
BBC Scotland resorts again to simplistic straw-man defence
During a phone-in on BBC Radio Scotland's Mornings Show discussing BBC impartiality, hosted by Connie McLaughlin, Murphy noted quite accurately that the half of the Scottish population who support independence have no trust in the broadcaster because it is 'so absolutely pro-Unionist'.
Until Murphy's intervention the programme had largely consisted of McLaughlin, former BBC political editor Brian Taylor, and former BBC Radio 4 presenter Roger Bolton mutually patting one another on the back about how wonderfully impartial the BBC is and what a great job it does.
When Murphy was brought in to have his 'final word', he said: 'We've gone on for 40-plus minutes and all I've heard so far is pro-BBC propaganda from the BBC.'
After calling out McLaughlin for constantly interrupting him when she'd allowed her BBC colleagues to speak without interruption, Murphy was finally allowed to say: "The BBC is biased in favour of big business, it is biased in favour of the right wing media because it uses that as its news sources in the main for discussion, it is biased against the nationalist cause in Scotland, it is biased against the Palestinian cause in its claim and its right to have a state, it is biased in favour of Israel very clearly."
The BBC likes to delegitimise those who call it out for its obvious bias, particularly on the issue of Scottish independence, by characterising its critics as conspiracy theorists, and indeed this was in essence the defence attempted on the programme by Brian Taylor, who claimed that he was 'never at any point asked within the BBC by managers to tailor a report to fit an agenda dictated by the BBC' adding that he had witnessed 'endless complaints' about BBC Scotland coverage.
Taylor's response represented a simplistic and self-serving mischaracterisation of how bias operates. No one is alleging that BBC managers issue instructions to journalists and reporters to alter their reports in particular ways. That's not how institutional bias works.
Institutional bias arises from a culture within an institution which creates and fosters perceptions that a particular institutional policy is fair, deserved, or justifiable in some manner. In the case of the BBC that policy is the belief that Scotland being a part of the UK is a natural and politically neutral state of affairs which does not require to be defended or justified. The BBC is a quintessentially British organisation and as such is incapable of viewing Scottish independence as anything other than a threat to the proper and natural order of things.
This institutional culture permits those BBC employees who possess personal beliefs against Scottish independence permission to allow these beliefs to colour their reporting, safe in the knowledge that pro-UK bias will go unchallenged or will be tacitly supported by senior management, while those who have personal views in support of independence will self-censor.
This is compounded by the BBC's unshakeable belief in its own impartiality, which inhibits staff from speaking out against bias from within the organisation, which allows bias to continue uncorrected and to become compounded over time.
Institutional bias also shows itself in the choice and framing of news stories. The BBC has a symbiotic relationship with the print media, which in the UK is largely right wing, and which in Scotland is both largely right wing and overwhelmingly anti-independence. In both these aspects the print media is wildly out of kilter with the views of the Scottish population as a whole, yet the BBC's own pro-British and establishment institutional bias prevents it from recognising that it allows print media bias to determine the BBC's own news agenda and presentation.
Evidence of BBC bias, particularly when it comes to the coverage of the Scottish constitutional issue, is overwhelming, but the BBC Scotland's institutional bias prevents the Corporation from recognising it as such. Recognising it would entail making a radical change to the entire structure, organisation and ethos of the BBC. Instead, it resorts to the simplistic and comfortable kind of straw man defence which was witnessed from Brian Taylor on this morning's BBC Scotland programme which implies that there is some sort of conspiracy being alleged. This protects the BBC from having to examine the more fundamental and systemic issues which are responsible for the bias which is so plain to see but which the BBC cannot admit to.
Ian Murray visits Faslane nuclear base
Ian Murray, the Governor General of North Britain, and a man whose views are remarkably plastic, changing over time to suit the requirements of his political masters, today visited the Faslane nuclear submarine base on the Clyde, to announce a £250 million investment in the ageing and polluting site. The cash will be spent over the next three years to improve infrastructure at the site, ensuring that the base can house the next generation of nuclear submarines. Murray was previously opposed to nuclear weapons, he's now an enthusiastic cheerleader for the UK's weapons of mass destruction.
The £250m won't be spent on cleaning up the radioactive waste which the MoD has released into the Firth of Clyde. In 2009, The Guardian reported that there were repeated leaks of radioactive waste from broken pipes and storage tanks at the site into the waters of the Holy Loch. The leaks were so serious that that the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (Sepa) warned that it would consider closing the base down if it had the legal powers to do so.
There is no reason to believe that the MoD has cleaned up its act in the intervening sixteen years. Indeed, in 2020 it was reported that the MoD was planning to increase discharges of radioactive waste into the Firth of Clyde by up to 50 times. That's something else that BBC Scotland didn't give a lot of publicity to.
[[BBC Scotland]] is quite content to push the UK Government line that its nuclear base on the Clyde is nothing more than an extremely generous job creation scheme for the greater Helensburgh area.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
13 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Donald Trump isn't a lame duck yet, but US politicians are looking out for signs of a limp
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... This is the week that the Don returns to Scotland. Much like the circus coming to town, we can expect a spectacle that generates a lot of noise and, no doubt, some fury. We know how Trump's last visit here was received. Should we expect more of the same as Lewis's most notable grandson steps off Airforce One? In large measure, probably yes. Performative politics is never far from the surface in modern Scotland so brace yourself for protestors wrapped in saltires proclaiming Scottish exceptionalism. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Or maybe not. Our First Minister has apparently decided to take a more mature approach and to meet the president. Well done him. Six months on from his inauguration as US president, it is already apparent that Trump Two will be a different administration from Tump One. Gone are the days of chaos when those around the President sought to manage upwards and to head him off at the pass. This time the Whitehouse is stuffed with people who seek to deliver on his pronouncements rather than to mitigate them. Donald Trump is the only show in town until the US mid-term elections (Picture: Win McNamee) | Getty Images Praise for UK in Washington DC If that is the understanding that has informed our First Minister in meeting the president, then it is to be welcomed. Talking to senators, diplomats and lobbyists for much of this week in Washington DC has been a revelation. Firstly, though it pains me to say it, there is widespread praise here for the UK and how it has played its hand since Trump's return. Anyone holding shares in Peter Mandelson before he arrived in DC could sell today and expect a healthy return on their investment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So, for now, we are sitting pretty as others work hard to catch up. Accepting the realpolitik of today, however, is not the same as signing up for the whole Trump agenda. The revelation of a few days spent in DC is that there is a lot more politics to play out here than you would know from watching any news channel in the UK. Don't expect any early bravery from either the Democrats or what we used to think of as the mainstream Republicans. They, like everyone else here, are too busy waiting to see what the midterms bring next year. Until then, Trump is the only show in town. Vance to inherit Maga support? Let us not forget that Trump Two is a one-term phenomenon. He may not yet be a lame duck but everyone in DC is watching closely for the first signs of a limp. What comes next? Can JD Vance hold together the Maga crowd? If not Vance, then who? And what of the still-traumatised Democrats? Can they emerge from under the stairs and put up a fight? The most optimistic analysis that I heard on Capitol Hill this week has been 'this too will pass'. It may be true but no one should depend on it. The circus is coming to town. Where it goes from here is anyone's guess but the answer will affect us all.


BBC News
14 minutes ago
- BBC News
'The hardest time I have lived through': BBC's Gaza freelance journalists on struggle to feed families
Three trusted freelance Palestinian journalists whom the BBC relies on for its Gaza coverage have shared how they are now struggling to feed their families and often go two days or more without of the men have kept their cameras running, sending us vital footage, even on days when their close relatives have been killed, they have lost their homes, or have been fleeing from Israeli military advances with their was previously badly wounded by shrapnel from an Israeli bombing while on assignment. But he says the current time is "the hardest time I have lived through since I was born. It's a huge crisis of suffering and deprivation."Global food security experts have not yet classified the situation in Gaza as a famine, but UN agencies have warned of man-made, mass starvation taking have blamed Israel, which controls all supplies entering the Palestinian territory, but it has denied responsibility. We have agreed not to identify our colleagues by name out of consideration for their tell us that not being able to provide for the youngest and most vulnerable of their loved ones is most difficult of all."My son who has autism is unaware of what is going on around him. He doesn't know that we are in a war and he doesn't speak," says one of our cameramen in Gaza City, who is a father-of-four."In recent days, he's so hungry that he's started hitting his stomach with his hand to signal to us that he wants food."Our youngest colleague, who is in southern Gaza, is the main breadwinner for his parents and siblings."I am constantly wondering how to get food for my family," he tells us. "My little sister, who's 13, keeps on asking for food and water and we can't get any for her. Any water we find will be contaminated." The BBC has released a joint statement with other media organisations saying it is "desperately concerned" about the wellbeing of local freelance journalists that it works with in Gaza."For many months, these independent journalists have been the world's eyes and ears on the ground in Gaza. They are now facing the same dire circumstances as those they are covering," says the statement by the BBC and AFP, AP and Reuters news current conditions make telling the story of what is happening even more challenging. "I feel tired and exhausted all the time, to the point of dizziness and falling to the ground," says a veteran journalist who now works with us in Gaza City and is looking after his mother, sisters and five children aged two to says he has lost 30kg (4st 7lbs) in 21 months of war."I used to complete most news reports with great speed, but now I am slow in finishing them due to my poor health and psychological state," he tells us. "Delirium and fatigue accompanies me.""I can't describe the feeling," says our southern Gaza cameraman. "My stomach twists in knots, and I have a headache, add to that being emaciated and weak. I used to work from 07:00 until 22:00 but now I can barely do one story. I just feel dizzy."Recently, he collapsed during filming but later resumed his work. While food shortages have been a constant issue during the war, previously those receiving salaries from outside could still buy basic supplies albeit at exorbitant prices on local markets. Now even those markets are largely empty."I've reached the point of taking food from the charity kitchen. In recent days, this has meant my kids have been eating one meal a day - just limited foodstuffs like lentils, rice and pasta," says the Gaza City journalist with four small of the men say they have taken to drinking water with a little salt to try to suppress their hunger. One says he can sometimes buy a 50g biscuit for his daily meal but this costs 30 shekels ($9; £6.60).Getting hold of money is an ordeal in itself. It now involves using money merchants."If I need cash, it's mostly not available, but when it is, it's accompanied by a withdrawal fee of 45%," explains one Gaza City cameraman. "That means that if I go to withdraw $1,000, I will get only $550. The whole process is exhausting and any vendors nowadays demand cash.""The difficulty is because of the closure of the banks. These money transfers are another form of suffering after our hunger," our colleague in southern Gaza adds. In the past, Israeli-accredited BBC journalists like myself were able to travel regularly to Gaza to report, even during since the start of the war on 7 October 2023, Israel along with Egypt - when its Rafah crossing was still open - has prevented foreign journalists from accessing the territory except on limited embeds with the Israeli army."We once again urge the Israeli authorities to allow journalists in and out of Gaza," the BBC and other news organisations said in their week, 28 countries including the UK released a joint statement saying: "The war in Gaza must end now." They called for Israel to comply with its obligations under international law and stop the "drip feeding" of Wednesday, more than 100 aid agencies and rights groups stated that "with supplies now totally depleted, humanitarian organisations are witnessing their own colleagues and partners waste away before their eyes."The news organisations noted that: "Journalists endure many deprivations and hardships in warzones. We are deeply alarmed that the threat of starvation is now one of them."They added: "It is essential that adequate food supplies reach the people [in Gaza]."For now, our own colleagues are battling to get through each day, balancing their responsibilities to their families with their desire to tell the world about the extraordinary difficulties their people are living through."It's currently catastrophic. Hunger has reached every home," one told us. "This is like a suspended death sentence."


Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Israel-Hamas negotiations collapse
Talks to end the war in Gaza have collapsed, bringing to an end the longest round of negotiations since the war started in October 2023. On Thursday afternoon, Benjamin Netanyahu's office said it had decided to withdraw its team from Qatar after studying Hamas's latest response to its proposals. The fresh negotiations were instigated in part due to significant pressure from Donald Trump, the US president, to reach a deal, following the perceived success of the Iran offensive in June. In recent days, leaks have suggested that the two sides were at loggerheads over the extent to which the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) would withdraw from Gaza once a ceasefire began, and also how aid would be distributed. It comes as the humanitarian situation in Gaza is deteriorating, with aid agencies warning of starvation and people 'collapsing' in the street. Both sides are facing huge pressure at home and abroad to reach a deal. Sources said Hamas still wants guarantees – despite guarantees from the White House – that Israel would not start fighting again after a 60-day initial ceasefire elapsed. The breakdown comes ahead of a huge protest in Tel Aviv calling on the Israeli government to end the war and secure the release of the remaining hostages. Around 20 are believed to be alive. An official in Mr Netanyahu's office said: 'In light of the response that Hamas gave this morning, it has been decided to return the negotiating team to continue consultations in Israel. We appreciate the efforts of the mediators Qatar and Egypt and the efforts of envoy Witkoff to bring about a breakthrough in the talks.' Another senior official said: 'Negotiations will continue, but there are serious differences and we face difficult decisions.' The statement came as Steve Witkoff, Mr Trump's Middle East envoy, held talks with Ron Dermer, Mr Netanyahu's right-hand man, and the Qatari prime minister in Sardinia. It prompted hope in Israel that a way forward could still be found, despite the lack of progress in Doha. Mr Trump is known to be impatient for the war to end. One Israeli source told Kan, the Israeli public broadcaster, that the momentum of negotiations remained 'positive' and that the withdrawal of the negotiators did not signify a total collapse of dialogue. However, another source said the talks were at an impasse. Axios reported sources as saying that Hamas was insisting on the release of 2,000 Palestinian prisoners, including 200 serving life sentences, in return for the hostages. Earlier in the week, it had been reported that the sides had agreed on a lower number. Israeli sources said officials had told Mr Witkoff that Hamas's demands were 'unacceptable', but that they are not necessarily final. Dependent in his coalition on ultra-nationalist ministers who want to take over Gaza with Jewish settlements, Mr Netanyahu has been accused of continuing the war despite reported warnings from his generals that the military rationale is wearing thin.