6000 year old skeletons with no connection to modern humans found in Colombia
The story of the region's human settlement is already confusing enough.
Some argued it was colonised by Stone Age clans crossing the Atlantic Ocean from Africa and the Pacific Ocean from as far away as Australia.
But the prevailing argument is that a migration of Clovis peoples out of Siberia followed an Alaskan ice bridge into North America some 20,000 years ago.
Scientists have been squabbling over who went where, when, for decades.
The modern discipline of genetics can offer answers. And add to the confusion. A new analysis of mitochondrial DNA (inherited from mothers) alongside complete genome data of 21 ancient burials presents a connect-the-dots puzzle of migration spanning millennia.
One group, however, stands out.
A tribe of hunter-gatherers who settled the Bogotá Altiplano mountains in what is now Colombia were different. But their isolated plateau sits near the exit from the narrow land bridge that linked Central and South America.
Anthropologists don't know where they fit.
They're not directly related to the ancient North American Clovis peoples.
And their genetic heritage is yet to be found in subsequent Native South American populations.
They appeared some 6000 years ago.They vanished about 2000 years ago.
And there's no hint as to why.
First arrivals
The oldest human remains found in South America are those of 'Luzia', otherwise dubbed 'The First Brazilian'. This 12,000-year-old woman was most likely from among the first wave of settlers to reach the southern continent. DNA shows they were descendants of the Clovis migration – not African or Australian seafarers as previously believed.
A second wave of North American tribes arrived around 9000 years ago, and a third some 5000 years later.
'However, a region that has not been investigated through ancient genomics so far is Colombia, the entry point into South America,' the authors of the study, published in the May edition of the journal Science Advances, state.
And that's what they sought to address.
They examined five archaeological sites across the Bogota Altiplano plateau. Genetic material was extracted from teeth and bones of 21 skeletons dating from 6000 to 500 years old.
The researchers argue the oldest remains must have been from a lingering branch of the first migration of humans into South America. But even then, their clan must have been unique.
'We show that the hunter-gatherer population from the Altiplano dated to around 6000 yr B.P. lack the genetic ancestry related to the Clovis-associated Anzick-1 genome and to ancient California Channel Island individuals,' the study finds.
'The analysed Preceramic individuals from Colombia do not share distinct affinity with any ancient or modern-day population from Central and South America studied to date.'
Whatever the case, their isolated mountain plateau could have contributed to its longevity. Until it didn't.
'We couldn't find descendants of these early hunter-gatherers of the Colombian high plains — the genes were not passed on,' explains Kim-Louise Krettek of the University of Tubingen.
'That means in the area around Bogotá there was a complete exchange of the population.'
Inevitability of change
Who were these people? What did they look like? How did they settle in their strange new homeland?
By the time the descendants of the Clovis tribes that crossed the Bering Strait out of northern China and Siberia reached South America, 7000 years of genetic mutation and evolution were already well down the path towards creating distinct new communities.
The Bogota Altiplano was among them.
Then, their mountaintop plateau home likely kept them isolated from external influence. Until strange new people began climbing the slopes 4000 years ago.
The march of progress is relentless.
The high tableland transitioned from its hunter-gatherer society into an agrarian economy in a process completed within 2000 years.
DNA shows the new people came from Central America. Archaeology reveals they brought with them innovations including pottery and planting seeds.
'In addition to technological developments such as ceramics, the people of this second migration probably also brought the Chibchan languages into what is present-day Colombia. Branches of this language family are still spoken in Central America today,' says co-author Andrea Casas-Vargas of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Whether exterminated through war or overwhelmed in numbers, the earlier Bogota Altiplano people vanished.
'The cultural transition between the Preceramic and Herrera periods is associated with a seemingly complete replacement of the local genetic profile,' the study reads.
'That genetic traces of the original population disappear completely is unusual,' adds National University of Colombia study participant Andrea Casas-Vargas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
6 days ago
- ABC News
Marsupials are underrated Australian survivors. It's time to get to know them better
A small golden animal with shovel-like claws swims through the red sand of Australia's central desert in pursuit of its supper. Over millions of years, it's lost its eyes, but it is still a fierce hunter. Even though it has no external ears, it can sense the smallest of movements. The Anangu people call it "itjaritjari". When Western scientists first stumbled across the cryptic animal in the 19th century, they dubbed it the "marsupial mole" because it bore a striking resemblance to the "true moles" they knew. Some even debated whether it was a missing link between mammals and marsupials. Then they discovered it had a pouch. At the time Notorctes typhlops was described, scientists such as John Gould regarded marsupials as primitive animals. Just a few years earlier, in 1863, he wrote: "This is a very low form of animal life, indeed the lowest among the Mammalia." The subject of his disdain? The majestic kangaroo — and, by extension, all Australasian marsupials. Marsupials had been respected and understood by Indigenous Australians for tens of thousands of years when Gould penned those words. Today, many marsupials have become Aussie icons — think kangaroos, koalas and wombats — and have arguably gained more attention than other Australian mammals such as rodents and bats. Yet our knowledge of this amazing group as a whole — even the popular animals — is still "inadequate", Tim Flannery argues. Professor Flannery is famous for his work as a climate advocate and director of the Australian Museum, but marsupials have been his passion since the 1980s. "If you want to know what it really means to be Australian, it pays to give the marsupials a little bit of time," he says. Today, two-thirds of the world's 300-plus marsupial species are found in Australia. Their story on this continent starts at least 55 million years ago. The earliest marsupials were probably like today's bandicoots, small omnivorous creatures that can breed at a rate of knots when conditions are correct, Professor Flannery suggests. Fossils from the Murgon fossil site in Queensland back him up, revealing ancient bandicoots and tiny climbing creatures that might have looked like today's phascogales. Their ancestors travelled here across the supercontinent of Gondwana, from what is currently South America through ancient Antarctica until they reached a land bridge that is now Tasmania. "Australia was still very much a polar environment. Everywhere south of northern New South Wales was all within the Antarctic circle," Professor Flannery explains. These early marsupials shared their damp polar world with the world's first songbirds and the egg-laying monotremes, which would evolve into today's platypus and echidna. The "scarce" fossil record also shows bats as well as hints that a few non-marsupial mammals were present on the continent at the same time. But marsupials may have had an evolutionary advantage over mammals. Marsupials have it easy in the birthing department compared to placental mammals like us. They have a super pared-back placenta — so don't nourish their young in their uterus for long. They birth underdeveloped joeys (sometimes the size of a grain of rice) and grow them up externally, usually in a pouch. When colonial scientists like Gould encountered marsupial reproduction, it was cast as an "intermediate" step between egg-laying monotremes and "high" placental mammals. In other words, it was thought that mammals evolved from marsupial-like creatures. And only monotremes — platypus and echidna — were considered lowlier. This idea was flipped upside-down like a ring-tailed possum on a wire by Heather White in 2023. Dr White, who is a researcher at London's Natural History Museum, studied ancient skulls, and showed that marsupials evolved from early placental mammals. This means marsupials are hyper-specialised placental mammals after all. Sorry Gould. And their pouch may have been the secret to their evolutionary success, Professor Flannery suggests. Dunnart females are ready to breed at three months old, and have 14-day pregnancies of up to 10 young at once — often from multiple fathers. When times are hard, they can hit "pause" on their pregnancies. This "eruptive and rapid" breeding may have given marsupials the edge they needed to cross the ancient polar land bridge from South America to Australia when placental mammals did not. And sure, there are no marsupials that have flippers like whales or that can fly like bats. But we should celebrate them for what they can do, says kangaroo fan Vera Weisbecker, who runs the bones and biodiversity lab at Flinders University. "Kangaroos are the biggest animal to ever hop, ever. This is biomechanically next to impossible at such large sizes," Dr Weisbeker says. As the continent changed over time, many species adapted to new challenges and habitats. The ancestors of today's itjaritjari, and its northern cousin the kakarratul (Notoryctes caurinus) as it is known by Ngaanyatjarra communities, appear in the fossil record about 20 million years ago. These early marsupial moles transformed adaptations used for foraging in soft rainforest to survive in the desert as the continent dried out. They weren't the only animals to adapt to arid conditions. Tiny carnivorous desert-dwelling mulgara (Dasycercus sp) produce super-concentrated urine and seemingly get all their moisture from their prey's flesh. The mainly herbivorous mala (Lagorchestes hirsutus) takes this feat one step further. It can survive in the desert without water or juicy insects, getting all its moisture from plants. Australia's climate is tough, but Professor Flannery says the real challenge of this continent is the soils. "The surface layer of the rocks has been leached of all of its nutrients a long time ago, with a few exceptions," he says. As a result, Professor Flannery believes the capacity of marsupials to survive on "miserable and meagre food" is underrated. "The good old euro can eat spinifex and survive which is bloody miraculous from a metabolic point of view," he says. Not all marsupials live in the arid zone. The cuscus (Spilocuscus maulatus), which is Professor Flannery's favourite underrated marsupial, along with the striped possum (Dactylopsila trivirgata) and tree kangaroos can still be found in pockets of dense rainforests in northern Australia. Yet despite their tenacity over the past 55 million years, many marsupials are now threatened with extinction. There are now around 159 marsupial species in Australia — and an estimated 40 per cent of them are threatened. Since colonisation, 17 Australian marsupial species have disappeared. This is an extinction rate of nearly 10 per cent — well above the global mammal extinction rate of 1.4 per cent over the same period. Marsupial moles — the itjaritjari and kakarratul — are rarely seen. Little is known about their range and distribution. The karkarratul is considered stable, but the itjaritjari is listed as endangered. Both species face predation by introduced species such as foxes and cats, and changes to their habitat. Despite being evolutionary wonders, the idea that marsupials are "inferior" to placental mammals still remains today, Professor Flannery says. Helping turn that notion on its head is Greg Irons, manager of the Bonorong Wildlife Sanctuary in Tasmania. As a wildlife rescuer, he hears concern about the charismatic cuties such as Tasmanian devils in his home state or bilbies, koalas and numbats on the mainland. But Mr Irons worries that less famous marsupials blur into "just another hopping thing", when they each have a unique (and underrated) role in the ecosystem. On mainland Australia, little diggers like bandicoots and bilbies and boodies eat seeds, travel and then disperse those seeds when they come out their back end. They pockmark arid environments with holes, increasing water penetration after rain and improving conditions for the young plants they help transport. In Tasmania, bettongs use their pointed snout to root out fungus from the forest floor, scattering spores and spreading fungi that keep forests healthy. "We've got kids at school that can all tell you what a lion, a tiger, and probably 40 different species of dinosaur are, but they cannot tell you what a bettong is," Mr Irons says. "Yet this animal could be responsible for the entire communication and health of the forest that allow us to breathe." Thanks also to Dr Jack Ashby, assistant director of the University Museum of Zoology, Cambridge for his input.
The Australian
12-08-2025
- The Australian
Scientists find 74-million-year-old mammal fossil in Chile
Scientists have discovered the fossil of a tiny mouse-sized mammal that lived in the time of the dinosaurs in Chilean Patagonia. "Yeutherium pressor" weighed between 30 and 40 grams (about one ounce) and lived in the Upper Cretaceous period, about 74 million years ago. It is the smallest mammal ever found in this region of South America, dating back to the era when it was part of a continental land mass known as Gondwana. The fossil consists of "a small piece of jaw with a molar and the crown and roots of two other molars," said Hans Puschel, who led the team of scientists from the University of Chile and Chile's Millennium Nucleus research center on early mammals. The discovery was published this month in the British scientific journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Researchers found the fossil in the Rio de las Las Chinas Valley in Chile's Magallanes region, about 3,000 kilometers (1,864 miles) south of Santiago. Despites its similarity to a small rodent, "Yeutherium pressor" was a mammal that must have laid eggs, like the platypus, or carried its young in a pouch like kangaroos or opossums. The shape of its teeth suggests that it probably had a diet of relatively hard vegetables. Just like the dinosaurs with whom it co-existed, the tiny mammal abruptly went extinct at the end of the Cretaceous period, about 66 million years ago. ps/axl/ksb/jgc/sla
News.com.au
12-08-2025
- News.com.au
Scientists find 74-million-year-old mammal fossil in Chile
Scientists have discovered the fossil of a tiny mouse-sized mammal that lived in the time of the dinosaurs in Chilean Patagonia. "Yeutherium pressor" weighed between 30 and 40 grams (about one ounce) and lived in the Upper Cretaceous period, about 74 million years ago. It is the smallest mammal ever found in this region of South America, dating back to the era when it was part of a continental land mass known as Gondwana. The fossil consists of "a small piece of jaw with a molar and the crown and roots of two other molars," said Hans Puschel, who led the team of scientists from the University of Chile and Chile's Millennium Nucleus research center on early mammals. The discovery was published this month in the British scientific journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Researchers found the fossil in the Rio de las Las Chinas Valley in Chile's Magallanes region, about 3,000 kilometers (1,864 miles) south of Santiago. Despites its similarity to a small rodent, "Yeutherium pressor" was a mammal that must have laid eggs, like the platypus, or carried its young in a pouch like kangaroos or opossums. The shape of its teeth suggests that it probably had a diet of relatively hard vegetables. Just like the dinosaurs with whom it co-existed, the tiny mammal abruptly went extinct at the end of the Cretaceous period, about 66 million years ago.
