Trump: Someone is not ‘telling the facts' about Biden's cancer diagnosis
'Someone is not telling the facts' about Joe Biden's prostate cancer diagnosis, Donald Trump has claimed.
The US president suggested Mr Biden or his medical team had sought to cover up his illness and cognitive decline during his time in office, calling it a 'very sad situation'.
Mr Biden's office revealed on Sunday that the former president had been diagnosed with an 'aggressive' form of prostate cancer which had metastasised to the bone.
Asked about his predecessor's diagnosis, Mr Trump said: 'I think it's very sad, actually. I'm surprised that the public wasn't notified a long time ago because to get to stage nine, that's a long time.'
Mr Biden's cancer – which is a grade nine on the Gleason scale, marking it as aggressive – is said to have been diagnosed on Friday after doctors discovered a nodule on his prostate the week before.
Speaking to reporters on Monday evening, Mr Trump expressed scepticism that the cancer would not have been detected on Mr Biden's annual physical exam at Walter Reed National Military Medical Centre in Maryland.
'Why did it take so long? I mean, this takes a long time, it can take years to get to this level of danger,' he said.
'So it's a very, very sad situation. I feel very badly about it, and I think people should try and find out what happened.
'Walter Reed… is really good. They're some of the best doctors I've ever seen. I don't even know if they were involved, but a doctor was involved in each case.
'Maybe it was the same doctor, and somebody is not telling the facts. That's a big problem.'
Although some doctors have expressed surprise that Mr Biden's cancer was not detected earlier, others suggested that it may have developed rapidly since his last physical examination.
Prof Karol Sikora, a former director of the World Health Organisation Cancer programme, told The Telegraph Mr Biden's late diagnosis was 'very unusual'.
He said it could have been 'a cover-up by his doctors' that had been hidden for months or years, but was more likely to be 'a rapid-growing cancer'.
Mr Biden's last physical exam at Walter Reed took place in February last year and was overseen by his personal physician, Dr Kevin O'Connor, who declared the then-president 'fit for duty' and said there were 'no new concerns' about his health.
It comes as Mr Biden faces renewed questions about his mental acuity in office following the publication of a new book, Original Sin, which reported he had forgotten the names of close aides whom he had known for decades.
'This is dangerous for our country'
On Monday, Mr Trump raised questions about why Mr Biden's doctors had not raised concerns about his 'cognitive ability'.
'And I think the doctor said he's just fine, and it's turned out that's not so,' he continued.
'It's very dangerous. Look, this is no longer politically correct. This is dangerous for our country.
'Look at the mess we're in. You're talking about all these questions on Ukraine and Russia – that would have never happened.'
Mr Biden never received a cognitive test during his time in office, despite calls from critics for him to submit to one during the 2024 election campaign.
He told an interviewer in July that his role as president meant he had 'a cognitive test every single day', amid calls from Democrats to drop his re-election bid following a faltering debate performance.
Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, told reporters Mr Trump was not concerned about a declining standard of care at Walter Reed, calling its medical team 'phenomenal'.
On Monday, JD Vance, the vice president, raised concerns that the public had been kept in the dark about Mr Biden's health struggles during his time in the White House.
'Why didn't the American people have more accurate information about what he was actually dealing with?' he asked.
. @VP JD Vance on former President Biden's cancer diagnosis: "We really do need to be honest about whether the former president was capable of doing the job...I don't think that he was in good enough health. In some ways, I blame him less than I blame the people around him." pic.twitter.com/0DYOd2mu4G
— CSPAN (@cspan) May 19, 2025
Mr Biden released a statement on social media on Monday, which read: 'Cancer touches us all. Like so many of you, Jill and I have learnt that we are strongest in the broken places.
'Thank you for lifting us up with love and support.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
John Oliver on the unregulated business of med spas: ‘People are going to get hurt'
John Oliver looked into the booming industry of med spas in the US on the latest Last Week Tonight. 'You're probably at least familiar with them,' he explained of the facilities, either because you've seen one pop up in your neighborhood, or you've been pushed by one of thousands of influencer videos about them.' 'Med spa' is a catch-all term for a facility that provides aesthetic procedures, both medical (lasers, Botox and IV drips) and non-medical (facials). In the age of Instagram, it's a lucrative business, with an estimated 10,000 or more med spas nationwide, generating $17bn annually. But 'while many med spas are safe and staffed by actual professionals', said Oliver, 'the rapid rise of med spas has also been accompanied a rapid rise' in stories of malpractice or procedures gone awry. That's because 'this whole industry can fall into a regulatory gray area,' as many of their procedures fall between esthetic services and traditional medical practice. 'Other services definitely fall under the practice of medicine, but no one – from practitioners, to customers, to law enforcement – acts like it,' said Oliver. There are currently no federal standards for med spas, and no legal definition for what one even is. 'And that has left the market wide open for bad actors,' Oliver explained, calling med spas the 'wild west' of medicine. 'If an industry can grow this fast and be run this loosely, people are going to get hurt,' he added. Oliver dissected the 'perfect storm' of factors for this wild west, starting with many med spas' franchising model, with all-cash businesses that can be opened anywhere. 'It's not exactly reassuring to hear a medical facility being pitched the same way you'd pitch a Subway sandwich shop,' he joked. 'I know both technically involve getting suspicious-looking goo inside you, but through vastly different delivery systems.' The regulatory frameworks also vary wildly by state. In New Jersey, only a doctor can perform laser hair removal, while anyone can in New York. In Texas, anyone can get certified to become an injector, and practice anywhere in the state. The laws are so behind the reality of med spas in Oklahoma that the state advises nurses to use their own professional judgment to determine what procedures they can provide based on the relevant laws. 'Which feels like they're one step away from just telling nurses to ask a Magic 8 Ball, 'am I allowed to give this woman chin filler?'' Oliver quipped. 'What this means is from the services they sell to the people they employ to the stuff they inject into you, med spas can be far less vigorously vetted than you may assume,' he noted. Some med spa procedures, such as facials, have scientific backing, while others – such as 'ionic foot detox bath' or 'ultraviolet blood irradiation' – do not. Some med spas also provide procedures like 'sculptsure' via devices that are FDA 'cleared'. As Oliver already covered in an episode on medical devices, FDA cleared 'doesn't really mean shit'. FDA approval means the device is both safe and backed by 'valid scientific evidence', while cleared simply means that it can be legally marketed. 'Which is barely one step above an FDA stamp declaring 'this exists!'' Oliver joked. 'Ideally, you'd have a doctor talk you through the risks and benefits of any sort of procedure on offer,' he continued, 'but that's not possible at many med spas.' While they are required to be supervised by a medical professional with 'full practice authority', that supervision can be done remotely, sometimes from professionals located hours away. Most of the staff in med spas are nurse practitioners, physician assistants and registered nurses. 'Nothing against people who hold those jobs – they can be extremely skilled,' Oliver noted. 'But their training on the procedures done in med spas can be thin at best,' as there are very few dermatology programs for non-doctors. Oliver cited one service that claimed to allow someone to inject Botox after just a day of training, 'which really does not feel like enough training to shoot a paralyzing neurotoxin into someone's face'. Especially one that could have deadly side-effects, as was the case with one central Texas woman who had a seizure after being injected with Botox by someone with non-medical certification; the med spa's protocol for emergencies was to call their supervising physician, a pediatrician located a three-hour drive away. 'A lot of the protections you associate with medical offices just don't apply to med spas,' Oliver summarized. 'Oversight can be incredibly lax,' as most states don't even require that med spas register their existence. In sum, Oliver said, med spas can cut corners both on their staffing and the contents of their injectables, and the market is rife with counterfeits. He referenced the story of one influencer who went to a med spa for B12 shots, got upsold 'fat dissolving' injectables, and ended up in the hospital for four months with a necrotizing, antibiotic-resistant skin infection. Her lawsuit against the practitioner, who injected her with a substance bought off Alibaba, hit a dead end, as he was unlicensed and had no malpractice insurance nor assets. 'The lack of accountability is honestly not that surprising,' said Oliver. 'If you're injured at an unlicensed med spa, there's often little to no recourse unless law enforcement takes an interest in your case.' And while it's easy to judge those that seek out the procedures, Oliver noted that 'it's both reasonable to want these services and to expect the people providing them to be licensed and adequately supervised. But far too often, they just aren't.' What can be done? 'Bare minimum, state laws and regulation should be clearly written, well publicized and enforced,' Oliver said. But 'laws can only do so much when they're ignored, and when demand is this high, and there is such a clear profit motive, there is always going to be the possibility that sketchy providers will break the rules.' He encouraged people to look up the names and credentials of any provider, get a full consultation and see the vials of any injectables before receiving them. 'And if they respond by acting defensively or won't show them to you, get the fuck out of there,' he concluded, because 'in too many places, it is far too easy to set up something that has all the appearances of medicine, but none of the protections.'
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Game-changing new tests to spot endometriosis early and spare women years of agony
It affects one in ten women, causes severe pain and can reduce the chances of having a child. And yet it can take years for endometriosis – where tissue similar to the lining of the womb grows in other parts of the body – to be diagnosed; some women suffer for almost a decade before it is identified.
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Forget the ‘vegan hippie' stereotype! People who follow plant-based diets are more POWER-HUNGRY than meat-eaters, study find
You might think that vegetarians and vegans are a bunch of peace-loving hippies. But a new study shows that the stereotype of the tofu-eating pacifist couldn't be further from the truth. Contrary to popular belief, vegetarians actually have a greater hunger for power than their omnivorous peers. Meat-eaters, meanwhile, are more strongly associated with values like kindness, conformity, and social harmony. Study author Dr John Nezlek, of SWPS University in Warsaw, says this mistaken impression likely emerges from the fact that the overwhelming majority of vegetarians are women. However, in reality, vegetarians are much more likely to express traditionally masculine values, such as the desire for personal success, than 'manly' meat-eaters. Dr Nezlek told MailOnline: 'When you think about a vegetarian, you think of someone who's warm, fuzzy, and 'huggy'. 'Well, in terms of the values that people espouse and what they aspire to, it's just not the case.' Dr Nezlek surveyed 3,792 vegetarians, including vegans and those on plant-based diets, and non-vegetarians from the US and Poland. Unlike previous studies which focused on vegetarians' personality traits, Dr Nezlek surveyed the participants to study their deepest convictions and values. During the study participants were given short descriptions of hypothetical individuals such as 'he likes to impress other people' or 'thinking up new ideas and being creative is important to her'. For each of these descriptions, the participant was then asked: 'Do you see yourself in that person?' - responding on a scale from one, not at all, to six, very much like me. These tests are designed to reveal the set of basic values that influence people's patterns of behaviour throughout their lives and determine many of their choices. But when the data came back, the results were so far removed from the established stereotypes that Dr Nezlek initially thought something had gone wrong with the test. However, after collecting more samples, the results clearly showed that everything most people think about vegetarians is incorrect. Contrary to popular belief, vegetarians were consistently more likely to align themselves with values linked to power, defined as the desire for control over people and resources. Vegetarians were also more likely to value personal success or achievement and stimulation in the form of excitement, novelty, or challenges. Omnivores, on the other hand, were more likely to value conformity to social norms, safety and security, and preserving the welfare of those around them. Vegetarians still value 'benevolence', preserving or enhancing the welfare of those close to themselves, but not as much as meat eaters. These differences are not so large that they would be noticeable in one individual - what psychologists would call a 'small to moderate' difference. However, across a large enough population the difference between vegetarians and non-vegetarians would become apparent. Dr Nezlek says: 'Over time, small differences begin to have large consequences and, if you interact with vegetarians over and over again, you begin to see that these people are not tree huggers who are going to back down.' What is less clear is whether having these values predisposes someone towards becoming a vegetarian or if they are developed as a result of the lifestyle change. However, Dr Nezlek says that upcoming research on how long people have remained vegetarian may be able to shed light on this question in the future. Vegetarians also gave less emphasis to values such as conformity, security, and benevolence which are linked with order and tradition. This suggests that the biggest difference between veggies and meat-eaters may be a desire for independence and a non-conformist streak. Yet it also points to a sort of psychological toughness and willingness to go against the grain which is required to be a vegetarian - a group which has historically been a 'berated minority'. Dr Nezlek says: 'If you're a member of a minority group which gets criticized more often than members of the majority, you've got to have some stones to hold those values. 'Particularly because vegetarians adopt their diets, that means they're going to have to stand up for themselves and you've got to have the values that support that.' WHAT SHOULD A BALANCED DIET LOOK LIKE? • Eat at least 5 portions of a variety of fruit and vegetables every day. All fresh, frozen, dried and canned fruit and vegetables count • Base meals on potatoes, bread, rice, pasta or other starchy carbohydrates, ideally wholegrain • 30 grams of fibre a day: This is the same as eating all of the following: 5 portions of fruit and vegetables, 2 whole-wheat cereal biscuits, 2 thick slices of wholemeal bread and large baked potato with the skin on • Have some dairy or dairy alternatives (such as soya drinks) choosing lower fat and lower sugar options • Eat some beans, pulses, fish, eggs, meat and other proteins (including 2 portions of fish every week, one of which should be oily) • Choose unsaturated oils and spreads and consuming in small amounts • Drink 6-8 cups/glasses of water a day
