logo
Four Pakistani Nationals On Temporary Visas Deported from Karnataka

Four Pakistani Nationals On Temporary Visas Deported from Karnataka

News1830-04-2025

After Pahalgam attack: Following the Centre's directive to cancel all visas issued to Pakistani nationals, these four individuals were sent back
In the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack, Karnataka has deported four Pakistani nationals who were residing in Bengaluru on temporary visas. However, the fate of nearly 100 others, including Pakistani Hindus living in the state, remains undecided, as the Centre is yet to issue directions on the deportation of those holding long-term visas.
'We issued instructions to immediately leave the country, and they complied. Their travel was closely monitored, and it was ensured that they left Indian soil," a senior police officer told News18.
Following the Centre's directive to cancel all visas issued to Pakistani nationals — excluding those holding long-term, diplomatic, or official visas — these four individuals were sent back. According to police sources, they departed on April 27, and confirmation of their exit was received soon after.
In the Bhatkal and Karwar regions of Karnataka, the Navayath community has a tradition of marrying Pakistanis, as they are believed to have ancestral roots in that region. After marriage, these individuals are granted long-term visas by the Indian government to stay and settle in Karnataka.
According to figures from the Karnataka Home Department, 102 Pakistani nationals currently reside in the state on long-term visas. Most are here to pursue their education or marriage to Indian nationals, a senior police officer said.
The FRRO department also has records of Pakistani nationals residing in Mysuru, Mangaluru, Kalaburagi, and Davanagere. One of them is a medical student in his final year, whose study visa has not yet expired. 'A drive has already begun to compile a fresh list of Pakistani nationals. If any are found to be overstaying, they will also be deported," the officer said.
In November last year, 18 Pakistani nationals affiliated with the Mehdi Foundation were previously arrested for living in India using forged documents.
The Indian arm of Mehdi Foundation International (MFI), which operated out of Bengaluru and was linked to Pakistanis staying in the country under false identities, has been officially disbanded, and its members booked.
In a joint operation by central agencies, Jigani Police arrested a 48-year-old Pakistani national, his wife, and in-laws, who were living on the outskirts of Bengaluru using fake identities for the past six years. The four Pakistani nationals initially caught were living under the aliases Shankar Sharma, Asha Rani, Ram Babu Sharma, and Rani Sharma.
Police first apprehended Rashid Ali Siddiqui, 48, his wife Ayesha, 38, and her parents Hanif Mohammed, 73, and Rubina, 61, who were living in Rajapura village. Later, they arrested Parvez Ahmed — also known as Farvez — the main handler responsible for facilitating the illegal entry of Pakistani nationals into Karnataka. Parvez would arrange fake identities and documents, secure employment for them, and help them remain under the radar of investigative agencies.
Karnataka Police, acting on intelligence inputs, traced others linked to MFI operations. Parvez was apprehended on October 7 on the outskirts of Bengaluru while travelling from Mumbai.
They are currently in judicial custody at Bengaluru's Parappana Agrahara jail, and a decision from the Home Department is awaited regarding further action in light of the Pahalgam incident.
The arrests in Bengaluru last year were made based on intelligence alerts after two Pakistanis were held at Chennai International Airport. They had travelled from Dhaka after attending a meeting of the Mehdi Foundation. Since then, a drive has been underway to trace and monitor Pakistani nationals across Karnataka.
Karnataka Home Minister G. Parameshwara said he has issued instructions to all Superintendents of Police and senior law enforcement officials across the state to compile updated lists of Pakistani citizens residing in their jurisdictions.
'The MHA has issued a directive to all states to deport Pakistani nationals. Based on this, we have started the groundwork. Permanent visa holders, however, will be exempt from this process," the minister told the media.
He also said Pakistani students enrolled in educational institutions across Karnataka may be asked to return. 'We have relayed the advisory to our district police heads. The exact number of Pakistani nationals in Karnataka is still being verified," he added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Okay with my daughter abusing...': Sharmishta Panoli's father hits back after influencer gets bail
'Okay with my daughter abusing...': Sharmishta Panoli's father hits back after influencer gets bail

Hindustan Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

'Okay with my daughter abusing...': Sharmishta Panoli's father hits back after influencer gets bail

The father of influencer Sharmishta Panoli, who was granted interim bail by the Calcutta High Court, has spoken out following her arrest over controversial social media comments related to Operation Sindoor. The 22-year-old was arrested by Kolkata Police from Gurugram and accused of hurting religious sentiments with allegedly communal remarks made in a video posted online. Days after she was granted bail, her father, Prithviraj Panoli, shared a post on X, quoting Urdu poet Allama Iqbal's song 'Saare Jahan Se Accha'. Referencing a verse which calls for no religious animosity, Panoli said, "He preached this to the secular Hindustan and then became one of the founding voices for Islamic Pakistan." Defending his daughter, Panoli urged others to follow in her footsteps. After a social media user urged him to discourage his daughter from using "inappropriate or offensive language", he hit back, saying he was "ok" with his daughter abusing 'Pakistani terrorists.' "I am OK with my daughter abusing Pakistani terrorists who killed innocents in the name of religion. She only used some words what many maulanas preach openly. Are you OK for her getting rape threats for that despite apologising? Did you raise your voice against that? If yes, I am with you," he wrote. A 22-year-old law student from Pune, Sharmishta Panoli, found herself at the centre of controversy after she allegedly made remarks about Bollywood celebrities' silence on 'Operation Sindoor.' The video quickly went viral, drawing sharp backlash online, with many accusing her of spreading hate speech. Panoli also received threats in the comments section of her post. Following the uproar, she deleted the video from Instagram and issued a public apology. In her statement, she expressed regret and stated that she never intended to hurt anyone's religious sentiments. She also deleted her previous posts. Panoli's arrest by Kolkata Police triggered a political storm in West Bengal, with the Opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) slamming the move as 'selective enforcement' of the law.

India will protect farmers' interest in US trade talks: Shivraj Singh Chouhan
India will protect farmers' interest in US trade talks: Shivraj Singh Chouhan

The Print

time13 minutes ago

  • The Print

India will protect farmers' interest in US trade talks: Shivraj Singh Chouhan

He was responding to a query on how India would safeguard farmers amid US pressure for greater market access for American agricultural and horticultural products. 'Our priority is to protect the interest of our farmers. India will not work closing its eyes. We will assess our gains and losses. Keeping that in mind, an agreement will be finalised,' Chouhan told PTI in an interview. New Delhi, Jun 8 (PTI) India will prioritise protecting its farmers' interests while assessing potential gains and losses in the ongoing trade negotiations with the United States over agricultural market access, Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan said. The negotiators are expected to agree on the framework for the broad contours of the first phase of the bilateral deal, expected to be signed by fall (September-October) 2025. 'The discussions are ongoing between India and the US. One thing is clear, we will protect the interest of our farmers. When we talk about two nations, we need to see the overall trade,' the minister added. According to a NITI Aayog report, 'Promoting India-US Agricultural Trade under the new US Trade Regime', the value for US agriculture and allied product exports to India was about USD 2.22 billion in the triennium ending 2024. In the same period, India exported USD 5.75 billion worth of agricultural products to the US. India's main agricultural exports to the US include frozen shrimp, basmati rice, spices, processed cereals, and other value-added products. The US wants to export more agricultural products such as corn, soybeans, and animal feed, but faces high Indian tariffs — especially in agriculture, where average tariffs can reach up to 39-50 per cent. The minister's comments come as India and the US continue negotiations on expanding agricultural trade, with Washington seeking reduced tariffs and improved market access for its farm products in the Indian market. India is cautious about fully opening its agriculture and dairy markets due to concerns about potential backlash from rural communities and the need to protect domestic producers from global price volatility. PTI LUX TRB TRB This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

SC refuses urgent hearing to TN's plea against Centre over education funds
SC refuses urgent hearing to TN's plea against Centre over education funds

Business Standard

time14 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

SC refuses urgent hearing to TN's plea against Centre over education funds

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to accord urgent hearing to a plea filed by the Tamil Nadu government against the Centre for allegedly withholding over Rs 2,151 crore in central education funds under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme for 2024-2025. A bench comprising Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan took note of the fact that the state government filed the petition in May alleging withholding of central funds for 2024 and this year also. "There is no urgency and it can be taken up after the 'partial working days' (the new name of summer vacation)," the bench said. In May, the Tamil Nadu government moved the top court against the Centre for allegedly withholding the funds. The DMK government's plea, filed against the Union Ministry of Education, invokes Article 131 of the Constitution which provides exclusive jurisdiction to the top court to hear pleas between the Centre and one or more states, or between one or more states. The state government alleged the Centre attempted to force the implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and the associated PM SHRI Schools Scheme which it strongly objected to, particularly the contentious three-language formula. The top court, therefore, was urged to declare that the NEP and the PM SHRI Schools Scheme are not binding on the plaintiff state unless and until a formal agreement is entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant for their implementation within Tamil Nadu. The lawsuit has also sought a declaration that the action of the Centre to link Tamil Nadu's entitlement to receive funds under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme to the implementation of the NEP, 2020, and the PM SHRI Schools Scheme within the state are unconstitutional, illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable. It has also urged the top court to declare the Centre's letters of February 23, 2024 and March 07, 2024 as illegal, null, void ab initio and not binding on the state government. The plea sought a direction to the Centre to pay "Rs 2,291,30,24,769 (two thousand two hundred and ninety-one crore thirty lakhs twenty-four thousand seven hundred and sixty-nine) within a time frame to be fixed by this court" along with a future interest of 6 per cent per annum on the "principal sum of Rs 2,151,59,61,000 (two thousand one hundred and fifty-one crore fifty nine lakh and sixty one thousand) from May 1, 2025 until realisation of the decree". The dispute stems from the non-release of central funds under the Scheme, a flagship centrally sponsored programme for school education aimed at universalising quality education. The Project Approval Board (PAB) of the Ministry of Education had approved a total outlay of Rs 3,585.99 crore for Tamil Nadu for FY 2024 25, of which the Union Government's committed 60 per cent share amounted to Rs 2,151.59 crore. The plea said despite this approval, no instalments have been disbursed by the Centre as yet. The Centre, it said, unilaterally linked the release of these funds to Tamil Nadu's full implementation of NEP 2020 and the signing of an MoU for the PM SHRI Schools Scheme, conditions which were neither part of the original Samagra Shiksha Scheme nor agreed upon by the state. The reason for such non-disbursement is that the defendant has linked the release of Samagra Shiksha Scheme funds with the implementation of national education policy and NEP exemplary PM SHRI Schools' Scheme despite the fact that these policy/scheme are separate schemes, it said. Referring to the impact of non-release of Samagra Shiksha funds, the plea said paying salaries was crucial in maintaining competent and motivated teachers and supporting staff. It directly impacts the quality of education provided to students and contributes to overall societal development by nurturing the next generation with the skills and knowledge needed for success, it added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store