeking to humiliate China yet again.
So China is in no hurry to end the current stand-off, a fact that is now making Trump extremely nervous. When pressed, Trump has a habit of saying whatever he thinks will buy him some time and take the pressure off, regardless of whether it is true or not. His constant promises to release some new policy 'in the next two weeks' became a running joke during his first term.
He's doing the same thing now, issuing fantasy statements about how a trade deal with China is imminent. Despite Trump's claim that Chinese officials have 'reached out' to him a number of times and his insistence that active talks are going on 'every day,' there are no negotiations going on at all.
Trump is essentially negotiating with himself. He abandoned his 145 percent tariff on Chinese-made electronics within 48 hours, and now, in response to Chinese silence, he's telling the world that tariffs on China will be much lower. He insists 'We're going to be very nice. They're going to be very nice, and we'll see what happens. But ultimately, they have to make a deal because otherwise they're not going to be able to deal in the United States.'
You can practically smell the fear. If you have to begin a negotiation by insisting that the other side come to the table, you've lost already.
Trump has good reason to be afraid, just as the Chinese have good reason to let him stew. While the impact of an effective trade embargo will begin to empty shelves in a matter of weeks, most wholesale Christmas orders are placed with factories by the beginning of June. None of those orders are going to be made if retailers think they might be hit with 145 percent tariffs on Christmas lights and Barbie dolls. 'The Trump That Stole Christmas' headlines write themselves.
Of course, Trump is free to abandon U.S. tariffs on China unilaterally, but there is no guarantee that China will reciprocate.
All this means that Trump has dug himself a very deep hole, and the Chinese are not going to help him dig his way out. Before they agree to restore normal trade, they're going to extract a price. It might be a groveling public apology. It might be a promise to abandon Taiwan — something Trump is probably temperamentally inclined to do anyway — or it might be a formal recognition of China's 'nine-dash line' territorial claims. But whatever it is, it will be big.
And it will be bad for America. Trump's effort to punish China for 'defying' him was an essay in historical ignorance and economic foolishness. He is now getting schooled in real time. And it's going to be an expensive lesson, both for him and for us.
Chris Truax is an appellate attorney who served as Southern California chair for John McCain's primary campaign in 2008.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Engadget
13 minutes ago
- Engadget
Engadget Podcast: How real is Ford's $30,000 EV pickup truck?
Ford has big plans for 2027: This week, the American carmaker announced a new "Universal EV Platform" for future electric cars, spearheaded by a $30,000 mid-sized EV pickup. In this episode, we're joined by SAE International Editor Roberto Baldwin to break down all of Ford's claims, as well as where its $5 billion manufacturing investment is going. Can Ford really rebound after slow EV sales and last year's disappointing product delays? Topics Ford has a plan for a 'Universal EV Platform' and a $30,000 mid-size electric pickup, can they pull it off? – 0:49 OpenAI releases GPT-5, the reception so far is mixed – 24:45 NVIDIA and AMD may tithe 15% of their Chinese GPU sales to the U.S. government – 30:18 Goodbye: AOL will phase out dial-up at the end of September – 33:25 AI-powered 'Smarter Siri' likely won't hit iPhones until Spring 2026 – 36:42 Perplexity makes an unsolicited offer to buy Chrome for $34 billion, which is more than the company is worth – 41:03 Listener Mail: Gaming on a MacBook Air – 52:31 Pop culture picks – 59:13 Host: Devindra Hardawar Guest: Roberto Baldwin Producer: Ben Ellman Music: Dale North and Terrence O'Brien If you buy something through a link in this article, we may earn commission.


The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bondi names DC ‘emergency police commissioner'
Attorney General Pam Bondi on Thursday tapped the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) chief to serve as Washington's 'emergency police commissioner,' a move to wrest power from the district's current police chief amid the Trump administration's law enforcement takeover. DEA Administrator Terry Cole will now assume 'all of the powers and duties' of D.C. Police Chief Pamela Smith, Bondi said in a directive Thursday. The appointment quickly drew backlash from local officials, including D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb, who told Smith in a letter that he believed Cole's appointment was unlawful. The attorney general's directive asserted that Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) leaders had to receive approval from Cole before issuing any directives to its officers. In his letter to Smith, however, Schwalb argued that the Home Rule Act — the law under which President Trump has temporarily assumed control of the district's police — did not allow for the federal government to directly alter the chain of command. 'It is my opinion that the Bondi Order is unlawful, and that you are not legally obligated to follow it,' he wrote. When the White House first announced its federalization of law enforcement in the nation's capital, Cole was named as the department's interim federal administrator. A career DEA agent who was stationed in Bogota, Colombia; Kabul, Afghanistan and Mexico City, he was confirmed to his position in the administration in July. MPD issued a statement following the decision, but did not offer an opinion on Cole's appointment. 'We understand there may be questions about recent decisions regarding the Metropolitan Police Department,' a department spokesperson told NewsNation, The Hill's sister network. 'What's most important for our community to know is that MPD remains committed to delivering high-quality police service and ensuring the safety of everyone in our city,' they added. Previously, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and Smith said MPD leaders would continue to make decisions. Bowser, who was out of town Thursday, called Trump's moves ' unsettling and unprecedented.' The president has signaled he plans to request an extension on the 30-day takeover from Congress. He also deployed National Guard soldiers to Washington earlier this week to patrol the streets amid the administration's efforts to fight crime, which has also sparked pushback and protests.


The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Australian and Philippine forces launch largest military exercises near disputed South China Sea
MANILA, Philippines (AP) — Australia on Friday launched its largest military exercises with Philippine forces, involving more than 3,600 military personnel in live-fire drills, battle maneuvers and a beach assault at a Philippine town on the disputed South China Sea, where the allies have raised alarm over Beijing's assertive actions. The exercises are called Alon, meaning wave in the Philippine language Tagalog, and will showcase Australia's firepower. The drills will involve a guided-missile navy destroyer, F/A-18 supersonic fighter jets, a C-130 troop and cargo aircraft, Javelin anti-tank weapons and special forces sniper weapons. Military officials said defense forces from the United States, Canada, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand and Indonesia will join as observers. 'This exercise reflects Australia's commitment to working with partners to ensure we maintain a region where state sovereignty is protected, international law is followed and nations can make decisions free from coercion,' Vice Admiral Justin Jones of the Royal Australian Navy said in a statement. The combat exercises are 'an opportunity for us to practice how we collaborate and respond to shared security challenges and project force over great distances in the Indo-Pacific,' Jones said. The exercises will run until Aug. 29. Australia is the second country after the U.S. with a visiting forces agreement with the Philippines, allowing the deployment of large numbers of troops for combat exercises in each other's territory. The Philippines has signed a similar pact with Japan, which will take effect next month. It is in talks with several other Asian and Western countries including France and Canada for similar defense accords. China has deplored multinational war drills and alliances in or near the disputed South China Sea, saying the U.S. and its allies are 'ganging up' against it and militarizing the region. China claims most of the South China Sea, a busy global trade route, where it has had a spike of territorial faceoffs with the Philippines in recent years. Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan also lay claims to the resource-rich waters. On Monday, a Chinese navy ship collided with a Chinese coast guard ship while trying to drive away a smaller Philippine coast guard vessel in the Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea. The Australian Embassy in Manila expressed concern over 'the dangerous and unprofessional conduct of Chinese vessels near Scarborough Shoal involving the Philippine Coast Guard' and said the incident 'highlights the need for de-escalation, restraint and respect for international law.' In response, the U.S. deployed two warships off the Scarborough on Wednesday in what it called a freedom of navigation operation to protest China's expansive claims, restrictions and its demand for entry notifications in the disputed waters. In February, a Chinese J-16 fighter jet released flares that passed within 30 meters (100 feet) of an Australian P-8 Poseidon military surveillance plane in daylight and in international air space, Australian defense officials said at the time.