We are PhD researchers with advice for US colleagues: Don't come to Ireland
It's the time of the year again when candidates from around the world will be accepting offers to pursue a PhD at Irish universities. At the same time, Minister for Further and Higher Education
James Lawless
wants to offer Ireland
as 'a welcoming host for the best and the brightest' researchers fleeing the US university system.
Reports this week revealed that the
Trump administration has ordered a pause on new appointments for international student and exchange visitor visa applicants
, which may encourage more candidates to look towards Ireland.
But as PhD researchers in Ireland, we have some advice: do not come to Ireland for a PhD, unless you enjoy grappling with a long list of injustices.
The idea to go public with this message emerged from members of the
Postgraduate Workers' Organisation (PWO)
, which was born out of a need for a union to directly deal with the challenges faced by PhD researchers. We know that by writing this, we face possible consequences for our career paths. That is why not all of those who have been involved in shaping the argument presented here are able to have their names attached to it.
READ MORE
As of this year, a stipend of
€25,000
per annum is the most that any PhD researcher in Ireland makes. It is below the minimum wage of €27,378 and far below the living wage of €29,913. Some of us started our PhD at an abysmal stipend of €16,500. But this recent increase is not uniform: while some universities have raised it for their internal scholarships, others have remained silent. Some other funders have promised to match the increase, but this has been extremely inconsistent and unreliable: only last month the
Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland
confirmed the delivery and backpayment of the increase it promised at the start of 2024, after 15 months of delay.
Meanwhile, some of us are completely unpaid and self-funded, and some are on exploitative contracts that include both full-time teaching and research responsibilities for stipends as low as €10,000 per annum.
Many researchers from outside the EU choose to come to Ireland on such paltry stipends without knowing the extent of the housing crisis here, the inability of universities to provide adequate housing, and often the lack of sufficient funds to conduct our research.
Non-EU researchers are subject to much higher costs, including the annual fee of €300 towards renewing our Irish residence permit and mandatory private insurance. No other country in the EU requires a PhD researcher to pay such a high fee for a residence permit. Additionally, non-EU researchers face high costs and barriers when it comes to conference travel and the relocation of their spouses to Ireland.
These injustices are not simply the outcome of bad policy, but are rather part of a model being set by the Irish higher education system. There is a clear, if never directly stated, agenda to abandon the idea of higher education as a public good and move towards a business model; PhD researchers, especially those from outside the EU, are at the coalface of this movement.
[
Low-paid PhD students: 'I work three part-time jobs to make ends meet living in Dublin'
Opens in new window
]
The strategic plan of Irish universities is to increase research output and attract more international (read non-EU) PhD researchers, but these documents lack any mention of an increase in funding to support this. Given that it is much more difficult for non-EU researchers to access Research Ireland funding, many of these may be 'self-funded'. This can only mean one thing: universities are moving towards an extractive research model, aiming to exploit non-EU researchers both through their unpaid labour and by relying on their extortionate fees to help balance the books.
But can universities afford to pay for the labour that sustains them?
Rather than providing a public service in the form of teaching and research, universities are increasingly run like businesses, trying to balance the books
Despite them constantly citing a lack of funds, we know that many of our institutions are running budget surpluses and are not acting so frugally in other areas.
Dublin City University
made a profit of €5 million from student beds in 2022, the Business Post reported. The University of Limerick was recently engulfed in controversy over a
€5.2m overspend on the purchase of new student accommodation
.
Maynooth University
last year issued a €500,000 tender for a taxi service with 'no wait time' for 'priority passengers' including 'a number of the university's staff'. This was only slightly more than the
whopper amount spent by the University of Galway in its 2023 rebrand
. Like with many systemic injustices in this country, the issue is not a lack of resources, but political decisions about how to distribute them.
Rather than providing a public service in the form of teaching and research, universities are increasingly run like businesses, trying to balance the books and bring in external funding at every opportunity. This means less public funding for a diverse set of research, more research directed and funded by private industry, and an increase in PhD candidates from outside the EU, who, instead of being paid for their work, will be charged extortionate fees to 'study' here.
This also means that underpaid PhD researchers have to teach undergraduate courses: our plight, hence, is tied to the quality of education we are able to provide in classrooms. The Irish Government is keen on positioning itself as the next best destination for higher education, academic excellence and innovation, especially in response to turmoil in US academic institutions. But how long can that reputation be sustained given the treatment of international PhD researchers?
[
If you want to see how democracies cede to autocracies, watch as US universities bend to Trump
Opens in new window
]
The PWO has been consistently advocating for an employment model of PhD research.
Plenty of examples of this exist across the EU
. Why would you do your PhD in Ireland when you can get decent pay, working conditions and dignity as a researcher in Germany or Sweden? In countries like Austria, the Netherlands and Sweden, PhD researchers pay taxes and have the right to unionise, and these countries also score better than Ireland across innovation indices. Clearly, treating PhD researchers as workers leads to better outcomes.
The fact that the majority of PhD candidates in all departments across all universities in Ireland are non-EU says a lot about how Irish higher education relies heavily on their exploitation, and all indications are that this model is being expanded.
We should not be misleading candidates about PhD life in Ireland. It is short-sighted for the Irish higher education system to exploit PhD researchers, who will surely head out the door as soon as they have their degree. Until the education system reflects how it treats PhD researchers, we will keep telling everyone: do not come to Ireland for a PhD.
Criostóir King, Luke Mac Carthaigh and Beatriz Carazo del Hoyo are members of the
Postgraduate Workers' Organisation
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Government seeks accommodation for 500 refugees
The Government is trying to find accommodation for 500 refugees who may need to come to Ireland under an international resettlement programme. The Department of Justice has put out a €61 million tender for accommodation for people who come to Ireland from countries such as Lebanon and Jordan under the Irish Refugee Protection Programme (IRPP). The State set up the programme in 2015 to respond to the migration crisis in central and southern Europe. People who come to Ireland under the IRPP are given refugee status before they arrive, so it is distinct from the international protection programme. People arriving in Ireland under the programme are described as being recognised by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) as refugees under the 1951 Geneva Refugee Convention. More than 4,500 refugees have come to Ireland since it was set up, with most coming under a programme led by the UNHCR. READ MORE A tender published this week revealed the Government is looking for accommodation 'for a minimum of 500 people, with a potential requirement for additional numbers depending on further reception of persons arriving in Ireland under IRPP'. The Department of Justice says it has advertised the tender to support the IRRP 'over the coming years.' These new 'reception and orientation' centres would provide a place refugees can stay while they are given access to health and social welfare services. Child refugees are given access to local primary or secondary schools. 'This period of orientation provides refugees with an opportunity to access necessary basic services in advance of their resettlement within the wider community' the tender document said. The Government warned potential bidders that the accommodation centres should be within 1km of local amenities such as shops, schools, GP clinics, hospitals and banks. It saidany bidder whose accommodation was further than 1km from such amenities should offer 'a road transport solution'. Accommodation providers would also be required to provide management catering, housekeeping, maintenance and security services. [ Family reunification delays having 'devastating' impact on refugee families Opens in new window ] Potential contractors were also 'reminded' that accommodation centres must comply with existing housing laws 'with regards to living space per person'. A number of inspections carried out last year on private accommodation centres who have been contracted to accommodate international protection applicants found rooms that were overcrowded under housing regulations. The new centres would be based on similar existing centres. The Department of Justice says there are currently three reception and orientation centres; Ballaghaderreen, Co Roscommon; Clonea Strand, Co Waterford; and Mosney Village, Co Meath. These have a combined capacity of 545 people. The department is organising a 'virtual' site visit to that centre for those interested in bidding for the new project. Due to privacy concerns for refugees and child welfare issues, the new refugee accommodation centres will have to be exclusively used for IRPP. 'If the premises has additional bedrooms or businesses beyond the contracting authority's required specification these can only be open to the public where it is guaranteed that no space will be shared between the public and IRPP residents, and that there will be no public access to the spaces reserved for the exclusive use of IRPP residents,' tender documents said. Ireland fell behind on commitments it had made in 2020-2023 to bring 2,900 refugees here, many of whom were Syrian refugees resident in Jordan and Lebanon. The government had blamed this on the Covid-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine and the arrival of refugees from Afghanistan in 2021. [ Refugees in Ireland: is the Government getting the balance right? Opens in new window ] Ireland has since told the European Commission that in 2024-2025 it would bring 800 refugees under the UNHCR resettlement process from Lebanon and Jordan, with another 100 'humanitarian admissions' from Afghanistan. Refugees are brought to Ireland under IRPP after a joint IRPP/An Garda Síochána 'selection mission' in their first country of asylum. Between January and May this year, 83 Syrian refugees and six Afghan refugees were brought to Ireland under the programme. In 2024 the figures were 199 and 77 respectively.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Is Conor McGregor really the only person who wants to be President of Ireland?
The election for the next President of Ireland must take place before November 11th. It's June, so where is the list of Áras hopefuls? It's a job with status and prestige, a place in history, a large salary and a list of perks that includes generous expenses and fine accommodation in the Phoenix Park. None of the political parties have put forward a candidate – yet. And some might not bother. The way the system works is that a candidate nominated by a political party goes straight on the ballot paper. For independents, it's more complex. They must present themselves before county councillors, make their case and persuade four local authorities to allow them to run. READ MORE As of now two independents have declared their intention to run, MMA fighter Conor McGregor and former candidate and businessman Peter Casey. They have yet to get local authority approval. So what is the job of President of Ireland and why, with just months to the election, are there no declared candidates from the political parties? When can we expect the race to get going and what qualities make for an ideal president? Harry McGee from the Irish Times political team, explains. Presented by Bernice Harrison. Produced by Suzanne Brennan.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
EPA projections require a frank reassessment of Irish climate policies
Judging by the EPA's latest greenhouse gas projections , Ireland's climate policies are in urgent need of an overhaul . The projections issued annually relate to likely carbon emissions across the Irish economy up to 2030, but also for following decades up to 2050. It is clear existing policies are failing to deliver significant emission reductions or are being overtaken by increases in energy demand or economic growth. At best, Ireland might achieve a 16 per cent reduction in agricultural emissions compared with the 51 per cent that is required under law, which is reasonably aligned with our Paris Agreement commitments. This would be with full implementation of measures in the Government's climate action plan. READ MORE But even that 16 per cent is not guaranteed: the EPA reports that emissions under an 'existing measures' scenario might even increase by 2030 above their 2018 levels. That must not be allowed to happen. Why is Ireland failing in climate policy , you might wonder. Don't we have a gold standard climate law? While it's true that our 2021 Climate Act is well designed from a governance point of view, any law – even a good one – is no substitute for political will. That the political will has waned is obvious from a reading of the Programme for Government and the choice of rural independents as coalition partners. But other decisions and non-decisions, delays and prevarications suggest that the Government has little interest or commitment to acting on the recommendations of its climate experts , and prefers to bend to the will of major exporters and a highly self-serving reading of public opinion. Though the policy framework has been considerably improved, it seems to take an age to implement what should be straightforward decisions (and I'm not even speaking of major infrastructure projects). [ Q&A: What should we do about multiple climate risks threatening Ireland? Opens in new window ] The Departments of Finance and Public Expenditure still dictate the pace of investment, and administrative delays in making decisions of any kind are common. Public bodies are notoriously cautious and risk-averse, but that mindset means that we are not getting the decisive actions that the public was promised to clean up our energy system and put Ireland on a path to climate neutrality – ideally, before 2050. The director general of the EPA, Laura Burke, remarked last week at a conference in Dublin Castle that 'additional measures and accelerated implementation' are required if we are to even get close to the 2030 targets. She stated that 'scaling up' efforts will be necessary across the board. But what does that actually mean? For you and me, scaling up our efforts might mean an additional journey by bike or a meat-free dinner once a week, or installing solar panels (if you're privileged enough to own a roof). Worthy actions taken voluntarily make us feel better but they won't put a significant dent in Ireland's emissions. Systemic change requires a different set of levers – the use of regulations, mandates, incentives, subsidies and enforcement. The truth is that our public representatives and policy experts seem unwilling to discuss the big decisions that will be needed to dramatically transform our energy system and land use and prefer to rely on policies and measures that the EPA now acknowledges will not be sufficient. [ The 'foot may be coming off the action pedal': Climate plan fails to build on ambition Opens in new window ] For instance, the Dáil hardly ever debates climate policy though the actual words are mentioned frequently. When the numbers are going in the right direction (eg, chemical nitrogen use) everyone wants to claim the credit (good policy, good farmers, etc). When the numbers are going in the wrong direction (chemical nitrogen figures have increased in 2024 again, which will be confirmed by EPA inventories in coming weeks), no one accepts responsibility. When the pressure mounts to make a decision, policymakers revert to default and recommend another report or a new consultation. And meanwhile we are blowing through the first carbon budget by between 8 and 12 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, which adds up to the total annual emissions of countries like Armenia or Nicaragua. And whenever a negative news story comes out about emissions or climate science, the Government is quick to report Ireland's stellar progress in renewable electricity, even though this, too, is but a small flicker (excuse the pun) of what we will actually need to deliver by 2050. The kind of bold interventions we now need would restrict the energy consumption of large energy users like data centres , restrict urban private car use, and deploy effective, catchment-based limits on nitrogen, ammonia and greenhouse gas pollution from agricultural sources . [ Tech giants' indirect emissions rose 150% in three years amid AI growth, UN says Opens in new window ] Imaginative and brave measures to accelerate the roll-out of renewables and to ensure that their environmental impact is properly assessed and mitigated will be essential. We are facing into a global climate emergency , with global temperature increases now heading well north of 1.5 degrees and the prospect of dangerous climate breakdown occurring within our lifetimes. Clearly the newly established Joint Oireachtas Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy doesn't view it as much of an emergency: following lengthy delays in setting up the Oireachtas committees, it has met just twice since the general election in late November 2024, and only to elect a chair and vice chair. Yes, scaling is hard to do, so we had better do what we know already works and what we are good at delivering. If the magic beans (small-scale nuclear reactors, feed additives, biomethane) don't deliver, then we have to consider more radical pruning. Everything should be on the table, including livestock herd reductions, transport hubs in every town and village, mandatory afforestation in suitable areas and urgent State investment in making heat pumps, solar panels, sustainable building materials and shared mobility services affordable and accessible to all as a priority over the demands of incumbent energy, water and land-hungry industries. And no one needs to be left behind. Sadhbh O'Neill is a climate and environmental researcher and activist
