PIL seeks ban on opinion trading platforms; Punjab and Haryana HC issues notice to Centre, RBI and SEBI
The Punjab and Haryana High Court Thursday sought the Centre's response on a PIL seeking a ban on opinion trading alleging that it promotes online betting.
A bench of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel issued notices to the Union of India, Reserve Bank of India and Securities and Exchange Board of India, Enforcement Directorate, State of Haryana and others.
Former Punjab Advocate General Atul Nanda appearing for Advocate Anuj Malik, who has filed the PIL, said the platforms were permitting betting.
He referred to a platform that pays money to users for guessing the outcome of cricket matches.
Nanda, assisted by his Advocate wife Rameeza Hakeem, contended that state governments and authorities like SEBI have to write to the Centre to take down these sites.
The petitioner who is also a member of the New India organization sought relief/ action against the continued and unchecked operation of certain online platforms that, under the guise of opinion trading, are engaged in illegal betting and gambling activities.
These platforms permit users to bet/wager on the outcome of uncertain and speculative events such as cricket wins and losses, election results bitcoin/market movements and current affairs which are nothing but games of chance.
'Such activities are a violation of the the Public Gambling Act 1867, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Section 112 and state specific legislations including Haryana Prevention of Public Gambling Act 2025 and the Information Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code Rules 2021, as amended in 2023 which lay down express obligations to restrict such content and platforms,' read the PIL.
The seriousness of this issue is also presently engaging the attention of other high courts in this country including ones that are pending before the High Court of Gujarat and the Bombay High Court, it added.
Further these entities thrive on surrogate advertising celebrity endorsements and manipulative digital marketing to target impressionable users particularly the youth despite a legal statutory bar and repeated regulatory advisories from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, the petition contends.
The Petitioner has sought appropriate directions to secure the enforcement of existing legal and regulatory frameworks and to protect the public , particularly youth and vulnerable persons from the harm caused by these platforms.
He has sought prohibition on promotion, advertisement, operation, and facilitation of such illegal betting platforms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
TMC's Abhishek Banerjee slams Centre for 'lack' of accountability over Pahalgam attack
TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee on Monday accused the Centre of lacking accountability over the Pahalgam terror attack and raised five questions, including those on border security and alleged intelligence failure. In a long post on X, Banerjee claimed, "It has been over 55 days since the Pahalgam terror attack. It is deeply concerning that in a democracy, neither the mainstream media, members of the opposition, nor the judiciary has stepped forward to raise these five critical questions before the Government of India." — abhishekaitc (@abhishekaitc) by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Social Security Recipients Under $2,384/Mo Now Entitled To 12 "Kickbacks" This Month (Tap for List) SuperSavings Learn More Undo He said, "However, as a citizen committed to the nation's well-being and as a public representative entrusted with accountability, I raise these five questions before the Government of India." The TMC leader first questioned how four heavily armed terrorists managed to infiltrate the Indian borders and carry out an attack that left 26 civilians dead. Live Events Calling it a "massive breach in national security", Banerjee asked who would take responsibility for the "failure". He also targeted the Intelligence Bureau, questioning why its chief was granted a one-year extension just a month after the attack. "If this was an intelligence failure, why was the Intelligence Bureau Chief granted a one-year extension, that too barely a month after the attack? Why was he rewarded rather than held accountable? What is the compulsion?" he asked. Banerjee also questioned the government's "selective" use of surveillance technology. "If the GoI can conveniently use Pegasus spyware against opposition leaders (including me), journalists and even judges, what stops it from using the same tools against terrorist networks and suspects?" he asked. Banerjee raised doubts over the fate of the attackers in Pahalgam and demanded clarity. Also Read: Destinations closed after Pahalgam attack are being reopened in phased manner: LG Manoj Sinha "Where are the four terrorists responsible for this brutal, religion-based massacre? Are they dead or alive? If they have been neutralised, why has the government failed to make a clear statement? And if they haven't, why is the silence?" the TMC's Diamond Harbour MP wrote on social media. He also brought up the issue of Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK) and questioned the Centre's "silence" on a reported statement by the US President claiming that he persuaded India into a ceasefire with trade promises. "When will India reclaim Pakistan-occupied Jammu & Kashmir (PoJK)? Why hasn't the government officially responded to the US President's claim that he persuaded India into a ceasefire with promises of trade?" Banerjee asked. "Just as the nation stood together irrespective of their caste, creed, religion and political affinity, celebrating the triumph of righteousness and saluting the valour and sacrifice of our armed forces, why were the emotions of 140 crore Indians disregarded?" he claimed. In his fifth and final question, Banerjee criticised the government's diplomatic efforts after the Pahalgam incident. "After reaching out to 33 countries post-Pahalgam in the last one month, how many extended explicit support to India?" he asked. Banerjee questioned why, instead of being censured, Pakistan secured global support. "If we are truly a Vishwaguru and the world's fourth-largest economy, why did the IMF and World Bank approve USD 1 billion and USD 40 billion in financial assistance and long-term investments to Pakistan immediately after the Pahalgam attack? How did a nation repeatedly involved in cross-border terrorism not only escape global scrutiny but get rewarded?" the TMC leader asked. He added, "And more shockingly: Why was Pakistan appointed Vice-Chair of the UN Security Council's Counter-Terrorism Committee barely a month later?" Banerjee concluded the post with a stinging remark on foreign policy expenditure. "Over Rs 2000000000000 (two lakh crores) has been spent on external affairs over the past 10 years. The Indian public deserves transparency, accountability and results - not silence and spin! The nation awaits a response," he said.
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
TMC's Abhishek criticises Centre for ‘lack' of accountability over Pahalgam attack
Calling it a 'massive breach in national security', Banerjee asked who would take responsibility for the 'failure'. In a long post on X, Banerjee claimed, 'It has been over 55 days since the Pahalgam terror attack. It is deeply concerning that in a democracy, neither the mainstream media, members of the opposition, nor the judiciary has stepped forward to raise these five critical questions before the Government of India.' He said, 'However, as a citizen committed to the nation's well-being and as a public representative entrusted with accountability, I raise these five questions before the Government of India.' The TMC leader first questioned how four heavily armed terrorists managed to infiltrate the Indian borders and carry out an attack that left 26 civilians dead. Kolkata, Jun 16 (PTI) TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee on Monday accused the Centre of lacking accountability over the Pahalgam terror attack and raised five questions on border security, foreign policy, alleged intelligence failure, and its 'inability' to take the nation into confidence. He also targeted the Intelligence Bureau, questioning why its chief was granted a one-year extension just a month after the attack. 'If this was an intelligence failure, why was the Intelligence Bureau Chief granted a one-year extension, that too barely a month after the attack? Why was he rewarded rather than held accountable? What is the compulsion?' he asked. Banerjee also questioned the government's 'selective' use of surveillance technology. 'If the GoI can conveniently use Pegasus spyware against opposition leaders (including me), journalists and even judges, what stops it from using the same tools against terrorist networks and suspects?' he asked. Banerjee raised doubts over the fate of the attackers in Pahalgam and demanded clarity. 'Where are the four terrorists responsible for this brutal, religion-based massacre? Are they dead or alive? If they have been neutralised, why has the government failed to make a clear statement? And if they haven't, why is the silence?' the TMC's Diamond Harbour MP wrote on social media. He also brought up the issue of Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK) and questioned the Centre's 'silence' on a reported statement by the US President claiming that he persuaded India into a ceasefire with trade promises. 'When will India reclaim Pakistan-occupied Jammu & Kashmir (PoJK)? Why hasn't the government officially responded to the US President's claim that he persuaded India into a ceasefire with promises of trade?' Banerjee asked. 'Just as the nation stood together irrespective of their caste, creed, religion and political affinity, celebrating the triumph of righteousness and saluting the valour and sacrifice of our armed forces, why were the emotions of 140 crore Indians disregarded?' he claimed. In his fifth and final question, Banerjee criticised the government's diplomatic efforts after the Pahalgam incident. 'After reaching out to 33 countries post-Pahalgam in the last one month, how many extended explicit support to India?' he asked. Banerjee questioned why, instead of being censured, Pakistan secured global support. 'If we are truly a Vishwaguru and the world's fourth-largest economy, why did the IMF and World Bank approve USD 1 billion and USD 40 billion in financial assistance and long-term investments to Pakistan immediately after the Pahalgam attack? How did a nation repeatedly involved in cross-border terrorism not only escape global scrutiny but get rewarded?' the TMC leader asked. He added, 'And more shockingly: Why was Pakistan appointed Vice-Chair of the UN Security Council's Counter-Terrorism Committee barely a month later?' Banerjee concluded the post with a stinging remark on foreign policy expenditure. 'Over Rs 2000000000000 (two lakh crores) has been spent on external affairs over the past 10 years. The Indian public deserves transparency, accountability and results – not silence and spin! The nation awaits a response,' he said. PTI PNT BDC This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
TMC's Abhishek criticises Centre for 'lack' of accountability over Pahalgam attack
TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee on Monday (June 16, 2025) accused the Centre of lacking accountability over the Pahalgam terror attack and raised five questions on border security, foreign policy, alleged intelligence failure, and its "inability" to take the nation into confidence. In a long post on X, Mr. Banerjee claimed, "It has been over 55 days since the Pahalgam terror attack. It is deeply concerning that in a democracy, neither the mainstream media, members of the Opposition, nor the judiciary has stepped forward to raise these five critical questions before the Government of India." He said, "However, as a citizen committed to the nation's well-being and as a public representative entrusted with accountability, I raise these five questions before the Government of India." The TMC leader first questioned how four heavily armed terrorists managed to infiltrate the Indian borders and carry out an attack that left 26 civilians dead. Calling it a "massive breach in national security", Mr. Banerjee asked who would take responsibility for the "failure". He also targeted the Intelligence Bureau, questioning why its Chief was granted a one-year extension just a month after the attack. "If this was an intelligence failure, why was the Intelligence Bureau Chief granted a one-year extension, that too barely a month after the attack? Why was he rewarded rather than held accountable? What is the compulsion?" he asked. Mr. Banerjee also questioned the government's "selective" use of surveillance technology. "If the GoI can conveniently use Pegasus spyware against Opposition leaders (including me), journalists and even judges, what stops it from using the same tools against terrorist networks and suspects?" he asked. Mr. Banerjee raised doubts over the fate of the attackers in Pahalgam and demanded clarity. "Where are the four terrorists responsible for this brutal, religion-based massacre? Are they dead or alive? If they have been neutralised, why has the government failed to make a clear statement? And if they haven't, why is the silence?" the TMC's Diamond Harbour MP wrote on social media. He also brought up the issue of Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK) and questioned the Centre's "silence" on a reported statement by the U.S. President claiming that he persuaded India into a ceasefire with trade promises. "When will India reclaim Pakistan-occupied Jammu & Kashmir (PoJK)? Why hasn't the government officially responded to the U.S. President's claim that he persuaded India into a ceasefire with promises of trade?" Mr. Banerjee asked. "Just as the nation stood together irrespective of their caste, creed, religion and political affinity, celebrating the triumph of righteousness and saluting the valour and sacrifice of our armed forces, why were the emotions of 140 crore Indians disregarded?" he claimed. In his fifth and final question, Mr. Banerjee criticised the government's diplomatic efforts after the Pahalgam incident. "After reaching out to 33 countries post-Pahalgam in the last one month, how many extended explicit support to India?" he asked. Mr. Banerjee questioned why, instead of being censured, Pakistan secured global support. "If we are truly a Vishwaguru and the world's fourth-largest economy, why did the IMF and World Bank approve $1 billion and $40 billion in financial assistance and long-term investments to Pakistan immediately after the Pahalgam attack? How did a nation repeatedly involved in cross-border terrorism not only escape global scrutiny but get rewarded?" the TMC leader asked. He added, "And more shockingly: Why was Pakistan appointed Vice-Chair of the UN Security Council's Counter-Terrorism Committee barely a month later?" Mr. Banerjee concluded the post with a stinging remark on foreign policy expenditure. "Over ₹2000000000000 (two lakh crores) has been spent on external affairs over the past 10 years. The Indian public deserves transparency, accountability and results – not silence and spin! The nation awaits a response," he said.
