logo
US Republicans, usually strong Taiwan supporters, quiet on denying NY stopover to Lai

US Republicans, usually strong Taiwan supporters, quiet on denying NY stopover to Lai

The White House's apparent decision to block Taiwanese leader William Lai Ching-te's transit through New York has sparked backlash from Democrats but met with relative silence from Republicans, including those typically outspoken about Taiwan.
The muted Republican response marks a notable shift for a party that has in recent years championed high-profile engagement with Taipei – including symbolic moves that Democrats have avoided.
It also comes amid high-stakes US-China trade negotiations that some observers have suggested is motivating the posture.
On Monday, three Democratic representatives – Raja Krishnamoorthi, the senior Democrat on the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party; Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee; and Gregory Stanton, a co-chair of the Congressional Taiwan Caucus – sent a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio raising 'grave concern' over the decision.
Stopping Lai's transit represented a 'stark departure from precedent', the Democrats wrote, and 'sends a dangerous signal to Beijing about our willingness to make concessions with regard to our national strategic interests'.
01:29
Proposed US stopover by Taiwanese leader William Lai reportedly blocked by Washington
Proposed US stopover by Taiwanese leader William Lai reportedly blocked by Washington
'We call on you to approve any requested transit by President Lai and reaffirm the United States' long-standing policy regarding Taiwan,' they continued.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says homeless people must be moved ‘far' from Washington
Trump says homeless people must be moved ‘far' from Washington

South China Morning Post

time27 minutes ago

  • South China Morning Post

Trump says homeless people must be moved ‘far' from Washington

US President Donald Trump said on Sunday that homeless people must be moved 'far' from Washington, after days of musing about taking federal control of the US capital where he has falsely suggested crime is rising. Advertisement The Republican billionaire has announced a press conference for Monday in which he is expected to reveal his plans for Washington – which is run by the locally elected government of the District of Columbia under congressional oversight. It is an arrangement Trump has long publicly chafed at. He has threatened to federalise the city and give the White House the final say in how it is run. 'I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before,' the president posted on his Truth Social platform on Sunday. 'The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital,' he continued, adding that criminals in the city would be swiftly imprisoned. Advertisement 'It's all going to happen very fast,' he said. Washington is ranked 15th on a list of major US cities by homeless population, according to government statistics from last year.

‘We can't pull out': Taiwan's orchid growers dig in as US tariffs shoot up
‘We can't pull out': Taiwan's orchid growers dig in as US tariffs shoot up

HKFP

time2 days ago

  • HKFP

‘We can't pull out': Taiwan's orchid growers dig in as US tariffs shoot up

Since the start of US President Donald Trump's global trade war, Taiwanese orchid grower Lee Tsang-yu has watched tariffs on his seedlings shoot from nothing to 20 percent. But, after weathering many economic crises, the 61-year-old seasoned farmer is digging in. Lee is cultivating new markets in Thailand and expanding in Vietnam, Indonesia and Brazil, while cutting back shipments to the United States. 'The US is such a huge market, we can't pull out, and we won't,' said Lee, whose company, Charming Agriculture, operates four rugby field-sized greenhouses in Houbi, a district of the southern city of Tainan. Taiwan's more than 300 orchid growers rank among the world's biggest producers of the thick-leaved plants, with Phalaenopsis orchids, also known as moth orchids, dominating exports. The island's orchid shipments reached NT$6.1 billion (US$204 million) in 2024, with about NT$2 billion worth of plants sent to the United States, its biggest market, official data shows. Until now, most growers have been absorbing the cost of the 10 percent tariff that Trump slapped on nearly every trading partner in April, said Ahby Tseng, 53, secretary-general of the Taiwan Orchid Growers Association. But 'no one can bear' all of Trump's temporary 20 percent levy on Taiwan announced last week, he said. Tseng said Taiwan's main rival in the United States was the Netherlands, which has been hit with a relatively lighter 15 percent tariff. The five percentage point difference is significant, he said. 'It is actually very difficult to immediately pass the cost on to consumers because consumers can choose not to buy, or they can choose to buy other types of flowers,' Tseng said. And stockpiling orchids in a warehouse wasn't an option given that the plants 'keep growing'. While the higher tariff would erode his bottom line, Lee said he was more concerned about the general state of the US economy since Trump took office. 'Everything has become more expensive in the US, and consumer spending is shrinking — that's what worries me,' he said. 'Since late May, we've already cut shipments by 15 percent. Before that, the US accounted for 45 percent of our exports.' Lee said he was optimistic his efforts to expand into other markets, though slow and not always as lucrative, would 'gradually offset this impact'. Taiwan's orchids also had a competitive edge, he said — their flowers could last longer than Dutch plants.

Taiwan's future precarious—with or without US-China conflict
Taiwan's future precarious—with or without US-China conflict

AllAfrica

time2 days ago

  • AllAfrica

Taiwan's future precarious—with or without US-China conflict

Taiwan has often compared itself to being a 'shrimp between two whales.' That expression has never been more apt than today with the US and China – which considers Taiwan to be part of its territory – locked in a standoff over the future of the island. At an event I attended some years ago, a Chinese scholar remarked when the issue of the US-China rivalry came up that they believed there was an African saying: 'When two elephants are either having a fight, or making love, the grass around them gets trampled.' It was best for everyone, they advised the other attendees, for the two superpowers to have a workmanlike, unexciting relationship rather than take the risk of things getting too friendly or hostile. But whether or not the current period of conflict continues or the US and China magically become more aligned, the challenges facing Taiwan are severe. First off, Taiwan is itself in a period of domestic turbulence. The government of Taiwanese President William Lai Ching-te, leader of the Democratic Progressive Party, was elected in January 2024 with a little over 40% of the vote. This was considerably less than his predecessor from the same party, Tsai Ing-wen. One of the main opposition leaders, Ke Wen-je of the Taiwan People's party, has since then been arrested on corruption charges. He is accused of accepting half a million US dollars in bribes during his term as mayor of Taipei, as well as misreporting campaign finances during his presidential run. Most recently, in late July, recall votes were held where citizens in 24 districts of Taiwan chose whether or not to remove their legislator from office. This is the result of a law in Taiwan stipulating a new vote if 10% of the electorate in a specific constituency express dissatisfaction at the previous outcome. Activists supporting the government mobilised to achieve this. The votes seem to be associated with frustration that, while the Democratic Progressive party controls the presidency, it cannot get legislation through a parliament dominated by its opponents. All of the votes were directed at seats held by the Kuomintang, the main opposition party in recent years, which is accused by its critics of being pro-China. Not a single seat was overturned. When the steady nationalism of Xi Jinping's leadership in Beijing is factored in, with its conviction that the global influence of the West is slowly declining and the East – dominated by China – is in the nascent, one can see why the issue of Taiwan might look more precarious and worrying. This is regardless of the various predictions that 2027 is the date that China has set to go for reunification. For the US, President Donald Trump's fixation has remained on correcting what he sees as China's unfair trade advantages with its largest single economic partner – something he has long talked about. The White House proclaimed in March, when the first set of trade negotiations with China concluded after tariffs were imposed by both sides, that: 'for too long, unfair trade practices and America's massive trade deficit with China have fuelled the offshoring of American jobs and the decline of our manufacturing sector.' The aim at the most recent set of talks in Stockholm, Sweden, in late July was to drive towards a new deal. Trump has also reportedly talked of taking a huge delegation of business people to China at some point later in 2025. This is despite the fact that so far since his inauguration in January, and despite many reasons to talk, Xi and Trump have yet to physically meet. Taiwanese people are therefore right to feel increasingly uneasy. Under Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, they received verbal commitments that the US would come to Taiwan's aid if it was attacked. This was not formal US policy, which has long maintained an ambiguous stance on Taiwan. Ambiguity has returned with a vengeance under Trump. His secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, has said that the US stands by Taiwan. But these days in Washington all roads lead to the Oval Office, and Trump's stance is far harder to predict. If China were to dangle a trade deal in front of the US president – committing to buy more US goods, put in more investment that is non-problematic on security grounds in the US and generally abide by American demands – would Trump be able to resist? It could be presented as a historic achievement, a new concordant between the world's two greatest powers who had seemed until then set on conflict and clash. There might even be the much-desired Nobel Peace Prize in it for the US leader. Trump, for his part, appears increasingly reluctant to back Taiwan in ways that risk provoking Beijing. Lai delayed a trip to Latin America in July after the Trump administration reportedly told him to cancel a proposed stopover in New York. And the US cancelled a meeting with Taiwan's defense minister one month earlier. The likelihood remains that, if a real crisis occurs, then the US will climb down from the middle wall and do something to defend Taiwan. Any trade deal between Beijing and Washington will also probably be a highly circumscribed one. China is not an easy partner to negotiate with, and it is unlikely to offer Trump the kind of capitulation he is seeking. Even so, these are very unpredictable times. The key calculation going forward will be the simple one of what the US gains and loses from all its relationships – and that includes Taiwan. Kerry Brown is professor of Chinese Politics and director of the Lau China Institute, King's College London This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store