Hit-and-run driver inhaled laughing gas moments before killing pensioner
Cian Byrne, 20, hit Graham Slinn, 81, at a pedestrian crossing near Todwick, South Yorkshire.
He ignored a red light and was well over the 50mph limit when he hit his victim.
Sheffield Crown Court heard Byrne, who has never held a driving licence, made no attempt to stop at the crossing and could have been travelling at up to 80mph.
On Monday, he was sentenced to 11 years and six months in a young offenders institution, with an extended licence period of five years. He was banned from driving for 17 years and eight months.
Father-of-two Byrne, of Chesterfield, Derbyshire, had admitted causing death by dangerous driving and other offences at a previous hearing.
An earlier hearing was told Mr Slinn had dismounted and was walking across the A57 when he was hit by a Volkswagen Golf driven by Byrne.
The defendant sped off with two passengers after the collision on April 4, with dashcam footage showing his tyres smoking as he appeared to be trying to control the vehicle.
A montage of footage shown in court showed him inhaling nitrous oxide gas from a yellow balloon several times before and after the collision with Mr Slinn.
One of these was just moments after he hit the former builder, who helped care for adults with learning disabilities after he retired and was weeks away from celebrating his 60th wedding anniversary with his wife Jaqueline.
Sentencing Byrne, Judge Jeremy Richardson KC said inhaling nitrous oxide was 'an exceptionally dangerous act while driving'.
He said Byrne 'endured a dreadful upbringing' and 'had known very few boundaries' in his life.
He told him: 'You are a dangerous offender and the public must be protected from your evident dangerous and ingrained criminal behaviour.'
The court heard Byrne had convictions for 27 offences including dangerous driving, despite having no licence.
Rebecca Stephens, defending, told the court her client drove off because he believed he had only hit another vehicle with his wing mirror.
Mrs Slinn had said she and her husband met through a love of cycling. He was also a keen singer who would perform in pubs and clubs in Sheffield.
Cycling was a lifelong passion
After the sentencing, Mr Slinn's daughter Nicola and son Victor described their father as 'kind to his core'.
They said: 'On the afternoon of April 4, our dad set out on his bike.
'Cycling was a lifelong passion and a shared family activity. He always took safety incredibly seriously and had planned his route to stick to quiet lanes and cycle paths.
'Despite taking every possible precaution to stay safe – dismounting at the end of the cycle path, waiting for the lights to change to green for pedestrian and wheeling his bike across the pedestrian crossing – on the day he died, he was hit at speed by a car driven by someone who just kept going, as if our dad wasn't even there, as if he was nothing.
'But he was there. He was everything to us. He was our dad, our mum's husband of 60 years, a granddad to two teenage girls, and a friend to so many.'
In a statement released through Thompsons Solicitors, the family said Mr Slinn's death had left a profound silence at the heart of their home.
They added: 'To lose any loved one is a shock. But to lose someone so vibrant, so active and to know their death was 100 per cent avoidable is doubly cruel.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man has conviction for Wilden murder quashed for second time
A man who was twice found guilty of a woman's murder has had his conviction quashed for a second time at the Court of Plummer was jailed in 1998 after a jury found he had fatally attacked Janice Cartwright-Gilbert at the building site of her future home near Wilden, Bedfordshire, the previous Cartwright-Gilbert, 38, was stabbed with a knife and scissors before her body was set alight in a caravan next to the building Plummer, who was 24 at the time of her death, had his first murder conviction quashed in 2021, but was convicted again following a retrial at Aylesbury Crown Court in 2023 and sentenced to life with a minimum term of 16 years. Mr Plummer's barristers challenged his second conviction at the Court of Appeal earlier this month, claiming the trial judge was wrong to allow hearsay evidence to be presented to the jury from a police informant, Christopher had shared a cell with Mr Plummer before his first conviction and claimed he had confessed to the murder, but the "cell confession" was not used in the first trial, and Dunne died in a ruling on Wednesday, three senior judges quashed Mr Plummer's second conviction, stating that Dunne's claims "should have been withdrawn from the jury". Lord Justice Edis, sitting with Mrs Justice McGowan and Judge Nigel Lickley KC, said: "Dunne was a criminal and paid police informant who was in the habit of passing information to the police about other criminals for his own benefit."He continued: "The circumstances of the suggested confession to murder and the reliability of the informant are such as to raise concerns about it."He added: "He gave no detail of the murder which could support its reliability." Mr Plummer had his first murder conviction quashed after it was referred to the Court of Appeal by the Criminal Cases Review Commission due to concerns over expert Plummer had admitted to burglary, but denied murder and that he had ever given a confession. Account discrepancies At a hearing on 15 July, Katy Thorne KC, for Mr Plummer, said that Dunne's evidence "should never have been admitted" and that the trial judge "failed to properly consider" the evidence had "inherent potential unreliability".She also said records showed a payment had been made to Dunne at the time he provided evidence to the police, but "there has never been any explanation given by anyone" for what it was did not ask to speak to police about the alleged confession until August 1997, and gave a differing account that Justice Edis said there were "discrepancies and matters that cannot in fact be correct" in Dunne's accounts, which also did not provide "any account of the killing".He continued the retrial "should have been stopped" after the jury had heard the evidence, and the judge's "failure to do that clearly therefore renders the conviction unsafe".The Crown Prosecution Service, which opposed the appeal, said: "Having carefully considered the judgement, it is not possible for the prosecution to seek a further retrial as the remaining evidence, without the cell confession, would not provide a realistic prospect of conviction." Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
The Sun
23 minutes ago
- The Sun
Hot sex with my bad girl ex-girlfriend is irresistible – even though she tried to ruin my life
DEAR DEIDRE: MY 'bad girl' ex is serious trouble yet I can't keep away, even though she tried to ruin my life. She's so incredible in bed that when she says 'jump' I can't help but come running. We found each other on a dating site and I was instantly attracted to her. She was gorgeous and very naughty in her messages. She was also potty-mouthed and her relationship track record was patchy, but that didn't put me off. I'm 42 and she's 30. When I met her, I was going through a difficult divorce and struggling to get access to my eight-year-old son. Living alone for the first time in my adult life, I was lonely. We met in a bar one night and went back to my flat after just one drink. The sex was out of this world. I can't tell you what she did to me, but no other woman has ever made me feel that way. We started seeing each other regularly, and it soon became clear that she was insanely jealous. When she found out I was innocently messaging an ex — a woman I went out with at school and now have a platonic friendship with — she lost it. She then sent a long message to my ex-wife, including telling her what we did in bed. And then she went to the police and accused me of emotional abuse. Thankfully, they saw through her crazy stories. They told me to stay away from her — especially as I was trying to get legal rights to see my son. Understanding the impact of ghosting I've tried a few times, but can't. She tells me how sorry she is and keeps luring me back into bed. I know she's bad news and that I should block her, but I'm not sure if I can keep away for long. DEIDRE SAYS: This woman is clearly not stable. She may be incredible in bed, but she's also incredibly bad news. She's tried to ruin your life once. Next time she might succeed. If you can't keep away from her for your own sake, then do it for your son. Listen to the brain in your head, not the one in your trousers, and tell yourself that no sexual experience is worth a police record and estrangement from your child. Only you can find the willpower to end this relationship. So you need to dig deep and stay away from her. If she then won't leave you alone, you can contact (0808 802 0300). MY FRIEND IS INCAPABLE OF SPEAKING FOR HERSELF DEAR DEIDRE: MY friend treats me like I'm a ventriloquist and she is the dummy – and it really gets on my nerves. She always expects me to do all the talking for her when we're out in public, and I'm sick of it. I'm 27 and she is 25. We have been friends for two years. She is a good mate, but her reliance on me to speak for her, as if she is not capable herself, irritates me so much. If we are in a restaurant and the waiter comes over, I always have to order for her. If a stranger starts up a conversation, she doesn't answer, but looks over to me to speak instead, even if the person spoke directly to her. Sometimes, I wonder how she copes when she goes somewhere, and I'm not with her. I know I need to say something but I don't know how to go about it without hurting her feelings. DEIDRE SAYS: Your friend sounds painfully shy and lacking in confidence. But I can see why this annoys you. You do need to say something, before this ruins your friendship entirely. Next time you see her, gently explain how you feel. Rather than telling her off, or accusing her, which will make her defensive, say you feel uncomfortable talking for her and would love to see her speak for herself. If she is just shy, perhaps ask if you can help her practise talking to people. My support pack, Standing Up For Yourself, should help you. DEAR DEIDRE: A DECADE ago, personal circumstances led me to ghost a man who I have now realised was perfect for me. Lately, the thought that I threw away my one chance of true love is stopping me from sleeping. I'm a 48-year-old single woman. Ten years ago, I met a man online, who is a year younger than me. We got on like a house on fire, had lots in common and he made me laugh. He was also kind, caring and genuinely wanted a relationship. But after a few weeks of talking, I lost my job and then my father died. I was in no state to date, so I deleted my profile – along with our potential relationship. When I went back online a few months later, his profile had disappeared. I had no way to get in touch. I haven't met anyone as lovely as him since and I can't help thinking what might have been. Should I try to track him down and tell him how I feel? DEIDRE SAYS: He's 'the one that got away'. In your head, he is perfect, but you never really got to know him. Ten years is a long time. If you track him down, there is a good chance he won't still single. After being ghosted, he might find it odd that you have contacted him now. Perhaps it is better to try to find someone new. My support pack, Finding The Right Partner For You, may help. HELP ME LEAVE RACIST HUSBAND DEAR DEIDRE: AFTER 30 years of marriage to a racist who won't even let our mixed-race grandchildren visit, I have had enough. I have realised he has ruined my whole life. I want to leave him but I'm scared of being alone, and don't know how to tell him. I'm 54 and have three children with this man, who is 60. He has always made racist remarks. He complains about immigrants and mutters under his breath when black people pass him in the street. Although I hate his attitudes, I have put up with them because he was a decent husband. But when my son fell in love with a black woman, my husband said he was dead to him. He hasn't spoken to him since. He won't let our son, daughter-in-law or grandchildren visit. If I want to see them, I have to go to their place. Our other children, who have white partners, are welcome to come whenever they like. But I love my children equally. I have begged and pleaded with him to change his mind, but he won't. He says he can't forgive our son. Any love I had for him has gone. Now I hate him for breaking up our family. How can I leave him? DEIDRE SAYS: As you have finally accepted, your husband is not going to change his obnoxious racist views, even if it hurts you and means missing out on his relationship with his son and grandchildren. Perhaps if you make it clear to him you will end your marriage unless he accepts his whole family, he will reconsider. But if he won't, then walking away is the best thing you can do. It won't be easy, but you will be happier in the long run. My support packs, Thinking Of Divorce and Ending A Relationship have lots of information and links that will help you to do this. Lean on your children and friends for support.
The Sun
23 minutes ago
- The Sun
Tech sec Peter Kyle should apologise for calling Farage a nonce-enabler – then make the move that WILL protect our kids
OUR wildly unpopular Government has decided to get down and dirty. Rather than come up with ideas to make our lives a bit bloody easier, it has resorted to disgusting smears against opponents. 8 8 The Onlife Safety Act — a genuinely awful piece of legislation — seeks to persuade hi-tech companies to be a bit more rigorous about who they show their porn and other nasty images to. It will not work. Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, has said as much. And he pledged to repeal the act if Reform wins the next election. Which is looking increasingly likely. This provoked Technology Secretary Peter Kyle to suggest that Farage was 'on the side of' Jimmy Savile. An insane accusation and one Kyle has refused to withdraw. Kyle's actual words were these: 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he would be perpetrating his crimes online — and Nigel Farage is saying that he is on their side, not the side of children.' What an odious comment — but it was repeated a little later by the dim-witted Transport Secretary, Heidi Alexander. So what Labour is saying, in short, is this: if you disagree with their stupid Onlife Safety Act, you're little better than a nonce. You're a nonce enabler. Nigel Farage was rightly furious. Here's the thing. The act is a disgrace. It hands the power to hi-tech companies and penalises the small online sites. And it will do little or nothing to stop kids getting hold of gruesome images. It will also erode freedom of speech. And increase censorship for adults. It is a chilling piece of legislation. And it has already been rubbished by both the Left, in The New Statesman, and the Right, in the Daily Telegraph. Tech Secretary left 'shocked to the core' after visiting crack team hunting down child abuse images There is, however, one failsafe way to make sure kids are safe from revolting images. Stop children having smartphones. Ban them from kids 16 years and younger. Something similar is to be tried in Australia, where under-16s will be banned from social media later this year. Labour says it is not going to do that. Peter Kyle has rejected the proposal. And you know why he's done that, don't you? It's because he, like the ludicrous Heidi Alexander, is a nonce enabler. He would actively help Jimmy Savile nonce the kids. There, how do you like that, Mr Kyle? That's what happens when you crawl into the political gutter. You meet horrible people like me. People who are prepared to stick the boot in and not worry. Nonce enablers People who will say stuff like this: if Kyle opposes my bill to ban smartphones from kids he is worse than Rosemary West and Hitler combined. And he probably hangs around infant schools with a bag of sherbet lemons and some puppies. You see, Kyle? It isn't only disgusting to make such accusations. It's also totally and utterly ludicrous. But it's particularly ludicrous and, indeed, hypocritical when it comes from Labour. Because the party is led by Sir Keir Starmer. And when Sir Keir Starmer was doing his previous job as Director of Public Prosecutions, it decided against charging Jimmy Savile. So you might have a point in saying that Starmer was 'on the side of' Jimmy Savile. Think again, Peter Kyle. Apologise to Farage and withdraw the comment. And when you've done that, withdraw the Online Safety Act. FEELING THE PINCH, CERYS? I'M sorry that the comedian Cerys Nelmes is upset. It's not nice to be upset. She's worried she may be put behind bars in Turkey for alleged shoplifting. Apparently, she left the Zara store in Istanbul having 'forgotten to pay' for an item. How refreshing it is that the Turks take apparent shoplifting seriously. And that Cerys could get three years in a prison like the one in Midnight Express. PM'S SO WRONG ON GAZA 8 IN promising to 'recognise' Palestine, Sir Keir Starmer has shed his very last vestige of principle. It is a wholly cosmetic exercise designed to appease the morons on his back benches. It will do nothing whatsoever to help the Palestinians. It offers not the slightest encouragement for the feral savages of Hamas to hand back the hostages. All it does is enrage the US and Israel. And what exactly is it that Starmer is pledging to recognise? The Hamas-governed Gaza Strip? But the Government has already proscribed Hamas as a terrorist organisation. There is, at present, no Palestinian state. Just chunks of territory ruled over by extremists. It is a truly shocking decision which will cause many, many problems down the line. CARMEN HAVE A GO THEN 8 SO, well done you tenacious Lionesses. They proved that they are incredibly difficult to beat. And also that they are not as useless at penalties as most of the other countries. I enjoyed the tournament, even if the quality of football was sometimes hilariously bad. It all works, though, if you don't keep comparing it with the men's game. It was also hugely pleasing to beat the Spanish. They are very bad losers and their petulant strop at Chloe Kelly cheered me up no end. A bit of grace in defeat wouldn't go amiss, senoritas. Meanwhile, my lot are away to Norwich next Saturday. The season is at last starting. And so Christmas can't be far away. A FOOL ENGLISH THERE were two stories which made me sit up this week. The first was that the average person now pays to the Government 57 per cent of their income in tax. This is all the result of hidden levies such as VAT, stamp duty, National Insurance, capital gains tax and a whole load of other stuff. There are 37 levies on top of income tax. We are now being taxed at the highest rate since the Second World War. And the other story? A picture of the breakfast buffet that illegal asylum seekers are provided with, at our expense, in one of their hotels. Would you like your eggs scrambled or poached, Asif? Coming right up. Along with bacon, sausage, hash browns, baked beans and black pudding. I couldn't see if they had mushrooms or not. Or waffles. If they're in Richmond upon Thames, by the way, they also get free membership of gyms to work off that full English. You wonder where our money goes? Here's an answer for you. MESSER 'N' MRS WE'RE moving house. I come home of an evening and see my wife licking the skirting boards clean. I can't find anything because it's all been hidden so that potential buyers think we don't have clutter. The final straw came at the weekend. Me and the dog were banished from the house 'for the foreseeable future'. That's because we make things messy. One of us drops fur all over the carpet and farts continually – and the dog's even worse. Houses always look good when nobody is in them. That's my wife's way of thinking. 'Nobody wants to look around a house when there's a lardy lummox lying on the sofa watching re-runs of Impossible.' I'll let you know when I'm allowed back in. I HAVE no idea where Tommy Robinson is. He has supposedly fled the country after allegedly punching a bloke at a Tube station. I have no idea if that's what he did. And still less about whatever it was that may have provoked him. But consider this. What chance do you think Robinson stood of a fair trial, for whatever he did or didn't do? They'd throw away the key, wouldn't they? WHAT proportion of muggings in London do you suppose are solved by the Old Bill? The answer is five per cent – or one in 20. Muggings are a serious crime. They make people afraid to go out of their homes. And muggers are encouraged because 95 per cent of them are going to get away with it. Don't you think it's time the Met Police started taking its duties seriously? And focused on solving serious crime? Instead of being obsessed with what people say to each other on social media?
