US Army sergeant shoots 5 fellow soldiers at Fort Stewart army base in Georgia
The US Army identified the suspected gunman behind the shooting at Fort Stewart as 28-year-old soldier Sergeant Quornelius Radford.
Brigadier General John Lubas, the commander of the 3rd Infantry Division, told reporters that Sergeant Radford appeared to use a personal handgun at his workplace, and described the wounded soldiers as Sergeant Radford's co-workers.
The gunman was now in custody, he added.
Soldiers in the area who witnessed the shooting "immediately and without hesitation" tackled the shooter, Brigadier General Lubas said.
The Army said it was still unsure why Sergeant Radford opened fire at his five fellow soldiers, who were in stable condition, adding it was still investigating the shooting.
The injured were treated and then moved to Winn Army Community Hospital, base officials said in a Facebook post, adding there was no threat to the community.
Some of the wounded were also taken to Memorial Health University Medical Center in Savannah, said spokesperson Bryna Gordon.
The hospital is the top-level trauma centre for coastal Georgia.
The Army would not release names of those wounded pending notification of family members and would not speculate on motive, Lieutenant Colonel Angel Tomko said at a news conference.
Governor Brian Kemp wrote on X that he and his family were "saddened by today's tragedy" at the base.
"We are keeping the victims, their families, and all those who answer the call to serve in our hearts and prayers, and we ask that Georgians everywhere do the same," he added.
President Donald Trump had been briefed on the shooting and was monitoring the situation, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Health experts dismayed by RFK Jr's defunding of vaccine research
"I've been in this business for 50 years and have seen many crises come and go, and I've seen many attempts by public health to address these kinds of situations. Never have I seen a more dangerous approach to responding to our vulnerability to infectious diseases than what happened yesterday." That's Dr Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota. He's responding to the announcement by US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Junior that the Department of Health is cancelling US$500 million (A$769 million) in mRNA vaccine development. Mr Kennedy says the health department's biomedical research agency, BARDA, has already begun its work terminating 22 mRNA projects. "After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses. That's why after extensive review, BARDA (the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority) has begun the process of terminating these 22 contracts totalling just under $500 million." Mr Kennedy claimed that mRNA vaccines do not protect against respiratory illnesses like COVID and the flu, and said the department would be favouring other types of vaccines in their place. Dr Osterholm has joined experts in rejecting Mr Kennedy's claims about the effectiveness of mRNA as false and misleading. "The piece yesterday that was absolutely devastating for those of us in public health to watch was the mis- and disinformation Secretary Kennedy shared. To talk about the fact that the risks outweighed the benefits of COVID vaccines or the whole mRNA technology was just absolutely irresponsible. That's just simply not true. No matter how many high times he says it, it's not true." mRNA vaccine technology was first used during the COVID-19 pandemic, but scientists have been researching mRNA for vaccine development for decades. The technology differs to other vaccines in that it delivers instructions to our cells to make a protein identical to one found in a virus, which triggers our body's immune response. Consultant medical virologist at Public Health England, Dr Kevin Brown explains how it works. "So the idea of an mRNA vaccine, is instead of actually using a virus to produce the antigen directly, the mRNA wrapped up in a lipid coat is injected into the body, goes into the cell, and the cell directly makes the protein from the mRNA. It's a really clever idea." Experts say the technology holds great promise for improving vaccines for viruses like influenza, because unlike traditional vaccines, it can be made within months and can be adapted quickly as viruses change. Dr Osterholm says if an influenza pandemic were to break out globally, without mRNA technology, outdated vaccine approaches would only allow for around a fourth of the world to be vaccinated within the first 18 months. "That would be a disastrous situation. mRNA technology applied into influenza vaccine could change that dramatically such that by the end of the first year, we could vaccinate the world. Now, all of that potential research and supportive information that we need is no longer gonna be collected here." Since February this year, when he took on the role of health secretary, Mr Kennedy has made a number of changes to how vaccines are regulated. In May, he announced COVID-19 would no longer be included on the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention's list of recommended vaccines, and in June, he fired all members of a national committee that helps craft vaccine policy. And it's not the first cut to mRNA funding and contracts, with the Department of Health and Human Services in May revoking a nearly US$600 million contract to the drug maker Moderna to develop a vaccine against bird flu. Dr Jeff Coller is a professor of RNA Biology and Therapeutics at Johns Hopkins University. He says the massive new cuts threaten vital progress in bird flu vaccine research. "It's not a question of if bird flu will become a pandemic. It's a question of when. Maybe it's not this year, maybe it's not five years from now, maybe it's ten years from now. But we have to be prepared. We have to have technologies in place. And that doesn't mean that everything should be mRNA, that we should only invest into mRNA for the development of vaccines against bird flu. We should be looking at all modalities, you know, in an effort to combat an emerging pandemic." He says this latest move will set the United States far behind other countries when it comes to vaccine research, but also future access to vaccines as well. "And the truth is that there are other countries around the world, including China as well as Europe and Asia in general, that are not throwing away their investment into mRNA research and mRNA vaccine development. In fact, they're doubling down. And if we don't reverse these decisions soon, then we'll be watching other countries achieve innovation in this space and life-saving medicines that we simply don't have access to."
News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
Machine Gun Kelly horrifies fans with worrying confession
Fans are worried about Machine Gun Kelly after he broke down his diet — or lack thereof. In a casual video interview shared by Instagram account HipHop-N-More, MGK, 35, told a small group of guys, 'I don't really eat. I just do water a bunch.' Shocked, the men asked if that means he fasts, which MGK confirmed with a head shake. 'Like, I ate that burger 'cause we're streaming, and it's my man's s**t, you know?' he replied, prompting one of the guys to ask, 'OK, if we weren't streaming, what would you have had for dinner?' The musician — who dabbles in rock, rap and pop — responded, 'Probably water.' The group could not believe their ears. 'But how? You don't ever feel weak or light-headed?' one of them wondered. 'Yeah, sometimes. I'll eat, like, a couple times a week,' the actor confessed, elaborating that those meals will consist of 'bone broth with kimchi and sauerkraut.' ''Cause it has probiotics, you know?' he continued. 'So, like, when you do those water fasts, the only thing that's crazy is it kills all the good bacteria in you, too, so you gotta put the pro[biotics].' Kimchi is a traditional Korean dish consisting of fermented vegetables, most commonly Napa cabbage and Korean radish. Sauerkraut, meanwhile, is shredded cabbage that's fermented with lactic acid bacteria. During fermentation, microorganisms like bacteria or yeast break down sugars and starches in the absence of oxygen to produce various by-products like acids, gases and alcohols. Both kimchi and sauerkraut contain probiotics, which are live microorganisms like bacteria or yeast that provide health benefits; however, they are low in calories and macronutrients, which are essential to organ function. MGK added that he often cooks his kimchi and sauerkraut in bone broth, a nutrient-rich liquid made by simmering animal bones, connective tissue and sometimes meat. 'Do you drink green juice and s**t, too?' one of his friends asked, to which he explained, 'I'll drink celery juice sometimes, yeah. Coconut water.' The father of two — who shares 16-year-old daughter Casie with Emma Cannon and 4-month-old daughter Saga with Megan Fox — made sure to note that 'coffee and cigarettes' are also staples of his diet. Netizens were quick to express concern, with many claiming, 'Bro is describing anorexia' and 'Today I learned MGK has an eating disorder.' Someone else argued, 'he is literally malnourished and his daily diet consists of Cigarettes and coffees.' Reps for the star, who celebrated one year of sobriety in August 2024, did not immediately respond to Page Six's request for comment.
News.com.au
8 hours ago
- News.com.au
Shocking comparison of medicine costs between the US and Australia
A doctor has exposed the shocking reality for Americans who are forced to pay up to tens of thousands of dollars for vital medicines that some Aussies fork out less than $10 for. Doctor Michael broke down the price discrepancies between five common medications in the United States, Australia and Scotland to his more than 500,000 followers on TikTok. Watched more than 2.7 million times, he started the video on a salbutamol inhaler, a puffer for asthma sufferers, costing about A$10, while it is US$50 in the states. Atorvastatin, a medication to lower cholesterol and prevent cardiovascular disease, is priced as little as A$6.70 for 30 tablets in Australia, compared to US$2,628 for Americans. Next was Omeprazole, used for treating stomach acid, heartburn and reflux, costs A$6 in Australia and up to US$326 in the US. While Azithromycin, an antibiotic to treat bacterial infections, can set Americans back US$155, while many Aussies pay just A$7.70. However, the biggest shock was Sofosbuvir, which treats hepatitis C, with a 12-week treatment roughly costing an eyewatering US$84,000 without insurance and discounts. It equates to about US$1,000 a tablet, multiple US health websites reported. Meanwhile, it costs about $31 for a packet of 28 in Australia on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). There are no costs involved for all five medications mentioned in Scotland, Dr Michael said. 'Oh my god,' he said in reaction to the five-figure cost. 'See, in Scotland and Australia there's a socialist healthcare system which means that the government subsidises the cost of medications.' Commenters from around the world were left shocked. 'Aussie here, happy to pay extra tax to know that everyone can get medical care. It's a human right ffs,' one person said. 'America is one gigantic scam,' added another. 'People in Australia cry over tax we have to pay,' added a third 'On the other hand, free hospitals, cheap medicine, cheap doctors, family tax benefit, aged care, unemployment benifits, aged pension, carer payments, meternity leave, farm house allowances, disability support, youth allowance. The list goes on. Australia looks after its citizens.' The medical practitioner's video came after President Donald Trump threatened a 200 per cent tariff on imported drugs, one of Australia's largest exports to the US. The commander-in-chief this week warned he may hike it a further 50 per cent. 'We'll be putting (an) initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year, one-and-a-half years, maximum, it's going to go to 150 per cent,' he said in a CNBC interview on Tuesday. 'And then it's going to go to 250 per cent because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country.' Trump's fresh tariff threat It is feared President Trump's war on Big Pharma could have monumental consequences in Australia that could see billions wiped from the economy and the PBS caught in the crossfire. However, The Australian Institute's chief economist, Matt Grudnoff, urged caution and argued the leader of the free world himself was likely unsure of what he is going to do on pharmaceutical tariffs 'yet'. 'Some of the numbers he throws around, we know that even after well over six months now of talk about tariffs, he really hasn't nailed down exactly what they're going to be anywhere. This is something that I think will be off in the future,' Mr Grundoff told He also stressed American consumers will be hit harder than Australians if any tariffs were to be applied, but Mr Grudnoff said the timing of it could be around the US midterms. 'If Trump imposes tariffs that increase the price of medicines in the US right before the midterm elections... I can't see that happening for political reasons if nothing else,' he said. 'I think that Republicans facing re-election will be very keen for that not to happen and also Trump has been... talking about decreasing medicine prices and (if) medicine prices go up, that might be quite difficult politically for him.' He said any levies on pharmaceuticals could have a 'slightly larger impact' compared to other industries and affect some of the largest medicine companies in Australia. The Albanese government ruled out making changes to the PBS to appease President Trump who has been urged to overhaul the 'discriminatory' scheme that 'undermines' US exports. Any alteration may drive up prices of medicines in Australia. 'To be very clear, there seems to be very strong bipartisan policy in Australia (on) both sides that no, they're not going to use the PBS as a bargaining tool,' Mr Grudnoff said. 'There has been no indication yet that the Australian government would reduce pharmaceutical tariffs for higher US drug prices in Australia. I think they'd be crazy to do it. I don't think our trade with the US in pharmaceutical goods is anywhere near big enough to warrant the pain that would be caused in Australia by higher drug prices.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has previously said the PBS is 'not up for negotiation'. Last week the government introduced legislation to bring down the cap of eligible medicines on the PBS from $31.60 down to $25 from January 1 next year. Labor said it will save Australians about $200 million a year. PBS wait times a big concern, peak body warns The threat of President Trump's tariffs are less of a concern compared to the long wait times for medicines to be put on the PBS, a peak pharmaceutical research industry has said. Medicines Australia chief Liz de Somer warned Australians could die waiting for new life-saving medicines to be listed on the scheme Patients and advocacy groups say the complex process and excessive red tape involved is leading to unnecessary and long delays. A report this week found the average wait time from when a medication is approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration to being listed is 22 months. It would see drugs costing hundreds to thousands of dollars drop to just over $30. 'Patients will die waiting for medicines to be listed,' Ms de Somer said. 'And this will have a far greater effect on the Australian system than anything else.' A review of the PBS system was completed by the Health Technology Assessment and handed to the federal government last year, making a series of recommendations to improve speed. Health Minister Mark Butler has said the review will help guide the Albanese government on future decisions on reform. 'The Albanese government is continuing to make medicines available to Australian patients faster and cheaper,' he said. 'We know patients want faster access to cutting-edge medicine and treatments. 'That's why our government is working through the recommendations of the HTA review, so Australians can get faster access to the best medicines and therapies, at a cost that patients and the community can afford.'
