Imagen Network (IMAGE) Integrates Grok AI To Elevate Dynamic Community Interactions
Singapore, Singapore--(Newsfile Corp. - August 12, 2025) - Imagen Network (IMAGE), the decentralized social innovation platform, has integrated Grok AI to enhance dynamic community engagement and real-time personalization. This integration empowers users with adaptive content delivery, improved discovery, and more meaningful peer-to-peer connections.
[ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/8833/262139_36a3d49724e77964_001.jpg ]
Delivering innovative AI-powered tools for decentralized online experiences.
To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/8833/262139_36a3d49724e77964_001full.jpg
By embedding Grok's AI capabilities, Imagen Network can intelligently filter, recommend, and adapt social interactions in real time. This upgrade enriches the platform's core goal of creating a more personalized and vibrant decentralized social experience, giving creators and communities tools to thrive without centralized control.
This milestone reflects Imagen Network's continued commitment to combining decentralized architecture with cutting-edge AI, shaping a social ecosystem where engagement is tailored, authentic, and user-driven.
About Imagen Network
Imagen Network is a decentralized social platform focused on creating transparent, user-led communities powered by AI. It offers tools for discovery, content sharing, and monetization, enabling creators and users to connect in a secure and open environment.
Media Contact
Dorothy Marley
KaJ Labs
+1 707-622-6168
[email protected]
Social Media
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/262139
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
a minute ago
- Fast Company
The new freight search engine: How AI ranks and reveals 3PLs
The fight for freight visibility has changed. It no longer happens at trade shows or over email. It now takes place inside AI platforms. More companies use AI tools to find logistics providers. In 2024, 70% of U.S. transportation companies used AI solutions—17% more than the year before. Most buyers are not yet asking, 'Which 3PL should I use?' But they already use AI to compare vendors, review services, and build shortlists. AI visibility now plays a big role in logistics sales, and companies that do not show up in these results may miss good opportunities. In the past, referrals, directories, and trade events helped companies find third-party logistics providers (3PL). That approach is fading, as AI in the freight transportation market is projected to grow from $1.2 billion in 2023 to $6.8 billion by 2033. AI tools now help build strategy. They do more than route planning and demand forecasting; they also help with vendor selection by letting teams compare services quickly. HOW AI TOOLS CHOOSE WHICH 3PLS TO SHOW AI platforms like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI process lots of content. They do not browse websites like people do. They scan documents and pick answers using signals like: Clear service descriptions with logistics terms Content with headings and short paragraphs Mentions in trusted sources like industry publications and government sites Recent updates that show the business is active Pages that load fast and show content without scripts or tabs These tools look for simple, direct answers that match the question. WHERE EACH AI PLATFORM GETS ITS INFORMATION Each AI platform gets information from different places. Profound's analysis of 30 million citations across AI platforms from August 2024 to June 2025 found clear patterns: • ChatGPT uses Wikipedia (47.9% of citations), Reddit (11.3%), and institutional sources. • Google AI Overviews uses Reddit (21%), YouTube (18.8%), Quora (14.3%), LinkedIn (13%), and Wikipedia (5.7%), among others. • Perplexity uses Reddit (46.7% of citations), YouTube (13.9%), user reviews, and community-generated content. WHAT THIS MEANS FOR 3PL MARKETING For ChatGPT visibility: Focus on getting mentioned in industry publications and keep Wikipedia entries accurate. ChatGPT likes trusted sources like FreightWaves and Transport Topics. For Google AI Overviews: Join Reddit communities like r/logistics and r/freight and create YouTube content. These platforms get many citations from Reddit discussions and YouTube videos where real logistics professionals share experiences. For Perplexity: Focus on Reddit engagement and review platforms. Perplexity gets almost half its citations from Reddit discussions. It also features user reviews from platforms like Yelp and G2. To test your visibility: Write 10 buyer prompts like 'Top cold chain 3PL.' Run them in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI. Use three variations per prompt per platform. Count how often your company appears. Review all 90 responses to find patterns. This testing method comes from Daydream's method on AI visibility optimization. It helps you measure where you stand and where to improve. The following content patterns often affect AI visibility. These insights are based on observations from this blog post, which explains how AI tools detect and quote useful content: 1. Low visibility Low visibility often occurs because AI tools do not use traffic as a signal. To improve visibility, use H2 questions and give direct answers at the start. 2. Inconsistent mentions Inconsistent mentions can result from the fact that different platforms have different content preferences. For example, ChatGPT tends to favor authoritative sources like Wikipedia and institutions, while Perplexity prefers user-generated content such as Reddit threads and customer reviews. 3. Content not found When content is not found, it's often because JavaScript or tabs hide key data. To address this, use server-side rendering or clean HTML. AI tools prefer short, answer-focused content. In freight, this means writing paragraph-level answers for questions like 'What is the best 3PL for cross-border shipments?' or 'Which providers offer refrigerated freight with HACCP certification?' These answers must be clear, specific, and formatted to match real buyer queries. Keep each paragraph under 80 words and focused on one clear idea. Begin each paragraph with the direct answer. Use real user questions as your H2 or H3 headings. Dedicate one page or section to a single use case or query. Include specific keywords that buyers actually type, such as 'cross-border 3PL.' Before: 'We're proud of our reliable cold chain service.' Better: 'We provide cold chain logistics with storage from 32°F to 70°F. Our HACCP-certified warehouses include real-time monitoring and direct delivery.' Also, add FAQ sections, use FAQ schema, and avoid hiding content in tabs, modals, or downloads. AI tools select FAQ pages, comparison lists, how-to guides, and pages that solve one clear problem. If your content follows this structure, it has a better chance of being selected. AI tools now play a major role in 3PL selection, as buyers use them to search for vendors that match their exact needs. Clear, structured, and specific content makes it easier for those tools to find and cite your business. Having more pages does not lead to better visibility. What matters is providing the right content in the right format. You also need to know where each AI platform gets its information. A freight company that writes for people and machines creates value for both. AI may not replace relationships, but it is already shaping how they begin. The companies that stay readable, helpful, and honest can earn the trust of both humans and machines.
Forbes
3 minutes ago
- Forbes
The AI Reality Check: Keeping Your Job As Automation Ramps Up
Erik Jost, VP Modern Workplace, Black Box Corporation. We've all seen the headlines. AI is supposedly set to replace 20%, 50%, maybe even 80% of today's jobs. The predictions keep coming, and they all point in the same direction. Automation is happening now, which has led many to ask, 'Will my job be replaced?' But the question I've been asking is, 'What kind of jobs are going to stay?' Connection As A Competitive Edge I keep having that 'who will stay' conversation at home. My wife is a global luxury real estate advisor, and her work is built on relationships and trust. She always says: 'Luxury isn't what you pay. It's the service you get.' She's right. The difference between a high-end experience and a commodity transaction isn't the commission; it's the connection. And that's going to define not just premium services, but the entire workforce moving forward. Take ride-sharing as a key example. Autonomous cars from Waymo and Tesla are working toward ensuring safer and cheaper alternatives to human drivers. But some people want more than transportation. They appreciate the human interaction, whether that takes the form of a bottle of water, a well-timed joke or the sense that someone actually cares about their experience. Even in an industry like real estate, while AI is changing the game, what makes workers irreplaceable is the way they work with people. This means doing more than just selling homes to help people build wealth and find places to live meaningful lives. It's having the foresight to keep clients' kids busy with coloring books and snacks when they bring their children to showings. That kind of connection can't be scripted or scaled. While AI undoubtedly will displace jobs, it can't replace the human element that makes people uniquely valuable. For Leaders: Automate, Then Invest In People Automation is viewed as the baseline for staying competitive today. While many organizations are working to automate everything they can, efficiency is just the starting point. The next step is rethinking what your team needs to look like in this new landscape. Here's where it gets interesting, as I believe the roles that remain won't be traditional. They won't fit into clean org charts. They'll be filled by people you already think of as your 'superstars,' the ones who stretch beyond their job description and deliver in front of customers and executives. They're the ones who are empathetic, socially aware and adaptable. These people aren't valuable because of a title or a certification. They're valuable because they bring a mix of curiosity, execution and emotional intelligence that no AI can match. They adapt quickly. They see change coming before it hits. They know how to talk to people. If you're leading a company, your work is to identify those people. Invest in them. Build your next chapter around them. These top performers will help to make your business future-proof. For Everyone Else: Lean Into Your Human-ness Thanks to AI, a small company can now do what used to take a large one. For that matter, a one-person startup with a smart AI stack can scale like never before. If you're just trying to stay relevant in an economy that feels like it's moving at light speed, what do you do? First, it's important not to pretend like AI and today's innovations can be beaten at their own games. They can't be out-memorized, out-produced or out-coded. However, you can work toward ensuring you're irreplaceable in the ways that matter most. That means developing the traits AI can't touch. Today, I see three traits that will define the people who survive and thrive in this new environment. First, they'll be deeply curious and actively engaged in learning and understanding how the world is changing. Second, they'll be capable of translating that curiosity into action, turning ideas into reality and consistently delivering results. Finally, they'll lean into their human strengths: the ability to communicate with empathy, navigate tough conversations and go above and beyond when the moment calls for it. These skills are what can separate those who have built high-value human connection from purely transactional workers. Across industries, that combination of curiosity, execution and human connection is already defining the next generation of successful professionals. Where Is This All Going? Nobody knows for sure what the future workforce might like. Today, it's BMW's factory robots placing screws with millimeter-level precision. Tomorrow, a household robot might be mowing your lawn, folding your laundry and troubleshooting your home's electrical systems. And the day after that? Maybe doing your taxes, running your business or driving your kids to school. Some days it feels like we're headed for a utopia where machines give us back our time to enjoy Michelin-quality dinners, clean homes and neatly tended gardens, and space to focus on meaningful work and relationships. Other days, it feels like we're racing toward a dystopia where half the world is unemployed and the other half is trying to keep up. There's no guaranteed path forward, but what I do know is that if you want to stay in the game, you need to bring what the robots can't. Show up. Stretch yourself. Connect. Learn. These very human skills will keep you relevant when the machines are doing everything else. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
The Verge
3 minutes ago
- The Verge
GPT-5 failed the hype test
Last week, on GPT-5 launch day, AI hype was at an all-time high. In a press briefing beforehand, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said GPT-5 is 'something that I just don't wanna ever have to go back from,' a milestone akin to the first iPhone with a Retina display. The night before the announcement livestream, Altman posted an image of the Death Star, building even more hype. On X, one user wrote that the anticipation 'feels like christmas eve.' All eyes were on the ChatGPT-maker as people across industries waited to see if the publicity would deliver or disappoint. And by most accounts, the big reveal would fall short. The hype for OpenAI's long-time-coming new model had been building for years — ever since the 2023 release of GPT-4. In a Reddit AMA with Altman and staff last October, users continuously asked about the release date of GPT-5, looking for details on its features and what would set it apart. One Redditor asked, 'Why is GPT-5 taking so long?' Altman responded that compute was a limitation, and that 'all of these models have gotten quite complex and we can't ship as many things in parallel as we'd like to.' But when GPT-5 appeared in ChatGPT, users were largely unimpressed. The sizable advancements they had been expecting seemed mostly incremental, and the model's key gains were in areas like cost and speed. In the long run, however, that might be a solid financial bet for OpenAI — albeit a less flashy one. People expected the world of GPT-5. (One X user posted that after Altman's Death Star post, 'everyone shifted expectations.') And OpenAI didn't downplay those projections, calling GPT-5 its 'best AI system yet' and a 'significant leap in intelligence' with 'state-of-the-art performance across coding, math, writing, health, visual perception, and more.' Altman said in a press briefing that chatting with the model 'feels like talking to a PhD-level expert.' That hype made for a stark contrast with reality. Would a model with PhD-level intelligence, for example, repeatedly insist there were three 'b's' in the word blueberry, as some social media users found? And would it not be able to identify how many state names included the letter 'R'? Would it incorrectly label a U.S. map with made-up states including 'New Jefst,' 'Micann,' 'New Nakamia,' 'Krizona,' and 'Miroinia,' and label Nevada as an extension of California? People who used the bot for emotional support found the new system austere and distant, protesting so loudly that OpenAI brought support for an older model back. Memes abounded — one depicting GPT-4 and GPT-4o as formidable dragons with GPT-5 beside them as a simpleton. The court of expert public opinion was not forgiving, either. Gary Marcus, a leading AI industry voice and emeritus professor of psychology at New York University, called the model 'overdue, overhyped and underwhelming.' Peter Wildeford, co-founder of the Institute for AI Policy and Strategy, wrote in his review, 'Is this the massive smash we were looking for? Unfortunately, no.' Zvi Mowshowitz, a popular AI industry blogger, called it 'a good, but not great, model.' One Redditor on the official GPT-5 Reddit AMA wrote, 'Someone tell Sam 5 is hot garbage.' In the days following GPT-5's release, the onslaught of unimpressed reviews has tempered a bit. The general consensus is that although GPT-5 wasn't as significant of an advancement as people expected, it offered upgrades in cost and speed, plus fewer hallucinations, and the switch system it offered — automatically directing your query on the backend to the model that made the most sense to answer it, so you don't have to decide — was all-new. Altman leaned into that narrative, writing, 'GPT-5 is the smartest model we've ever done, but the main thing we pushed for is real-world utility and mass accessibility/affordability.' OpenAI researcher Christina Kim posted on X that with GPT-5, 'the real story is usefulness. It helps with what people care about-- shipping code, creative writing, and navigating health info-- with more steadiness and less friction. We also cut hallucinations. It's better calibrated, says 'I don't know,' separates facts from guesses, and can ground answers with citations when you want.' There's a widespread understanding that, to put it bluntly, GPT-5 has made ChatGPT less eloquent. Viral social media posts complained that the new model lacked nuance and depth in its writing, coming off as robotic and cold. Even in GPT-5's own marketing materials, OpenAI's side-by-side comparison of GPT-4o and GPT-5-generated wedding toasts doesn't seem like an unmitigated win for the new model — I personally preferred the one from 4o. When Altman asked Redditors if they thought GPT-5 was better at writing, he was met with an onslaught of comments defending the retired GPT-4o model instead; within a day, he'd acquiesced to pressure and at least temporarily returned it to ChatGPT. But there's one front where the model appears to shine brighter: coding. One iteration of GPT-5 currently tops the most popular AI model leaderboard in the coding category, with Anthropic's Claude coming in second. OpenAI's launch promotion showed off AI-generated games (a rolling ball mini-game and a typing speed race), a pixel art tool, a drum simulator, and a lofi visualizer. When I tried to vibe-code a puzzle game with the tool, it had a bunch of glitches, but I did find success with simpler projects like an interactive embroidery lesson. That's a big win for OpenAI, since it's been going head-to-head in the AI coding wars with competitors like Anthropic, Google, and others for a long while now. Businesses are willing to spend a lot on AI coding, and that's one of the most realistic revenue generators for cash-burning AI startups. OpenAI also highlighted GPT-5's prowess in healthcare, but that remains mostly untested in practice — we likely won't know how successful it is for a while. AI benchmarks have come to mean less and less in recent years, since they change often and some companies cherry-pick which results they reveal. But overall, they may give us a reasonable picture of GPT-5. The model performed better than its predecessors on many industry tests, but that improvement wasn't anything to write home about, according to many industry folks. As Wildeford put it, 'When it comes to formal evaluations, it seems like GPT-5 was largely what would be expected — small, incremental increases rather than anything worthy of a vague Death Star meme.' But if recent history has anything to say about it, those small, incremental increases could be more likely to translate into concrete profit than wowing individual consumers. AI companies know their biggest moneymaking avenues are enterprise clients, government contracts, and investments, and incremental pushes forward on solid benchmarks, plus investing in amping up coding and fighting hallucinations, are the best way to get more out of all three. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Hayden Field Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All OpenAI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Report
