[Editorial] Expand supply
The Korean housing market is showing signs of heating up. Last week, Seoul apartment sale prices rose 0.26 percent from the previous week, according to data from the Korea Real Estate Board. It was the highest weekly increase since August last year.
Seoul apartment sale prices have moved up for 19 consecutive weeks.
The upward trend of apartment prices in parts of Seoul is threatening to spread to areas of nearby Gyeonggi Province with large populations, such as Gwacheon and Bundang. The government had an emergency meeting Friday to check the real estate market.
There are many factors behind the recent surge in housing prices, but its root cause lies in a supply shortage. This year, presales of new Seoul apartments decreased 28 percent year-over-year to 7,350 units, the smallest number in four years. In Seoul or densely populated areas like Seoul, new apartments are supplied through reconstruction or redevelopment. Spare units to be built, except units for existing landowners, are presold in installments to the general public.
Expectations for expansion of liquidity supply stimulate the sentiment of investment in the real estate market.
Many anticipate the Bank of Korea to cut the benchmark interest rate from the current 2.5 percent to 2.0 percent in the second half out of concerns about economic recession.
Liquidity is scheduled to increase when the government expends an additional supplimentary budget worth at least 20 trillion won ($14.6 billion). The budget plan to be unveiled soon will include local currency vouchers to be handed out to every Korean, a key campaign promise by President Lee Jae-myung.
The surge in Seoul apartment prices is also affected by the last-minute jump in the issuance of housing loans. People rush to take out mortgage loans to buy homes before strengthened repayment requirements are implemented next month. Last month, mortgage loans increased to 5.6 trillion won, the largest in eight months.
It is difficult to ignore people's expectation that housing prices will likely shoot up while the Democratic Party of Korea is in power, as they experienced in the Moon Jae-in administration.
People seem to believe that the real estate policies of liberal governments tend to be focused on curbing demand, which drives up home prices.
In fact, the Moon government treated owners of multiple homes like criminals. It took policies to impose heavy taxes on landlords and multihouse owners, lower presale prices of new apartments and tax "excess" profits from reconstruction. If apartment presale prices are mandatorily set below the market value of nearby apartments, advance buyers could make a profit, while existing homeowners shoulder the greater burden of reconstruction costs.
These measures distressed multihome owners in particular, but only drove them into selling their homes in less expensive areas and owning a single home in the most expensive areas, such as well-to-do districts of Seoul. As a result, housing prices in Gangnam and a few other affluent areas of the capital skyrocketed, sending home prices rising across Seoul more broadly.
Fortunately, President Lee pledged to vitalize reconstruction and redevelopment and avoid regulating homeowners with taxes. Yet, a "buy homes first" atmosphere is strong.
The government said that if housing price instability continues, it would consider expanding the regulated area where land trade is restricted. However, policies to hold down demand have limitations. They could hike up property prices near the regulated areas.
The first thing to do is draw up a blueprint for supply expansion. Though it is impossible to increase housing supply immediately, the government could calm uneasiness in the market just by showing a clear policy direction.
Developing unpopular areas far from Seoul will have a limited effect. High-demand areas need to be developed first. Reconstruction restraints in popular areas should be reconsidered to increase supply.
The new government should avoid repeating the policy error of regulating the market thoroughly. Restraining demand without expanding supply when prices keep rising instigates housing price hikes. That is a lesson that leftist liberal governments of the past have left behind.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Wang Son-taek] Lessons from Kim Dae-jung's diplomacy](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F08%2F20%2Fnews-p.v1.20250820.80772b0d38a4490b8a1a127155a6a186_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Wang Son-taek] Lessons from Kim Dae-jung's diplomacy](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75)
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
[Wang Son-taek] Lessons from Kim Dae-jung's diplomacy
This week marks the 16th anniversary of the passing of Kim Dae-jung, former president of the Republic of Korea. Few leaders in modern Korean history left as deep and lasting an imprint on the nation's development as he did. Kim was a champion of democracy, a reformer who guided Korea through economic peril, and a statesman who dared to extend a hand of peace to the North. His life was one of survival and resilience — he overcame five near-death experiences — and those experiences shaped the philosophy and strategy that defined his diplomacy. Kim Dae-jung's diplomacy grew out of his commitment to democracy and human rights, but it was never naive. He believed in values and principles, but he also believed they should never come at the expense of the nation's core interests. What he practiced was not abstract 'values diplomacy,' but a pragmatic diplomacy built on values. This balance allowed Korea to gain moral legitimacy without sacrificing its real national interest. He did not just insist on our position while conducting diplomacy with other countries. Instead, he preferred a way in which the other side naturally supported our proposal by preparing a mutually beneficial plan. Thus, he could deal with the United States, Japan and China with confidence and dignity while not compromising our core interests. He did his best to win the support of domestic public opinion before negotiating with foreign countries in earnest. This way, he was able to be flexible in diplomatic negotiations. The highlight of his diplomacy came with the June 2000 summit in Pyongyang, the first ever meeting between the leaders of South and North Korea. His policy on North Korea was a carefully crafted strategy to reduce confrontation and open channels of dialogue and exchange. The summit was not a sudden breakthrough, but the result of deliberate and systematic preparation. Kim understood that the Korean question was not just a domestic matter but an international one. He therefore worked first to stabilize Korea's external environment. He pursued normalization with Japan, improved ties with China, strengthened policy coordination with Washington, and sought to defuse potential points of friction between Pyongyang and Washington. Only after these foundations were laid did he move forward with the inter-Korean summit. This was a display of sophisticated and calculated diplomacy, a demonstration that peace initiatives must be embedded in a wider international framework to succeed. Kim did not see North Korea merely as an enemy to be contained, but also as a partner with whom reconciliation and reunification were both possible and necessary. This perspective was not sentimental but strategic. It aimed to ease tension on the peninsula, stabilize the regional security environment, and ultimately integrate the Korean question into a broader peace order in Northeast Asia. For these efforts, he won the Nobel Peace Prize, the first Korean leader to receive the honor, and in doing so elevated Korea's international standing. Kim's diplomacy was never divorced from economic statecraft. He took office at the height of the Asian financial crisis, when Korea faced its gravest economic collapse since the Korean War. With steely resolve, he negotiated with the International Monetary Fund and major powers, restoring international confidence in Korea. At home, he pushed painful reforms, demanding sacrifices but also laying the foundation for recovery. At the same time, he looked ahead and planted the seeds of the digital economy. His promotion of broadband infrastructure, IT development and human capital training transformed Korea into a leader of the information age. He also foresaw the power of culture as a diplomatic tool. By promoting the cultural industries as strategic assets, supporting content exports, easing the "screen quota" system that had restricted American movies in Korea, and even opening to Japanese popular culture, Kim created the conditions for what later became the Korean Wave. Cultural diplomacy, he understood, builds soft power, enhances national image and strengthens ties between peoples. Today's Hallyu owes much to the vision of Kim Dae-jung, who saw culture not only as entertainment but as diplomacy. His approach anticipated the way nations today use culture, technology and communication to project influence in a globalized world. These legacies speak loudly to our own turbulent moment. The world is again in flux. The return of President Donald Trump to the White House has shaken the international order. His tariff policies have imposed enormous stress on Korea, too, forcing Korean businesses to endure unfavorable conditions in the US market and putting the government under new economic and diplomatic pressure. At the same time, some in the Trump administration are promoting policies under the banner of 'alliance modernization,' but they distort and weaken the US-Korea alliance, creating unnecessary losses for both countries. Though the current challenges we are facing are quite difficult, we can manage the alliance with the US if we do not forget the basic elements of sophisticated diplomacy that Kim Dae-jung showed a couple of decades ago. Kim Dae-jung's diplomacy demonstrated that confrontation is not the only path, that dialogue and trust can serve national interest more effectively than hostility. He showed that diplomacy requires patience, preparation and the ability to connect domestic needs with international realities. He also showed the courage to take political risks for peace, understanding that leadership sometimes means moving ahead of public opinion to open new horizons. And above all, he proved that values and pragmatism are not mutually exclusive but can reinforce each other when guided by principle and anchored in the national interest. On this anniversary of his passing, we should not only honor Kim Dae-jung's achievements but also recall the wisdom of his diplomacy. His legacy is not a matter of nostalgia but a living guide for today's challenges. When diplomacy seems blocked and the world uncertain, his vision and determination remind us that breakthroughs come not from force or bravado, but from mutual understanding and peaceful coexistence. That is the enduring lesson of DJ diplomacy. Wang Son-taek is an adjunct professor at Sogang University. He is a former diplomatic correspondent at YTN and a former research associate at Yeosijae. The views expressed here are the writer's own. — Ed.


Korea Herald
8 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Lee to meet Bill Gates to discuss global health issues, collaboration
President Lee Jae Myung plans to meet Bill Gates, chair of the Gates Foundation and Microsoft Corp. co-founder, in Seoul on Thursday, the presidential office said Wednesday. Gates, who has spearheaded initiatives on climate change, poverty reduction and global health through the foundation, is visiting South Korea to reportedly explore cooperation with Korean pharmaceutical companies on a vaccine supply project for low-income countries. During the meeting at the presidential office, the two are expected to discuss global health issues and potential collaboration in the sector, according to officials. (Yonhap)


Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
HD KSOE acquires Doosan Vina at W290b
Shipbuilding giant looks to bolster production of independent tanks to maximize profitability of eco-friendly vessels HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering, an intermediary holding firm of Korean shipbuilding conglomerate HD Hyundai, said Wednesday that it has signed a deal with Doosan Enerbility to acquire the latter's Vietnamese company, Doosan Vina, in order to expand its lineup of eco-friendly vessels. According to HD KSOE, it agreed to buy out Doosan Enerbility's 100 percent stake in Doosan Vina at a price of 290 billion won ($207 million). Doosan Enerbility said it will utilize the 290 billion won it secures from the deal to expand facilities in core businesses, such as small modular reactors and gas turbines, which are seeing rapid growth in demand amid the increasing need for energy and carbon reduction across the globe. Doosan Vina, which was established in 2006 in the Dung Quat Economic Zone of Quang Ngai Province, Central Vietnam, has manufactured boilers for thermal power plants, port cranes and modules for liquefied natural gas plants. HD KSOE plans to carry on the existing business of Doosan Vina while utilizing the newly acquired site as a regional foothold to build independent tanks and port cranes for the Asian region. An independent tank is a key component in eco-friendly vessels such as LNG-fueled vessels, liquefied petroleum gas carriers, ammonia carriers and liquefied carbon dioxide carriers. 'This deal was able to be finalized as it fulfills the interests of both companies, backed by the government's cooperation and support,' said an HD KSOE official. 'As we have expanded our production capacity of eco-friendly equipment, we plan to maximize profitability by bolstering our lineup of globally competitive eco-friendly vessels."