logo
Scientists discover two drugs already approved by the FDA can reverse Alzheimer's

Scientists discover two drugs already approved by the FDA can reverse Alzheimer's

Daily Mail​5 days ago
Two drugs already approved by the FDA for cancer treatment may hold the key to reversing Alzheimer's disease in patients, experts say.
Researchers from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) believe that letrozole, a hormone-based breast cancer drug, and irinotecan, a lung and colon cancer chemotherapy medication, can help reverse brain damage caused by the incurable neurodegenerative disease.
In an animal study, the UCSF experts found that both cancer drugs were seen to reduce brain degeneration in mice and even improve their memory and learning capacity.
Alzheimer's disease is one of the most common forms of dementia and mostly affects adults over the age of 65. About 7million Americans live with the condition and over 100,00 die from it annually.
The disease is believed to be caused by the development of toxic amyloid proteins and/or tau proteins in the brain, which can accumulate and damage cells responsible for memory and learning.
Amyloid protein molecules stick together in brain cells, forming clumps called plaques. While tau proteins twist together in fiber-like strands called tangles.
As of now, there is no cure for AD and only two FDA-approved therapies, Lecanemab (Leqembi) and Donanemab (Kisunla), are available for early-stage Alzheimer's treatment.
However, because letrozole and irinotecan are already approved for other treatments, this could fast-track clinical trials and the potential approval for use in Alzheimer's patients.
Co-senior author Dr Marina Sirota, a professor at UCSF, said: 'Alzheimer's disease comes with complex changes to the brain, which has made it tough to study and treat, but our computational tools opened up the possibility of tackling the complexity directly.
'We're excited that our computational approach led us to a potential combination therapy for Alzheimer's based on existing FDA-approved medications.'
In Alzheimer's patients, the plaques and tangles block the ability of the brain's neurons to send electrical and chemical signals back and forth.
Over time, this disruption causes permanent damage in the brain that leads to Alzheimer's and dementia, causing patients to lose their ability to speak, care for themselves and interact with the world around them.
While the exact mechanisms of how the Alzheimer's-related brain damage begins are still under investigation, age and genetics are known risk factors.
Experts also believe that lifestyle factors such as physical inactivity and high blood pressure can also contribute to the development of Alzheimer's.
Despite rigorous preclinical and clinical research efforts, drug development for dementia faces significant challenges, with a 98 percent failure rate in recent decades.
Neuroscientist Dr Yadong Huang, co-author of the study and professor of neurology at UCSF, explained: 'Alzheimer's is likely the result of numerous alterations in many genes and proteins that, together, disrupt brain health.
'This makes it very challenging for drug development – which traditionally produces one drug for a single gene or protein that drives disease.'
However, researchers at USCF believe their discovery can help reduce or reverse the cognitive decline caused by the disease.
First, the team looked at how dementia changes gene expression in the brain.
Then, they scoured a database of over 1,300 drugs, including antipsychotics, antibiotics, antifungals and chemotherapy drugs, to determine which, if any, reversed any of these gene expressions.
If any existing drugs were found to be effective, they could be repurposed to treat the condition in a reduced the time in which the drugs could be made available to patients.
During their search, the team specifically looked for drugs that would target the harmful Alzheimer's-related changes in neurons and in brain cells called glia that are responsible for supporting the nervous system.
Then, the researchers analyzed millions of digital medical records to find patients who took some of these drugs as part of cancer treatments and their likelihood of developing Alzheimer's.
Ultimately, they identified letrozole and irinotecan as the best candidates to lower Alzheimer's risk in patients.
By combining the two drugs together, the researchers were able to target different types of brain cells affected by the disease.
They noted that letorozole could counter the effect of Alzheimer's on neurons and irinotecan helped reverse damage on the glia cells.
When the combination was tested on mice, the scientists saw that the harmful clumps of tau protein were reduced significantly and the mice showed improvements in learning and memory tasks.
The study authors noted that it remains unclear how the cancer drugs are able to reverse the damage.
However, they theorized that it was possible that letrozole blocks the production of estrogen, a hormone that controls the working of a large number of genes, which therefore reduces the genetic risk factor of developing Alzheimer's.
Additionally, they believe that irinotecan may also block inflammation in the brain by preventing the rapid reproduction and DNA damage of glial cells.
As this was an animal study, the researchers hope to test the drugs in a clinical trial with human Alzheimer's patients.
Dr Huang said of the results: 'Developing a new drug can take hundreds of millions, or even billions, of dollars, on average take more than 10 years. For this repurposed drug, usually it just takes two or three years, and then you can go to the clinical trial and the cost is much, much lower.
'We still haven't generated or produced any very effective drugs that can really slow dramatically the cognitive decline.'
However, despite their groundbreaking discovery, risks continue as letrozole is known to cause hot flashes in patients while irinotecan can cause severe diarrhea. Both drugs can also lead to nausea and vomiting.
Dr Sirota said: 'These drugs have huge side effects, so you need to always balance and figure out whether those types of side effects would be amenable to somebody with Alzheimer's. It's not that it's a slam dunk.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chaos erupts after radioactive wasps go missing from former US nuclear bomb factory
Chaos erupts after radioactive wasps go missing from former US nuclear bomb factory

Daily Mail​

time23 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Chaos erupts after radioactive wasps go missing from former US nuclear bomb factory

A South Carolina city has been left rattled after a radioactive wasp nest was discovered at a former nuclear weapons site, yet no trace of the actual wasps has been found. A new report from the US Department of Energy (DOE), released July 27, revealed that the nest was emitting radiation levels 10 times higher than what federal regulations allow. The alarming find was made on July 3 at the Savannah River Site (SRS) near Aiken, where employees conducting routine checks stumbled upon the contaminated nest perched on a post near tanks storing liquid nuclear waste. Officials stressed there was no leak from the nearby waste tanks, saying they believe the nest became radioactive due to 'onsite legacy contamination.' Legacy contamination refers to leftover radioactive residue from the site's bomb-making days during the Cold War. 'The wasp nest was sprayed to kill wasps, then bagged as radiological waste. The ground and surrounded area did not have any contamination,' the report said. A DOE spokesperson told NewsNation that if wasps had been present, they likely would have carried far less radiation than what was measured in the nest itself. However, the watchdog group Savannah River Site Watch slammed the report as 'incomplete,' saying it fails to explain the source of the contamination, how wasps were exposed or if more radioactive nests may be hidden. Tom Clements, executive director of the group, told AP: 'I'm as mad as a hornet that SRS didn't explain where the radioactive waste came from or if there is some kind of leak from the waste tanks that the public should be aware of.' The tank farm is well inside the boundaries of the site and wasps generally fly just a few hundred yards from their nests, so there is no danger they are outside the facility, according to a statement from Savannah River Mission Completion which now oversees the site. SRS, a 310-square-mile-site in Aiken, focused on the production of plutonium and tritium for use in the manufacture of nuclear weapons from its inception in the early 1950s until the end of the Cold War. In 1992, the focus at SRS turned to environmental cleanup, nuclear materials management and research and development activities. The site generated more than 165 million gallons of liquid nuclear waste which has, through evaporation, been reduced to about 34 million gallons, according to Savannah River Mission Completion. There are still 43 of the underground tanks in use while eight have been closed. 'Radiological Control personnel discovered a wasp nest in F Tank Farm at the Savannah River Site while performing routine radiological monitoring activities,' according to a statement released by Savannah River Mission Completion. The F-Area Tank Farm where the nest was found holds 22 massive underground tanks, each up to 100 feet wide and 23 feet deep, packed with between 750,000 and 1.3 million gallons of radioactive waste. 'While no wasps were found on the nest, the individual insects would have significantly lower levels of contamination, Savannah River Mission Completion added. The organization noted that 'F Tank Farm is centrally located inside the 310-square-mile Savannah River Site. Generally, wasps travel only a few hundred yards from their nest.' Officials admit the report on the wasp nest was delayed, citing the need to review past incidents involving contaminated wildlife and to meet strict federal reporting rules. 'No further action was required in the field. There is no impact from event on other activities and operations,' the DOE stated in the report.

World's 'oldest baby' born from embryo frozen in 1994
World's 'oldest baby' born from embryo frozen in 1994

Daily Mail​

time23 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

World's 'oldest baby' born from embryo frozen in 1994

A baby born just last week holds the title of 'world's oldest baby'—because he was created from an embryo frozen in 1994 and 'adopted' thirty years later. Thaddeus, who is five days old, was born on July 26 to parents Lindsey, 35, and Tim Pierce, 34. The couple from Ohio, were inspired to 'adopt' an embryo after they had struggled to conceive for nearly eight years. Their embryo was one of four created in May 1994 when Linda Archerd, now 62, and her husband underwent invitro fertilisation (IVF) because, like the Pierces, they had struggled to conceive naturally. The process created four viable embryos for the Archerds, one of which resulted in the birth of their daughter, now 30. The other three embryos remained on ice, just in case the family decided to expand their family. Mrs Archerd said: 'I called them my three little hopes. I always wanted another baby desperately.' Once Ms Archerd filed for divorce, she was awarded custody of the embryos which she then decided to put up for adoption. She said: 'I always thought it was the right thing to do.' But, given how long her embryos had been in storage, they were placed under Snowflake's Open Hearts programme, a 'hard to place' scheme for embryos that are less likely to result in a healthy birth. Years later, Mr and Mrs Pierce signed up for the same scheme and the couple finally realised their dream of becoming parents after a successful IVF procedure. Recalling the birth, Mrs Pierce told MIT Technology Review: 'We are in awe that we have this precious baby. 'We had a rough birth, but we're both doing well now. 'We didn't go into it thinking we would break any records. 'We just wanted to have a baby.' Ms Archerd added that she found the whole experience 'surreal', adding it's 'hard to even believe'. IVF procedures often produce far more embryos that can be implanted, resulting in millions of surplus embryos being stored in freezers worldwide. Rejoice Fertility implanted the embryo as part of Dr John Gordon's mission to reduce the number of embryos in storage. Dr Gordon, a reformed Presbyterian, said: 'Every embryo deserves a chance at life and the only embryo that cannot result in a healthy baby is the embryo not given the opportunity to be transferred into a patient.' The previous record for the 'oldest baby' was held by twins born in 2022, who were conceived from embryos frozen 30 years before. The first groundbreaking successful birth through IVF took place in 1978, when Louise Brown was born, paving the way for millions of births worldwide.

'Like a sci-fi movie': US baby born from 30-year-old frozen embryo breaks record
'Like a sci-fi movie': US baby born from 30-year-old frozen embryo breaks record

BBC News

time23 minutes ago

  • BBC News

'Like a sci-fi movie': US baby born from 30-year-old frozen embryo breaks record

A baby boy has been born to an Ohio couple from an embryo that was frozen for more than 30 years, reportedly setting a new world 35, and Tim Pierce, 34, welcomed their son, Thaddeus Daniel Pierce, on Saturday. Ms Pierce told MIT Technology Review her family thought "it's like something from a sci-fi movie".It is believed to be longest that an embryo has been frozen before resulting in a successful live birth. The previous record-holder was a pair of twins who were born in 2022 from embryos frozen in Pierces had tried to have a child for seven years before they decided to adopt the embryo Linda Archerd, 62, made with her then-husband in 1994 through IVF. At the time, Ms Archerd initially created four embryos. One become her now-30-year-old daughter, and the other three were left in storage. Despite separating from her husband, she did not want to get rid of the embryos, donate them for research or give them to another family said it was important that she was involved with the baby, as they would be related to her adult daughter. Ms Archerd paid thousands of dollars a year for storage until she found a Christian embryo adoption agency, Nightlight Christian Adoptions, which runs a programme known as Snowflakes. Many of these agencies consider their programmes to be saving lives. The programme used by Ms Archerd allows donors to choose a couple, meaning they can state religious, racial and nationality Archerd's preference was for a married Caucasian, Christian couple living in the US, as she didn't want to "go out of the country", she told MIT Technology Review. She ultimately matched with the Pierces. The IVF clinic in Tennessee at which the couple underwent the procedure, Rejoice Fertility, said its aim was to transfer any embryo it received, no matter the age or Pierce said she and her husband did not set out to "break any records", but just "wanted to have a baby".Ms Archerd told MIT Technology Review she had not met the baby in person yet, but could already see a resemblance with her daughter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store