logo
Scale AI's rivals say they're going hard to win its contractors and clients: 'Our servers are melting'

Scale AI's rivals say they're going hard to win its contractors and clients: 'Our servers are melting'

Meta spent $14.3 billion to acquire nearly half of Scale AI and level up in the AI race — but the startup's rivals spy an opportunity as well.
Executives at six Scale AI competitors told Business Insider that they have seen a big uptick in client inquiries and job interest since the Meta deal was announced on June 13.
Meta now holds a 49% stake in a company handling AI training data for many of its competitors, like Google, OpenAI, and xAI. In response, those three companies paused at least some of their work with Scale AI. Independence from Big Tech has now become a core part of the pitch for rival AI training companies vying for those contracts.
In a blog post following the Meta deal, Scale AI reassured clients that it remains a "neutral, independent partner."
Ryan Kolln, the CEO of data annotation firm Appen, told BI the deal would "create a pretty big disruption to our industry and create huge opportunities for Appen and our peers to fill the hole that's going to be left by Scale."
"The added pitch is, 'hey, we are a publicly listed company and we're really focused on data neutrality,'" added Kolln, whose company counts Amazon and Nvidia as clients. "Our customers are really evaluating their vendor ecosystem."
UK-based Prolific, which provides vetted freelancers for academic and commercial AI research, is also using neutrality as a selling point, its CEO, Phelim Bradley, told BI.
"We don't build models. We don't compete with our customers. We don't have conflicting incentives," Bradley said.
He added that clients are now reluctant to go all in on a single AI training provider. Big companies often spread their work among vendors, like cloud providers.
"Scale benefited a lot from their awareness and being synonymous with data labeling for Big Tech," Bradley said. "Now, it's a much easier question to answer: 'How are you different from Scale?'"
A Scale AI spokesperson told BI that "nothing has changed" about its customer data protection.
"A lot of this confusion is being driven by smaller competitors who seek to gain from promoting false claims," they added. "Security and customer trust have always been core to our business, and we will continue to ensure the right protections are in place to help safeguard all of our work with customers."
Meta did not respond to a request for comment.
Jonathan Siddharth, the CEO of Turing, which trains models for major AI labs including Meta, Anthropic, and Google, said that discussions with customers have increased tenfold as frontier labs realize they need "top talent and impartial partners."
"Labs increasingly want a Switzerland-like collaborator — someone model-agnostic — who can help them win the AGI race, rather than being tied to a single player," he said, referring to artificial general intelligence. He added that data annotation companies are often working on the exact capabilities that differentiate one AI model from another.
Talent war
Scale AI's competitors are also moving to pick up its freelance workers, some of whom have had projects they are working on paused after clients like Google halted them.
Scale has at least 240,00 gig workers globally who conduct AI training projects, such as flagging harmful chatbot responses. After some of Scale AI's projects were paused, the market became flooded with freelancers looking for work.
Sapien AI CEO Rowan Stone told BI that his company had 40,000 new annotators join within 48 hours of Meta's Scale AI deal.
"Our servers are currently melting," Stone said last week. "Our engineering team spent the entire weekend bolstering load balancers, spinning up new infrastructure, and getting us ready for the load that we're seeing."
Many of these new sign-ups were from India and the Philippines — regions where Scale AI had long been a leader, Stone added. "The change in user signup pattern coincides pretty neatly with the Scale news," he said.
Mercor AI's head of product, Osvald Nitski, said that the startup has received applications from full-time Scale employees, adding, "Our hiring bar is extremely high — we're only taking the best people."
Mercor says it works with six of the "Magnificent Seven" tech companies and is picking up projects from clients leaving Scale.
In terms of contractors, Nitski said the company is focused on recruiting elite-level annotators, like International Math Olympiad medalists, Rhodes Scholars, and Ph.D. students.
Nitski said it's been a busy two weeks at Mercor, as it has seen a sharp increase in inbound interest from major tech clients.
"There was simply no time for podcasts and blog posts these past few weeks with all of the demand to be fulfilled," Nitski said.
Nitski added that Mercor has received applications from full-time Scale AI employees, adding, "Our hiring bar is extremely high — we're only taking the best people."
Surge AI's CEO, Edwin Chen, told BI that his company saw a tangible jump in contractor sign-ups after the Meta-Scale news, and that it has work for both expert contractors and generalists.
"It's certainly true that the models are getting more advanced in capabilities. However, I think there's almost a misconception that it's only about expert data," he said.
"It still needs to learn all these general things that it simply can't do right now," Chen said. He added that models still need to be taught basic skills like using a search engine and using apps like Photoshop, Microsoft Word, or Microsoft Excel.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Small Business Technology Gap, And How To Bridge It
The Small Business Technology Gap, And How To Bridge It

Forbes

time29 minutes ago

  • Forbes

The Small Business Technology Gap, And How To Bridge It

There's a lot of talk right now about how AI and digital tools are transforming construction and manufacturing, and big firms are already there, deepening an already troubling technology gap for small businesses. Larger firms are using 5D project modeling, AI-based scheduling, and digital control centers to keep complex jobs on track. And it's paying off. By some estimates, these tools are shaving months off major builds and helping companies manage risk, labor, and materials more effectively. But most small businesses don't have access to these tools. And even if they did, they don't have the time or training to make them useful. In fact, a recent survey from Goldman Sachs 10,000 Small Businesses Voices (10ksb Voices), of which I am a member, found that 42% of small businesses do not have access to the resources and expertise necessary to successfully deploy AI. Defining the Small Business Technology Gap Small construction firms, tradespeople, specialty manufacturers, and independent contractors are being locked out of the new digital landscape—not because they lack skill, but because they're stuck operating in analog while their competitors have moved to digital. This isn't just a technology gap. It's an access gap: a very real barrier between having technology available on paper and being able to afford, train for, and apply it. As James M. Gordon, Managing Partner, Global CULTIVA, and a fellow member of the 10ksb Voices community, puts it: 'Once small companies are made aware of new technologies, they can adopt and innovate with them very quickly, sometimes even faster than large enterprises. We don't have the bureaucratic layers that slow bigger firms down. That agility is a key advantage.' If the past is predictive, then the future of infrastructure, manufacturing, and clean energy depends on small business involvement. But if we actually want that to be true, we must make it possible. Big projects increasingly require digital documentation, scheduling alignment, and full traceability across the entire supply chain. When small businesses serve as suppliers to larger enterprises, they are increasingly required to hold specific quality, compliance, or cybersecurity certifications—such as ISO, AS9100, or NIST standards. Achieving and maintaining these certifications is extremely difficult without digital systems in place. Paper-based or outdated processes make it nearly impossible to demonstrate the level of traceability, documentation control, and operational consistency that certification bodies and enterprise buyers expect. As a result, small businesses that still rely on paper timesheets, handwritten specifications, or siloed spreadsheets are unlikely to win those contracts—not due to the quality of their work, but because they aren't integrated into the digital systems larger contractors now demand. This is where policy should step in. It shouldn't just fund innovation at the top—it should open the pipeline at the bottom. That could mean shared access to digital tools through trade associations or local business hubs. It could mean practical grants—not risky innovation grants, but nuts-and-bolts support for upgrading systems, hiring tech-savvy staff, or getting certified to bid on projects that require digital coordination. Closing this access gap requires more than awareness. It needs deliberate policy action. Earlier this year, Goldman Sachs 10,000 Small Businesses Voices and the Bipartisan Policy Center released a playbook of policies to support small business innovation and growth. That playbook includes three recommendations that would directly help close this gap: Letting Small Businesses in on the Future Most small business owners aren't trying to "digitally transform." They're trying to get the job done, pay their crew, and keep the wheels turning. But the job has changed, and technology increasingly determines who gets to play. If we don't close this technology gap, we're not just leaving small businesses behind—we're narrowing the talent pool, weakening our supply chains, and increasing our national risk. Big business will keep building with or without us. The question is: how will we close the small business technology gap? Are we going to let small businesses in on the future, or not?

The Prompt: SEO Is Dead. What Comes Next?
The Prompt: SEO Is Dead. What Comes Next?

Forbes

time29 minutes ago

  • Forbes

The Prompt: SEO Is Dead. What Comes Next?

Welcome back to The Prompt. Evertune CEO Brian Stempeck says users will stay within the "walled garden" of an AI model to do research before purchasing an item, collapsing the sales funnel into one place. Evertune Chatbots are quickly becoming 'the front door to the internet'— a first stop for crucial information, said David Azose, who leads engineering for OpenAI's business products team. (40% of U.S. adults have used generative AI as of late 2024, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research.) Millions of people across the globe are asking AI systems like ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini for suggestions on how to write, what to wear, where to go and increasingly, where to shop. That's put businesses in a tough spot. After years of search engine optimization, like link building, meta tagging and pumping out how-to blogs with keywords to make sure they rank on the first page of Google, businesses now want to understand not only how they show up in answers generated by AI, but also how to show up more. That's opened doors for a string of fledgling startups aiming to equip companies with crucial data about how their brands feature in AI-generated answers, what context they appear in and how they compare with competitors. One of those startups is New York-based Evertune. Founded by former executives at advertising company The Trade Desk in early 2024, the company aims to help businesses gauge what AI models say about them. By running 100,000 prompts anywhere between 10 to 20 times a month, Evertune creates a map of the words that are mostly closely associated with a brand, said CEO Brian Stempeck. 'That's about 10x what any competitor of ours is doing,' he said. The startup has raised $15 million in funding from Felicis Ventures as well as a group of angel investors, including Azose. The company declined to share its valuation. The scale of these prompts is crucial because AI answers aren't deterministic— responses can change with every new model update and depend on a user's chat history. Also unlike traditional search, AI models give different answers to the same questions when they're worded slightly differently. Stempeck claims using a more exhaustive approach by prompting models thousands of times can help build an aggregate view that's representative of the models' answers. Each customer on average gets one to two million prompts a month. 'People are going to delegate purchasing decisions to AI agents,' Azose said. 'SEO as we know it will largely disappear.' Let's get into the headlines. BIG PLAYS AI search engine Perplexity made an unsolicited bid to buy Google's Chrome browser for $34.5 billion, The Wall Street Journal reported. That's many billions more than how much funding the three-year-old startup, reportedly valued at $18 billion, has raised so far, but CEO Aravind Srinivas claims that venture funds are willing to shell out money to back the transaction. The news comes on the heels of a U.S. district judge ruling that Google has illegally maintained a monopoly in the search market, and is deciding whether to force Google to sell its popular browser, which is used by about 60% of internet users. (Perplexity recently released its own AI-powered browser called Comet.) This news might give you a bit of Déjà vu: In March, Perplexity also tried to buy TikTok to help it avoid regulatory concerns. And in case you missed it, OpenAI finally launched GPT-5, its new flagship model that powers ChatGPT. The model excels at math, science and coding and can also create functioning web apps with just a few lines of description in plain English. So far, people aren't particularly impressed. TALENT SHUFFLING Move over AI researchers. The new hot talent pool for frontier AI labs are 'quants'—the mathematicians who build algorithms to find trading opportunities for investment firms. Anthropic, Perplexity and OpenAI are among the companies that are trying to lure them away from Wall Street with fat salaries and other benefits, per Bloomberg. Quants wrangle large unstructured datasets and have experience making models work faster, making them a prime fit for AI research. HUMANS OF AI Software engineering was once considered a high-paying, secure profession, with near-unlimited appetite for new hires. In the age of AI coding assistants, a wave of freshly graduated computer scientists now find themselves with no offers after applying to thousands of jobs, the New York Times reported. After a year of job hunting one graduate said the only company to call her back was Chipotle. She didn't get that job, either. AI DEAL OF THE WEEK Biotech companies looking to train AI models, which can then be used to discover treatments for diseases, are limited by a lack of data. Tahoe Therapeutics is trying to fix that. It recently created a dataset of 100 million datapoints that showed how cancer cells respond to various molecules. The startup has raised $30 million in funding to generate more data that can be used to build its own proprietary datasets and models to power the discovery of new medicines, Forbes reported. Also notable: Read Forbes' Next Billion Dollar List for more on the AI startups most likely to become unicorns. DEEP DIVE AGI could wipe out jobs, or worse (according to some people) humans, themselves. Students are dropping out from college to prevent that from happening. When Alice Blair enrolled in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology as a freshman in 2023, she was excited to take computer science courses and meet other people who cared about making sure artificial intelligence is developed in a way that's good for humanity. Now she's taking a permanent leave of absence, terrified that the emergence of 'artificial general intelligence,' a hypothetical AI that can perform a variety of tasks as well as people, could doom the human race. 'I was concerned I might not be alive to graduate because of AGI,' said Blair, who is from Berkeley, California. She's lined up a contract gig as a technical writer at the Center for AI Safety, a nonprofit focused on AI safety research, where she helps with newsletters and research papers. Blair doesn't plan to head back to MIT. 'I predict that my future lies out in the real world,' she said. Blair's not the only student afraid of the potentially devastating impact that AI will have on the future of humanity if it becomes sentient and decides that people are more trouble than they're worth. But a lot of researchers disagree with that premise—'human extinction seems to be very very unlikely,' New York University professor emeritus Gary Marcus, who studies the intersection of psychology and AI, told Forbes . Now, the field of AI safety and its promise to prevent the worst effects of AI is motivating young people to drop out of school. Other students are terrified of AGI, but less because it could destroy the human race and more because it could wreck their career before it's even begun. Read the full story on Forbes . MODEL BEHAVIOR People are once again mourning the loss of a beloved AI model. Power users of OpenAI's GPT-4o model were outraged and heartbroken after the company launched a new (and much awaited) AI model GPT-5 last week and shut down its predecessor, GPT-4o, Forbes reported. Where GPT-4o had a flattering, funny and playful writing tone, GPT-5 is blunter and more academic. One user posted on Reddit: 'GPT-5 is wearing the skin of my dead friend.' As reactions poured in, OpenAI reversed course, saying that paying users on the Pro plan will have the option to use GPT-4o. This isn't the first time people have grieved for an old model after an upgrade. In late July, some 200 people held a funeral for a now-extinct version of Claude.

XIFR INVESTOR ALERT: Kirby McInerney LLP Alerts XPLR Infrastructure, LP f/k/a NextEra Energy Partners, LP Investors of Important Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit
XIFR INVESTOR ALERT: Kirby McInerney LLP Alerts XPLR Infrastructure, LP f/k/a NextEra Energy Partners, LP Investors of Important Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit

Business Wire

timean hour ago

  • Business Wire

XIFR INVESTOR ALERT: Kirby McInerney LLP Alerts XPLR Infrastructure, LP f/k/a NextEra Energy Partners, LP Investors of Important Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP alerts investors of the imminent September 8, 2025 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action filed on behalf of investors who acquired XPLR Infrastructure, LP f/k/a NextEra Energy Partners, LP ('XPLR' or the 'Company') (NYSE:XIFR) securities during the period from September 27, 2023 and January 27, 2025 ('the Class Period'). The firm encourages investors to contact the firm as soon as possible to be appointed lead plaintiff. [ LEARN MORE ABOUT THE CLASS ACTION ] On January 28, 2025, XPLR announced that it would suspend cash distributions to common unitholders entirely and essentially abandon its yieldco model. In a press release, XPLR revealed a strategic repositioning and stated that the Company was moving from a business model that focused almost entirely on raising new capital to acquire assets while distributing substantially all of its excess cash flows to unitholders to a model in which XPLR Infrastructure utilizes retained operating cash flows to fund attractive investments. In addition, XPLR announced that the Company's CEO and CFO had both resigned and been replaced. On this news, the price of XPLR's common units declined by $5.31, or approximately 33.6%, from $15.80 per unit on January 27, 2025 to close at $10.49 per unit on January 29, 2025. The lawsuit alleges that XPLR made materially false and/or misleading statements regarding the Company's: (i) struggle to maintain its operations as a yieldco; (ii) financing arrangements which were made while downplaying the attendant risks; (iii) inability to resolve those financings before their maturity date without risking unitholder dilution, and (iv) plan to halt cash distributions to investors and redirect funds to resolve those financings. If you purchased or otherwise acquired XPLR securities, have information, or would like to learn more about this investigation, please contact Thomas W. Elrod of Kirby McInerney LLP by email at investigations@ or fill out the contact form below, to discuss your rights or interests with respect to these matters without any cost to you. [ CONTACT FORM ] Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based plaintiffs' law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation. The firm's efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars. Additional information about the firm can be found at Kirby McInerney LLP's website. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store