‘Mr. Nobody Against Putin' Review: A Riveting Look Inside an Increasingly Totalitarian Russia
Borenstein is the credited director, but the footage itself was largely shot by Pavel 'Pasha' Talankin, a guy with an impish grin and a freethinking sensibility who worked as a videographer and events coordinator at Karabash Primary School #1. Karabash is a small town of 10,000 in the Ural Mountains, which outside visitors have tried to paint as the 'most polluted town in the world' due to its copper smelting plant that one observer says has resulted in the town's population having an average life expectancy of 38. 'It's not so bad,' Pasha says in his voiceover right after that. And as much of the film that follows is about illuminating the dark turn Russia has taken since the Ukraine War — especially in terms of indoctrinating its children — it's also slyly a message to the West: Russians don't all think alike, and they don't all live in grinding, miserable conditions.
More from IndieWire
2025 Sundance Keynote Looks Ahead: 'We'll Not Only Adapt to the Changing Industry but Also Shape Its Future'
For Cooper Raiff to Build a Market for Indie TV, He Needed to Make 'Hal & Harper' 'Undeniable'
Since Talankin shot almost all of the footage in his role as the school's videographer himself, he's credited as DP (and as co-director) of 'Mr. Nobody Against Putin.' And though he's aiming for the kind of nuance that the West doesn't typically see in depictions of Russia, he's clear-eyed about the all-out descent into totalitarianism the country has experienced since those harrowing days of February 2022, when Vladimir Putin began his 'special military operation' against Ukraine.
Not too many years removed from the school himself, Pasha has the kind of the connection with the students there indicative of someone who was a student there himself. We see him filming poetry readings and trying to shoot a music video with the older students (the school appears to be veritably a K-12). And then suddenly, in February 2022, they're asked 'from above' to start staging patriotic displays and the singing of anthems about the Motherland. It's about both indoctrinating the students, and making sure that the school staff are willing to indoctrinate the students when ordered so that the government knows the adult population is falling in line (which priority is more important is unclear, though we know even in the U.S., as seen in the documentary 'The Librarians,' that bad-faith political actors believe indoctrinating children will help achieve future goals). Pasha then has to upload all the patriotic videos to a mysterious government website.
From that point on, each schoolday begins with a 'presentation of the colors' ceremony that requires kids to do a military-style march. 'Are we completely fucked up?' Pasha asks his supervisor when the order comes down to start doing this. 'Fuck! It hurts!' Suddenly, class lectures are all about the need to 'demilitarize' and 'denazify' Ukraine. Assault rifle demonstrations are held. And younger students are encouraged to join a new 'patriotic' group that has its roots in the Soviet Pioneers (but that most U.S. viewers watching this will be inclined to think of as akin to the Hitler Youth).
The way that Pasha shows us these things being added to the curriculum, it's clear it wasn't always like this. Russians have a greater diversity of thought when it comes to Putin and the Ukraine War than is typically acknowledged in the West. And this particular slide into totalitarianism is a rather recent development (which gives one hope that it could be reversed). Presumably, Putin felt that ramping up the propaganda efforts for the Ukraine War, a war in which Russians might feel they are fighting against their brothers and sisters, required greater effort than anything attempted for Russia's involvement in the wars in Syria and Chechnya.
There are definitely some true believers here. One teacher, Mr. Abdulmanov, wins an award because he's turned his history class into a veritable daily propaganda lecture. When asked, he includes Lavrentiy Beria, Stalin's NKVD head, and a notorious murderer and sexual predator (several children's skulls were found on his property, among those of others), as one of his personal heroes. Even Pasha's mother, a librarian who he clearly loves (though he says he's never told her), supports the war — even if her justification is that 'our people have always been involved in all the battles' and that 'people love shooting each other.'
Over time, Pasha makes contact on Instagram with a producer in the West who's interested in footage being taken about how the war's being communicated inside Russia. Presumably, that's how this resulting film came to be. But Pasha also gets it in his head to start subverting the day-to-day propaganda at the school, which could make him a target even before delivering the footage he's taken to the producer.
One day, Pasha even subverts the daily 'procession of the colors' ceremony by swapping out the Russian national anthem for Lady Gaga's rendition of the 'The Star Spangled Banner,' and in his voiceover notes that nothing could be more threatening to the regime than the fact it was Gaga's version. The Western view might be that Pasha would be spirited away to a gulag as soon as he did that, but nothing happens right away. There is a police car suddenly parked in front of his apartment block, however. And he knows that he'll have to leave the country if he's ever to share all the video footage he's taken. There are moments when Pasha laments what's happened here, even if he immediately qualifies it by saying 'of course, it's nothing like what's happening in Ukraine.' But even still, he grieves over former students he knew who've been drafted and sent to Ukraine and never returned.
When the school's graduation ceremony finally arrives, Pasha uses the occasion to deliver a speech that's both about honoring the grads and a statement about how much he himself has learned here — with hindsight everyone would have recognized it as a farewell speech. And indeed, he fled the next day.
Borenstein assembled all of this into a film that's not only a revealing bit of journalism on Talankin's part but a satisfying character study about an independent thinker suddenly faced with totalitarianism. You're rooting for Pasha so hard in all of this, even if, based on the existence of this film and his retroactive voiceover, you know from the very beginning he must be okay. 'Mr. Nobody Against Putin' is unique in dealing with serious issues about war and dehumanization with a light, even humorous, and certainly personality-filled, touch — in the serious-as-a-heart-attack war documentary landscape, it is a unicorn. The fact that it leads to more empathy and understanding, and a capacity for seeing ordinary Russians in a more human light, makes it profound film as well as an engaging one.
'Mr. Nobody Against Putin' world premiered in the World Cinema Documentary Competition at the 2025 Sundance Film Festival. It is currently seeking U.S. distribution.
Want to stay up to date on IndieWire's film and critical thoughts? to our newly launched newsletter, In Review by David Ehrlich, in which our Chief Film Critic and Head Reviews Editor rounds up the best new reviews and streaming picks along with some exclusive musings — all only available to subscribers.
Best of IndieWire
The 25 Best Alfred Hitchcock Movies, Ranked
Every IndieWire TV Review from 2020, Ranked by Grade from Best to Worst
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why the US bombed a bunch of metal tubes − a nuclear engineer explains the importance of centrifuges to Iranian efforts to build nuclear weapons
When U.S. forces attacked Iran's nuclear facilities on June 21, 2025, the main target was metal tubes in laboratories deep underground. The tubes are centrifuges that produce highly enriched uranium needed to build nuclear weapons. Inside of a centrifuge, a rotor spins in the range of 50,000 to 100,000 revolutions per minute, 10 times faster than a Corvette engine's crankshaft. High speeds are needed to separate lighter uranium-235 from heavier uranium-238 for further collection and processing. Producing this level of force means the rotor itself must be well balanced and strong and rely on high-speed magnetic bearings to reduce friction. Over the years, Iran has produced thousands of centrifuges. They work together to enrich uranium to dangerous levels – close to weapons-grade uranium. Most of them are deployed in three enrichment sites: Natanz, the country's main enrichment facility, Fordow and Isfahan. Inside of these facilities, the centrifuges are arranged into cascades – series of machines connected to each other. This way, each machine yields slightly more enriched uranium, feeding the gas produced into its neighbor to maximize production efficiency. As a nuclear engineer who works on nuclear nonproliferation, I track centrifuge technology, including the Iranian enrichment facilities targeted by the U.S. and Israel. A typical cascade deployed in Iran is composed of 164 centrifuges, working in series to produce enriched uranium. The Natanz facility was designed to hold over 50,000 centrifuges. Iran's early intentions to field centrifuges on a very large scale were clear. At the peak of the program in the early 2010s it deployed over 19,000 units. Iran later scaled down the number of its centrifuges in part due to international agreements such as the since scrapped Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action signed in 2015. Iran has a long history of enriching uranium. In the late 1990s, it acquired a Pakistani centrifuge design known as P-1. The blueprints and some components were supplied via the A.Q. Khan black market network – the mastermind of the Pakistani program and a serious source of nuclear proliferation globally. Today, the P-1 design is known as IR-1. IR-1 centrifuges use aluminum and a high-strength alloy, known as maraging steel. About one-third of the centrifuges that were deployed at the sites of the recent strike on June 21 are IR-1. Each one produces on the order of 0.8 separative work units, which is the unit for measuring the amount of energy and effort needed to separate uranium-235 molecules from the rest of the uranium gas. To put this in perspective, one centrifuge would yield about 0.2 ounces (6 grams) of 60%-enriched uranium-235 per year. A typical uranium-based weapon requires 55 pounds (25 kilograms) of 90%-enriched uranium. To get to weapons-grade level, a single centrifuge would produce only 0.14 ounces (4 grams) per year. It requires more work to go higher in enrichment. While capable of doing the job, the IR-1 is quite inefficient. Small yields mean that over 6,000 centrifuges would need to work together for a year to get enough material for one weapon such as a nuclear warhead. Or the efficiency of the centrifuges would have to be improved. Iran did both. Before the strike by U.S. forces, Iran was operating close to 7,000 IR-1 centrifuges. In addition, Iran designed, built and operated more efficient centrifuges such as the IR-2m, IR-4 and IR-6 designs. Comparing the IR-1 with the latest designs is like comparing a golf cart with the latest electric vehicles in terms of range and payload. Iran's latest centrifuge designs contain carbon fiber composites with exceptional strength and durability and low weight. This is a recipe for producing light and compact centrifuges that are easier to conceal from inspections. According to the international nuclear watchdog International Atomic Energy Agency, before the strike Iran was operating 6,500 IR-2m centrifuges, close to 4,000 IR-4 centrifuges and over 3,000 IR-6 centrifuges. With each new generation, the separative work unit efficiency increased significantly. IR-6 centrifuges, with their carbon fiber rotors, can achieve up to 10 separative work units per year. That's about 2.8 ounces (80 grams) of 60%-enriched uranium-235 per year. The International Atomic Energy Agency verified that the IR-6 cascades have been actively used to ramp up production of 60%-enriched uranium. The most recent and advanced centrifuges developed by Iran, known as IR-9, can achieve 50 separative work units per year. This cuts down the time needed to produce highly enriched uranium for weapon purposes from months to weeks. The other aspect of IR-9 advanced centrifuges is their compactness. They are easier to conceal from inspections or move underground, and they require less energy to operate. Advanced centrifuges such as the IR-9 drive up the risk of nuclear weapons proliferation significantly. Fortunately, the International Atomic Energy Agency reports that only one exists in testing laboratories, and there is no evidence Iran has deployed them widely. However, it's possible more are concealed. Uranium enrichment of 60% is far beyond the needs of any civilian use. The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed that Iran stockpiled about 880 pounds (400 kilograms) of highly enriched uranium before the attack, and it might have escaped intact. That's enough to make 10 weapons. The newer centrifuges – IR-2m, IR-4 and IR-6 – would need a bit over eight months to produce that much. It's not clear what the U.S. attack has accomplished, but destroying the facilities targeted in the attack and hindering Iran's ability to continue enriching uranium might be a way to slow Iran's move toward producing nuclear weapons. However, based on my work and research on preventing nuclear proliferation, I believe a more reliable means of preventing Iran from achieving its nuclear aims would be for diplomacy and cooperation to prevail. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Anna Erickson, Georgia Institute of Technology Read more: Uranium enrichment: A chemist explains how the surprisingly common element is processed to power reactors and weapons Iran-Israel 'threshold war' has rewritten nuclear escalation rules Israel bombed an Iraqi nuclear reactor in 1981 − it pushed program underground and spurred Saddam Hussein's desire for nukes Anna Erickson receives funding from Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) related to nuclear nonproliferation technologies. She has previously served on the Board of Directors of the American Nuclear Society.
Washington Post
3 hours ago
- Washington Post
North Korea's Kim Jong Un shown with coffins of his soldiers killed in Russia
SEOUL — In the year since North Korea's Kim Jong Un and Russia's Vladimir Putin signed a landmark defense pact, their relationship has become demonstrably stronger, not least through Kim's decision to dispatch at least 12,000 troops to fight in Putin's war against Ukraine. On Tuesday, North Korea's state media broadcast footage of the leader leaning over the coffins of soldiers who died in that fight, marking the first time Kim had openly displayed his regime's role in aiding Russia's war.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' doesn't directly allow president to delay or cancel elections
Claim: H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, contains a provision allowing the U.S. president to delay or cancel elections. Rating: Context: Other provisions in the bill would add restrictions on the judiciary's power to enforce rulings — but the repercussions of a U.S. president delaying or cancelling an election is outside the scope of this claim. "One big, beautiful bill" is what U.S. President Donald Trump called H.R .1 — the budget bill Republicans in Congress were using as a vehicle in 2025 to turn some of Trump's agenda into law. The lawmakers must have liked the phrasing — the proposed legislation is known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The bill contained large changes and budget cuts. It passed the House by just one vote on May 22 ,and as of this writing, had not yet passed through the Republican-controlled Senate, where it's faced major pushback from Democrats and arguments from a few Republicans that the bill cuts either too much or too little. But posts on social media sites like Facebook, Reddit and X went further, alleging that the bill contained a provision that would allow the president to "delay or cancel elections — legally." Snopes carefully reviewed the mammoth of a bill looking for provisions that would match that description. There were none — therefore, the claim is false. The bill's table of contents provides a brief description of what each section does. H.R. 1 does contain a provision that would make it more difficult for courts to enforce injunctions against the federal government, and therefore could theoretically abet delaying or cancelling an election. However, this claim is not about the potential repercussions of a U.S. president taking such an action — it is about whether H.R. 1 legally allows the president to do that. It does not. The bill's table of contents provides a brief description of what each section does. As examples: Title IV (Energy and Commerce), Subtitle B (Environment), Part 1 (Repeals and Recissions) contains a list of laws the bill would repeal, including Section 42106, "Repeal and rescission relating to funding to address air pollution at schools." Title IV, Subtitle D (Health), Part 1 (Medicaid), Subpart b ("preventing wasteful spending") includes Section 44125, "Prohibiting Federal Medicaid and CHIP funding for gender transition procedures." Nothing in the bill's table of contents even appeared remotely like it would give the president power to delay or cancel elections. If such a provision were hidden in the bill, it would have to contain either the word "president" or "executive," since that's who the power would supposedly go to. But searching the bill for those keywords also turned up nothing relevant. The term "president" came up 18 times in the bill, on topics as broad as transnational oil pipelines, to Medicaid eligibility, to radio frequency ranges, but never in relation to elections. The term "executive" came up 44 times, mostly in relation to government departments with the word in their name, but again, never in relation to elections. Arrington, Jodey C. One Big Beautiful Bill Act. H.R. 1, 20 May 2025, Hubbard, Kaia "Here's What's in Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" That Narrowly Passed in the House." CBS News, 23 May 2025, "Interpretation: Elections Clause | Constitution Center." National Constitution Center – Accessed 27 May 2025. Moore, Elena. "Here's What's in the GOP Megabill That's Just Passed the House." NPR, 22 May 2025. NPR, News, A. B. C. "Dems Call GOP's 'big, Beautiful' Bill 'Ugly' for Hurting Low-Income, Helping Rich." ABC News, Accessed 27 May 2025.
