
Trump's crackdown on foreign students threatens to disrupt pipeline of inventors
Ajay Bhatt had never been on a plane when he left India for City University of New York to pursue a graduate degree in 1981. More than four decades and 130 patents later, billions of people are still using Bhatt's most-recognizable invention, the Universal Serial Bus, or USB.
'My dad really didn't want me to go," Bhatt recalls. But, he said, 'This was the country where you could get the very best education, and everybody was welcoming."
High-skilled immigration has long been part of the secret sauce that gave the U.S. the world's most dynamic economy. Studies show newcomers punch well above their weight in innovative output and entrepreneurship. They authored 23% of U.S. patents from 1990 to 2016, according to a 2022 study by Shai Bernstein of Harvard Business School and four co-authors. They founded or co-founded more than half of America's billion-dollar startups, according to another study. Immigrants co-founded or played a major early role in Nvidia, Alphabet and Tesla.
From Elon Musk to lesser-known figures such as Bhatt, many of these inventors and founders originally came to the U.S. on student visas. President Trump's policies could disrupt that pipeline.
In May, the Trump administration paused interviews with student-visa candidates to vet their social-media activity and said it would begin to 'aggressively revoke" the visas of Chinese students at U.S. universities. It also sought to block Harvard University from enrolling foreign students; that order has been stayed by a federal judge.
'We have people who want to go to Harvard and other schools," Trump said last month. 'They can't get in because we have foreign students there. But I want to make sure that the foreign students are people that can love our country."
The U.S. hosted more than 1.1 million international college students in the 2023-24 academic year, according to the Institute of International Education. In fiscal 2024, the government approved 263,000 applications by foreign graduates for temporary employment under the Optional Practical Training program, or OPT, and 52,000 onetime students or dependents rotated into H-1B work visas, which can lead to citizenship.
Trump's nominee for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services director, Joseph Edlow, said in a confirmation hearing May 21 that he would like to develop regulations 'that would allow us to remove the ability for employment authorizations for F-1 students beyond the time that they are in school." F-1 is the main visa used by students.
'For too long, woke, so-called 'elite' institutions like Harvard have admitted inordinate numbers of foreign students and allowed antisemitic violence to ravage their campuses—hindering Jewish students' education, prompting concerns of espionage, and threatening U.S. national security," a White House spokeswoman said. 'Ensuring that guests in our country want to learn and contribute positively to our educational environment, rather than undermine Americans' safety, is critical to a strong U.S. economy."
The changes outlined by Edlow would effectively kill the OPT program, said Stuart Anderson, who now runs the National Foundation for American Policy, which supports high-skilled immigration. That would make it impossible for many foreigners to start U.S. businesses after they graduate and significantly dim the allure of American universities for international students, he said.
In a 2022 study, Anderson found that immigrants founded or co-founded 319 of 582 U.S. startup companies that had achieved valuations of $1 billion or more, including Stripe, Instacart and Epic Games. Nearly half of those had been founded by immigrants who attended U.S. universities as international students, the study said. Instagram was co-founded by a Brazilian, Mike Krieger, who studied at Stanford University.
'It's not that surprising that a lot of international students end up starting a business, because risk-taking is obviously in their makeup," Anderson said. 'They're willing to take a chance and travel a long way to study in another country. It's an entrepreneurial thing to do."
Gleb Yushin, a materials scientist who was born in the Soviet Union, considered schools in a handful of other countries—Germany, Japan, the U.K.—before deciding to get his Ph.D. at North Carolina State University. 'In Europe, there was an invisible ceiling…that would prevent immigrants from reaching their full potential," said Yushin, who came to the U.S. in 1999 on an F-1 visa, like Bhatt.
The company he co-founded, Sila Nanotechnologies, has raised more than $1.3 billion from investors, employs roughly 400—mostly in Alameda, Calif., and Moses Lake, Wash.—and developed groundbreaking technology for improving batteries, Yushin said.
Whether the world's best and brightest will continue flocking to American universities is an open question.
Angelika Fretzen came from Germany to do postdoctoral research at Harvard University 1998. She joined a biotech startup alongside four other post-docs and spearheaded the development of Linzess, now a leading drug for irritable bowel syndrome. The company grew to employ as many as 500 people, plus hundreds more at manufacturers, suppliers, labs and partner firms across the country.
As is often the case, the early days of Fretzen's career were hard, marked by routine failed experiments. Boston's community of scientists, many foreign, repeatedly helped her get back on the horse.
'If I had faced the kind of adversity that I think some of our young students here are facing right now," Fretzen says, 'I would have probably gone back to Germany and done the regular career in some pharmaceutical company."
Trump recently suggested that foreign students at Harvard might be 'troublemakers" and that the school should cap international enrollment at lower levels. In a May 29 interview with Newsmax, Vice President JD Vance dismissed concerns about the effect on U.S. technological prowess of fewer foreign students.
'This idea that American citizens don't have the talent to do great things, that you have to import a foreign class of servants and professors to do these things, I just reject that," Vance said. A crackdown on foreign student visas and related abuse is 'an opportunity for American citizens to really flourish."
Bhatt got the idea for the USB in 1991 after watching his wife and daughter struggle with a printer. At the time, external devices such as printers and keyboards came with unique cables that plugged into specific ports on a computer, some of them similar in appearance and compatible with only certain brands. The jumble of wires made personal computers daunting for non-geeks to use.
Bhatt's supervisor at Intel, where he had recently started working, was skeptical of the USB but gave him time to work on it. A year and a half later, the company's management was convinced, and Bhatt began building a consortium of manufacturers, including Microsoft, International Business Machines, HP and eventually Apple, to agree to a universal standard.
'I owe all my success to the opportunities that were given to me in the U.S.," says Bhatt, who is now retired.
For his scientific achievements, Bhatt in May was awarded India's equivalent to the Presidential Medal of Freedom. On a visit to his home country to receive the honor, he was struck by the number of parents who now want to send their college-age children to study in Britain, Canada, Australia or Singapore instead of the U.S.
Bhatt doubts he would have been able to convince his own father to let him come to the U.S. in the current environment.
'I don't think he would have allowed me," he said.
Write to Paul Kiernan at paul.kiernan@wsj.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
12 minutes ago
- News18
Russia Mocks Trump-Musk Spat, Offers To Broker ‘Peace Talks' And Give Tesla A Home
Last Updated: The feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk provoked chatter, mockery and amusement among the ruling class in Moscow, where one senior official joked about hosting peace talks. The public fallout between US President Donald Trump and his one-time ally and Tesla CEO Elon Musk has provoked chatter, mockery and intrigue in Moscow where the senior officials and media persons are treating the feud as both comedy and opportunity. Seniors leaders in Moscow are also joking about hosting peace talks between the two individuals and urging the tech giant in a tone mixing humour to bring his businesses to Russia. 'Elon, don't be upset! If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us. Here you will find reliable comrades and complete freedom of technical creativity," nationalist senator Dmitry Rogozin, who once ran Russia's space programme, posted on X. Elon @elonmusk, don't be upset! You are respected in Russia. If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us and become one of us – a 'Bars-Sarmat" fighter. Here you will find reliable comrades and complete freedom of technical creativity.— ROGOZIN (@Rogozin) June 6, 2025 Former Russian President and senior security official Dmitry Medvedev took the trolling a step further, offering to mediate between the feuding duo. 'We are ready to facilitate the conclusion of a peace deal between D and E for a reasonable fee," he posted on X, before jokingly requesting Starlink shares as payment. Reuters, the fallout has been widely ridiculed as an example of chaos in Washington. Margarita Simonyan, one of Russia's most powerful state media executives, mocked it as an example of 'modern US political culture" — "Sort of like the English Industrial Revolution. Only in reverse." Современная американская политическая культура войдет в историю как переломная, конечно.Вроде английской промышленной революции. Только наоборот. Но наблюдать занятно. — Margarita Simonyan (@M_Simonyan) June 5, 2025 Kirill Dmitriev, head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has in the past tried to interest Musk in cooperating with Russia on flights to Mars, asked on X, "Why can't we all just get along?" He then asked Grok, X's AI chatbot, how Musk and Trump could reconcile. However, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, when asked about the clash, said it was an internal matter for the US, though he was confident that Trump would handle it. 'Presidents handle a huge number of different things at the same time, some more and some less important," Peskov said. What Happened Between Trump And Musk? The high-profile alliance between Trump and Musk has dramatically unraveled into a bitter public feud with the two exchanging sharp accusations. The fallout began when Trump publicly criticised Musk at a White House press briefing, backing legislation that could severely impact the electric vehicle industry- a direct hit on Tesla. Musk, in response, fired back on his platform X, claiming that without his financial and strategic backing, Donald Trump would have lost the 2024 election. Calling the US President 'ungrateful", Elon Musk said, 'Without me, Trump would have lost. The Democrats would control the House." Musk then dropped a bombshell claim that Trump's name appears in sealed files related to Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting that's why the documents remain hidden. He wrote, 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files." He then went on to endorse a post calling for Trump's impeachment and suggested that Vice President JD Vance replace him. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that Musk's Epstein tweet 'is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it does not include the policies he wanted." Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : donald trump elon musk moscow Russia Location : Moscow, Russia First Published: June 06, 2025, 21:33 IST News world Russia Mocks Trump-Musk Spat, Offers To Broker 'Peace Talks' And Give Tesla A Home


Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump asks Supreme Court to let him dismantle Education Department
Donald Trump's administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday to permit it to proceed with dismantling the Department of Education, a move that would leave school policy in the United States almost entirely in the hands of states and local boards. The Justice Department asked the court to halt Boston-based U.S. District Judge Myong Joun's May 22 ruling that ordered the administration reinstate employees terminated in a mass layoff and end further actions to shutter the department. The Justice Department said the lower court lacked jurisdiction to "second-guess the Executive's internal management decisions," referring to the federal government's executive branch. "The government has been crystal clear in acknowledging that only Congress can eliminate the Department of Education. And the government has acknowledged the need to retain sufficient staff to continue fulfilling statutorily mandated functions and has kept the personnel that, in its judgment, are necessary for those tasks. The challenged (reduction in force) is fully consistent with that approach," the filing said. The department, created by a U.S. law passed by Congress in 1979, oversees about 100,000 public and 34,000 private schools in the United States, though more than 85% of public school funding comes from state and local governments. Live Events It provides federal grants for needy schools and programs, including money to pay teachers of children with special needs, fund arts programs and replace outdated infrastructure. It also oversees the $1.6 trillion in student loans held by tens of millions of Americans who cannot afford to pay for college outright. Trump's move to dismantle the department is part of the Republican president's campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government. Closing the department long has been a goal of many U.S. conservatives. Attorneys general from 20 states and the District of Columbia, as well as school districts and unions representing teachers, sued to block the Trump administration's efforts to gut the department. The states argued that the massive job cuts will render the agency unable to perform core functions authorized by statute, including in the civil rights arena, effectively usurping Congress's authority in violation of the U.S. Constitution. Trump on March 20 signed an executive order intended to effectively shut down the department, making good on a longstanding campaign promise to conservatives to move education policy almost completely to states and local boards. At a White House ceremony surrounded by children and educators, Trump called the order a first step "to eliminate" the department. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon announced plans on March 11 to carry out a mass termination of employees. Those layoffs would leave the department with 2,183 workers, down from 4,133 when Trump took office in January. The department said in a press release those terminations were part of its "final mission." Trump on March 21 announced plans to transfer the department's student loan portfolio to the Small Business Administration and its special education, nutrition and related services to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which also is facing deep job cuts. Joun in his ruling ordered the administration to reinstate the laid off workers and halt implementation of Trump's directive to transfer student loans and special needs programs to other federal agencies. The judge rejected the argument put forth by Justice Department lawyers that the mass terminations were aimed at making the department more efficient while fulfilling its mission. In fact, Joun ruled, the job cuts were an effort to shut down the department without the necessary approval of Congress. "This court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the department's employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the department becomes a shell of itself," the judge wrote. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields called the judge's ruling "misguided." The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on June 4 rejected the Trump administration's request to pause the injunction issued by Joun.


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump vs Musk: What happens to Nasa's ISS missions if SpaceX grounds Dragon capsule? Is Russia only other option?
President-elect Donald Trump listens as Elon Musk explains the operations ahead of the launch of the sixth test flight of the SpaceX Starship rocket, Nov. 19, 2024, in Boca Chica, Texas. (AP) As US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk exchanged barbs on social media on Thursday, Musk said he might stop using the Dragon spacecraft, which is used to take astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station (ISS). This came after Trump said he may cancel government contracts given to Musk's companies, SpaceX and Starlink. Musk responded on X, saying SpaceX "will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' It is not clear how serious Musk was. But the Dragon spacecraft is important for keeping the ISS working. Nasa also depends on SpaceX for other programs, such as launching science missions and, later this decade, taking astronauts to the moon. SpaceX and Nasa's partnership In 2006, a company named Space Exploration Technologies Corp, or SpaceX, got a Nasa contract to carry cargo and supplies to the ISS. At the time, SpaceX had not launched anything into orbit. Its first successful launch happened two years later with Falcon 1. In 2010, SpaceX launched the first Falcon 9 rocket. By 2012, it began sending cargo to the space station. Nasa gave money to help develop the Falcon 9 rocket. SpaceX then used the Nasa connection to attract other clients to launch satellites using its rockets. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo During the Obama administration, SpaceX also got a contract to take astronauts to the ISS. This happened for the first time in May 2020, during President Trump's first term. "Today the groundbreaking partnership between Nasa and SpaceX has given our nation the gift of an unmatched power a state-of-the-art spaceship to put our astronauts into orbit at a fraction of the cost of the space shuttle," Trump said in a speech at Kennedy Space Center in Florida on May 30, 2020, after that flight. He also praised Musk in the same event. As SpaceX made progress, other companies faced difficulties. Today, SpaceX is the main company handling both US civilian and military space activities. The US government now depends a lot on SpaceX. Musk started the company in 2002 with the goal of one day sending people to Mars. For now, the company is the only option the U.S. has to send people and equipment to space. Impact of decommissioning Dragon SpaceX's Crew Dragon capsules are used to take astronauts and cargo to the ISS for Nasa. If Musk follows through on his statement about decommissioning, it could affect the future of the space station. Later in the day, Musk seemed to take back the threat. But if he had followed through, SpaceX would likely bring back the Crew Dragon that is already docked at the space station, along with the four astronauts who plan to return in it. However, there would be no way to send the next group of astronauts to the ISS. Dragon capsule Right now, SpaceX is the only US company that can take crews to and from the ISS, using the Dragon capsule, which can carry four people. Another US company, Boeing, has a capsule called Starliner. But it has flown astronauts only once. That test flight had problems, and the two Nasa astronauts had to return to Earth using SpaceX in March. That was more than nine months after they launched last June. Starliner is still not ready to fly again. Nasa is deciding whether to do another test flight with cargo instead of a crew. SpaceX also uses Dragon capsules for its own private missions. The next such mission, managed by Axiom Space, is expected to launch next week. Cargo versions of Dragon are also used to carry food and other supplies to the ISS. Russia's Soyuz: The only other option The only other way to send crews to the ISS is using Russia's Soyuz capsules. Each Soyuz can carry three people. Usually, each Soyuz trip includes two Russians and one Nasa astronaut. Each SpaceX trip includes one Russian under a mutual agreement. This setup ensures that in an emergency, both US and Russian crew members have a way to return. When SpaceX started sending crews for Nasa in 2020, it reduced Nasa's dependence on Russia. Earlier, Nasa had to pay Russia tens of millions of dollars per seat. For cargo, Nasa also works with Russian spacecraft and a US company called Northrop Grumman.