Italian physicists explain how to avoid lumps in cheesy pasta sauce
How do you mix cheese and hot water without making it lumpy? This is the question for anyone who has ever tried to make the popular Italian pasta dish Cacio e Pepe, which consists of pasta, the Italian hard cheese Pecorino and pepper.
Physicists have now taken on the challenge of solving this complex culinary puzzle and sharing it with pasta enthusiasts around the world.
In the journal Physics of Fluids, scientists from the Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems in Dresden, the University of Padua and other institutions report their findings – and provided what they consider to be a "foolproof recipe."
Normally, fatty substances like cheese do not mix well with water, which is why starch is an important binding agent. Through tests, the research team discovered that 2-3% starch relative to the amount of cheese is optimal for a creamy, uniform sauce.
With less than 1%, the risk of lumps is too high, while more than 4% makes the sauce stiff and unappetising.
Heat is also crucial, as the sauce cannot tolerate much of it. Excessive temperatures destroy the proteins in the cheese, causing it to form lumps – a process the researchers refer to as the undesirable "mozzarella phase."
That's why the water should be cooled slightly before mixed it with the cheese, the scientists say.
"A true Italian grandmother or a skilled home chef from Rome would never need a scientific recipe for cacio e pepe," the study states. "For everyone else, this guide offers a practical way to master the dish."
For those attempting the recipe, the researchers recommend preparing a starch solution – ideally with potato or corn starch – rather than relying on pasta water, where the starch content is unknown.
Dissolve four grams of starch in 40 grams of water and heat it until it reaches a gel-like consistency. To this gel, add another 80 grams of water to cool the mixture.
Only then should the Pecorino (160 grams in this example) be stirred into the starch solution until a homogeneous consistency is achieved. Finally, warm the sauce to serving temperature. Add pepper, mix in the pasta, and the dish is ready.
The researchers had not only scientific curiosity but also a personal interest in the project. "We are Italians living abroad. We often have dinner together and enjoy traditional cooking," co-author Ivan Di Terlizzi from the Max Planck Institute in Dresden is quoted as saying in a statement by the American Institute of Physics.
Cacio e Pepe, he said, seemed like an interesting dish from a physics perspective. "And of course, there was the practical aim to avoid wasting good pecorino."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
a day ago
- Fox News
Dead Sea Scrolls could be even older than previously thought, according to new study
Print Close By Andrea Margolis Published June 05, 2025 The Dead Sea Scrolls may be even older than researchers thought, according to a new study driven by an artificial intelligence (AI) model. A group of researchers from the Netherlands, Italy and Denmark recently published their findings in the journal PLOS One on June 4. The researchers said they developed an AI-based date-prediction model named Enoch, a nod to the biblical patriarch of the same name. ANCIENT CHRISTIAN FIGURINES DISCOVERED IN 1,500-YEAR-OLD DESERT GRAVES Enoch "was trained as a machine learning-based date-prediction model applying Bayesian ridge regression on established handwriting-style descriptors," according to the study. In order to date the scrolls, the model analyzed each one's handwriting style. Researchers also integrated radiocarbon dating methods — and found that most of the scrolls were at least a generation older than previously thought. Previous estimates placed the scrolls between 150 and 50 B.C., but the model found that many of the scrolls date to around 200 B.C. "There are no compelling paleographic or historical reasons that preclude these older dates as reliable time markers." "Enoch's style-based predictions are often older than traditionally assumed paleographic estimates, leading to a new chronology of the scrolls and the re-dating of ancient Jewish key texts that contribute to current debates on Jewish and Christian origins," the paper states. LITTLE GIRL DISCOVERS 3,800-YEAR-OLD AMULET WITH TIES TO BIBLICAL PEOPLE DURING FAMILY TRIP The researchers also indicate that the new dates are "realistic." "There are no compelling paleographic or historical reasons that preclude these older dates as reliable time markers," the authors said. For more Lifestyle articles, visit The scrolls, found in desert caves near the Dead Sea in the 1940s and 1950s, date between the third century B.C. to the first century A.D. They offer a wealth of knowledge about ancient Judaism, with many religious texts during the Second Temple period that were previously unknown. CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER Since their discovery, the scrolls have attracted a great amount of interest from both scholars and the public at large. In 2021, Israeli researchers uncovered dozens of new Dead Sea Scroll fragments. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP In April, the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library showcased a special collection of eight ancient Jewish manuscripts as part of its exhibition on the Dead Sea Scrolls. Print Close URL
CNN
2 days ago
- CNN
First evidence of ‘living towers' made of worms discovered in nature
Nature seems to offer an escape from the hustle and bustle of city life, but the world at your feet may tell another story. Even in the shade of a fruit tree, you could be surrounded by tiny skyscrapers — not made of steel or concrete, but of microscopic worms wriggling and writhing into the shape of long, vertical towers. Even though these miniature architects, called nematodes, are found all over Earth's surface, scientists in Germany recently witnessed their impressive building techniques in nature for the first time. After months of closely inspecting rotten pears and apples in local orchards, researchers from the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior and the University of Konstanz were able to spot hundreds of the 1-millimeter-long (0.04-inch) worms climbing onto one another, amassing structures up to 10 times their individual size. Related video Rare video shows 12 sharks co-feed socially To learn more about the mysterious physics of the soft, slimy towers, the study team brought samples of nematodes called Caenorhabditis elegans into a lab and analyzed them. There, the scientists noticed the worms could assemble in a matter of hours, with some reaching out from the twisting mass as exploratory 'arms' sensing the environment and building accordingly. But why the worms formed the structures wasn't immediately clear. The team's findings, published Thursday in the journal Current Biology, show that even the smallest animals can prompt big questions about the evolutionary purpose of social behaviors. 'What we got was more than just some worms standing on top of each other,' said senior study author Serena Ding, a Max Planck research group leader of genes and behavior. 'It's a coordinated superorganism, acting and moving as a whole.' To find out what was motivating the nematodes' building behavior, the study team tested the worms' reactions to being poked, prodded and even visited by a fly — all while stacked in a tower formation. 'We saw that they are very reactive to the presence of a stimulus,' said the study's first author, Daniela Perez, who is a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior. 'They sense it, and then the tower goes towards this stimulus, attaching itself to our metal pick or a fly buzzing around.' This coordinated reaction suggests the hungry nematodes may be joining together to easily hitch a ride on larger animals such as insects that transport them to (not so) greener pastures with more rotten fruit to feast on, Perez said. 'If you think about it, an animal that is 1 millimeter long cannot just crawl all the way to the next fruit 2 meters (6.6 feet) away. It could easily die on the way there, or be eaten by a predator,' Perez explained. Nematodes are capable of hitchhiking solo too, she added, but arriving to a new area in a group may allow them to continue reproducing. The structures themselves may also serve as a mode of transport, as evidenced by how some worms formed bridges across gaps within the petri dishes to get from one surface to another, Perez noted. 'This discovery is really exciting,' said Orit Peleg, an associate professor of computer science who studies living systems at the University of Colorado Boulder's BioFrontiers Institute. 'It's both establishing the ecological function of creating a tower, and it really opens up the door to do more controlled experimentation to try to understand the perceptual world of these organisms, and how they communicate within a large group.' Peleg was not involved in the study. As the next step, Perez said her team would like to learn whether the formation of these structures is a cooperative or competitive behavior. In other words, are the towering nematodes behaving socially to help each other out, or are their towers more akin to a Black Friday sale stampede? Studying the behaviors of other self-assembling creatures could offer clues to the social norms of nematodes and help answer this question, Ding said. Ants, which assemble to form buoyant rafts to survive floodwaters, are among the few creatures known to team up like nematodes, said David Hu, a professor of mechanical engineering and biology at Georgia Tech. Hu was not involved in the study. 'Ants are incredibly sacrificial for one another, and they do not generally fight within the colony,' Hu said. 'That's because of their genetics. They all come from the same queen, so they are like siblings.' Like ants, nematodes didn't appear to display any obvious role differentiation or hierarchy within the tower structures, Perez said. Each worm from the base to the top of the structure was equally mobile and strong, indicating no competition was at play. However, the lab-cultivated worms were basically clones of one another, so it's not clear whether role differentiation occurs more often in nature, where nematode populations could have more genetic differences, she noted. Additionally, socially cooperative creatures tend to use some form of communication, Peleg said. In the case of ants, it may be their pheromone trails, while honeybees rely on their ritual dance routines and slime molds use their pulsing chemical signals. With nematodes, however, it's still not clear how they might communicate — or if they are communicating at all, Ding said. 'The next steps for (the team) are really just choosing the next questions to ask.' Notably, there has been a lot of interest in studying cooperative animal behaviors among the robotics community, Hu said. It's possible that one day, he added, information about the complex sociality of creatures like nematodes could be used to inform how technology, such as computer servers or drone systems, communicates.
Gizmodo
2 days ago
- Gizmodo
Worms Caught Building Flesh Towers in the Wild
Scientists have just discovered something most of us probably would've been fine never knowing: wild nematodes—also known as roundworms—love to climb on top of each other to build fleshy, writhing towers. Researchers in Germany detailed their discovery in a new study published Thursday in Current Biology. They found and videotaped several nematode species, living out in the wild, organizing into these living worm towers—a phenomenon previously only seen in the lab. The findings also show that the microscopic worms use these structures to climb onto animals or objects that can bring them elsewhere, though there remain many other questions about the practice. According to senior study author Serena Ding, a researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, the towers are hardly a secret among the worm science community. But the behavior had reached a sort of mythical status, since no one had ever documented it in wild nematodes. That could have meant the worms are only compelled to build towers under lab conditions, which might have limited the usefulness of any research on the behavior. 'It's just something that always bugged me. I mean, yes, we're studying nematode collective behavior in the tower context and other contexts, but is it real?' Ding, the leader of a lab focused on nematode research at Max Planck, told Gizmodo. 'So when I started my research program four years ago, I really dedicated a push towards just actually finding nematodes at a high density and high numbers doing this stuff out there. And then we were successful.' It ultimately took months for Ding's colleagues, particularly co-author Ryan Greenway, to find and record instances of natural worm tower building in the decaying fruits strewn across the orchards near the University of Konstanz (one of three locations where the Institute is based). Once the towers were found, the researchers brought some into the lab for further study. They also encouraged and studied the creation of worm towers in the lab with Caenorhabditis elegans, a species frequently used for research. 'There's the important finding of, 'Yes, they do exist.' But the second finding is that we actually confirm the towers can serve to disperse individuals at the same time,' Ding said. 'This [has] always been thought of as a dispersal behavior, but nobody's really confirmed it.' The researchers observed the worms in these towers latching onto animals like fruit flies passing them by, for instance, or using them as a sort of bridge to cross otherwise unreachable gaps. Moreover, the towers appeared to collectively respond to stimuli like being touched. The fruits contained loads of nematodes, but the towers themselves were always made of only one species at a time. All of this suggests that these living buildings should be seen as temporary 'superorganisms,' similar to slime molds or certain ants. Though Ding and her team did hope and expect to find the worm towers in nature, they were surprised in other ways. The researchers found no evidence of the lab worms taking on different roles inside the tower, for one. The worms were equally mobile, and none appeared to have an advantage over others in becoming the head of the tower (i.e. the part that most benefits from this behavior). These worms are clonal, however, meaning they're practically identical to each other genetically. And it's possible that things aren't quite so chummy among more distantly-related worms in the wild. 'These are active directions which we're trying to follow up on right now, because not everybody gets to disperse. So who gets to disperse? Are they helping each other? Are they cheating?' Ding said. There are other questions left to be answered about these towers. The team's lab experiments showed that C. elegans worms were capable of building towers throughout their lives, for instance, including adulthood. Previous research had suggested this behavior was only performed by dauer worms—a larval stage of life some worms adopt to survive harsher environments. At the same time, the natural towers they found were only made out of dauer worms, so maybe there's something else that makes the behavior more common during that stage of life. This research is only the start for Ding and her team, since they plan to pursue these mysteries further. But Ding hopes her team's work can already impart a valuable lesson, especially to other worm researchers. She notes worms like C. elegans are commonly altered in the lab so scientists can track how certain behaviors might work on the molecular level. But she argues that there's also still plenty more to be learned from studying them out in the real world. 'What I'm trying to do is to take really well-known organisms but study them from a more natural perspective. I want to understand not just how the behavior is generated, but also what the behavior means for the animal from a more ecological and evolutionarily relevant perspective,' she said. 'At least for me, this is an important study where as a worm person, I can publish a study without using a single mutant and we're just looking at the behavior, and what those behaviors say. For me, that's super exciting.' Personally, I'm just glad I now have more frightening trivia to bring up at my next party.
