Fetch pet insurance review 2025
Fetch pet insurance rating: 1 out of 5 stars
Fetch has relatively generous coverage, but unfortunately, its rating in our evaluation was brought down by its extremely high cost: It was by far the most expensive pet insurance policy for $5,000 in annual coverage in our evaluation. Ultimately, you can get much more value with other pet insurers that offer good coverage at competitive rates.
One upside to Fetch is that if your pet has a curable preexisting injury or illness and goes 12 months without signs, symptoms, or treatment, the condition is eligible for coverage. This can include problems such as respiratory infections and diarrhea.
Another upside, if you choose to pay the high price for Fetch, is that policies include a range of small coverage types:
Payment for advertising and a reward if your pet is lost or stolen
Reimbursement for kennel costs if you're hospitalized
Reimbursement of the price you paid for the pet if the pet dies
Coverage for lost travel costs if you have to cancel a vacation because your pet becomes sick or injured
Learn more: How does pet insurance work? A complete guide.
Pros
Covers dental illness
Covers acupuncture and chiropractic care
Reimburses for a range of smaller costs, such as advertising and rewards
Cons
Very high average cost
Maximum annual coverage of $15,000
No multi-pet discount
If your pet has not been to the vet six months before the start of your policy, an exam is required within 30 days of the policy effective date
Fetch pet insurance basics
Annual maximum limit choices: $5,000, $10,000, $15,000
Deductible choices: $300, $500, $700
Reimbursement choices: 70%, 80%, 90%
Fetch waiting periods
For accident coverage: 15 days
For illness coverage: 15 days
Special waiting period: 6 months for cruciate ligament problems, patella issues, and hip dysplasia
Fetch age restrictions for buying a new policy
Minimum pet age: 6 weeks
Maximum pet age: None
Fetch sells an accident and illness policy and a wellness plan.
Fetch pet insurance provides a solid range of coverage, without the need to pay for add-ons. Fetch covers:
The vet exam fee
Hereditary and congenital conditions
Diagnostics such as X-rays and ultrasounds
Dental accidents and illnesses
Behavioral therapy for conditions such as aggression, separation anxiety, and phobias
Alternative therapy, such as acupuncture and chiropractic care
Prescription drugs and supplements
Up to $1,000 for pet telehealth visits
Advertising/reward for lost/stolen pets
Kennel costs if the owner is hospitalized
Cost of pet if the pet dies
Vacation cancellation costs due to pet illness or injury
Learn more: Your guide to what pet insurance covers
Fetch offers three wellness plans: Essentials, Advantage, and Prime. Prime provides the most comprehensive coverage and is, therefore, the most expensive option.
Essentials: Covers up to $315 in annual care costs starting at $10/month
Advantage: Covers up to $520 in annual care costs starting at $20/month
Prime: Covers up to $735 in annual care costs starting at $30/month
Learn more: Why a pet wellness plan is worth considering
All three plans will reimburse you up to specified limits for the following:
Annual exam
Blood test
Dental cleaning
Heartworm tests
Heartworm, flea, and tick prevention
Spaying/neutering
Urinalysis and fecal test
Vaccinations
The Advantage and Prime plans cover anal gland expression and microchipping. The Prime plan also covers a behavioral exam, activity monitor, and health certificate.
Learn more: Does pet insurance cover vaccines?
Fetch does not cover preexisting conditions. A preexisting condition is defined as an illness, injury, or condition that your pet has shown signs of or that you or your veterinarian noticed before you enrolled, your policy took effect, or during the waiting period for coverage.
However, Fetch does cover curable preexisting conditions that go without signs, symptoms, or treatment for 12 months. Examples include broken bones, respiratory infections, and urinary tract infections.
Learn more: Pet insurance that covers preexisting conditions
Fetch pet insurance does not include access to a 24/7 vet helpline.
Fetch policies don't cover the following expenses:
Bathing, unless medically necessary
Boarding and travel expenses
Breeding and pregnancy
Cremation
Degenerative disorders, including cruciate ligament disease
Elective procedures, including tail docking and ear cropping
Euthanasia, unless recommended by a veterinarian
Experimental treatments
Grooming
Injury or illness related to abuse, neglect, racing, organized fighting, occupational use of a pet
Obedience or training classes
Preexisting and bilateral conditions, even if they appear on the other side of the body
Preexisting intervertebral disk disease
Prescription food
Preventive care
Weight-loss treatment
Yes, but there are restrictions if you want to increase your coverage. All requests for changes in coverage must be made in writing or with verbal confirmation.
Increases. You can apply to increase your policy coverage – or decrease your deductible or co-pay – only if you haven't submitted any claims. In most states, you can only apply to increase your coverage once a year when your policy renews. Increasing your coverage will reset your waiting period and preexisting coverage exclusions.
Decreases. You can apply to decrease your coverage – or increase your deductible or co-pay – at any time.
Fetch had the highest-priced policy in our evaluation of policies with a $5,000 annual coverage limit.
Fetch pet insurance came in at 55% above the average cost in our analysis.
Learn more: Is pet insurance worth it? How to decide.
Fetch does not offer a multi-pet discount. Most pet insurance companies provide a discount of 5% or 10% for insuring multiple pets.
No, you must pay your vet and submit a claim to be reimbursed. However, if you expect a large bill, contact Fetch in advance to ask if it will make a special arrangement to pay the vet directly.
Learn more: Pet insurance that pays the vet directly: How does it work?
Here's what to know about filing a claim with Fetch:
To make a claim: Submit a detailed invoice showing your balance was paid in full and medical records from your pet's most recent vet visit.
To submit claims quickly: Upload documents through your online account or use the Fetch app.
To receive reimbursements faster: Set up direct deposit to be paid five to 10 days faster than by check.
If your claim is denied: You can appeal in writing within 90 days of denial of a claim.
You must submit a claim within 90 days after a vet visit.
Fetch says that it processes claims within 15 days and, once a claim is approved, makes payments in as few as two days if you have direct deposit.
Fetch's mobile app is highly rated, but it may not offer as many features as some other pet insurance apps. The Fetch app can be used to upload records, submit claims, track the status of claims, and set up direct deposit.
Fetch's mobile app ratings:
Apple App store: 4.8 out of 5 stars
Google Play store: 4.7 out of 5 stars
Fetch pet insurance is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Canada.
Yes, Fetch requires that your pet get a medical exam within six months before enrollment.
You can contact Fetch by phone, email, mail, and interactive chat on its website.
Contact the Fetch sales team at 1-866-984-0104 from 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. ET Monday through Friday and 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. ET on Saturday
Contact the Fetch service team at 1-866-467-3875 Monday through Friday from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. ET
The email address is info@fetchpet.com
The mailing address is Fetch, P.O. Box 1489, Bolingbrook, IL 60440
The interactive chat is at Fetch.com
You can cancel a policy at any time by calling or emailing Fetch. If you cancel a policy within 30 days and haven't filed any claims, you will receive a full refund. After 30 days, your refund will be pro-rated based on the date of termination.
Tim Manni edited this article.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
34 minutes ago
- CBS News
Northwestern University performing cost-cutting measures taking effect next year
Northwestern University is changing its tuition benefits program and health insurance for its staff and faculty beginning next year. According to the university, the changes are due to rising costs and other factors straining the school's finances. In an email earlier this month, the university informed staff and faculty that on Jan. 1, 2026, it will change from Blue Cross Blue Shield to UnitedHealthcare and new dental and prescription insurance providers. The move is forcing staff to petition the board of trustees to allow them to keep the Blue Cross. The university said that without the changes, employees would pay more, and the school would be forced to make additional cuts in other areas beyond what they've already announced. Changes to the tuition benefits program, which allows staff to take courses at a discount, will also be made for new and returning hires. Current faculty and staff will not be affected by the changes. Now, the school will cap the program at $12,000 per year.


Health Line
38 minutes ago
- Health Line
When Is the Best Time to Take Vitamins?
You can take most vitamins at any time of the day. But your body may absorb some nutrients better if you take them with a meal containing fat. To function properly, your body needs 13 vitamins — 9 of which are water-soluble and 4 of which are fat-soluble. While these nutrients are found in varying amounts in food, some people need to supplement with certain vitamins to meet their nutritional requirements. Normally, most vitamins can be taken at any time of day. That said, some vitamins are better absorbed under special conditions, which is why it's good to know how and when to take a supplement to promote optimal absorption. This article explains how and when to take vitamins. Water-soluble vitamins As the name implies, water-soluble vitamins dissolve in water. As such, you don't need to take them with food for them to be absorbed. There are nine water-soluble vitamins, which include vitamin C plus the eight B vitamins — B1 (thiamine), B2 (riboflavin), B3 (niacin), B5 (pantothenic acid), B6 (pyridoxine), B7 (biotin), B9 (folate), and B12 (cobalamin). You need to regularly consume water-soluble vitamins because, unlike fat-soluble vitamins, they're not readily stored in your body's tissues. Instead, excess water-soluble vitamins are excreted through your urine. Vitamin C Vitamin C plays many critical roles in your body. For example, it functions as a powerful antioxidant and is needed for immune health, as well as collagen and neurotransmitter synthesis. There are several forms of vitamin C supplements, including ascorbic acid, ascorbic acid with bioflavonoids, liposomal vitamin C, and calcium ascorbate. Ascorbic acid supplements have a bioavailability similar to that of the ascorbic acid found in foods like fruits and vegetables. You can take vitamin C supplements at any time of day, with or without food, although taking ascorbic acid with foods can help decrease the potential gastrointestinal side effects caused by its high acidity. Make sure to store vitamin C supplements in a cool, dark place, as this nutrient is sensitive to heat and light. B vitamins B vitamins are sold individually or as B complex supplements that contain all eight B vitamins. Because they're water-soluble, you can take them with or without food and at any time of the day. That said, it's often recommended to take B vitamins in the morning due to their important role in nutrient metabolism and energy production. What's more, some people may benefit from taking B vitamins on an empty stomach. For example, it's recommended that people with a B12 deficiency take B12 supplements on an empty stomach with water to promote maximal absorption. Fat-soluble vitamins Unlike water-soluble vitamins, fat-soluble vitamins depend on fat for proper absorption. Thus, it's generally recommended that you take fat-soluble compounds with a meal that contains fat. Vitamin A Vitamin A deficiency is rare in the United States but more common in developing countries. Certain populations are more at risk of developing vitamin A deficiency due to increased needs or reduced absorption. This includes people who are pregnant and nursing and those with cystic fibrosis. Most vitamin A supplements contain vitamin A derived from fish liver oil or in the form of vitamin A carotenoids, which are plant compounds that your body converts into the active form of vitamin A. To promote optimal absorption, you should take vitamin A supplements with a fat-containing meal. Keep in mind that if you eat a balanced diet, taking vitamin A supplements typically isn't necessary. Plus, some evidence suggests that high dose vitamin A supplements may increase the risk of all-cause and cancer-related mortality. For this reason, don't supplement with high dose vitamin A unless a healthcare professional recommends doing so. Vitamin D Vitamin D is needed for immune function, bone health, cellular growth, and more. More than 1 billion people worldwide are deficient in this important nutrient. Vitamin D can be taken at any time of day, and most of these supplements should be taken with fat-containing meals or snacks to ensure optimal absorption. For example, one study in 50 older adults found that vitamin D absorption was 32% greater in those who took a vitamin D supplement with a fat-containing meal compared with those who took it with a fat-free meal. However, some vitamin D supplements aren't affected by what you eat. For example, one animal study found that oil-based and microsomal vitamin D supplements — vitamin D encapsulated in fatty acid spheres — can be taken without food. It's important to note that vitamin D activation depends on having adequate levels of magnesium. Therefore, to maintain healthy vitamin D levels, make sure you're also getting enough magnesium. Also, keep in mind that certain fat-soluble vitamins, including vitamin E, may affect vitamin D absorption. On the other hand, taking vitamin K alongside vitamin D may benefit bone mineral density. Vitamin E Vitamin E functions as a major antioxidant in your body and is essential for healthy blood flow and immune function. It's also a popular dietary supplement — even though this nutrient is found in many foods and deficiency is rare. That said, people who have certain medical conditions, including short bowel syndrome, cystic fibrosis, and Crohn's disease, may have to supplement with vitamin E to avoid deficiency. It's typically recommended that vitamin E supplements are taken with a meal. However, one 2019 study in 27 women found that as long as fat was ingested throughout the day, vitamin E was absorbed effectively. This means it may not be necessary to take vitamin E with a fat-containing meal as long as you consume enough fat at subsequent meals. Keep in mind that even though vitamin E is essential to health, taking too much in supplement form could cause harm in certain populations. For instance, some older research suggests that high dose vitamin E supplements may lead to an elevated risk of prostate cancer in healthy men. Vitamin K Vitamin K refers to a family of fat-soluble compounds that includes vitamin K1 (phylloquinone) and vitamin K2 (menaquinones). Vitamin K is needed for blood clotting, bone and heart health, and more. Clinically significant vitamin K deficiency is rare in adults, although it's more common in those with bleeding disorders and malabsorption conditions, as well as in people taking medications that interfere with vitamin K absorption. You can take vitamin K supplements at any time of day with a meal or snack that contains fat. Because most people get enough vitamin K through their diet, it's not recommended to take high dose supplements unless a healthcare professional recommends doing so — even though these supplements are generally safe and not related to significant side effects. Nevertheless, vitamin K supplements may interfere with certain anticoagulant medications. If you're taking these medications, consult your healthcare professional before taking vitamin K. If possible, take vitamin K separately from the fat-soluble vitamins E and A. On the other hand, taking vitamins D and K together can be beneficial, as these nutrients work synergistically to promote bone health and healthy calcium levels in your body. Multivitamins Multivitamins typically contain a variety of vitamins and minerals. Some people prefer multivitamins over single-nutrient supplements because they're convenient and can be less expensive. Although data on the long-term health benefits of taking a multivitamin is inconsistent, it's known that taking them can help fill nutrient gaps, particularly in vulnerable populations like older adults and people who are pregnant. Because these supplements commonly contain both fat- and water-soluble vitamins, it's typically recommended to consume them with a meal. This may enhance the absorption of certain nutrients while reducing the risk of gastrointestinal upset, which can otherwise occur when taking a multivitamin on an empty stomach. If you're taking two or more pills per day, consider splitting the dose to help your body absorb certain nutrients more effectively. For example, take one pill with breakfast and one with lunch. If you have questions about dosing or how to take your vitamin supplements, consult your healthcare professional for advice. The bottom line Your body absorbs and stores nutrients in different ways. This should be considered when taking single-nutrient supplements and multivitamins. For example, some nutrients are better absorbed with meals, while others can be taken on an empty stomach.


CNN
41 minutes ago
- CNN
What to know about thimerosal, a target of RFK Jr.'s new CDC vaccine advisers
Vaccines Disability issues Federal agencies Children's healthFacebookTweetLink Follow A century ago, one of the biggest safety concerns about vaccines involved bacterial contamination. In 1916, four young children died in South Carolina after receiving typhoid vaccine that had been contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. Twelve years later, 12 children in Queensland, Australia, died from tainted immunizations against diphtheria. In the 1930s, vaccine makers began using a preservative called thimerosal to stave off microbial growth in their products. For the next six decades, it didn't receive much notice; ill effects appeared limited to minor local injection-site reactions, according to the US Food and Drug Administration. That changed in 1999, when US health officials asked pharmaceutical companies to remove thimerosal from vaccines. There was no evidence that it caused harm in the quantities used, but thimerosal contains a form of mercury, and questions had emerged about whether it could cause neurotoxicity when given in childhood vaccinations. Vaccine makers have removed it from all but a few shots, such as multidose vials of flu vaccine. In the meantime, subsequent studies have confirmed no link between thimerosal in vaccines and neurodevelopmental issues, including autism, and autism rates have continued to rise. So public health experts were puzzled when the preservative appeared on the agenda for this week's meeting of outside vaccine advisers to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 'I actually don't know any pediatric practices that even use that multidose influenza vaccine,' said Dr. Sean O'Leary, a pediatrician at Children's Hospital Colorado and former liaison to the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, for the American Academy of Pediatrics. The group is meeting on Wednesday and Thursday for the first time since US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dismissed the committee's previous 17 members, claiming they had conflicts of interest, and days later installed eight new advisers. Public health experts and lawmakers have called into question the credentials and backgrounds of some of the new panelists, and just before the meeting began, one member withdrew during the financial holdings review, an HHS spokesman said, bringing the panel down to seven. A presentation 'regarding thimerosal in vaccines' is scheduled for Thursday morning, followed by 'proposed recommendations' specifically about thimerosal in flu vaccines, according to an agenda posted Monday. The meeting is scheduled to conclude with a vote on the latter, a move that could lead to official CDC policy if adopted by agency leadership – or, without a confirmed director in place, by Kennedy. The last-minute addition of thimerosal to the agenda was a red flag for vaccine experts, who consider the science settled and fear that Kennedy – who led an anti-vaccine group called Children's Health Defense – is seeking to sow doubt about vaccine safety. Another former Children's Health Defense leader, Lyn Redwood, is slated to make a presentation on the topic at the meeting. Here's how thimerosal became such a hot-button issue. In 1997, Rep. Frank Pallone, a New Jersey Democrat concerned about mercury pollution in his community's lakes and rivers, attached an amendment to a US Food and Drug Administration reauthorization bill that would require the agency to catalogue intentionally introduced mercury compounds in drugs and food. That led to a possibly startling discovery: 'As people looked in vaccines, there was the potential that, by six months of age, infants could have received more thimerosal than was listed in several sources of what was considered safe levels of mercury,' said Dr. Walter Orenstein, who was director of the National Immunization Program at the CDC at the time. But those limits were set for methylmercury, the kind found in some fish, which is known to be toxic. Thimerosal contains ethylmercury, a different compound that's 'intrinsically less stable, and more readily metabolized, than methylmercury,' said Dr. Matthew Rand, an associate professor in the Department of Environmental Medicine at the University of Rochester who studies mercury toxicity. That means it's cleared from the body more quickly than methylmercury, according to the CDC, 'and is therefore less likely to cause any harm.' The FDA notes that there were no existing guidelines for ethylmercury. Still, the finding led to a number of emergency meetings among federal health officials and outside groups to determine what should be done, Orenstein recalled. 'While there was no evidence of harm from thimerosal, the general feeling was, 'let's get rid of it, because we don't need it,' ' he said. Moving to single-dose containers alleviated the need for a preservative, although it came at a higher expense for manufacturers. In 1999, the FDA sent a letter to manufacturers of US vaccines requesting their plans to remove thimerosal, and by 2001, the compound had been removed from or reduced in all vaccines routinely recommended for children under 6 in the US, according to the CDC. The message from public health agencies, Orenstein said, was 'we're going to make safe vaccines even safer.' But the die was cast. Vaccines had already been tied to autism in 1998 by British doctor Andrew Wakefield, who published a since-retracted paper that claimed the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine was linked to autism, although not because of thimerosal – the MMR vaccine never contained the preservative. Still, parents of children with autism were seeking answers. One of those parents was Redwood, who said that in 1999, she tallied up her son's mercury exposure and found 'at two months of age, he had received 125 times his allowable exposure to mercury based on EPA's guidelines in his weight.' 'That was a real answer for me,' Redwood said in a video posted by Children's Health Defense this month, 'because my son at this time was almost 5 years old, and he had regressed developmentally after his first year of life and was diagnosed with autism.' Redwood, a nurse practioner, decided to become an advocate, speaking at events and publishing papers about thimerosal and autism. The uproar over a potential link between thimerosal and autism came as a surprise to Orenstein and colleagues. 'Mercury itself had never been implicated as a major cause of autism,' Orenstein said. 'But this was a major, major concern.' It led to a number of studies of the issue, including a 2004 assessment by the Institute of Medicine (now known as the National Academy of Medicine) that concluded 'the body of epidemiological evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism.' It made the same conclusion for MMR vaccines and autism. A 2010 study by the CDC also found no link. And 'even after thimerosal was removed from almost all childhood vaccines, autism rates continued to increase,' the agency noted, 'which is the opposite of what would be expected if thimerosal caused autism.' Still, those who continued to push the disproven autism connection included Kennedy, who published a book in 2014 called 'Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak.' Its subtitle calls for the 'immediate removal of mercury – a known neurotoxin – from vaccines.' It rejects the findings of the 2004 Institute of Medicine report and warns that millions of children in the US and around the world 'appear to be at risk of injury from the thimerosal in vaccines.' Thimerosal is still present in 'a small percentage of flu vaccines, confined to multidose vials,' according to a post from the Vaccine Integrity Project, a group focused on countering vaccine misinformation that was started at the University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, or CIDRAP. The group suspects that thimerosal is included on ACIP's agenda this week – with a presentation by Redwood and a vote by the committee – 'to put greater focus on and generate more public discussion about vaccine risk.' HHS didn't return a request for comment about Redwood's involvement in this week's meeting, and Redwood declined to comment. Her presentation slides, however, were posted ahead of the meeting and continued to claim thimerosal presents safety risks. One slide initially included in the presentation cited a study in animals that appeared not to exist; its apparent lead author told CNN he'd published a study with a similar title, but in a different journal, in different animals, and with dramatically different findings — ones that didn't appear to show a link between autism and thimerosal. The slide presentation was subsequently updated to remove that slide. CDC staff also posted its own review of the data, citing nearly two dozen studies showing 'the evidence does not support an association between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism spectrum disorder or other neurodevelopmental disorders.' During her Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee confirmation hearing on Wednesday, Dr. Susan Monarez, President Donald Trump's pick to lead the CDC, said, 'I have not seen a causal link between vaccines and autism.' The decision to remove thimerosal from most vaccines, despite no evidence of harm, had other consequences. At the same time the FDA made its request to vaccine makers, US health authorities advised that babies born to mothers known to be negative for hepatitis B not receive a shot for that virus at birth, but at two months to 6 months of age, as thimerosal was phased out. But about 10% of hospitals 'suspended use of the hepatitis B vaccine for all newborns, regardless of their level of risk,' wrote Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine scientist at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and a member of the FDA's outside advisory committee on vaccines, in a 2007 perspective piece in the New England Journal of Medicine. 'One three-month-old child born to a Michigan mother infected with hepatitis B virus died of overwhelming infection.' Orenstein looks back on the decision to remove thimerosal as a hard one. 'The fear would be keeping it in there, doing a study over two or three years and then it showed harm, and lo and behold, for three years, we used this vaccine and this component was harmful,' he said. 'Since we didn't know what the results would be of any of the studies at the time, we thought it better to just get it out of there. 'The autism issue,' he added, 'didn't play any role in the initial decision.' CNN's Brenda Goodman contributed to this report.