Same slides, new fiscal year
Listen to article
It is that time of the year again. No, not mango season — though that might offer more sweetness than what is coming. It is pre-budget seminar season in Pakistan, our annual economic charade where universities, think tanks, chambers of commerce, and just about every office with a whiteboard and Wi-Fi hold solemn gatherings to discuss 'The Way Forward'. PowerPoint clickers are charged, macroeconomic jargon is dusted off, and economists reappear like migratory birds, repeating the same truths that have now become ritual chants.
One wonders: is there a secret mandate from the Ministry of Finance compelling every economics department to host at least one budget seminar before June? Or is it just national cosplay everyone pretending their budget recommendations will somehow find their way into the corridors of power, where the actual budget is being stitched together in Excel sheets, under IMF supervision and political desperation?
The truth is that these seminars have become Pakistan's economic folklore. They appear in May, make a bit of noise, generate a few tweets, and vanish without a trace much like the budgets they try to influence.
Let us take a moment to salute our brave economic commentators. Year after year, they appear on stage like clockwork, armed with the same prescriptions: broaden the tax base, rationalise subsidies, increase exports, fix the energy sector, reduce the fiscal deficit, and invest in human capital. They are not wrong. But it is hard not to notice that they have been saying the same things since 2020. Or was it 2010?
Actually, some of these slides are so old you can almost smell the Windows XP on them. One prominent economist even used the exact same line this year as last: "We must delink politics from economic policy." If only he could also delink himself from this loop of budget déjà vu. And then there are the PowerPoint slides, gloriously adorned with World Bank graphs and IMF warnings, showcasing declining tax-to-GDP ratios (currently hovering around 9.2 per cent, the lowest in South Asia), rising debt-to-GDP (77.8 per cent in FY24), and current account deficits as if they were horoscope signs. Everyone nods solemnly. We have seen this show before.
Now let us ask the forbidden question: do these recommendations ever reach the Ministry of Finance? If they do, is there a designated intern who bins them with a polite auto-reply? Or do they simply fade into the budget void like an old PC's startup sound? One can only imagine the Finance Division receiving a report titled 'Budget Reform Proposal from Institute of Economic Rethinking' and responding with a group chuckle before going back to their IMF spreadsheets.
There is no evidence — none that these seminars have ever substantively influenced a federal budget. Not even a footnote. Even more absurd is that the actual budget-makers — bureaucrats, special assistants and IMF whisperers - rarely attend these events. It is like holding wedding rehearsals without the bride and groom. The audience is often a mix of students, donors, NGO representatives and retired civil servants enjoying the air conditioning.
What we are witnessing is not policy input. It is policy theater. There are photo opportunities, panel selfies, hashtags and post-event pressers. Some speakers use it to test-drive op-ed ideas. Others hope to impress the donors in the room. And a few institutions hold these seminars so that they can say in their annual report: "XYZ Think Tank contributed to budget discourse through a high-level policy roundtable." And why not? The show must go on.
After all, what else are we to do when the economic reality is bleak and largely pre-decided? Pakistan's FY25 budget will be written with one eye on the IMF (which has already demanded a tax revenue target of Rs12.97 trillion), and another on urgent financing needs from bilateral partners and financial markets.
Within this harsh matrix, how practical is it to propose, say, "cutting non-development expenditures" when 52 per cent of the budget is already going to interest payments and another 11 per cent to defence? What is the point of "rationalising tax exemptions" when those with the power to tax are often the ones enjoying those exemptions? And why talk about "reforming state-owned enterprises" when PIA and Pakistan Steel are now punchlines, not policy goals?
If this sounds cynical, it is but it is also empirically accurate. Our pre-budget seminars are economic rituals, not reform tools. Like a high-budget drama serial that resets every season, they offer emotional highs, some tears for the middle class, and the illusion of progress. In 2023, over two dozen budget seminars were held in Islamabad alone.
Yet Pakistan still missed its fiscal targets, borrowed five billion dollars more than expected, and delayed reforms on pension and energy subsidies again. Even as inflation briefly catches its breath at 0.3 per cent, the rupee continues its downward yoga, and foreign reserves dance around the eight billion dollar line with the enthusiasm of a tired ballerina. So why do we continue this spectacle? Because, much like sending good wishes to the Pakistan cricket team, it makes us feel better even when we know the outcome.
To be clear, debate is not the problem. Dialogue is necessary. But repetition without impact is a form of national gaslighting. If the same economists are saying the same things at the same places with the same results, maybe just maybe the problem is not the budget. It is the echo chamber. Let us save the seminar snacks, reduce paper waste, and redirect some of that pre-budget energy toward pushing for parliamentary hearings, public budget scorecards or citizen audit tools.
Until then, happy seminar season! Pass the microphone and the samosas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan's crypto chief meets New York City mayor, pushes for global blockchain cooperation
In a high-profile meeting at Gracie Mansion, New York City Mayor Eric Adams extended a symbolic gesture of camaraderie to Pakistan by telling Bilal Bin Saqib, Pakistan's Minister of State for Crypto and Blockchain, 'We consider New York to be Lahore.' The remark, made during an official diplomatic engagement, highlighted the growing ties between the two emerging hubs of digital finance and innovation. The meeting marked a key step toward building direct collaboration between the New York Crypto Council and the Pakistan Crypto Council—two government-backed bodies committed to shaping the future of Web3, read a statement released by the Ministry of Finance on Friday. Both New York City and Pakistan have taken bold steps by establishing dedicated crypto councils to support the responsible growth of the digital economy. During the meeting, Mayor Adams and SAPM Saqib explored opportunities to co-develop knowledge-sharing initiatives, capacity-building programs, and strategic advisory efforts to foster innovation while ensuring regulatory compliance. The two leaders also discussed shared challenges and approaches to growing the digital asset economy in diverse, high-potential markets, read the statement. The meeting marked the final stop on Saqib's official US tour focused on blockchain innovation, public-private partnerships, and advancing global crypto collaboration. Earlier, Saqib met with the Executive Director of President Trump's Council on Digital Assets, Robert 'Bo' Hines, at the White House. During the meeting, both sides discussed ways to enhance cooperation between Pakistan and the United States in the field of digital assets. Key areas of discussion included Bitcoin, future partnerships, and potential collaboration in the evolving global digital economy. They also discussed strategic alignment on digital assets, Bitcoin integration and the future of decentralised infrastructure. A major topic of the meeting was Pakistan's recently announced strategic Bitcoin reserves, which were explored in detail as a step toward strengthening the country's position in the digital finance space.
Express Tribune
15 hours ago
- Express Tribune
WB readjusts poverty line in Pakistan at 44.7%
Listen to article The World Bank has adjusted upward the income levels in an effort to measure global poverty, which has also pushed the percentage of Pakistanis living in poverty by to 44.7% — an outcome that may not still be fully reflecting the harsh ground realities due to the use of seven years old survey data. The Washington-based lender on Thursday released its new international poverty line to reflect changes in the prices of goods and services and their implications on the global population. The new poverty line for Pakistan, which is a lower middle-income country, is set at $4.20 per person per day, up from $3.65, said Christina Wieser, the senior poverty economist of the World Bank while briefing the media persons here. She said that due to the upward revision, for the lower middle income level, the poverty ratio has jumped from 39.8% of the old level to 44.7% on the threshold of $4.20 per day income. The World Bank has also updated the extreme poverty line from $2.15 to $3 per person per day. Because of the revision in the threshold, 16.5% of the Pakistani population lives in extreme poverty, up from 4.9% under the previous $2.15 threshold, said Christina. She said that one of the reasons for such a high jump was that the majority of the people were clustered around $2.15 to $3 per day income level, which resulted into a significant surge. About 82% of this increase in extreme poverty is due to the higher value of the new international poverty line reflecting increases in the national poverty lines of comparator countries, with the rest explained by price increases in Pakistan between 2017 and 2021, according to the World Bank. The World Bank has not used the latest population census data and instead relied on the United Nations population dataset. Christina also added that the underlying Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES) 2018/19 data has been used for both national and international estimates. While international poverty lines are essential for tracking global progress and comparisons, national lines remain more appropriate for informing country-specific policy decisions, said the senior economist. Anything that has affected since 2019 is not included in either Covid-19 or 2022 floods, as the baseline remains the same, said Christina while responding to a question. We are desperately looking forward to the new household integrated economic survey to update our baseline, she added. The local economists had estimated a sharp rise in poverty after the 2022 floods, which inundated one-fourth of the country and adversely impacted populations in three provinces. These updates to the international poverty lines ensure that poverty estimates remain accurate and comparable across countries. The methodology remains consistent with past updates, continuing a practice that began with the introduction of the dollar-a-day line in 1990, according to the World Bank economist. "The revisions help position Pakistan's poverty levels in a global context and underscore the importance of continued efforts to reduce vulnerability and improve resilience," said Najy Benhassine, the outgoing World Bank Country Director for Pakistan. For domestic policy and programme targeting, the national poverty line remains unchanged and continues to serve as the primary benchmark for assessing poverty within Pakistan, Christina said. The forthcoming World Bank Poverty, Equity, and Resilience Assessment for Pakistan will provide critical context for interpreting these updated poverty estimates, she added. The report would offer a detailed update on poverty, inequality, and non-monetary outcomes, will investigate key drivers of poverty, and outline a forward-looking agenda to enhance prosperity and resilience for all Pakistanis. According to the government's last official available numbers, which are based on the 2018-19 survey, 21.9% of the population was living below the national poverty line. However, because national poverty lines differ widely, the resulting poverty rates are not comparable internationally. The need for new international poverty lines arises from the evolving price levels and cost of basic needs across the world and within income groups, according to Christina Wieser. To maintain accurate global comparisons, the World Bank periodically updates these poverty lines. International poverty estimates are based on the headcount of people with consumption below the international poverty line, defined in purchasing power parities (PPPs). Pakistan is among the countries experiencing the largest changes in poverty when transitioning to the 2021 PPPs based on the Low-Income International Poverty Line, according to the World Bank. The World Bank said that the international poverty line should be used only for cross-country comparison and analysis; for evaluating poverty in a particular country (Pakistan), the national poverty line remains the appropriate standard. The revisions help position Pakistan's poverty levels in a global context and underscore the importance of continued efforts to reduce vulnerability and improve resilience, The new figures reflect updated international thresholds and improved data from other countries, not deterioration in living standards, according to Christina.
Express Tribune
16 hours ago
- Express Tribune
India paving ground for N-war: Bilawal
Listen to article Former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari on Thursday said India is laying the ground for the first nuclear war over water by disrupting the supply of the precious resource and disregarding the World Bank-brokered Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) with Pakistan. Addressing the Middle East Institute in Washington, Bilawal, who is also chairman of the Pakistan People's Party, said India shutting off Pakistan's water supply is laying the foundation for the first nuclear war over water. "We have declared that cutting off our water supply would be an act of war," he added. The PPP chairman said, "We don't say it in a jingoistic manner. We don't say it with any relish. It is an existential crisis for us. Any country on the planet, no matter their size, their strength or their ability, would fight for their survival and fight for their water." He asserted that India must abide by the IWT and the US and other countries must take a firm stance to not allow it to violate the treaty. "You cannot allow this precedent to be set in the Pakistan context, because we'll fight the first war, but it won't be the last. If India is allowed to stop our water, every upper riparian with hostilities to a lower riparian will have a carte blanche," Bilawal highlighted. "And if our dialogue and diplomacy in pursuit of peace are to be successful, if we are to talk to India, have a positive dialogue with India, make new arrangements, new deals, perhaps even new treaties with India, then surely they first must abide by the old treaties and take back their decision vis-a-vis the IWT," the former foreign minister noted. He said India held the IWT in abeyance after the deterioration in relations between the two countries following the April 22 Pahalgam attack in occupied Kashmir. In retaliation, Pakistan decided that it would exercise the right to hold all bilateral agreements with India, including but not limited to the Simla Agreement, in abeyance. It also announced the closure of the Wagah border and suspension of all trade with New Delhi, among other measures. Bilawal criticised the Indian government, saying it had refused cooperation on terrorism, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's offer for cooperation on investigating the Pahalgam attack, US President Donald Trump's mediation in the current dispute and more dialogue. "All that means there'll be more terrorism, more war, and no peace. The prime minister of India and his government may want to damn his people to this fate. I refuse to damn my people, and I refuse to damn the people of India to this fate, which is why my delegation and I will be traveling from capital to capital with a simple message: We want peace. We need your help," said Bilawal. "Surely, India and Pakistan working together, we can eradicate terrorism from the subcontinent. India and Pakistan working together can create that conducive environment in Kashmir where the people that live there can live there free from oppression, suffocation, and actually see prosperity. India and Pakistan's cooperation obviously would require the waters to flow freely, but it should lead to broader cooperation," Bilawal maintained.
