
Thousands of energy customers to receive compensation over prepayment meter force-fitting
Thousands of energy customers who were forced to have prepayment meters installed in their homes are set to receive compensation or have their debts written off, Ofgem has said.
Following a review into energy companies forcing vulnerable customers onto prepayment meters, the regulator announced that eight suppliers will provide compensation and support.
Scottish Power, EDF, E.ON, Utility Warehouse, Good Energy, TruEnergy, and Ecotricity have all agreed to the scheme.
Ofgem stated that the suppliers have committed to paying additional compensation where it is due, and in some cases, will write off some of the energy debts of customers who had a prepayment meter installed involuntarily between 1 January 2022, and 31 January 2023.
The suppliers will pay £5.6 million in compensation to 40,000 customers who had a prepayment meter installed involuntarily during the assessment period, using guidelines set out by Ofgem. This would mean around £140 for each customer.
Additionally, the suppliers will write off a further £13 million of debt from customers who had a prepayment meter installed involuntarily during the same period.
This action is in addition to the £55 million in financial support already provided directly to affected consumers by suppliers before the review's completion, which included hardship payments and debt write-offs, the regulator added.
Customers identified as having had a PPM wrongly installed or where processes were not followed adequately between January 1 2022 and January 31 2023 will be contacted by their suppliers, and do not need to take action.
OVO has also confirmed it will pay compensation to customers in line with the guidelines developed by Ofgem.
Tim Jarvis, director-general of markets for Ofgem, said: 'This has been one of the most detailed reviews of supplier practices in Ofgem's history, looking at tens of thousands of cases. It has taken time, but our priority has been to put things right for those who weren't treated properly, and ensure we don't see bad practice repeated.
'While the number of cases where a prepayment meter was wrongfully installed is relatively low compared to the total number of PPM customers, one case is one too many.
'Our review also found wider issues with the processes suppliers had in place, which is why we've put in place clearer, tougher rules to protect customers in vulnerable situations, and I'm pleased that from today suppliers will be applying our compensation framework for those customers affected and have also committed to further support such as debt write-off.
'We have made our expectations clear to suppliers on how those customers who were treated poorly should be compensated. They have, and continue to, work closely and collaboratively with us to make sure their processes are robust and that their customers are properly supported.
'We know that PPMs can be an effective tool in helping customers manage their costs and debt. However, customers must always be treated fairly and compassionately, and we are confident that the changes we have made are a significant step to ensure that happens.'
Dhara Vyas, chief executive of Energy UK, which represents energy firms, said: 'Suppliers have worked hard to co-operate with this comprehensive review and taken further action to put things right in the cases where a prepayment meter (PPM) shouldn't have been installed – or where there was insufficient support for the customers concerned.
'Suppliers have been working closely with Ofgem to meet the requirements of its review and have signed up to the Code of Practice before they have been able to restart involuntary installations of PPMs and have carried out thorough testing of the new processes.
'Involuntary installations have been a last – but necessary – resort for cases where repeated attempts to address debt with the customer through other means have been unsuccessful. It's bad for customers to fall further and further into arrears, and bad debt ultimately drives up the prices that are paid by all customers.
'Since the pause on installations, customer debt has risen to a record £4 billion, and the industry remains keen to work with Ofgem on the proposed relief scheme to tackle this problem.'
The scandal first made headlines two years ago, at the peak of the cost-of-living crisis, when it came to light that energy companies were switching people on to prepayment methods.
This was done by entering properties to install a smart meter or remotely changing a smart meter to prepayment mode.
The energy regulator subsequently suspended all forced installations and launched a review of the process.
It comes weeks after Good Energy was made to pay £150,000 in compensation and redress after it failed to give final bills and refund credit to more than 2,000 prepayment meter customers.
Ofgem said 2,284 customers on prepayment meters were affected by an error with Good Energy's billing system between 2014 and October 2023.
It meant that prepayment customers who switched to another supplier or ended their contract with Good Energy did not get a final bill within six weeks, as required by the watchdog.
Good Energy paid out £150,067 as a result, with the average sum per customer standing at £66.
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said: 'Justice is finally being delivered to many of the families, lots of them vulnerable, who were affected by the scandal of energy suppliers wrongly forcibly installing pre-payment meters. The government has campaigned tirelessly on this issue and are pleased to see the level of compensation increase to £18.6 million, up from £420,000 under the previous government.
'Consumers must come first, which is why we are reforming the energy market to stamp out bad practice and make it easier to access proper redress when things go wrong, through our comprehensive review of Ofgem. This increased compensation package is a good start, and we will be announcing further reforms in the weeks ahead as we deliver our Plan for Change.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'Public are sick to death of the migrant free-for-all', says Top Tory as he hails Mail's cash-for-visas investigation
The public are 'sick to death' of the immigration 'free-for-all', Robert Jenrick warned yesterday after the Mail revealed how crooked legal advisers run cash-for-visas scams. The Tory justice spokesman hailed our 'crucial' undercover investigation which exposed how companies are charging up to £22,000 per person to provide 'skilled' jobs in the UK for underqualified foreign workers. The Mail probe discovered a range of brazen tricks being used to dupe the Home Office into providing sponsorship licences which enable convenience stores, barbers, warehouses and bars across the country to bring in overseas labour on false pretences. It is so lucrative that many firms have been started up just to profit from hiring foreign staff and then exploit them for cheap labour. Immigration advisers working as fixers for the firms coach immigrants on how to lie to officials, overstating their levels of education and experience to secure the visa. Mr Jenrick said: 'This crucial Daily Mail investigation shows our immigration system is a free-for-all. 'Scammers are lining their pockets while the public have yet more low-skilled migration forced upon them. 'It's gone on for decades and the public are sick to death of it.' Border security minister Dame Angela Eagle launched an urgent investigation into our probe. She also immediately suspended the sponsorship licence of Leicester-based immigration advice firm Flyover International after the Mail revealed its managing partner tricks the Home Office into believing employers need a certificate of sponsorship to take on overseas workers. Joe Estibeiro told our undercover reporter that he worked with businesses in Bradford, Leicester, Northampton and Peterborough, but takes payment for his services only via third-party bank accounts to avoid a paper trail linking the firm to his scam. He makes it appear that employers can't find any British residents to fill 'skilled' jobs by first advertising the positions in the UK and only recording interviews with the worst candidates to use as evidence if the Home Office investigates. The overseas workers he recruits officially earn around £3,000 a month to meet the Government's minimum salary requirements for skilled worker visas. But Estibeiro described how after the money is paid into their account they have to withdraw all but £900 and secretly hand it back to their boss. More than 131,000 businesses are on the Home Office's list for licensed sponsors for the permits. including market traders, dog groomers – listed as 'canine beauticians' – curtain fitters and even scores of kebab shops. Critics warned the open duplicity could sink Sir Keir Starmer's immigration crackdown which made new restrictions on skilled worker visas a major part of his aim to end the economy's addiction to cheap overseas labour. Flyover International is owned by another man who is understood to be taking the matter seriously and investigating, and says Estibeiro was not officially hired to work for the UK end of the business. Estibeiro denied involvement in any 'illegal or unethical' activity and said he was 'solely involved in student recruitment'. A Home Office source claimed that when Mr Jenrick was immigration minister, he failed to clamp down on the criminal gangs fuelling illegal immigration. The source added: 'If he needs reminding what the Labour Government has done to tackle this, we've introduced a new law to prevent suspected crooks like the one found by the brilliant journalism in the Daily Mail – so the Immigration Advice Authority will get new powers to immediately suspend registered advisers and organisations.'


Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Rachel Reeves to sign off funding for Sizewell C nuclear power plant - 43 years after it was proposed
will tomorrow sign off funding for the Sizewell C nuclear power plant – more than 40 years after it was proposed. The Chancellor will announce £14.2billion to pay for a new reactor at the site in Suffolk, with the plant eventually powering 6million homes. The funding will be included in her comprehensive spending review, which was finalised last night after a bitter row with Yvette Cooper over police funding ended with the Home Secretary having to accept the Treasury's terms. Sizewell C was first proposed in 1982 and, after years of paralysis, was given the green light by the Tories in 2022. Ms Reeves will also confirm a £2.5billion investment in nuclear fusion research, while government sources said ministers would press ahead with proposals for 'mini' nuclear plants around the country. The Treasury said the funding would help create 10,000 new jobs. The last time Britain completed a new nuclear plant was in 1987, which was Sizewell B. Hinkley Point C, in Somerset, is under construction but not expected to open until 2031. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said last night: 'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy.' But Alison Downes, of the Stop Sizewell C group, said the plant was a 'white elephant'. The Prime Minister's spokesman said: 'The review is settled. We will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off.'


Sky News
32 minutes ago
- Sky News
The five considerable problems with the chancellor's U-turn on winter fuel payments
There are considerable problems with the winter fuel payment U-turn, but perhaps the political argument in favour outweighs them all? First, Rachel Reeves has executed the plan without working out how to pay for it. This, for an iron chancellor, is a wound that opponents won't let her forget. A summer of speculation about tax rises is not a summer anyone looks forward to. Politics latest: Treasury minister challenged over reason for U-turn Second, the fig leaf that she and Treasury ministers are using is an improvement in economic conditions. If you were being polite, you'd say this is contested. The OBR halved growth this year and the OECD downgraded UK forecasts, albeit only by a little, last week. The claim that interest rates are coming down ignores that their descent is slower because of government decisions of the last six months. Third, the question immediately becomes, what next? Why not personal independent payments (PIP) and the two-child benefit cap? At this stage, it would feel like a climbdown if they did not back down over those. But then, what will the markets - already policing this closely - make of it, and could they punish the government? Fourth, this is aggravating divisions in the Parliamentary Labour Party: the soft left Compass group and ministers like Torsten Bell pushing bigger spending arguments. Those MPs in Tory-facing seats who rely on arguments that Labour can be trusted with the public finances are worried. 👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne's on your podcast app👈 Fifth, this has created a firm division between No 10 (the PM) and No 11 (the Chancellor). No 10 is now conscious that it does not have enough independent advice about the market reaction to economic policies and is seeking to correct. Others, I am told, are just critical of the chancellor's U-turn - for she wobbled first. Read more:UK to become 'AI maker not taker', says PMHow much cash will Reeves give each department? Given the litany of arguments against, why has it happened? Because the hope is this maxi U-turn lances the boil, removes a significant source of pensioners' anger and brings back Labour voters, a price they calculate worth paying, whatever the fiscal cost. We wait to see who is right.