When is the right time to take your kids on their first road trip?
Age 3 and a half is when kids are the most challenging to travel with, according to new research.
The survey of 2,000 American parents with children under the age of 13 asked respondents about the best — and worst — ages to go on a road trip with their children.
When asked why this was the worst age, parents' top reason was because their little one gets bored easily (46%).
Others said this was the worst age because their 3-and-a-half-year-old will throw a tantrum in the car (39%) and they don't enjoy road tripping at this age (31%).
5 The survey found that while 3 and a half was pinpointed as the most difficult to road trip with, age 6 was found to be the easiest.
Getty Images
And 55% of parents have purposefully avoided traveling with their child at certain ages because of how difficult they thought it would be.
Commissioned by good2grow ahead of their On The Road campaign and conducted by Talker Research, the survey found that while 3 and a half was pinpointed as the most difficult to road trip with, age 6 was found to be the easiest.
Regardless of their age, parents said seven hours is the cut-off — that's the maximum length of time they're comfortable road tripping with a child under the age of 13.
5 55% of parents have purposefully avoided traveling with their child at certain ages because of how difficult they thought it would be.
SWNS
5 59% of parents surveyed said road tripping is 'somewhat' or 'very' stressful.
SWNS
In those seven hours, parents are likely to hear 'Are we there yet?' 22 times (3.2 times per hour), experience 18 sibling fights (2.6 per hour) and deal with 14 tantrums (2 per hour) in the car.
Perhaps it's no surprise, then, that 59% of parents surveyed said road tripping is 'somewhat' or 'very' stressful.
'Traveling with young kids isn't always easy, but our research shows that 93% of parents still find road trips to be a fun and memorable experience,' said good2grow VP of Brand Marketing Edzra Gibson. 'With our annual On The Road campaign, we want to help take the mess and stress out of family travel — so there's more room for smiles, laughter and connection for both kids and parents.'
5 Parents said seven hours is the cut-off — that's the maximum length of time they're comfortable road tripping with a child under the age of 13.
Getty Images/iStockphoto
Parents said the most stressful parts of a road trip are the prep and packing (46%), keeping their child entertained throughout the journey (36%) and the drive itself (36%).
The number one way parents reduce this stress? Giving their child snacks to help keep them occupied (53%).
This was followed by having movies or TV shows pre-loaded and ready for the car (52%), as well as giving their child toys to help keep them occupied (47%).
5 Parents look for snacks that don't have to be refrigerated (56%), ones that are mess-free (51%) and easy to share (51%).
SWNS
When it comes to the snacks they want to give their children, parents look for snacks that don't have to be refrigerated (56%), ones that are mess-free (51%) and easy to share (51%) — potentially to help prevent any additional sibling disagreements.
They also prioritize snacks that come in a variety of flavors (44%) and 'better-for-you snacks' (i.e., not junk food) (32%)
'Kids' snacks and beverages are an everyday treat that helps families enjoy smooth, meltdown-free travel,' said Gibson. 'This summer, families can go the extra mile with our mess-free options with reusable packaging, packed with flavor and fun for maximum value on every adventure.'
Top tips for parents taking summer road trips with their kids, based on the survey results —
Pack plenty of snacks
Ensure there are movies, TV shows and toys to keep their child entertained
Pick a destination five hours or less away from home, to help ensure the 'perfect' trip
Regardless of the length, make regular stops along the way to get out of the car
Be a little flexible with the rules — maybe giving more screen time to help make it a smooth journey
Survey methodology:
Talker Research surveyed American parents with children under the age of 13; the survey was commissioned by good2grow and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between May 5–9, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Serengeti Springs hosts international students this summer
HATTIESBURG, Miss. (WHLT) – Two dozen international students will spend their summer working at Serengeti Springs in Hattiesburg. More than 20 students from Thailand, Mexico, Jamaica and Colombia are participating in the park's J1 International Student Program. They will work as lifeguards, in ticketing and in food and retail services. The Hattiesburg Convention Commission has planned a full itinerary, including trips to New Orleans and the Mississippi Gulf Coast. The program offers students a chance to experience the American culture while gaining valuable work experience. USM rises in rankings for Best Education Schools in US 'We want to give them a great work experience and definitely the training, the hospitality, learning, things from the retail sector, from the food and beverage sector, from the aquatics world. And we hope that our staff, as well, get to embrace them, learn some things from them, and then they get some awesome things from us,' said Demetric Kelly, director of Guest Services and Retail with the Hattiesburg Convention Commission. 'This program has really helped me to open my mind and gave me understanding of different perspectives,' said Shenane Goodwin, a student from Jamaica. The students also received new wheels to explore the Hub City thanks to Moore's Bicycle Shop, which helped collect donated bikes from the community. They will call Hattiesburg home through the end of September. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump brings the BOOM! New order opens skies across US to supersonic flights
President Donald Trump has ordered the Federal Aviation Administration to scrap a longstanding ban on supersonic air travel across the U.S. and replace it with a to-be-determined set of regulations that will allow faster-than-sound travel so long as the sonic booms it creates do not breach certain noise limitations. In an executive order signed on Friday, Trump directed the FAA administrator to begin the process of repealing a section of the Code of Federal Regulations that prohibits anyone in the United States from flying a civilian aircraft 'at a true flight Mach number greater than 1.' That regulation was imposed in April 1973, at a time when the British and French governments were jointly developing Concorde, a supersonic airliner that had a cruising speed in excess of Mach 2, or twice the speed of sound. Because aircraft that break the sound barrier create shockwaves that produce loud sounds, known as sonic booms, the U.S. government banned supersonic flight over the U.S. out of concern over disruptive noise from supersonic jets criss-crossing the country. As a result, Concorde was limited to subsonic speeds when arriving or leaving American airports, only crossing the sound barrier during transit over the Atlantic Ocean on routes between New York's JFK airport and London. Michael Kratsios, the director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, told reporters that Trump's order 'seeks to revolutionize supersonic aviation in the United States' by allowing for modern aircraft to fly faster than sound over the continental U.S. 'The US used to be the global leader in this technology, but stifling regulations have grounded progress for generations. The reality is that Americans should be able to fly from New York to LA in under four hours,' he said. Kratsios added that 'advances in aerospace engineering, material science and noise reduction' by new startups working on faster-than-sound passenger aircraft can make supersonic travel 'safe, sustainable and commercially viable' and noted that the longstanding American ban on such flights had ' grounded supersonic passenger flight and weakened our global competitiveness in aviation.' 'Today's order fixes that,' he said. Trump's order comes just weeks after a pair of Republicans in Congress, Rep. Troy Nehls of Texas and Senator Ted Budd of North Carolina, introduced legislation to direct the FAA to repeal and replace the current supersonic flight ban within a year. That legislation will no longer be necessary, as the Trump executive order directs the FAA to withdraw the ban within 180 days and launch a notice-and-comment period for replacement regulations that would be based on a noise standard rather than a strict speed limit. According to a senior administration official, the function of the new regulations would be 'to replace the effective speed standard with instead an interim noise standard, and then to have a longer term process to publish a Notice of Proposed Rule Making to result in a final rule.' That process would be 'coordinated through the White House [and] through the National Science and Technology Council' and would be based on research and development that has been going on at NASA, the Department of Defense, and 'elsewhere within the federal government,' the official said. Trump's effort to enable supersonic flight across the U.S. follows the success of the first flight of a civilian supersonic aircraft since Concorde 216 (registered as G-BOAF) made its' final flight to Bristol Filton Airport in 2003. In January, Boom Supersonic's XB-1 aircraft reached a speed of Mach 1.122 during a 34-minute flight over California's Mojave Desert. The test flight, just eight days into Trump's second term, produced no audible sonic boom — or at least not one that was heard from the ground during the flight. The company says its' proposed Overture passenger jet will cut a trip from Los Angeles to Washington to three hours and 15 minutes, more than an hour less than the current duration of such a flight, while producing no sonic booms that are audible from the ground. It attributes this to atmospheric effects that cause the sound to reflect off layers in the atmosphere and travel upward, rather than downward. It also claims to be able to cut flights over water by even more time by reaching even higher speeds.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
The risk of death is greater than safari goers would like to believe
There's a mistaken assumption that heavy rains halt play for most wildlife. But one thing I've learnt from my 50-plus safaris is that animals – particularly predators – are reliably unpredictable. My most recent uncomfortably close encounter occurred earlier this year during the height of Kenya's rainy season. Thick grey clouds had gathered over the luxury lodge where I was staying on the edge of the Maasai Mara, accelerating the onset of dusk. During daylight hours, it's generally considered safe to walk freely between rooms – even in unfenced areas – so with the sun still hovering above the horizon, I assumed a short dash to the communal dining area would be fine. As I left my fancy villa, furiously scrolling through emails on my phone, I heard a growl far louder than peals of thunder tearing across the plains. Looking up, I saw the back end of a lioness prowling through the undergrowth and I did exactly what I've always been told not to do – I turned around and ran. In reality, she was probably more terrified of the giant two-legged creature encroaching on her territory – but bumping into a big cat in Africa doesn't always end so well. On May 30, businessman Bernd Kebbel was mauled to death by a lioness as he stepped out of his tent to use the toilet. He was camping in Namibia's Hoanib Valley, a remote area where desert-adapted lions roam along seasonal riverbeds. I'd visited the region only two weeks previously and had been thrilled to spot a lion in a region historically ravaged by drought. According to a survey carried out by Namibia's Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism (MEFT) in 2022/2023, there are less than 100 desert-adapted lions in the country, with numbers fluctuating due to human/wildlife conflict. That population declined further when Charlie, the lioness responsible for the attack, was shot dead by authorities. What happened to Mr Kebbel was tragic, but it's not the first time that foreigners have had fatal run-ins with animals. Last year, an American tourist was killed when an elephant charged their vehicle in Zambia's Kafue National Park. A month earlier, a Spanish traveller was trampled to death by a breeding herd when he stepped out of his car to take a photograph in a South African game reserve. As the safari industry continues to thrive and our appetite for wild encounters grows, our guards have dropped faster than the fences which once enclosed many camps. I've always been an advocate for opening up corridors, allowing elephant herds to follow traditional migratory routes and predator-prey dynamics to naturally evolve. But living alongside wildlife requires careful and cautious planning and as human populations continue to grow, that relationship hangs in a delicate balance. The real problem is not 'them' but 'us' and the safari industry is partly to blame. Cultivated by marketers eager to sell holidays, the romantic, Disneyfied notion of an idyllic wilderness is misguided. On countless game drives, I've watched vehicles edge uncomfortably close to potentially dangerous animals in the hope of getting a better iPhone photograph. There's also an assumption that booking a room in a five-star lodge gives us carte blanche to wander around freely as we would at home. Despite repeated warnings from staff, it's all too easy to switch off our senses – ironically detaching ourselves from an environment where we're encouraged to feel immersed. To their credit, many camps – like Angama Amboseli in Kenya and Dukes in Botswana – are attempting to educate travellers about the true struggles of human and wildlife co-existence. But due to a combination of complacency and over-confidence, too many have lost a healthy, respectful fear for the wild. Of course, not every creature in Africa's forests, plains and oceans is actively set on killing humans. Far from it. Most would prefer to be left to continue their lives undisturbed. But blurring the invisible boundaries which should exist between humans and wild animals can lead to fatal accidents. Every time I look into a lion's eyes, I shudder. Hearing their guttural roars outside my tent still sends me into shivers. That tingling fear is humbling – a reminder of the awesome wonders existing within our natural world. Several years ago, I joined a mobile safari through northern Namibia with the late conservationist Garth Owen Smith. One night, we camped on a dry riverbed, close to the Hoanib Valley. As we fell asleep, listening to lions roar, I asked Owen Smith why nobody had thought to pack a rifle for protection. 'Because we might be tempted to use it,' he replied matter-of-factly. Years later, his response makes total sense. Far more effective than bullets, fear, respect and caution are the greatest weapons we have to protect ourselves in a world which should always be alluringly but dangerously wild. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
