logo
Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has a book out this fall, 'Independent'

Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has a book out this fall, 'Independent'

NEW YORK (AP) — Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has a book out this fall that promises a close look at President Biden's decision not to run for reelection and calls for thinking beyond the two-party system.
Jean-Pierre herself has switched her affiliation to independent after working in two Democratic administrations, according to Legacy Lit, a Hachette Book Group imprint that will publish 'Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines' on Oct. 21.
'Until January 20, I was responsible for speaking on behalf of the President of the United States,' Jean-Pierre, the first Black woman and openly gay person to hold the position of White House press secretary, said in a statement released Wednesday.
'At noon on that day, I became a private citizen who, like all Americans and many of our allies around the world, had to contend with what was to come next for our country. I determined that the danger we face as a country requires freeing ourselves of boxes. We need to be willing to exercise the ability to think creatively and plan strategically.'
Jean-Pierre, 50, succeeded Jen Psaki as press secretary in 2022 after previously serving as deputy press secretary and also working as a senior adviser during Biden's victorious 2020 campaign. During President Barack Obama's first term, she was a regional political director.
Jean-Pierre was criticized at times for being evasive about Biden's physical condition. Wednesday's announcement from Legacy Lit says that she will take readers 'through the three weeks that led to Biden's abandoning his bid for a second term and the betrayal by the Democratic Party that led to his decision.'
'She presents clear arguments and provocative evidence as an insider about the importance of dismantling the torrent of disinformation and misinformation that has been rampant in recent elections and provides passionate insight for moving forward,' the announcement said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opinion - The US Postal Service has an animal welfare problem
Opinion - The US Postal Service has an animal welfare problem

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - The US Postal Service has an animal welfare problem

Many Americans have a frustrating relationship with the United States Postal Service. Lines are often long, mail gets lost and packages can be delayed. But the government institution's biggest blemish has nothing to do with late birthday cards. The current Postal Service standards for shipping live animals are dangerously inadequate and in desperate need of reform. In May, thousands of chicks were found abandoned in a Postal Service truck in Delaware. With the baby birds trapped without food or water in high temperatures for three days, thousands sadly perished, with less than half of the total 12,000 birds surviving. The U.S. Postal Service said it is investigating the 'process breakdown,' but the incident requires more than bureaucratic proceedings. This particular event is part of a larger pattern of animal mistreatment at the government agency. Earlier this year, Postal Service delays in Indiana left dozens of chicks dead. Thousands more were killed in New England following mail delivery disruptions in 2020. The country's flagship mail carrier transports millions of animals every year, but puzzlingly does not employ a single veterinarian to oversee its animal shipment operations and practices. With weak expert supervision, the shipments happen under conditions that most Americans would find unacceptable for domestic pets like dogs or cats. Animals ranging from birds to reptiles and bees to fish are shipped cross-country with limited standards that only mandate basic ventilation and box labeling. The conditions at airports are particularly heartbreaking. Animals transported through the Postal Service via plane can be left on the tarmac for extended periods before being loaded into the cargo hold. That leaves the living, breathing creatures exposed to extreme heat, bitter cold or other harsh weather conditions. When traveling on vacation through the Phoenix airport in July, would you leave your family dog baking in a crate on the hot runway? Absolutely not. Stronger federal rules are needed to ensure that animals shipped through the Postal Service are treated humanely. The status quo around animal welfare is abhorrent, but the government does not need to reinvent the wheel to rectify the situation. Other companies that transport live animals already have robust rules in place that can, and should, be duplicated at the U.S. Postal Service. For example, when being transported through the sky, animals should be last on and first off the plane. When not actively being loaded, species should be held in climate-controlled hangers, rather than left out in the elements. Flying routes should also be adjusted to cut down on transport time and to reflect weather forecasts that could become hazardous for the animals. When on the road, Postal Service regulations should limit the maximum transit time, create temperature standards and mandate special training for employees to learn best practices around facilitating the transport of live animals. After all, moving a container of baby chicks or insects should be approached differently than delivering an Amazon package. Most importantly, the agency should explore mechanisms that ensure workers adhere to these new protocols. That includes monitoring employees for compliance as well as holding those accountable who break the rules. The tragic episode that recently unfolded in Delaware should be a wake-up call for the United States Postal Service. President Trump should sign an executive order directing the postmaster general to swiftly craft and implement changes. It is well past time for the mail carrier to revamp its processes to reflect modern standards of animal welfare. Animal lives hang in the balance. Robin Ganzert, Ph.D., is the president and CEO of the American Humane Society. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

"I don't want to see my parents fighting": Fox News struggles to cope with Trump-Musk explosion
"I don't want to see my parents fighting": Fox News struggles to cope with Trump-Musk explosion

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

"I don't want to see my parents fighting": Fox News struggles to cope with Trump-Musk explosion

The cracks in the MAGA alliance are beginning to show, and Fox News isn't quite sure how to patch them. The conservative outlet appeared to be in damage control on Thursday as the rift between Donald Trump and Elon Musk continued to deepen. Many of the network's prominent commentators tried to cope with the situation, downplaying the public clash, describing it as a predictable outcome of a relationship between two powerful individuals and urging the two men to reconcile. 'Sometimes, guys fight,' said Jesse Watters. 'Guys sometimes will punch you in the face, and the next night you're having a beer. Sleep with your girlfriend, and you patch things up.' 'These guys are like roommates,' he added. "They're just blowing off steam.' Greg Gutfeld also reached for metaphors when he urged the two billionaires to 'knock it off.' 'It's like, I don't want to see my parents fighting," Gutfeld said. 'I like Batman and Robin. I don't like Spy vs. Spy.' He also praised Trump and Musk for airing out their grievances transparently for everyone to see. Sean Hannity sought to strike a similarly conciliatory tone, saying that just last week the two men were 'best friends,' and that the dispute ultimately came down to a disagreement over a piece of legislation. 'You have the president of the Free World; the richest guy on earth, one of the strongest guys on earth,' Hannity added. 'Conflicts? They're kind of predictable ... they disagree on policy.' Hannity predicted that Musk and Trump would work it outOther Fox figures didn't shy away from the implications of the very public breakdown. 'This is not a story that anyone was looking for,' Will Cain said. 'Hard to see a path forward for these two to repair their relationship." He called the feud 'a big, ugly battle,' and lamented the consequences for the country. Laura Ingraham, typically a Trump defender, urged the former president to pull back. 'Musk is his own person,' she said. 'Threatening to pull [his] government contracts—that's not wise, when five minutes ago you were of course hailing Musk's work in helping rescue the stranded Americans in space.'

DC police officer convicted for Proud Boys leaks sentenced to more than year in prison
DC police officer convicted for Proud Boys leaks sentenced to more than year in prison

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

DC police officer convicted for Proud Boys leaks sentenced to more than year in prison

A District of Columbia police lieutenant convicted of tipping off Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio that he was being investigated, and who later lied about their communication, was sentenced Friday to 18 months in prison. Former Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Lt. Shane Lamond was found guilty last year on one count of obstructing justice and three counts of making false statements to federal law enforcement officials. Federal prosecutors accused him of warning Tarrio, then national chairman of the right-wing extremist group, that D.C. law enforcement had an arrest warrant for him related to the destruction of a Black Lives Matter banner. They also said he lied to law enforcement when pressed on the nature of his relationship with Tarrio, suggesting it was 'one-sided.' Lamond told U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson on Friday that he 'respectfully disagrees' with her finding of guilt but, 'in retrospect,' agrees he made several errors throughout his communications with Tarrio. He said that he believed that building rapport with Tarrio was part of doing his job but described his efforts as 'sloppy,' lamenting that his conviction had now upended his career and life. 'Frankly, I'm broken at this point,' the former law enforcement officer added. Jackson said the idea Lamond could have done better when communicating with the Proud Boys leader was 'quite the understatement.' His conduct was not consistent with police practices 'unless you twist them until they're unrecognizable,' she said. Prosecutors had asked for a sentence of four years in prison. The government's sentencing memorandum was submitted under Ed Martin, who was President Trump's first pick for U.S. Attorney in D.C. but ultimately moved into another Justice Department post when his Senate confirmation seemed unlikely. Assistant U.S. Attorney Rebecca Ross called Lamond a 'trusted leader' who used his reputation to 'insert himself' into the investigation of Tarrio. 'MPD was able to bring Tarrio to justice not because of the defendant but in spite of the defendant,' she said. At trial, prosecutors said Lamond's communications with Tarrio grew more secretive and frequent as pressure to arrest him mounted in 2020. Both Lamond and Tarrio took the stand at the week-long bench trial. Lamond said he never passed sensitive police information along to Tarrio. Tarrio as a witness in Lamond's defense said he never received any confidential information from the lieutenant. Lamond attorney Mark Schamel told Jackson they 'fundamentally disagree' on the facts of the case and urged her to give him a sentence without incarceration, instead asking for probation and suggesting that the police officer's ruined career and reputation in the media is punishment enough. 'Shane Lamond has been destroyed,' he said. Schamel also indicated that a pardon from Trump was not likely. Jackson rejected the notion that the potential for future clemency could sway her decision. The judge called the government's 48-month sentencing request 'excessive' but said that probation would 'not suffice.' She acknowledged that, until the incident regarding Tarrio, Lamond performed his job with 'honor.' Letters from his family painted a picture of a dedicated father, partner and son. However, that cuts both ways, Jackson said, and the then-officer 'should have known better than this.' 'You repeatedly dishonored the badge,' the judge added. Tarrio was arrested over the incident on Jan. 4, 2021, and ordered out of the nation's capital. He wasn't in Washington two days later, when a mob of Trump's supporters — including dozens of Proud Boys — stormed the Capitol in aim of stopping the certification of the 2020 presidential election. The Proud Boys leader was sentenced to 22 years in prison after being convicted of seditious conspiracy but was pardoned by Trump when he returned to the White House. Tarrio was in the courtroom Friday, alongside Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes and Ivan Raiklin, a Trump supporter who has deemed himself 'Secretary of Retribution.' Outside the courthouse, the former Proud Boys leader said Lamond is 'worthy' of a pardon from Trump. Rhodes, who was sentenced to an 18-year prison term for sedition that was commuted to time-served by Trump, called Lamond a 'J6er' for how he has been treated over the incident, a term of endearment for those who participated in the Capitol riot. 'This has to be corrected,' Tarrio said. Updated at 1:10 p.m. EDT. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store