Senate to vote on bill banning trans athletes from women's sports
(NewsNation) — The Senate is slated to vote Thursday on the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act, which would prevent transgender athletes from participating in women's sports.
The legislation asserts under Title IX protections for female athletes that gender is 'recognized based solely on a person's reproductive biology and genetics at birth.'
'The bill does not prohibit male individuals from training or practicing with programs or activities for women or girls as long as such training or practice does not deprive any female of corresponding opportunities or benefits,' the bill's summary reads in part.
Its passage through the House was aided by two Texas Democrats, Reps. Vicente Gonzalez and Henry Cuellar. Senate Republicans need the support of seven Democrats for the bill to pass.
Judge extends block on Trump gender-affirming care federal funding ban
The legislation will head to the Senate floor just weeks after President Donald Trump signed an executive order with the same goal.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association complied with the order and barred trans athletes from competing in women's college sports, though proponents of the bans are calling for more.
Sia Li'ili'i, a college athlete and ambassador for the Independent Women's Forum, told NewsNation's 'Morning In America' the Senate needs to 'listen to female athletes like myself, as well as the nation and common sense.'
Li'ili'i is the women's volleyball co-captain at the University of Nevada, Reno — a team that forfeited a game against San Jose after learning their opponents had a trans woman on the roster.
'I've been directly impacted by the participation of transgender athletes in sports — not only did this person take a roster spot from a female athlete, but also the starting position,' she explained.
Li'ili'i said she hopes that, if the bill is signed into law, 'this will never happen to another future female athlete' at the college level.
NCAA transgender policy doesn't go far enough, some athletes say
A recent Pew Research Center survey found Americans have grown more supportive of policies restricting trans rights, including in sports participation.
Li'ili'i told NewsNation that shift in attitude has come after 'momentous wins' in the House, courts and behind the Oval Office desk.
'People are waking up and seeing that this isn't right and that female sports need to remain female,' she said.
NCAA President Charlie Baker told a Senate panel in December that he knows of fewer than 10 trans NCAA athletes.
Li'ili'i said that number is '10 too many.'
'Just because a group is marginalized and minority doesn't mean that they can overstep the rights of women. We are going to be pushed to the side just because of the feelings of 10 people,' Li'ili'i said.
More than 400 civil rights groups opposed the bill in a Jan. 13 letter to Congress, saying it ultimately 'would harm women and girls and undermine civil rights for all students.'
'Although the authors of the legislation represent themselves as serving the interests of cisgender girls and women, this legislation does not address the longstanding barriers all girls and women have faced in their pursuit of athletics,' the letter reads in part.
Those with gender dysphoria can no longer serve in military: Pentagon
Those against banning trans athletes are also concerned that restrictions could lead to harmful speculation about athletes' appearances, whether they're transgender, intersex or cisgender.
The letter points to the bill's 'vague language' and 'intrusive focus on the scrutiny of students' bodies' as a potential concern.
'… [The bill] will effectively exclude cisgender girls and women with intersex variations from participation, will invite scrutiny and harassment of any other student perceived by anyone as not conforming to sex stereotypes, and will likely be disproportionately used to target all girls and women of color,' the letter reads in part.
A procedural Senate vote for the bill is scheduled for Monday.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Secret Service Followed Protocol in Padilla Incident
California Sen. Alex Padilla is getting plenty of mileage out of his scuffle with the Secret Service and federal authorities in Los Angeles Thursday. Padillas Senate and campaign accounts posted a total of seven outraged videos in the first 24 hours after the altercation. Viral videos of the incident show a Secret Service agent dragging a fuming Padilla out of a press conference with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and he identifies himself as a senator only as hes being pushed out the door. The agent then forces Padilla to the ground, while two agents handcuff him. Padilla, however, wasnt arrested. Within the hour, agents released him with no charges. Dozens of Democratic members of Congress then jumped to Padillas defense, denouncing the action while casting the Secret Service and FBI agents involved as an extension of what they labeled as President Trumps totalitarian police state. Sen. Schumer called the Secret Services use of force "cruel and unacceptable." "This was a deliberate attempt to intimidate an elected official whose only offense is standing up for the voiceless," Schumer said. "But its not just about Sen. Padilla, its about every person who dares to speak truth to power." Republicans and conservative commentators countered that it was all a big publicity stunt and noted that a Padilla staffer filmed the tussle and then quickly distributed it to the media in the room. "Sen. Padilla didnt want answers - he wanted airtime," Rep. Byron Donalds said on Fox News Thursday night. "Shoving past security for a viral moment is a stunt, not leadership. If he cared about solutions, hed have asked for a meeting. But like most Democrats, he just wants the spotlight." "Alex Padilla is an embarrassment to California," said Steve Hilton, who is running for governor in California as a Republican. "Hes a complete nonentity. Thats why they didnt recognize him … [he has] zero accomplishments and now this pathetic stunt as his only claim to fame." Yet, one Republican, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, an ardent Trump critic, condemned Padillas treatment as "shocking at every level" and "not the America I know." Secret Service experts argue nothing could be further from the truth - that the agent was simply following normal protocol. Padilla, they said, actually received preferential treatment by not being arrested and jailed for his menacing display. The Secret Service agent warned Padilla, whom agents did not recognize as a senator and who wasnt wearing his Senate pin, to back away from Noem and then forcibly removed him when he ignored their entreaties. "They can represent this however they want, but those agents made the right decision to get him out of the room," Charles Marino, a former Secret Service agent told RealClearPolitics. "He did not have a congressional pin on, he was yelling and closing distance very quickly to make it to the front of the room to confront Noem." "Look, hes not above the law. Anyone taking those actions would been treated far worse - they would have been arrested and been forced to spend some time in jail," Marino said. "Who was escalating the situation? When you look at Padillas action, taken in totality, the agents had no other choice." Instead of dragging him to a cell, federal agents released the senator after the incident. Then Noem met with Padilla for 15 minutes and gave him her cell phone number to discuss matters further. "We probably disagree on 90% of the topics, but we agreed to exchange phone numbers and continue to talk - that is the way it should be in this country," Noem told Fox News Thursday afternoon. The Homeland Security Department issued a statement Thursday defending the federal agents actions, arguing that Padilla chose "disrespectful political theater" over constructive congressional oversight. Padilla, the agency said, "interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on as he lunged toward Secretary Noem." "Mr. Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers repeated commands," the department added. "@Secret Service thought he was an attacker and officers acted appropriately." Several other Secret Service sources backed up Marinos account. "Any sudden movement towards a protectee that feels threatening, especially when that person has not been identified, the policy is 100% to prevent further escalation or movement toward Noem," said a source in the Secret Service community. "We would have done the same thing for anyone threatening [former DHS Secretary] Mayorkas." Even though the situation escalated very quickly, the agent still followed the basic rules of engagement for law enforcement, the source asserted. Agents and officers first ask a person to move away from the protectee, then they tell them firmly to move away, and if those warnings arent abided, then they can use physical force to move the threatening person away. "Its a pretty common law enforcement way of relaying information and taking action, because emotions can get the best of people, and agents are forced to err on the side of protection," the source added. After the two assassination attempts against Trump, agents are highly attuned to aggressive behavior and working to ensure theyre not involved in any security lapses. "In this day and age, you can see what a split-second hesitate could result in," one former agent remarked. "Could you imagine if the agent didnt respond, and Padilla got on the stage and hit [Noem]?" The agency has been knocked around for months for the egregious security failures in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13 and then nearly two months later during another close call against Trump at his West Palm Beach golf course. And just because its Padilla who was attending a press conference doesnt mean assaults against a Cabinet secretary or president are unlikely to occur. During a December 2008 press conference in Iraq, an Iraqi journalist threw both of his shoes at former President George W. Bush in a pique of outrage. Secret Service agents with their zero-fail mission have to be poised to respond to all types of unexpected threats, which sometimes come with no warning at all. Back in 2005, during Bushs visit to the country of Georgia, a man attempted to assassinate Bush and then-Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili by throwing a hand grenade at both of them. "Listen, we dont always know who you are if youre not wearing your [congressional] pin," the source said. "Youre coming at [Noem] in an aggressive manner, and you didnt heed our warnings to stop. If you get into the buffer zone, we have to take you down. All public officials should know, and I would hope understand, that." Susan Crabtree is RealClearPolitics' national political correspondent.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘No Kings' protests to serve as Trump parade counterprogramming
(NewsNation) — As President Trump marks the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army on Saturday with a lavish military parade in Washington, D.C., thousands of anti-Trump protests have been planned across the country. Billed as the 'No Kings' movement — a rejection of what some consider to be Trump's unilateral method of governing — these demonstrations will occur in more than 1,500 U.S. communities, organizers say. 'No Kings is a nationwide day of defiance. From city blocks to small towns, from courthouse steps to community parks, we're taking action to reject authoritarianism — and show the world what democracy really looks like,' the event's website says. Posse Comitatus Act: Does law allow Trump to send troops to LA? Organizers say Trump's multimillion-dollar Army parade is a vanity project that coincides with the president's 79th birthday (it's also occurring on Flag Day). More than 6,000 troops are expected to march near the National Mall, with tanks, armored personnel carriers and aircraft augmenting the festivities. Trump will review the procession, and 200,000 people are expected to attend, weather permitting (NewsNation will stream the event and provide coverage of simultaneous 'No Kings' protests). It begins at 6:30 p.m. Eastern. Saturday's 'No Kings' day of defiance is credited to the 50501 Movement, a grassroots organization. The name 'stands for 50 states, 50 protests, one movement,' according to the group's website. 'Since January, the Trump Administration has continued to attack our civil liberties, take illegal and unconstitutional actions, and gut the public services we pay for with our taxes,' organizers say. 'No Kings' organizers say they are committed to 'nonviolent protest and community safety,' with organizers trained to de-escalate conflicts. Still, some police departments are being cautious about the possibility that things may get out of hand or that some participants will purposely try to instigate violence or damage property. In New York City, an estimated 75,000 protesters are expected to converge in Bryant Park from across the five boroughs. 'When you have 5,000 people on the street, all you need is 20 to be an outside agitator. You don't need 4,999. You have a small number of people that are professionals,' Mayor Eric Adams said Friday. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senator Nicole Mitchell's trial for 2024 burglary charge starts Monday
The Brief Minnesota Senator Nicole Mitchell's trial for a burglary charge starts Monday morning in Becker County. Mitchell, a DFL lawmaker representing Woodbury, is accused of breaking into her stepmother's home in Detroit Lakes in April of 2024. She said her father had just died, and wanted some of his personal belongings her stepmother wouldn't give her. Mitchell was supposed to go to trial in January, but it got pushed back so she could finish her work with the Minnesota Legislature. BECKER CO., Minn. (FOX 9) - A Minnesota senator accused of breaking into her stepmother's Detroit Lakes home in April 2024 heads to trial on Monday. What we know Nicole Mitchell, a DFL Senator who represents Woodbury, pleaded not guilty to one count of burglary after she was arrested inside her stepmother's Detroit Lakes home back in April 2024. On Feb. 6. 2025, an additional charge for possession of burglary or theft tools was added. Mitchell was originally scheduled for trial in January, but got it pushed back so she could finish out the legislative session. That ended earlier this week in a special session. The trial starts Monday morning at 8:30 a.m. in Becker County, and cameras are being allowed in the courtroom. That means you can see daily clips of the trial on and on FOX 9's YouTube page. Timeline A criminal complaint states Detroit Lakes police responded to a reported burglary at a home around 4:45 a.m. on April 22, 2024. At the scene, police found Mitchell in the home's basement dressed in all black. Officers say they also found a flashlight covered with a black sock on Mitchell. Officers searched for a black backpack that was stuck in a window at the scene and recovered two laptops, a cellphone, a driver's license, Senate identification and miscellaneous Tupperware, according to the complaint. Mitchell reportedly told investigators she was "just trying to get some of my dad's things" and added "clearly, I'm not good at this." The complaint states that Mitchell explained to police that her father had just died, and she wanted sentimental items her stepmother refused to give to her. Mitchell said those include her father's ashes, pictures, clothes and other sentimental items. What they're saying In May of 2024, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and democratic leaders called for Mitchell to resign after she was charged with the burglary. She appeared before the Senate's Ethical Conduct Subcommittee in May of 2024 as members considered whether the lawmaker adhered to the highest standards of ethical conduct required of a state senator. However, she refused to answer questions and invoked her 5th Amendment rights. While Democrats have previously argued to allow for due process before taking action, the Minnesota DFL Chairman Ken Martin released a statement Thursday morning calling for her resignation. "The Minnesota DFL believes that all elected officials should be held accountable, including members of our own party. While Sen. Mitchell is entitled to her day in court, her continued refusal to take responsibility for her actions is beneath her office and has become a distraction for her district and the Legislature. Now that her constituents have had full representation through the end of the legislative session, it is time for her to resign to focus on the personal and legal challenges she faces," said Martin.
