Smartphones were ‘quite boring' until we came along, Nothing co-founder says
Akis Evangelidis was speaking as Nothing unveiled its latest mid-range phones, the Phone 3(a) Series.
The London-based start-up launched in late 2020, looking to offer an alternative to the likes of Apple, Google and Samsung through striking design and unusual features, including flashing LED light patterns on the rear of its phones to symbolise different types of notifications.
'Back then, four years ago, it was quite boring to be honest. All the devices looked the same. They were just minor iterations; on camera module, more megapixels, all that kind of stuff – there wasn't much happening. There wasn't any grander vision,' he told the PA news agency.
'(There was also) a lot of negativity around tech, like with data privacy, social media consumption and there was a negative spiral.
'Whereas, when we were growing up, with the launch of the first iPhone, I still remember interacting with it and feeling super excited. You would stay up late to watch the Apple keynotes and so on… but that kind of sense of sense of magic around tech has gradually disappeared.'
The new Phone (3a) Series has been given a better camera system, as well as an AI-powered tool the firm calls Essential Space, a hub for user text and audio notes, screenshots and other items which act as a 'second memory' on the device, able to capture, apply and recall key details from that data as the user needs it.
The handsets will start at £329, and come just a week after Apple unveiled its own mid-range device, the iPhone 16e – although that device starts at £599.
It is Nothing's first steps into the ultra competitive world of smartphone AI tools – following Samsung, Google and Apple which all introduced features in 2024 – and Mr Evangelidis said the company was approaching the technology with the same alternative attitude that it has approached phone development in general.
'AI is coming into play and we definitely think it will disrupt the overall user experience when it comes to smartphones,' he told PA, adding that he felt many of the biggest firms had been drawn into a 'specs race' to introduce similar tools quickly.
'I think there's been a lot of buzz around AI but I think users are confused. The market is confused in terms of, what's the end game? We've seen camera features and so on but we think that the opportunity is drastically, much bigger than that, yet people don't see or don't understand what their opportunities are.
'If you think about it, ever since really the first iPhone was introduced, this kind of app-based user experience hasn't really changed. But we're super dependent on smartphones, we do everything on them – watch media, we work, we connect with people.
'But having this very siloed experience actually brings a lot of clutter in terms of how all these things interact.'
In contrast, he said Essential Space would serve as a 'second memory' when users choose to place items into that space, and will be able 'pull any kind of action or further insights' from screenshots and other items dropped into it, arguing that the jumping between apps and services that many AI-powered phones offer is 'too much friction'.
'I think what's most important is a clear-use case, and is that this (AI) can be leveraged to really improve your smartphone experience,' he said.
'All the information is on your phone, and there is no reason why this shouldn't be organised for you and presented to you in a very seamless way in terms of actioning those things – I think that's where AI is going to lead us, redefining the experience.
'The idea is to gradually introduce that into user behaviour and how they interact, and then gradually start merging closer and closer with our overall software experience.'
Nothing has been emboldened by its success so far, Mr Evangelidis said, adding that the company was the 'fastest growing smartphone brand across quite a few countries' last year, and said the firm had crossed seven million products sold by the end of 2024, up from two million at the end of 2023.
'As basic as it sounds, we started this company from a user standpoint, thinking from a user standpoint, actually a lot more people are like us, and that it was more about this excitement, and then everything we've done when it comes to product features, we keep ourselves in mind,' he said.
'There is no product we haven't tested or features we don't understand, or features we do for other reasons than just purely enhancing the user experience.
'I think bigger companies have more to lose, they have a running business and eventually they don't see the need to change – and you see that all kind of have a similar approach to things, it's why all the features are quite similar across all of them, they follow each other in a way.
'Whereas I think our strength is just having started from a blank sheet, and having that agility and forcing ourselves to look at things in a different way.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
a minute ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
VTv Therapeutics: Q2 Earnings Snapshot
HIGH POINT, N.C. (AP) — HIGH POINT, N.C. (AP) — VTv Therapeutics Inc. (VTVT) on Tuesday reported a loss of $6 million in its second quarter. On a per-share basis, the High Point, North Carolina-based company said it had a loss of 92 cents. _____
Business Wire
a minute ago
- Business Wire
New Concept Energy, Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results
DALLAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--New Concept Energy, Inc. (NYSE American: GBR), (the 'Company' or 'NCE') a Dallas-based company, today reported Results of Operations for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025. The Company reported a net loss from continuing operations of ($18,000) for three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to net income of $3,000 for the similar period in 2024. For the three months ended June 30, 2025 the Company had revenue of $40,000 including $26,000 for rental income and $14,000 in management fees. For the three months ended June 30, 2024 the Company had revenue of $37,000 including $25,000 for rental income and $12,000 in management fees. For the three months ended June 30, 2025, corporate general & administrative expenses were $85,000 as compared to $78,000 for the comparable period in 2024. For the three months ended June 30, 2025, interest income was $42,000 as compared to $56,000 for the comparable period in 2024. New Concept Energy, Inc. is a Dallas-based company which owns real estate in West Virginia and provides management services for a third-party oil and gas company. For more information, visit the Company's website at NEW CONCEPT ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - CONTINUED (amounts in thousands, except share and par value amount) June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 (Unaudited) (Audited) Liabilities and stockholders' equity Current liabilities Accounts payable $ 27 $ 20 Accrued expenses 48 37 Total current liabilities 75 57 Stockholders' equity Preferred stock, Series B, $10 par value; authorized 100,000 shares, 1 issued and 1 1 outstanding at June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized, 100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 5,131,934 shares at June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 51 51 Additional paid-in capital 63,579 63,579 Accumulated deficit (59,132 ) (59,094 ) Total stockholders' equity 4,499 4,537 Total liabilities & stockholders' equity $ 4,574 $ 4,594 Expand NEW CONCEPT ENERGY, INC AND SUBSIDIARY (Unaudited) (amounts in thousands, except per share data) For the Three Months ended June 30, For the Six Months ended June 30, 2025 2024 2025 2024 Revenue Rent $ 26 $ 25 $ 52 $ 50 Management fee 14 12 26 23 Total revenues 40 37 78 73 Operating expenses Operating expenses 15 12 27 25 Corporate general and administrative 85 78 174 156 Total operating expenses 100 90 201 181 Loss from operations (60 ) (53 ) (123 ) (108 ) Other income Interest income (from related parties) 42 56 85 113 Total other income 42 56 85 113 Net income (loss) applicable to common shares $ (18 ) $ 3 $ (38 ) $ 5 Net income (loss) per common share-basic and diluted $ (0.00 ) $ 0.00 $ (0.00 ) $ 0.00 Weighted average common and equivalent shares outstanding - basic and diluted 5,132 5,132 5,132 5,132 Expand
Fast Company
a minute ago
- Fast Company
Perplexity's bid to buy Chrome is likely more stunt than strategy
The AI search startup Perplexity has tendered an unsolicited offer to buy Google's Chrome browser for $34.5 billion, the Wall Street Journal reports. The bid comes as the Justice Department has asked a federal judge to require Google to sell off Chrome to end an ongoing antitrust case. But it's questionable that a startup valued at half that amount on paper ($18 billion) can afford to buy Chrome; and Google, of course, almost certainly has no intention of selling it—at least not yet. Fast Company reached out to Google and Perplexity for comment. A federal court in Washington, D.C., decided last year that Google holds a monopoly in the internet search and advertising markets and is now considering a Department of Justice demand that the search giant sell off its Chrome browser. Google called the DOJ proposal 'wildly overbroad' and part of a 'radical interventionist agenda' (language that could draw some negative attention from the Trump administration). Perplexity testified in that same case last spring, at which time it expressed a desire to buy Chrome. OpenAI also testified, and its ChatGPT product lead, Nick Turley, also testified that his company would be interested in buying Chrome if the court required Google to sell. Indeed, owning the Chrome browser would immediately catapult Perplexity from being a longshot for winning, placing, or showing in the internet search wars, to being a real contender. Strategically, Perplexity could use the Chrome browser in the same way Google does—as a widely popular front door to its AI-powered search engine. 'A clever publicity play' With Chrome, Google fused the ideas of web browsing and web search into one thing that could be done in one place. Chrome changed the browser's URL to act as a search bar, too (the 'omnibox,' as it's called). A huge portion of Google searches come from Chrome, and Google makes the lion's share of its revenues from showing ads around search results. Google can place ads more effectively because of its access to all kinds of user browsing behavior in Chrome. Perplexity's bid, which it said would be financed by its venture investors, is very likely something less than a serious strategic gambit. 'This is a clever publicity play by the startup, but no one should take this stunt seriously,' says Neil Chilson, former FTC chief technologist and current head of AI policy at the Abundance Institute. Chilson adds that the bid will have no bearing on the remedies that Judge Amit Mehta is currently considering in the antitrust case. Perplexity is good at what it does, but still small Perplexity employs some very talented AI engineers, its 'answer engine' product works surprisingly well by most accounts (including mine), and the company has been agile about releasing new products that augment its core service. (It recently released its own browser, called Comet.) But in the face of Google Search, Perplexity is still small fry. It serves only a fraction of internet searches, and sends only a fraction of the product search referrals that go to brand websites. Perplexity looks more like a company to be acquired, not like an acquirer. Meta, parent company of Facebook and Instagram, reportedly held talks to acquire Perplexity earlier this year, but an agreement couldn't be reached. It's likely that other suitors have approached the startup. And yet the existing rules of market dominance in tech could be shifting under everyone's feet—because of generative AI. During this seminal period in the potentially transformative technology (when the next Googles and Apples may be being decided), optics matter. Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas seems to have a keen sense of this. He knows he needs to keep his company's name in the conversation with other up-and-comers, such as OpenAI and Anthropic, as the so-called AI revolution unfolds. He's done an admirable job of it—as evidenced by his many podcasts, public appearances, and viral tweets. So Perplexity's Chrome bid may come out of the same playbook. It's about posturing. For a company of Perplexity's stature to convince consumers that it could really be the heir to Google's search throne, it may want to puff itself up to appear to belong in (roughly) the same weight class as the incumbent. Putting in an offer to buy a key piece of Google's business may serve that end.
