Builder.ai-VerSe fake sales: All you need to know about the 'round-tripping' scandal
VerSe Innovation
, the parent company of Dailyhunt, for several years to falsely boost its reported sales, according to a Bloomberg report.
What happened
Between 2021 and 2024, Builder. ai and VerSe Innovation reportedly exchanged invoices for similar amounts in a scheme known as
'round-tripping'
, according to sources familiar with the matter. This practice involves moving money between companies without any real exchange of goods or services — purely to inflate revenue figures for investors.
The Bloomberg report claims many of these transactions were for services that were never actually delivered by either company.
VerSe responds
Live Events
Umang Bedi, cofounder of VerSe Innovation, dismissed the allegations, saying: 'It was absolutely baseless and false' to suggest that VerSe recorded expenses or billed for services it didn't receive or provide.
Discover the stories of your interest
Blockchain
5 Stories
Cyber-safety
7 Stories
Fintech
9 Stories
E-comm
9 Stories
ML
8 Stories
Edtech
6 Stories
'We're not the kind of company that is in the business of inflating revenues,' Bedi said in an interview.
The
Deloitte audit
Last month, ET reported that Deloitte, the auditor for VerSe,
flagged serious internal control issues
in the company's financial operations for the year ended March 31, 2024. The audit firm said these 'material weaknesses' could lead to errors in reporting expenses, trade payables and other accounts.
Specifically, Deloitte pointed to gaps in how VerSe selects and evaluates suppliers, approves invoices and payments, and tracks its expenses. The firm also noted an 'unsubstantiated claim' of Rs 35 crore from a supplier, which VerSe hasn't recognised as a payable.
Despite these concerns, Deloitte clarified that its opinion on VerSe's consolidated financials remained unchanged.
In response, VerSe said it was working to tighten its internal processes. The company said that it is conducting a detailed workshop on the 'best practices and checklists' and aims to build a complete, well-documented system covering everything from supplier selection to payment approvals.
Builder. ai files for bankruptcy
Earlier this month, Builder. ai
confirmed plans to file for bankruptcy
after one of its key lenders, Viola Credit, seized $37 million from its accounts. This left the company with just $5 million in its reserves, according to CEO Manpreet Ratia.
Reports by Bloomberg revealed that Builder. ai had overstated its 2024 projected sales to creditors by 300%. This led to increased scrutiny and the freezing of its funds. As a result, US prosecutors have issued a subpoena demanding detailed financial records and customer information from the company.
Job cuts at both companies
On 17 May, VerSe Innovation announced it was
laying off 350 employees
as part of its push to focus more on AI and reduce costs. This follows a previous round of layoffs, when 150 employees were let go in 2021.
Meanwhile, as reported earlier, Builder. ai is also being forced to let go of most of its workforce due to a lack of available cash. According to Ratia, although the company still has $5 million in Indian bank accounts, restrictions on overseas remittances prevent it from paying its international employees.
Founded in 2016, Builder. ai offered a platform to help businesses quickly build custom apps with little or no coding, positioning itself as a faster and simpler alternative to traditional app development.
The startup attracted major investment, including $250 million in 2022 from QIA, a leading sovereign wealth fund. In 2023, Microsoft also became a strategic partner, investing in Builder. ai as part of a broader collaboration.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
26 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Sebi floats consultation paper on prudential norms for derivatives on non-benchmark indices
Sebi issued a consultation paper on implementing new eligibility norms for derivatives on non-benchmark indices, proposing constituent limits and weight caps. Exchanges BSE and NSE favor adjusting existing indices with phased transitions to ensure smooth compliance. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Markets regulator Sebi on Monday issued a consultation paper on how to implement new eligibility norms for derivatives on non-benchmark indices . The paper follows a May 29 circular that mandated stricter prudential rules to ensure such indices remain broad-based and not overly per the circular, non-benchmark indices with derivatives must have at least 14 constituents, with the top constituent's weight capped at 20% and the combined weight of the top three limited to 45%. Weights must also follow a descending order across exchanges have been evaluating two options: Alternative A - Launch new indices that meet the criteria while continuing existing ones and Alternative B - Adjust the constituent structure and weights of existing which runs the Bankex index with 10 constituents and no ETF tracking, has preferred Alternative B, opting to adjust weights and constituents in one on the other hand, has two affected indices — Nifty Bank (12 constituents, Rs 34,251 crore AUM in ETFs) and Nifty Financial Services (20 constituents, Rs 511 crore AUM).After consulting with mutual funds and AMFI, NSE has also favored Alternative B, but recommended a phased glide-path approach to avoid disruptions, particularly given the large AUM in Nifty Bank the proposed glide path, adjustments in constituent weights would be carried out in up to four monthly tranches, ensuring a staggered and orderly has now invited comments from stakeholders on whether adjusting existing indices is the right approach and on the modalities of such weight adjustments. The deadline for submitting comments is September 8 via Sebi's online portal (link here) or through email.
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Not party's ideology': Punjab AAP chief distances from Sisodia's ‘saam daam' remark
Former Army Chief General Manoj Naravane emphasized that defense spending is essential for national security and development during the launch of his book in Pune. He argued that such expenditure acts as an "insurance premium" to prevent war and highlighted the importance of preparedness, using Ukraine's situation with Russia as a cautionary example. The Union Budget allocates Rs 6,81,210.27 crore for defense in FY 2025-26.
Economic Times
28 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Sebi mulls relaxing minimum public offer size for large cos; to trim retail quota in IPO
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Markets regulator Sebi on Monday proposed relaxing the minimum public offer requirements for very large companies, and extending the timeline for them to meet minimum public shareholding norms Additionally, the regulator has proposed reducing the retail quota in IPO allocations from 35 per cent to 25 per cent for IPOs exceeding Rs 5,000 crore, considering the challenges faced by issuers in executing large to the consultation paper, the proposed framework, if implemented would, reduce the immediate dilution burden while still ensuring gradual compliance with public shareholding is expected to help large issues, which often find it challenging to dilute substantial stakes through an IPO, as the market may not be able to absorb such a large supply of shares, Sebi said in its consultation proposal may encourage large issuers to pursue listings in such issuers are required to offer a higher percentage of their shareholding to the public, which often results in massive IPO sizes that are difficult for the market to the proposed rules, instead of sticking to a fixed high percentage, large companies will be allowed to raise a lower percentage of companies with a market capitalisation between Rs 50,000 crore and Rs 1 lakh crore, the new minimum public offer (MPO) will be Rs 1,000 crore and at least 8 per cent of the post-issue capital, with minimum public shareholding (MPS) of 25 per cent to be achieved within 5 issuers with a market capitalisation between Rs 1 lakh crore and Rs 5 lakh crore, the MPO will be Rs 6,250 crore and at least 2.75 per cent of the post-issue capital. In such cases, if public shareholding is below 15 per cent at the time of listing, it should be increased to 15 per cent within 5 years and 25 per cent within 10 years; however, if it is already 15 per cent or more at listing, then 25 per cent should be achieved within 5 companies with a market capitalisation above Rs 5 lakh crore, the proposed MPO will be Rs 15,000 crore and at least 1 per cent of post-issue capital, subject to a minimum dilution of 2.5 per cent. In these cases, if public shareholding is less than 15 per cent at listing, it must reach 15 per cent within 5 years and 25 per cent within 10 years, while issuers with at least 15 per cent public shareholding at listing must achieve 25 per cent within 5 means companies can list with smaller IPOs initially, while gradually increasing their public shareholding over a longer period, reducing the immediate burden of large-scale equity dilution At present, small companies with a market capitalisation of up to Rs 1,600 crore must list with 25 per cent public shareholding at the time of medium-sized companies with a market capitalisation between Rs 1,600 crore and Rs 1,00,000 crore, a lower MPO of 10-25 per cent is permitted, with a timeline of 3-5 years to achieve 25 per cent Minimum Public the case of very large companies with a market capitalisation above Rs 1,00,000 crore, the requirement is an MPO of Rs 5,000 crore or at least 5 per cent, with public shareholding to be raised to 10 per cent within 2 years and 25 per cent within 5 Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has sought public comments on the proposals till September 8.
