
Why are ice cream prices soaring this summer?
At the end of May, the wholesale price for Philippine coconut oil delivered in Rotterdam, an industry benchmark, reached $2,800 a tonne, roughly twice as much as the year before.
Adverse weather in Indonesia and the Philippines, which together account for three-quarters of global coconut oil supplies, has negatively affected production. Ice cream prices, in turn, have risen.
According to an analysis by RIFT, a British business consultancy, United Kingdom supermarket ice lollies and cones shot up by 7.6 percent in May.
Due to its high melting point, coconut oil keeps industrially made ice cream solid for longer at room temperature. Crucially for food companies, it does so without affecting ice cream's flavour and texture.
The global ice cream industry, worth $81bn in 2024, is now paying close attention to the market dynamics affecting coconut prices.
Coconuts are found in the tropics, where they benefit from lots of rain and sunshine. But the El Nino weather pattern, which produces warmer-than-average sea surface temperatures across the Pacific, led to drier weather across Southeast Asia, particularly from June last year to October.
During that period, coconut farms suffered from extreme heat and droughts. Because coconuts take a year to grow, last year's weather pattern has meant that palm trees have yielded less fruit than normal in 2025, reducing supply.
The United States Department of Agriculture expects that unfavourable weather conditions will see global coconut oil production fall to 3.6 million tonnes in 2024-2025, down 5 to 10 percent from the previous season.
Output is also likely to stay low in the 2025-2026 season, according to analysts.
In October, the Philippine government mandated blending larger amounts of coco methyl ester, a fatty derivative of coconut oil, with diesel to produce biodiesel.
Until recently, the impact of the coconut-for-diesel policy was limited. A blending target of 1 percent was introduced in 2007 and then 2 percent from 2009. But that changed last year, when Manila hiked the target to 3 percent.
The government announced a further jump to 4 percent by late 2025 and 5 percent by the end of 2026. A 1-percentage-point increase requires an extra 900 million coconuts for the biofuels market, raising demand and prices.
Last year, Philippine Energy Secretary Raphael Lotilla said: 'Implementing the higher biofuels blend is a win-win solution as we promote economic growth, uphold environmental stewardship and strive for cleaner energy utilisation.'
If the Philippine government carries out its plan, it will use 4.5 billion coconuts to generate the 500 million litres of coco methyl ester necessary to meet the biodiesel target by 2026. That would amount to nearly one-third of the country's annual crop of 15 billion coconuts.
For context, the US diverts about 40 percent of its annual corn crop into its bioethanol, a fuel made primarily from fermented cornstarch designed to lower greenhouse gas emissions.
In an effort to maintain profit margins and contain costs, increasing numbers of chocolate makers have started reformulating products with cocoa substitutes. One of those is coconut oil.
In December, the US ICE cocoa futures contract surged to a record $12,931 per tonne, up a staggering 177 percent from the same period the year before. Since then, prices have come down but continue to remain elevated.
The high price of cocoa – currently trending about $10,000 per tonne – continues to be supported by crop shortages and resilient consumer demand for cocoa-based products, especially chocolate.
Coconut oil is an established alternative for cocoa butter, particularly in vegan or dairy-free chocolate recipes. And even at its elevated price, coconut oil is still cheaper than cocoa.
'I expect many confectionery and chocolate makers to substitute cocoa for coconut oil in the near term,' Felipe Pohlmann Gonzaga, a Switzerland-based commodity trader, told Al Jazeera.
Platforms like TikTok and Instagram have become another source of demand. In recent years, coconuts have been extolled by celebrities like Gwyneth Paltrow and Kourtney Kardashian for their nutritional benefits.
Wellness Mama, a popular healthcare website, lists 101 uses for coconuts, including as a treatment for insomnia, heartburn, cuts, acne, haemorrhoids, mosquito bites and sunburn.
In the makeup and beauty market, coconut oil is seen as a natural and environmentally friendly alternative to palm oil. Here too, industrial consumption is rising.
While the health benefits of coconut oil continue to be questioned, this niche source of demand is rising. And although they wouldn't have a big impact on their own, health-conscious buyers are entering an already tight market, lifting prices.
Despite coconut oil's growing popularity, expanding production is a difficult task.
'Unlike with other crops, coconut farmers can't simply add acres in response to higher prices,' Pohlmann Gonzaga says.
'It takes at least a year for the trees to reach maturity and production. Deforestation concerns and environmental laws also make expansion difficult,' he added.
Like palm fruit, coconuts grow on trees in tropical areas where forests would have to be removed to plant more trees.
'The European Union deforestation regulation, for instance, inhibits the destruction of biodiverse forests in order to import monoculture crops,' Pohlmann Gonzaga said.
He also pointed out that 'we're moving from El Nino to La Nina, which tends to bring more flooding in Southeast Asia. So planting, harvests and logistics will be impacted.'
With demand for coconuts likely to remain firm and supplies constrained, he added that he does not expect the prices to come down anytime soon.
'We can expect ice cream prices to be high this summer and stay high next year,' he said.
'For ice cream lovers out there, it may be time to start looking at fruit-based sorbet substitutes.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
Singapore celebrates success on 60th anniversary but challenges loom ahead
Singapore – As Singapore's Diamond Jubilee celebrations draw to a close on Saturday night, a huge fireworks display will illuminate the city's extraordinary skyline. The numerous skyscrapers and futuristic buildings stand as a tribute to the country's remarkable development after separating from Malaysia in 1965. This tiny Southeast Asian state, with a population of just over six million people, has one of the highest rates of wealth per capita in the world. Its advanced economy also attracts workers from across the globe. The financial hub is famed for its stability, high standard of living, forward-thinking approach and infamous for its centralised style of governance. While Singapore will bask in some success this weekend, once the flags are taken down and the SG60 merchandise is removed from the shelves, the island-nation will get back to work and begin contemplating its future. Plans are already in motion to continue Singapore's growth, with its most famous landmark – Marina Bay Sands – set to house a new fourth tower of hotel rooms in 2029, while a 15,000-seat indoor arena will also be built at the site. Changi international airport, which was ranked this year as the world's best for the 13th time, will also gain a fifth terminal by the mid-2030s. Residents of the 'Lion City' clearly have plenty to look forward to, but the road ahead may also contain some potholes. Al Jazeera has been taking a look at some of the challenges that Singapore could face in the next 60 years and how they might be tackled. Climate change As a low-lying island, sitting just north of the equator, Singapore is particularly vulnerable to the threat of a changing climate. The country's former prime minister, Lee Hsien Loong, once described it as a matter of 'life and death'. Rising seas and increased rainfall could lead to flooding, with extreme weather events set to be a more common occurrence. While the city-state has so far dodged the kind of weather disruption that plagues many of its neighbours, the government is preparing for the worst. Rising sea levels are of particular concern, with alarming estimates that the waters around Singapore could rise by more than a metre (3.2ft) by 2100. To counter the threat, plans are being considered to build three artificial islands off the country's east coast. These areas of reclaimed land would be linked by tidal gates and sit higher than the mainland, acting as a barrier. Benjamin Horton, former director of the Earth Observatory of Singapore, said the country could come to a standstill if catastrophic rain were to combine with a high tide. 'If it flooded a lot of the infrastructure in Singapore, closing down MRTs [mass rapid transit], shutting down emergency routes, flooding a power station and the electricity went down – Singapore would be crippled,' Horton said. The already-sweltering Southeast Asian financial hub will also have to cope with even hotter conditions. A 2024 government study found that the daily average temperature could rise by up to 5 degrees Celsius (9 degrees Fahrenheit) by the end of the century. Horton, who is now dean of the School of Energy and Environment at City University of Hong Kong, said this could impact the country's economic productivity. 'Singapore is always developing and is reliant on immigrant labour that works outside during the day. Climate change is going to impact that significantly,' he said. Yet, Singapore, Horton said, has 'the potential to be the lead in how you adapt to climate change and to be the leader in coastal protection'. Demographic time bomb Singapore's population is ageing at a rapid rate. By 2030, it's estimated that almost one in four citizens will be aged 65 and above. The life expectancy for a Singaporean born today is a little under 84 years, with residents benefitting from a high quality of life and a world-class healthcare system. But this demographic shift is set to challenge the city-state over the next six decades. An ageing population will inevitably require more investment in the medical sector, while the country's workforce could face shortages of younger workers. 'The resulting strain will not only test the resilience of healthcare institutions but also place significant emotional, physical, and financial pressure on family caregivers,' said Chuan De Foo, a research fellow at the National University of Singapore's (NUS) Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health. While the authorities are looking to expand and strengthen healthcare facilities, they are also urging citizens to make better lifestyle choices in order to stay healthier for longer. New marketing campaigns encourage regular health check-ups, allowing for early intervention, while new technology is also being utilised. 'AI-driven tools are being developed to support mental wellbeing, detect early signs of clinical deterioration and assist in diagnosis and disease management,' Foo told Al Jazeera. Fewer babies Alongside living longer, Singaporeans – like many advanced Asian economies – are also having fewer babies, adding to the country's demographic woes. The fertility rate, which measures the average number of children a woman is expected to have in her lifetime, fell below 1.0 for the first time in 2023 and shows little sign of increasing. That figure is even lower than Japan's fertility rate of 1.15. This week, Japan reported its 16th consecutive year of population decline, with nearly a million more deaths than births in 2024. Kalpana Vignehsa, a senior research fellow at NUS's Institute of Policy Studies think tank, said the Singapore government is 'swimming against a cultural tide' in its efforts to reverse the decline in births. 'Now is the time for expansive action to make parenting less expensive, less stressful, and most importantly, a highly valued and communally supported activity,' said Vignehsa. An unstable world Singapore is renowned for its neutral approach to foreign policy, balancing strong ties with both China and the United States. But as relations between the world's two biggest superpowers become increasingly strained, the Lion City's neutrality could be challenged. Any pivot towards Washington or Beijing is likely to be subtle, said Alan Chong, senior fellow at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies. He said that this situation occurred during the COVID pandemic, when Washington was not forthcoming with assistance for Asian economies. 'Almost all of Southeast Asia, including Singapore, tilted towards Beijing for economic support without announcing it,' said Chong. US President Donald Trump's punitive tariff policy has also caused consternation in the Southeast Asian business hub, which relies heavily on global trade. Despite the threat from Washington's increasingly protectionist policies, Chong believes that Singapore is prepared to weather the storm after signing a trade pact in 2020. The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership was agreed between 15 mainly Southeast Asian countries, plus major North Asian economies including China, Japan and South Korea. 'It's a huge insurance against any comprehensive global trade shutdown,' said Chong. Stability at home While the international outlook appears increasingly troubled, Singapore's domestic political scene is set for more stability over the coming years. The ruling People's Action Party (PAP) has been in power since the country was formed and shows no signs of losing control. In May's election, the PAP, led by new Prime Minister Lawrence Wong, won all but 10 seats in parliament with just over 65 percent of the vote. While the country's leaders are likely to stay the same in the near-term, Teo Kay Key, research fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies Social Lab, said younger Singaporeans will soon want a different style of politics, one that is more open and more participatory. 'They are more likely to favour discussions and exchange of views,' she said. 'There is also a growing trend where the preference is to conduct open discussions, with a more democratic exchange of ideas,' she added.


Al Jazeera
3 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Tougher transshipment penalties on US imports not immediate: Report
Tougher United States trade penalties on goods originating in one country being re-shipped from another are not expected to immediately follow new US tariffs, three people in Southeast Asia with knowledge of the matter said, easing a major cause of concern. Southeast Asian countries, including Vietnam and Thailand, have been explicitly targeted by White House officials for their alleged role in facilitating the so-called transshipment to the US of Chinese goods, which would face higher tariffs if shipped directly from China. The administration of US President Donald Trump imposed tariffs on goods from dozens of countries from Thursday, and in an executive order, said products determined to have been illegally rerouted to conceal their country of origin would face additional duties of 40 percent. But it did not clarify what constitutes transshipment. US imports from Southeast Asia's biggest economies, which rely heavily on exports, are now subject to tariff rates of about 19 percent, many of which have been significantly reduced from previously threatened rates. Existing US customs guidance states that goods from countries with no free trade agreements with Washington, such as Southeast Asian nations, can be labelled as made in the country where they undergo a 'substantial transformation' of components, even if those parts entirely come from another country, such as China. And with no new US guidance on rules of origin or specification of what transshipment means, some officials in Southeast Asia have told exporters that existing rules apply. That effectively limits cases of transshipment to illegal activities, like the use of forged export certificates or documents obtained illicitly. 'Currently, all exported goods [from Thailand] are subject to a 19 percent rate because there are no rules on transshipment yet,' Arada Fuangtong, head of the Thai Ministry of Commerce's Department of Foreign Trade, told Reuters on Thursday. Her message was echoed by US officials in Vietnam, who told businessmen the tariff of 20 percent would apply to Vietnamese goods, even if they are entirely made with Chinese components and only assembled in Vietnam, according to one person familiar with those talks. Trade consultants have said rules are vague, and they have advised clients, even before the new wave of US tariffs, to have at least 40 percent of local content for their exports to the US. That is 'to be on the safe side', one of them said. The US embassy in Vietnam did not immediately reply to a request for comment. The Office of the US Trade Representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside US working hours. 'Goods defined by US customs as transshipped are subject to 40 percent duties, but pending any new definition, that's limited to old definitions,' said a Vietnam-based consultant. Both people declined to be named in order to speak more freely. China dependence According to the US customs guidance, repackaging does not usually cause a 'substantial transformation', but assembly may, depending on the complexity of the operations. It is unclear if this narrow interpretation of transshipment could be enforced for other countries. Economic ministries in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Vietnam and Singapore did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the issue. Manufacturers in Southeast Asia, which rely heavily on Chinese components, have been in the dark for months about what Washington would consider transshipment. Questions remain about whether that would include goods with a large, but yet undefined, share of components or raw materials from China, even when they are legitimately transformed in Southeast Asian nations. A strict definition of transshipment may come later, multiple investment consultants warned. An executive order signed by Trump last week said the US will 'publish every six months a list of countries and specific facilities used in circumvention schemes'. That will 'inform public procurement, national security reviews, and commercial due diligence', it said. 'The message from Washington is deterrence,' said Marco Forster, director for Southeast Asia at investment consultancy Dezan Shira and Associates. 'If your supply chain cuts corners, it won't be treated as a technical error. It'll be treated as fraud.'


Al Jazeera
4 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump's transshipment crackdown spells danger for Southeast Asian economies
Taipei, Taiwan – Southeast Asia's export-driven economies are facing new uncertainty from United States President Donald Trump's trade war, as his administration cracks down on exports directed through third countries to avoid his tariffs on China. Under an executive order issued by Trump last week, goods imported into the US face a punitive 40 percent tariff, plus penalties and any applicable country-of-origin duties, if US Customs and Border Protection determines they have been 'transshipped'. The tariff is set to go into effect on Thursday, along with Trump's latest country-specific tariffs ranging from 10 to 41 percent. While China is the main target of the new tax on transhipments, which applies to all redirected goods irrespective of country of origin, Southeast Asia could suffer much of the fallout, because of the region's highly integrated supply chains with Chinese manufacturers, trade experts say. The effect will depend on exactly how the Trump administration defines transhipments, which is still unclear, said Puan Yatim, an associate professor at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia's Graduate School of Business. 'If Washington maintains a narrow interpretation – targeting only those goods that are imported from China, minimally processed or relabeled and then re-exported to the US – the economic impact on ASEAN may be limited,' Yatim told Al Jazeera, referring to the Southeast Asian regional bloc. 'However, a broader and more punitive interpretation – where goods with any significant Chinese input are also deemed in violation – could prove economically devastating for countries like Vietnam, Indonesia, Cambodia, and Malaysia,' she added. Chinese manufacturers have for years been steadily expanding into Southeast Asia as part of a strategy known as 'China Plus One'. The strategy has helped Chinese firms avoid US tariffs, exploit cheaper labour, and diversify their supply chains – a particular concern during China's COVID-19 lockdowns. From 2020 to 2024, Chinese foreign direct investment into the 10 ASEAN nations grew from $7.1bn to $19.3bn, according to ASEAN data. During the same period, exports from China to Southeast Asia rose from $385bn to $587bn, according to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The surge in Chinese exports, including goods illegally mislabeled to conceal their origin, has placed Southeast Asia in the Trump administration's crosshairs. '[Companies] need intermediate imports from China to create products which get shipped to the US, but because companies have been embroiled in illegal transshipments in the region, there's a huge bias in the Trump administration that ASEAN is the predominant channel,' Priyanka Kishore, principal economist at Asia Decoded in Singapore, told Al Jazeera. A key example of trade that invoked Washington's ire centred on the solar cell industry. Following a years-long investigation, the US Department of Commerce in April announced tariffs of up to 3,500 percent on Southeast Asian manufacturers alleged to have illicitly exported Chinese goods. Southeast Asia is now in a 'sticky situation' where it must appease the US – the region's top export market – while not alienating China, Kishore said. Beijing has threatened to 'resolutely take countermeasures' against countries that agree to trade deals with the US that go against its interests. In May, Malaysia announced that it would no longer allow nongovernmental organisations such as chambers of commerce to issue certificates of origin, as part of its efforts to ensure the integrity of its exports. Vietnam similarly agreed to a 40 percent transshipment tariff in a framework deal reached with the US in May, while Indonesia's Trade Minister Budi Santoso said last month that his country was opposed to transshipping. Despite Southeast Asian governments' efforts to mollify the US, the transshipment tariff could create major compliance issues for the private sector, said Steve Okun, founder and CEO of APAC Advisors in Singapore. A top concern will be how the US treats products made with components from multiple countries. US tariffs are typically determined by the location where a product underwent 'substantive transformation', but if the Trump administration were to apply duties based on the presence of even small amounts of Chinese components, compliance and enforcement would be extremely difficult, Okun said. 'You're going to have to be doing due diligence on supply chains that you never had to do before,' Okun told Al Jazeera. The changes would 'potentially redefine trade,' he said. A strict interpretation of transshipping could further dim Southeast Asia's appeal, at a time when the Trump administration is already chipping away at its China Plus One competitive advantage with his tariffs on the region's economies, said Richard Laub, CEO and cofounder of Dragon Sourcing, a global procurement service provider. Under Trump's latest tariffs, Singapore is subject to a 10 percent rate, while Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam and Indonesia are subject to rates of 19 or 20 percent – less than the 30 percent rate proposed for China under the White House's latest tariff framework. Trump's transshipment tariff potentially eats into that advantage. 'A lot of the Chinese supply strategy has been to establish some kind of facility abroad with limited content, limited value, adding those facilities to basically circumvent those transshipments. I suspect that that will come to a standstill,' Laub told Al Jazeera. A Washington, DC-based consultant who advises businesses on trade and supply chain issues in China, said he had observed a similar phenomenon, but to the detriment of US exporters. 'We are seeing [multinational corporations] from around the globe, particularly those that served the China market from the United States, doing more to localise supply chains for China in China,' the consultant told Al Jazeera, asking not to be named. Companies in sectors that rely on materials like foreign-sourced steel – which is subject to separate tariffs – have found manufacturing becoming too expensive in the US and started moving manufacturing out of the country, the consultant said. 'This is a terrible outcome and the opposite of what the administration intends,' he said. Nick Marro, principal economist for Asia at the Economist Intelligence Unit, said despite the uncertainty, the direction of the policy in Washington is ambiguously bad for Southeast Asia. 'Clearly, the US is concerned about transshipments,' Marro told Al Jazeera. 'Clearly, it is moving to crack down on them, and so for those investors, those companies, those governments that have staked their premise on things like China Plus One, we are now seeing a reassessment, and that is something which investors have to be integrating into their strategies.'