Rate cut another boost for rising property market
This is the fourth interest rate cut since September 2024 and will take the prime rate and home loan 'base rate' to 10,75%, compared to 11,75% a year ago, notes Berry Everitt, CEO of the Chas Everitt International property group, and will cut the cost of borrowing by around R17 per R100 000.
'This means that on the R1,6m average home price noted in the May BetterBond Property Brief, the minimum monthly bond repayment will drop by R272, making it easier for prospective buyers to qualify for new home loans.
'And for existing homeowners with 20-year bonds at that level, their monthly repayments will now be almost R1100 lower than at this time last year.'
The news for first-time buyers is even better, he says, with the minimum monthly repayment on the average first-time buyer home price of R1,28m dropping by R218 and the gross monthly income required to qualify for a 20-year loan of that amount falling by more than R700.
'In addition, the banks have been easing deposit requirements in recent months and the average deposit for first-time buyers is currently almost 9% lower, at R175 000, than it was at this time last year. Coming on top of the Budget decisions to raise the Transfer Duty threshold to R1,2m and not to raise VAT, this means that first-time buyers now require a lot less cash to become homeowners.'
Everitt says this is already being reflected in the market, with BetterBond recording a 2,2% year-on-year increase in home loan applications in April, 'which represents a huge comeback from the 15% year-on-year decline recorded in April 2024'.
Today's MPC decision follows news released by StatsSA that the inflation rate in April was 2,8%, still under the Bank's current target range of 3 to 6%, despite large electricity tariff increases and higher food prices in recent months.
Reserve Bank governor Lesetja Kganyago noted that inflation was also expected to remain lower than initially expected this year largely due to lower oil prices, a stronger Rand/dollar exchange rate and the decision not to raise VAT. On the other hand, economic growth projections are lower and unemployment is higher worldwide, so there is a need to lower rates to stimulate spending, company revenues and employment.
Many other central banks have already cut rates in response to this situation, and the US Federal Reserve is also expected to start doing so at its next meeting.
Issued by Chas Everitt International
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Eskom proceeds with court challenge to five trading licences
Fears 'cherry-picking' of its best customers. Eskom has made good on its earlier threat to challenge in court energy regulator Nersa's granting of licences for electricity trading. It wants trading rules to be finalised first and even suggests that traders contribute to the payment of municipalities' R100 billion arrear debt for bulk purchases. Following Nersa's publication of the reasons for its decisions, Eskom has launched an application in the Gauteng Division of the High Court to have the granting of five trading and one import/export licence reviewed and set aside. The respondents are Nersa and the five licensees: Green Electron Market, CBI Electric Apollo, GreenCo Power Services, Discovery Green and Noa Group Trading. This comes more than decade after the first electricity trading licence was granted to PowerX. Nersa has so far granted around ten such licences. According to the agenda, the regulator will consider two more trading licences and two import/export licences at its 30 July meeting, as well as an application by a municipality for separate distribution and trading licences. If granted, Eskom may join the new licensees to the action. Traders, also referred to as aggregators, are essentially middle-men between independent power producers and end-users. They enter into agreements with multiple generators and sell to multiple customers with diverse energy requirements, at a margin to compensate them for taking some of the risk. This enables especially smaller businesses to access renewable energy despite being unable to take the full production of a specific independent power producer or enter into a 20-year off-take agreement. ALSO READ: Electricity trading? Not so fast, says Eskom Eskom's argument In an affidavit in support of the application, Eskom senior manager for legal matters Mohlago Masekela says the licensing decisions 'form the beginning of a fundamental change of policy by Nersa that has not been the subject of public consultation and the implications of which appear not to have been explored by Nersa.' According to Masekela it will 'upend the entire landscape of electricity provision in this country, without taking meaningful steps to understand the consequences before doing so. 'Under the guise of promoting competition and labouring under material misapprehensions about the law and the facts, Nersa has allowed a free-for-all in which traders are allowed to poach the best of Eskom's customers without carrying any of the redistributive obligations that the tariffs paid by those customers to Eskom enable Eskom to discharge.' Eskom contends that its distribution licences and those of municipalities, grant them the exclusive right to distribute and trade in electricity in the licensed distribution areas. It relies on Nersa's distribution rules that prohibit two or more distributors to operate in the same area. According to the utility, no rules have ever been made to deal with electricity trading as a separate licensed activity. Although Nersa has acknowledged the need for such rules and has embarked on a process to finalise it, it proceeded to approve trading licences in the meantime. This, Eskom states, is irrational. Eskom submits it is not possible to lawfully issue individual trading licences on an ad hoc basis, without considering the impact on the businesses of Eskom and municipalities of traders cherry-picking its best clients and setting conditions to balance the rights of such traders with those of Eskom and the municipalities. ALSO READ: Nersa approves cross-border electricity trading Eskom argued that instead of promoting competition, the granting of the trading licences will lead to unfair competition, because traders will have the flexibility to offer large power users, that are consistent payers, discount tariffs, while Eskom is bound to regulated prices. The utility states that 'simply opening up a free-for-all for traders in areas of supply previously provided by either Eskom or a municipality, has the potential of causing profound risk to the viability of the system'. 'Eskom continues to hold the various obligations arising from the obligations in its distribution licences, but can now have its most reliable and lucrative customers taken from it by traders given permission to trade in the same area of supply.' It continues: 'Ultimately, since it is funded by both the taxpayer (in the form of government assistance given in the recent past) and the electricity consumer, it is taxpayers and smaller electricity consumers who are not attractive to traders, who will pay the price for this.' Some of the issues Eskom believes should be addressed in the trading rules include which customers will be allowed to chose who they buy electricity from, thereby demarcating the trading market. If customers are for example allowed to buy from a trader, but top-up continuously or on an ad hoc basis from Eskom's supply, the rules could provide for Eskom to set differentiated tariffs in such cases 'that reflect the true cost of providing these specific services.' ALSO READ: Presidency 'very concerned' about licence for Eskom transmission unit Eskom further suggests that the matter of the R100 billion-odd arrear municipal debt must be dealt with in the trading rules by restricting traders from operating in defaulting areas or establishing a financial clearing house that prioritises the payment of Eskom arrears before disbursing revenue to traders. It suggests that the cross-subsidisation regime should be preserved, with traders being required to contribute to a subsidy pool or municipal support levy. It is not yet clear whether Nersa and the five traders will oppose Eskom's application. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Armoured Mobility now offering an armoured Chery Tiggo 8 for under R20,000 per month
Buying an armoured vehicle in South Africa no longer necessitates sneaking into a warehouse at an ungodly hour with a briefcase full of cash. Jokes aside, armoured vehicles are becoming more mainstream and easier to finance, as an increase in crimes such as hijacking, kidnapping, and assassinations lead South Africans to seek more protection on the streets. One of the most affordable complete armoured vehicle solutions in South Africa is the B4 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max offered by Joburg-based Armoured mobility, and it is now more accessible thanks to a new finance package. The B4-armoured Chery is priced at R1,299,900, and those opting for the finance will pay R18,999 per month, over 72 months at 10.75% prime. It does require a deposit of R300,000 however.
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
Identifying the bugs in SA's long-promised infrastructure boom
Some, such as regulatory reform, are easily fixed. Now comes the hard part. SA's rail network needs about R300 billion invested in trains and track infrastructure to boost freight volumes from the current 160 million tons (Mt) to 250 Mt, according to James Holley, CEO of private rail operator Traxtion. The last time state logistics operator Transnet came close to this volume was in 2018, when it shipped 226 Mt. Eskom needs about R350 billion over 10 years to expand its transmission network and transformer capacity. On the logistics front, the good news is that the needed regulatory reform is well underway, with the separation of the rail infrastructure from Transnet itself being placed under an independent manager. This will allow private operators like Traxtion to compete for business on key corridors. Any discussion of reviving the SA economy must start with electricity and logistics – two chokepoints that have robbed SA of upwards of 10% in GDP. The recovery of even part of this will make a huge difference to job creation and business investment. Holley outlines some of the difficulties facing private entrants: a train set completing eight train trips in a month instead of six means a 33% jump in revenue. 'This cannot be achieved without high-quality track, signalling, and scheduling infrastructure. The national network is in poor condition, and with the fiscal constraints the country faces, the Private Sector Participation projects are our only route to efficiency,' he says. ALSO READ: How private sector can help with SA's infrastructure Private investors in rail infrastructure will want to earn a decent return from access fees charged to train operators. If volumes are low, access fees will have to increase and rail will become unaffordable. Government lacks the budget to fix either Eskom or Transnet, so private sector funding will be key. Anyone ploughing money into rail wants policy and regulatory certainty. If not, the cost of capital goes up, hence access agreements and concession terms must be designed to reduce risk for investors and lenders. There's progress too in reforming SA's electricity market, with Eskom being split into generation, transmission and distribution entities, while the Electricity Regulation Amendment Bill is intended to establish a competitive energy market under the management of an independent system operator. The latest national budget allocated R1 trillion to infrastructure over the next three years, with more than a third of this going to transport, R132.5 billion to water and more than R50 billion each for human settlements and municipal upgrades. However, government has a storied history of promising big infrastructure spending and then failing to deliver. The National Development Plan in 2012 promised to plough 10% of GDP annually into infrastructure but actual spend was 3% to 4%. Under former President Jacob Zuma, we had the infamous delays and cost overruns at Medupi and Kusile power stations which contributed to load shedding, while enriching politically connected elites. ALSO READ: Three budgets later, infrastructure investment amount still the same New study highlights bottlenecks A new study from the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) takes a broader look at how to accelerate infrastructure development in Africa and shows that SA is not alone in its disappointing performance. The complexity of negotiating projects across borders adds costs, delays and frustration to projects. A case in point is the Grand Inga Hydropower Project in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). It was intended to create the world's largest hydropower scheme, by phasing up to 40 000 megawatts to feed power to Africa and potentially Europe. There's no doubt about the project's technical feasibility, but what has strangled it is 'political instability, corruption, lack of credibility and an inability to secure the massive funding,' says the PIC. As a result, key funders have withdrawn from the project. Then there's the Abidjan-Lagos Corridor, connecting five West African countries with a six-lane highway. The original start date of January 2024 was missed due to the complexity of coordinating five countries and securing the massive $15.6 billion funding required. The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (Gerd) is finally operating at 95% completion, after a decade of failed negotiations with Sudan and Egypt over water flow rights on the Nile. It has been generating power since February 2022, with cheap power being sold to bitcoin miners to generate extra revenue in off-peak times. The Lobito Atlantic Railway will connect mines in Zambia and DRC to the Angolan port of Lobito. It involves the rehabilitation and expansion of an existing corridor, with a new rail spur targeted for completion in 2026. Financing negotiations took more than two years, with the DRC section adding substantially to the overall cost. There are fears of funding cuts under the new administration of US President Donald Trump, adding more uncertainty to the project. ALSO READ: Treasury confirms R27bn World Bank loan to fix infrastructure Urgent African infrastructure 'Accelerating infrastructure development in Africa is not only necessary, it is urgent,' says the PIC. 'The continent's current economic trajectory, rapid population growth, and persistent gaps in access and service quality all point to the same conclusion: without a step change in the pace and scale of infrastructure delivery, Africa risks falling further behind in its pursuit of inclusive growth and structural transformation.' According to the African Development Bank, the continent requires investment of $130 billion to $170 billion a year to bridge this infrastructure gap. Energy systems remain underpowered, transport networks fragmented, water infrastructure insufficient, and digital connectivity far from universal. 'The persistence of corruption, poor inter-agency coordination, and a lack of project-ready pipelines continues to stall delivery,' adds the PIC. There's no shortage of excellent models to benchmark against, such as the Cities Development Initiative for Asia, which assists cities in preparing infrastructure projects by making sure they are bankable and ready to fire. ALSO READ: Public-private partnership: key to infrastructure transformation Rwanda created the Rwanda Development Board by merging multiple government agencies into a single point of contact for investors. South Africa formed the National Treasury Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) Unit to provide guidance on standardising contracts, training for public officials, building expertise in financial structuring and risk allocation to ensure infrastructure projects are bankable and effectively managed. The PIC urges policymakers to streamline regulations to facilitate private investment, with clear rules for domestic institutional investors such as pension funds and insurance companies, a strong local currency bond market, and unambiguous legal frameworks for public-private partnerships and blended finance. Much of what it advocates is relatively inexpensive to fix. The risk of not addressing these bugs is more years of foiled infrastructure promises and continuing economic atrophy. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
