logo
Overlooked No More: Beulah Henry, Inventor With an Endless Imagination

Overlooked No More: Beulah Henry, Inventor With an Endless Imagination

New York Times14-03-2025
This article is part of Overlooked, a series of obituaries about remarkable people whose deaths, beginning in 1851, went unreported in The Times.
From the time Beulah Henry was a child in the late 19th century, she dreamed of ways to make life easier. That impulse would eventually drive her to secure dozens of patents and would earn her a nickname: Lady Edison.
When she died in the early 1970s, she held far more patents than any other woman, according to the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and in 2006 she was inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame for her contributions to technological innovation.
'I invent because I cannot help it,' she often said. 'New things just thrust themselves upon me.'
Her first prototype, when she was 9, was for a mechanism that would allow a man to tip his hat to a passerby while simultaneously holding a newspaper.
The visions kept coming. In 1912, while she was in college, she received her first patent (No. 1,037,762) for an ice-cream maker that functioned with minimal ice, something that was in short supply at the time. It was not a commercial success, but that did not stop her from dreaming up other innovations.
'Ice Cream Freezer'
Anything and everything seemed to interest her: toys, typewriters, sewing machines, coffee pots, hair curlers, can openers, mailing envelopes. Her achievements were all the more remarkable because she had no knowledge of mechanics and lacked the technical vocabulary to describe what she was trying to do.
Working out of a series of hotel suites — one reporter who visited described what he saw as resembling a boudoir more than a place of business — she hired model makers, draftsmen and patent lawyers to realize her visions. Sometimes she sold her ideas to manufacturers who then applied for their own patents.
Henry could see the finished product in her head, she said, 'as clearly as you see a book or a picture or a flower held up before you.' Her challenge was to communicate that vision clearly enough so that others could bring it to reality.
'I say to the engineers, build me such and such, and they say to me, 'Miss Henry, it couldn't possibly work,'' she told The Winston-Salem Journal and Sentinel in 1965. 'And I say to them, 'I don't know if it will work but I'm looking at it,' and so they build it and it works.'
Beulah Louise Henry was born on Sept. 28, 1887, in Raleigh, N.C. Her father, Walter R. Henry, was an art connoisseur and collector who was active in local Democratic politics. Her mother, Beulah (Williamson) Henry, was an artist. Her brother, Peyton, was a songwriter.
Henry claimed to be descended from Benjamin Harrison, the 23rd president of the United States, and from the Revolutionary War hero Patrick Henry.
In interviews, she said her ability to invent may have been influenced by a neurological condition called synesthesia, in which unrelated senses are linked — certain sounds or tastes may call to mind particular colors, for example. 'I have it one million percent,' she would say.
After graduating from Elizabeth College, in Charlotte, N.C., she moved with her mother to New York City to pursue her inventing career.
One idea involved a parasol with snap-on covers in various colors that could be changed to match a woman's outfit. It wasn't an easy sell.
'Parasol' and 'Runner Shield Attachment'
One after another, the experts told her, 'It can't be done,' she was quoted as saying in The Raleigh News and Observer in 1923. 'But I knew it could be done.'
The final result, described in the press as 'a miracle for the smart milady,' was so popular that she established the Henry Umbrella and Parasol Company to make and market her creation. Lord & Taylor displayed the parasols in its windows, and they sold by the thousands.
For a while, Henry put her energy into reinventing children's toys, primarily dolls. She used springs and tubes to make them kick, blink and cry; she put a radio inside one. Her most popular creation was the Miss Illusion Doll, with eyes that changed color to match its wigs. She also created a plush toy cow called Milka-Moo, which dispensed milk and had a secret compartment for a bar of soap.
'Simulating Dispensing Device'
Later, she turned to typewriters. Of the 10 or so related patents she received, the most impressive was perhaps the 'protograph' (No. 1,874,749), an attachment that produced multiple copies of a document without carbon paper.
She would 'just look at something,' Henry said, 'and think, 'There's a better way of doing that,' and the idea comes to me.'
In 1941, she took a long look at sewing machines and invented the Double Chain Stitch Sewing Machine (No. 2,230,896), which functioned without the bobbins that seamstresses had to periodically stop and change.
'Double Chain Stitch Sewing Machine'
She also found a way to make cooking easier. For years, she said, 'the percolator on the coffee pot said to me, 'Do something with me,' but I didn't know what. And then one day when I was basting a roast, I knew what I had to do with that percolator.'
She went on: 'I worked out a device that percolates the juice in a roaster and bastes the meat continuously by itself.' She received the patent for it in 1962.
Reporters portrayed her in effusive terms: She was 'a superb, commanding figure,' one noted; 'stylishly gowned,' another said — 'delightfully, almost theatrically feminine' and 'more like an opera star than a studious scientific person.'
Those who visited her at work in her hotel room often detected a whiff of incense and mentioned her pink lampshades or the large telescope she placed near a window so that she could gaze at the night sky. Then there were the pets: At various times she kept small turtles, a parakeet, a tropical oriole, several doves and cockatiels, and a cat named Chickadee.
Henry was active in the American Museum of Natural History, the National Audubon Society, the New York Women's League for Animals and the New York Microscopical Society, among other organizations. She never married.
Her far-flung inspirations were a mystery to her mother, who lived with her much of the time.
'I don't know what to make of her,' her mother said in 1923. 'She gets up at night and prowls around making experiments with the electric lights and the water system, or hunting for sheets of brown paper to draw on or cut up.'
Henry offered a mystical explanation for her compulsion.
'I have come to believe in spirit control,' she told The News Tribune, in Tacoma, Wash., in 1939. 'And I'm sure that the ideas that flock into my mind in the early hours of the morning are messages from a guiding spirit.'
She was 85 when she died in February 1973, with her 49th and final patent — the nature of it is lost to time — pending.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Order Gives Political Appointees Vast Powers over Research Grants
Trump Order Gives Political Appointees Vast Powers over Research Grants

Scientific American

time5 days ago

  • Scientific American

Trump Order Gives Political Appointees Vast Powers over Research Grants

US President Donald Trump issued an expansive executive order (EO) yesterday that would centralize power and upend the process that the US government has used for decades to award research grants. If implemented, political appointees — not career civil servants, including scientists — would have control over grants, from initial funding calls to final review. This is the Trump administration's latest move to assert control over US science. The EO, titled 'Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking', orders each US agency head to designate an appointee to develop a grant-review process that will 'advance the President's policy priorities'. Those processes must not fund grants that advance 'anti-American values' and instead prioritize funding for institutions committed to achieving Trump's plan for 'gold-standard science'. (That plan, issued in May, calls for the US government to promote 'transparent, rigorous, and impactful' science, but has been criticized for its potential to increase political interference in research.) Impacts might be felt immediately: the latest order directs US agencies, such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH), to halt new funding opportunities, which are calls for researchers to submit applications for grants on certain topics. They will be paused until agencies put their new review processes in place. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Trump's EO comes after the US Senate — which, along with the House, ultimately controls US government spending — has, in recent weeks, mostly rejected his proposals to slash the federal budget for science, totalling nearly US$200 billion annually. The White House did not respond to questions from Nature about the EO. Negative reaction Trump, a Republican, has previously used EOs, which can direct government agencies but cannot alter existing laws, to effect policy change. In January, on his first day in office, he signed a slew of EOs with wide-ranging effects, from pulling the United States out of the Paris climate agreement to cutting the federal workforce, which had included nearly 300,000 scientists before he took office. Scientists and policy specialists have lambasted the latest EO on social media. 'This is a shocking executive order that undermines the very idea of open inquiry,' Casey Dreier, director of space policy for the Planetary Society, an advocacy group in Pasadena, California, posted to Bluesky. Also on Bluesky, Jeremy Berg, a former director of the NIH's National Institute of General Medical Sciences, called it a 'power grab'. Speaking to Nature, he said: 'That power is something that has not been exercised at all in the past by political appointees.' In a statement, Zoe Lofgren, a Democratic member of the US House of Representatives from California, called the EO 'obscene'. It could lead to political appointees 'standing between you and a cutting-edge cancer-curing clinical trial', she said. The EO justifies the changes to the grant-awarding process by casting doubts on past choices: it accuses the US National Science Foundation (NSF) of awarding grants to educators with anti-American ideologies and to projects on diversity, equity and inclusion, which are disfavoured by the Trump team. It also points to senior researchers at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Stanford University in California who have resigned over accusations of data falsification. To 'strengthen oversight' of grants, the EO imposes several restrictions, including prohibiting grants that promote 'illegal immigration' and prohibiting grant recipients from promoting 'racial preferences' in their work or denying that sex is binary. In some cases, the restrictions seem to contradict Congressional mandates. For instance, the NSF has, for decades, been required by law to broaden participation in science of people from under-represented groups — an action that takes race into consideration. In addition to these broader restrictions, the EO directs grant approvals to prioritize certain research institutions, such as those that have 'demonstrated success' in implementing the gold-standard science plan and those with lower 'indirect costs'. As part of its campaign to downsize government spending and reduce the power of elite US universities, the Trump administration has repeatedly tried to cap these costs — used to pay for laboratory electricity and administrative staff, for instance. It has proposed a flat 15% rate for grants awarded by agencies such as the NSF and the US Department of Energy, but federal courts have so far blocked such policies. Some institutions with the highest indirect-cost rates are children's hospitals, Berg told Nature. 'Does that mean they're just not going to prioritize research at children's hospitals?' he asks. Out for review At the heart of the grant-awarding process is peer review. Project proposals have typically had to pass watchful panels of independent scientists who scored and approved funding. 'Nothing in this order shall be construed to discourage or prevent the use of peer review methods,' the EO notes, 'provided that peer review recommendations remain advisory' to the senior appointees. The EO worries many researchers, including Doug Natelson, a physicist at Rice University in Houston, Texas. 'This looks like an explicit attempt to destroy peer review for federal science grants,' he says. Programme officers at agencies, who have been stewards of the grant-review process, are similarly alarmed. 'The executive order is diminishing the role of programme officers and their autonomy to make judgments about the quality of the science,' says an NSF employee who requested anonymity because they are not authorized to speak with the press. 'That's disheartening, to say the least.'

Trump's shadow sparks new and unique climate moves
Trump's shadow sparks new and unique climate moves

Axios

time6 days ago

  • Axios

Trump's shadow sparks new and unique climate moves

Climate initiatives outside of government are springing up in response to Trump 2.0 officials pulling back science and data programs. Why it matters: The federal government historically does research and produces climate data that's widely used by academics, local governments, companies and others. But others are picking up the slack: 1. The National Academy of Sciences just launched a "fast-track" review of the latest evidence on how greenhouse gases threaten human health and welfare. It's a response to EPA's planned revocation of its 2009 "endangerment finding" that's the legal underpinning of Clean Air Act climate rules. 2. The new Cornerstone Sustainability Data Initiative, co-led by a former EPA researcher, is an open-source hub for info corporations use to tally supply chain emissions. The project — unveiled Friday — comes after EPA decided to stop supporting the in-house research that many companies use, the NYT reports. 3. This fall, the American Geophysical Union and the American Meteorological Society will issue a formal call for manuscripts on climate change in the U.S. It will be the next step in their planned initiative, launched in May, to "sustain the momentum" of the next National Climate Assessment. That's the congressionally mandated, multiagency report series that faces an uncertain future under Trump 2.0. 4. Many veteran climate scientists are "launching a coordinated response" to DOE's new report that challenges mainstream academic views on climate impacts, CNN reported. Reality check: Scientists aren't claiming they can replace projects like the NCA with these ad hoc efforts. And obviously the National Academy can't regulate emissions in response to EPA's pullback, though I wouldn't be shocked to see its new work surface in court battles. The other side: Trump officials say Democratic policies variously downplay domestic costs of emissions regulations and overstate climate threats. What we're watching: Energy Secretary Chris Wright tells CNN that "we'll probably have public events here in D.C. this fall" about DOE's report.

Coastal Commission vs. SpaceX: Round 2
Coastal Commission vs. SpaceX: Round 2

Politico

time06-08-2025

  • Politico

Coastal Commission vs. SpaceX: Round 2

With help from Camille von Kaenel ROCKET REMATCH: The California Coastal Commission is going for another round with Elon Musk's space company. U.S. Space Force officials will be back in front of the commission next Thursday with a proposal to double SpaceX's rocket launches from Vandenberg Space Force Base from 50 to 95 per year — and agency staff is recommending commissioners reject it. 'The simple fact remains that it is a privately owned company engaged in activities primarily for its own commercial business,' staff said in a report Friday. 'It is not a public federal agency or conducting its launches on behalf of the federal government.' The vote promises to reopen a rift between Musk and the agency after the commission rejected Space Force's previous proposal to increase SpaceX launches from 36 to 50, but cited Musk's politics and support for President Donald Trump in doing so. The commission drew a lawsuit from Musk — and a rebuke from Gov. Gavin Newsom at the time. 'I'm with Elon,' Newsom said in October after Musk sued the commission for political bias. 'You can't bring up that explicit level of politics.' The fight is flying further under the radar this time around, though. Where a bipartisan group of pro-space state and federal lawmakers spoke up for SpaceX ahead of October's vote — and environmentalists chimed in on behalf of nearby residents and wildlife they argued would be disturbed by the launches' sonic booms — that type of lobbying hasn't materialized. Neither Newsom's office nor SpaceX responded to a request for comment. Space Launch Delta 30 Commander Col. James T. Horne III, who oversees Vandenberg and Western operations, said in a statement that the commission staff recommendation doesn't change the military's 'unwavering commitment to preserving the California coastline' and that its partnership with SpaceX helps maintain 'its technological edge and strategic advantage over competitors.' The relative quiet comes amid a shifted political landscape, after Trump returned to power and Republicans swept Congress on a message of affordability and economic strength. Newsom and Democratic state lawmakers, faced with looming refinery closures and perpetually high building costs, are trying to boost in-state oil drilling and have already weakened environmental permitting for everything from wildfire fuel breaks to high-speed rail, putting environmentalists on the back foot. Jennifer Savage, California policy associate director for the Surfrider Foundation, said environmental groups are in rapid response mode, which has 'taken energy away from other things that we normally would have perhaps had more capacity to deal with.' 'I do think there's a lot of political overwhelm happening on all fronts, and that has divided people's attention perhaps more than when this first came up,' Savage said. Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and Senate President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire have also shaken up the commission since last year, replacing members like former Chair Justin Cummings, former Vice Chair Paloma Aguirre and alternate Gretchen Newsom (no relation to Gavin Newsom), all of whom had bemoaned Musk's behavior. And Newsom himself spent the early part of this year clipping the commission's wings, issuing several executive orders in the wake of the Los Angeles fires to suspend the Coastal Act — the 1976 law that established the commission — in an effort to fast-track rebuilding. But there's also the reality that Space Force officials moved forward with the increase from 36 to 50 last year, even after the no vote, citing federal preemption and national security considerations. Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.), one of the lawmakers who signed a bipartisan letter last year backing the launch increase, said the reality that the commission can't stop the military's plan means the issue has taken on less urgency. 'Now that the commission has proved its own irrelevance, maybe that same imperative doesn't exist,' said Kiley, who is pushing a bill that would limit state authority to review certain activities related to national security and post-disaster recovery and rebuilding. — AN Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! MERCURY RISING: Los Angeles landlords and tenants, get your fans ready. The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors passed an ordinance Tuesday to require landlords in its unincorporated areas to keep indoor temperatures in all the rooms of rental units below 82 degrees, either by using passive cooling methods like blackout curtains or by installing air conditioners. Chair Pro Tem and Supervisor Hilda L. Solis, who introduced the measure after three years of efforts to establish an indoor heat standard, called it a 'life-saving policy that prioritizes the health and dignity of renters' amid growing evidence that rising temperatures are triggering more heat illnesses and death. She said she hoped other cities in the region would follow suit. She and her co-author, Supervisor Lindsey Horvath, agreed to partly carve out small landlords from the requirement amid pushback from the California Apartment Association and Supervisor Janice Hahn. Landlords who only own a few units will have until January 2032 to bring temperatures into check in every room of the unit; in the interim, they will have to keep only one room below 82 degrees. The compromise partly responded to a RAND report that recommended that Los Angeles policymakers should focus first on cooling one room instead of the whole unit so as not to stress the grid with new air conditioners. The ordinance takes effect in 30 days but won't be enforced until Jan. 1, 2027. — CvK AI YI YI: Artificial intelligence could be the power sector's savior — if the industry plays its cards right, California policy editor Debra Kahn writes in her latest column. Trump is canceling loan guarantees for wind-connected transmission lines and trying to block federal land from being used for wind power — but he's telling agencies to figure out how to build data centers on that same land. And those data centers need power. AI and its attendant data centers are projected to unleash the U.S. electricity industry's first net growth in 20 years. They could solve the industry's longstanding problem of spreading its growing costs across a shrinking pool of customers, if it can build fast enough to meet the demand. 'The size and the scale of what we're seeing now is unlike anything we've ever seen,' Pacific Gas & Electric Co. executive Mike Medeiros said, after PG&E got approval for a new rate structure to speed up connecting data centers to the grid. 'People will tell you — they probably haven't seen load growth like this since World War II.' — DK WHAT CANCELED PROGRAM?: The Trump administration is claiming it didn't really cancel a FEMA grant that funds disaster preparation and mitigation, four months after it shuttered the program. FEMA acting Administrator David Richardson wrote in a July 25 court declaration that 'despite FEMA's public announcements,' the agency actually didn't end the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program, of which California is one of the largest beneficiaries. The document startled state and local officials and created new uncertainty about the administration's plans for helping communities with hurricanes, floods and other disasters, Thomas Frank reports for POLITICO's E&E News. Attorney General Rob Bonta joined 19 other AGs in a lawsuit last month challenging the program cancellation, arguing that the Trump administration violated congressional guidance to prioritize mitigation efforts and defied government spending authority by refusing to reallocate funds dedicated for BRIC to other programs. — AN CASTING SHADE: The Trump administration is making plans to cancel a $7 billion program funding solar projects in low-income communities across the country, people familiar with the agency's plan told POLITICO's Zack Colman, Alex Guillén and Kelsey Tamborrino on Tuesday. The termination letters are being drafted this week and could go out within days, according to a former EPA official familiar with the agency's plan granted anonymity to speak ahead of the release of the letters. The Solar for All program awarded money to state agencies, localities or nonprofit groups in almost every state to be used for residential rooftop panels, community solar developments or storage technologies — including $250 million to California state energy agencies that has yet to be distributed. Kym Meyer, litigation director at the Southern Environmental Law Center, signaled the group would pursue legal action if the administration terminates the grants. — The shipping company that delivers most of Hawaii's cars has stopped sending electric vehicles to the state because of the risk of battery fires. — Purple states are piling onto the lawsuit challenging Trump's freezing of federal electric vehicle funding. — A heat wave is coming to California this week, intensifying the wildfires already burning and raising the risk of more blazes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store