logo
Could TSA be privatized? What it could mean for travelers.

Could TSA be privatized? What it could mean for travelers.

"I think ... the North Star for us at TSA is making sure that we are driving the highest level of security, the best passenger experience in the most efficient way possible," McNeill told lawmakers during the May 20 hearing. "And so if new privatization schemes make sense, then we're happy to have that discussion to see what we can come up with."
She added that some airports could choose to privatize while others don't. "It's not an all-or-nothing game," she said.
What would it mean if the TSA privatized?
The possibility of privatizing TSA has been a divisive idea. The public agency was "created specifically in response to the failures of the private airport screening model to stop" the terrorist attacks on 9/11, said Scott Keyes, founder of Going.
"Proponents of privatizing TSA argue that doing so would save money (especially in smaller airports), allow for more accountability of errant workers, and bring the U.S. in line with many other countries that have privatized some or all of their airport screeners," he told USA TODAY in an email.
McNeill noted that privatization "has always been a part of the TSA construct since its inception under the Screening Partnership Program," which contracts with private companies for security screening at commercial airports. According to the TSA's website, 21 airports participate in the SPP.
While Keyes said there has not yet been a "serious push" to privatize the agency, other types of privatization in aviation aren't totally unheard-of. In many countries, including Canada, air traffic control is fully privatized. Even in the U.S., some smaller air traffic control facilities are contracted out to private operators that partner with the Federal Aviation Administration.
There have long been calls to fully privatize the FAA's air traffic control organization, though none of those proposals have been adopted.
What are the risks of privatizing TSA?
Keyes said opponents of the idea "point to safety and workers' rights."
The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), which represents around 47,000 TSA Transportation Security Officers, has said that privatizing screening could compromise security and result in high employee turnover, as was commonly seen prior to 9/11.
Keyes also noted that the cost savings would be partly achieved by paying private screeners lower wages than TSA officers make now.
TSA did not immediately share a comment on the concerns prior to publishing.
Escobar also pushed back on the idea during the hearing, which she noted was mentioned in Project 2025. President Donald Trump distanced himself from the conservative policy blueprint while campaigning, but many of his moves have closely aligned with it since taking office.
"I definitely would call (privatization) a 'scheme' as well," she told McNeill. "I hope that privatization is not a part of the administration's efforts."
The Department of Homeland Security announced it was ending collective bargaining for TSOs in March, arguing the move would "enhance productivity and resiliency" and make the workforce more agile, among other benefits. AFGE sued the Trump administration following the decision.
"This attack on our members is not just an attack on AFGE or transportation security officers. It's an assault on the rights of every American worker," AFGE President Everett Kelley said in a news release at the time. "Tearing up a legally negotiated union contract is unconstitutional, retaliatory, and will make the TSA experience worse for American travelers."
McNeill said during the hearing that the committee, Congress and stakeholders have a say as officials "look to modernize TSA."
Keyes believes "it's still quite unlikely we'll see the Trump Administration privatize the TSA, given the extreme political risk if another terrorist attack were to occur."
"But given what we've seen from DOGE and the White House this year," he continued, "it's fair to say that the chances of privatization have never been higher."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Constance defends Police Scotland sex and gender policy
Constance defends Police Scotland sex and gender policy

The Herald Scotland

time5 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Constance defends Police Scotland sex and gender policy

Last weekend, in The Herald on Sunday, a senior Police Scotland source accused the force of creating a 'culture of fear', where staff felt unable to raise concerns about how to record the sex of transgender suspects. READ MORE: The whistleblower claimed that officers were being instructed to search and record individuals 'as they present', even though no formal policy to that effect appeared to exist. She warned this could result in rapes committed by men being recorded as having been carried out by women — a scenario she described as 'unbelievable' and deeply traumatic for victims. On Tuesday, Scottish Labour MSP Pauline McNeill raised The Herald on Sunday's report in Holyrood, saying there was 'clear confusion' in the force due to the lack of official guidance. 'Many staff say they have to record someone — and indeed search them — based on how they present, even if that is the moment of arrest,' she said. 'It appears there is no official guidance, so staff are left to navigate sensitive and legally significant decisions without it.' She asked the Cabinet Secretary whether she was not 'concerned about the apparent lack of clarity being experienced by officers on the front line about how to record the sex and gender of suspected serious sexual offenders.' Ms Constance said: 'I do believe that there currently is clarity.' She also pointed to the comment given to The Herald on Sunday by the force, which said the whistleblower's account was 'inaccurate and misleading.' Ms McNeill said the force had offered contradictory explanations. While Chief Constable Jo Farrell told the Scottish Police Authority in September last year there was a clear approach, she said in a letter to her and in press reports, they had 'indicated since then that there is no set policy on how to record sex and gender of individuals.' The force is reviewing how it records sex and gender, and the Justice Secretary said this would take full account of the UK Supreme Court's landmark ruling on the definition of 'sex' in the Equality Act — which confirmed it means biological sex. Ms McNeill urged the Cabinet Secretary to engage directly with the force: 'Surely she must have a discussion now with Police Scotland about how they are recording sex when it comes to sexual crime, and that there is clarity for police officers on the front line?' Ms Constance replied that the Chief Constable had already given clear public assurances, and that Police Scotland would also consider forthcoming guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), which is currently under review. Tess White, the Conservative MSP for North East Scotland, accused Police Scotland of 'kicking the can down the road.' 'The force provided assurances to the Scottish Police Authority that the timeline for review does not preclude any immediate improvements identified and required to internal practice or policy, and that is in stark contrast with the meeting the Cabinet Secretary herself held with the Chief Constable on 30 April in which she emphasised that Police Scotland must await EHRC guidance on the Supreme Court ruling. 'Will her government now get off the fence and finally issue an urgent directive to public bodies to comply with the law and put an end to this mess?' Ms Constance said ministers were already taking action by working to ensure public services would be in a 'state of readiness' to respond to the EHRC guidance when it is finalised. READ MORE Speaking after the debate, Ms McNeill said she found the minister's answer 'disappointing.' 'The Government is responsible for this confusion — it is too important for them to leave to another review. If they support my view on data that the sex of the offender should be recorded then they should act to clear up the confusion.' Fraser Hudghton, from the Free Speech Union, said: 'The Justice Secretary's response in Parliament does not cut it. She is either being misinformed by the leadership at Police Scotland who have lost all control, or she is playing fast and loose with the facts. 'We know from serving officers and staff that police leadership are in thrall to 'woke' policies that originated from the SNP Government, regardless of what that means for data collection or the effective prosecution of criminals. It has to stop.' A spokesperson for Police Scotland previously told The Herald on Sunday: 'It is inaccurate and misleading to suggest a male accused of rape would be recorded as a woman. It is inaccurate and misleading to suggest female officers and members of staff are coerced into carrying out intimate searches on male prisoners.'

Australian reporter Lauren Tomasi shot with nonlethal bullet in LA
Australian reporter Lauren Tomasi shot with nonlethal bullet in LA

The Herald Scotland

time17 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Australian reporter Lauren Tomasi shot with nonlethal bullet in LA

9News reported that Tomasi is sore but otherwise unharmed from the incident. Only about an hour before, Tomasi had been caught in a group of protesters while covering the raids. Exploding flashbang grenades can be heard as Tomasi conducts a live shot before protesters begin yelling at her and grabbing the camera she is talking into. Live updates: Gov. Newsom challenges Trump on National Guard deployment What is happening in Los Angeles? Thousands of people began to gather in Los Angeles on Friday, June 6 to protest President Donald Trump's immigration enforcement operations. Small protests throughout the city have mounted to large demonstrations and some destructive clashes between officers and protesters. Local police and hundreds of National Guard troops were deployed to the city over the weekend. Authorities declared several of demonstrations on Sunday as "unlawful assemblies" and began firing flash bang and tear gas grenades into large groups of protesters. California's 101 Freeway has been blocked by protesters and several vehicles have been set on fire during the protests. Trump and California Gov. Gavin Newsom have continued to spar on the raids, especially after the president sent National Guard troops to the city. "Let's get this straight: 1) Local law enforcement didn't need help. 2) Trump sent troops anyway - to manufacture chaos and violence. 3) Trump succeeded," Newsom said in a X post. "4) Now things are destabilized and we need to send in more law enforcement just to clean up Trump's mess." On the other hand, Trump said in a Truth Social post on June 8 that Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass should "apologize to the people of Los Angeles for the absolutely horrible job that they have done, and this now includes the ongoing L.A. riots. These are not protesters, they are troublemakers and insurrectionists." Contributing: John Bacon, Trevor Hughes, USA TODAY Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@

Trump stumbles on plane steps walking to Air Force One; Rubio too
Trump stumbles on plane steps walking to Air Force One; Rubio too

The Herald Scotland

time17 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Trump stumbles on plane steps walking to Air Force One; Rubio too

The clip has been widely shared on social media, racking up millions of views. Air Force One: How Air Force One stacks up to the Qatari 747, Trump's coveted 'palace in the sky' Trump is tied with former President Joe Biden for the oldest president to be sworn into office. Republicans have repeatedly hammered Biden's age and pointed to a video of Biden tripping up the stairs as they argued he was unfit for office. Trump's campaign used video of Biden stumbling repeatedly On March 19, 2021, Biden fell while climbing the steps of Air Force One, which his press secretary at the time blamed on the wind, according to ABC News. But Trump and his allies used that clip repeatedly in campaign ads like "Jugular," "Who Is Laughing Now," and "Not A Young Guy," painting him as unfit to serve another four years in the Oval Office. Biden dropped out of the 2024 presidential election after a disastrous debate against Trump as he struggled to answer questions coherently, raising insurmountable questions about his mental acuity. Biden's recent advanced-cancer diagnosis has amped up questions and accusations about his age and fitness in office. Multiple accounts have detailed White House efforts to conceal Biden's aging decline since he left office. Trump recently ordered a Department of Justice investigation into Biden's supposed "cognitive decline," alleging his administration misused the autopen to sign orders, which Biden called "false" and a "distraction." How old is President Donald Trump? Trump is 78. He will be 79 on June 14, 2025. How old is former President Joe Biden? Biden is 82 years old. He is the oldest president to hold office. By the end of his term, Trump will be 82 and tie Biden for the record. Contributing: Bart Jansen, USA TODAY Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store